House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2008 - 09
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Equality Bill


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 3 — Employment tribunals

 
 

(b)   

is satisfied that the provision, criterion or practice was not applied with

the intention of discriminating against the complainant.

(5)   

It must not make an order under subsection (2)(b) unless it first considers

whether to act under subsection (2)(a) or (c).

(6)   

The amount of compensation which may be awarded under subsection (2)(b)

5

corresponds to the amount which could be awarded by a county court or the

sheriff under section 113.

(7)   

If a respondent fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with an appropriate

recommendation in so far as it relates to the complainant, the tribunal may—

(a)   

if an order was made under subsection (2)(b), increase the amount of

10

compensation to be paid;

(b)   

if no such order was made, make one.

119     

Remedies: national security

(1)   

In national security proceedings, an appropriate recommendation (as defined

by section 118) must not be made in relation to a person other than the

15

complainant if the recommendation would affect anything done by—

(a)   

the Security Service,

(b)   

the Secret Intelligence Service,

(c)   

the Government Communications Headquarters, or

(d)   

a part of the armed forces which is, in accordance with a requirement

20

of the Secretary of State, assisting the Government Communications

Headquarters.

(2)   

National security proceedings are—

(a)   

proceedings to which a direction under section 10(3) of the

Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (national security) relates;

25

(b)   

proceedings to which an order under section 10(4) of that Act relates;

(c)   

proceedings (or the part of proceedings) to which a direction pursuant

to regulations made under section 10(5) of that Act relates;

(d)   

proceedings (or the part of proceedings) in relation to which an

employment tribunal acts pursuant to regulations made under section

30

10(6) of that Act.

86


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 3 — Employment tribunals

 
 

Clause 120: Remedies: occupational pension schemes

Effect

398. This clause sets out the additional remedies available to employment tribunals in cases

involving occupational pension schemes. These are cases in which the respondent is an

employer, or the trustee or manager of the pension scheme; and the complaint relates to the

5

terms on which membership is offered to a pension scheme or how members of an existing

scheme are treated. In these cases the tribunal can in addition to the remedies of declaration,

compensation and recommendation, also make a declaration about the terms on which a

person should be admitted as member to that scheme or a declaration about the rights of an

existing member of that scheme to not be discriminated against.

10

399. However, a tribunal can award compensation only for injured feelings or for failure to

comply with a recommendation; it cannot compensate the claimant for loss caused by the

unlawful discrimination.

Background

400. This provision is designed to replicate the effect of provisions in current legislation.

15

Chapter 4: Equality of terms

Clause 121: Jurisdiction

Effect

401. This clause sets out the types of cases relating to equality of terms which employment

tribunals have jurisdiction to hear. Tribunals may hear and decide claims (including those

20

referred to them by courts) involving equality in the rules of occupational pension schemes

and claims relating to an equality clause, including claims relating to pregnancy and maternity

equality.

402. A responsible person (as defined in clause 75, such as an employer, or a pension

scheme trustee or manager) can also ask a tribunal for a declaration of each party’s rights in

25

relation to a dispute or claim about an equality clause or rule.

403. Members of the armed forces must bring a complaint under service complaints

procedures before they can bring a claim to a tribunal.

404. This clause does not alter any jurisdiction the courts or the sheriff have in relation to

an equality clause or rule.

30

Background

405. This clause is designed to replicate the effect of provisions in current legislation.

E87


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 4 — Equality of terms

 
 

120     

Remedies: occupational pension schemes

(1)   

This section applies if an employment tribunal finds that there has been a

contravention of a provision referred to in section 114(1) in relation to—

(a)   

the terms on which persons become members of an occupational

pension scheme, or

5

(b)   

the terms on which members of an occupational pension scheme are

treated.

(2)   

In addition to anything which may be done by the tribunal under section 118

the tribunal may also by order declare—

(a)   

if the complaint relates to the terms on which persons become members

10

of a scheme, that the complainant has a right to be admitted to the

scheme;

(b)   

if the complaint relates to the terms on which members of the scheme

are treated, that the complainant has a right to membership of the

scheme without discrimination.

15

(3)   

The tribunal may not make an order under subsection (2)(b) of section 118

unless—

(a)   

the compensation is for injured feelings, or

(b)   

the order is made by virtue of subsection (7) of that section.

(4)   

An order under subsection (2)—

20

(a)   

may make provision as to the terms on which or the capacity in which

the claimant is to enjoy the admission or membership;

(b)   

may have effect in relation to a period before the order is made.

Chapter 4

Equality of terms

25

121     

Jurisdiction

(1)   

An employment tribunal has, subject to subsection (6), jurisdiction to

determine a complaint relating to a breach of an equality clause or rule.

(2)   

The jurisdiction conferred by subsection (1) includes jurisdiction to determine

a complaint arising out of a breach of an equality clause or rule; and a reference

30

in this Chapter to a complaint relating to such a breach is to be read

accordingly.

(3)   

An employment tribunal also has jurisdiction to determine an application by a

responsible person for a declaration as to the rights of that person and a worker

in relation to a dispute about the effect of an equality clause or rule.

35

(4)   

An employment tribunal also has jurisdiction to determine an application by

the trustees or managers of an occupational pension scheme for a declaration

as to their rights and those of a member in relation to a dispute about the effect

of an equality rule.

(5)   

An employment tribunal also has jurisdiction to determine a question that—

40

(a)   

relates to an equality clause or rule, and

(b)   

is referred to the tribunal by virtue of section 122(2).

87


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 4 — Equality of terms

 
 

Example

• An employment tribunal can hear claims brought by an employee, office holder or

member of the armed forces in relation to a breach of an equality clause and in relation

to breach of an equality rule in relation to a pension scheme.

Clause 122: References by court to tribunal, etc.

5

Effect

406. The Bill does not prevent the civil courts from considering a contractual claim relating

to an equality clause or rule or a non-discrimination rule. However, this clause gives a court

the power to strike out such a claim if it would be more convenient for a tribunal to deal with

it, or to refer an issue relating to such a claim to an employment tribunal.

10

Background

407. Employment tribunals have the specialist knowledge and procedures to handle claims

relating to equality of terms and this clause gives a court power to refer such issues to a

tribunal. This clause replaces similar provisions in current legislation.

Example

15

• An employer sues an employee in a civil court for breach of her employment contract.

In response, the employee counterclaims for breach of an equality clause. The court

decides to refer the counterclaim to an employment tribunal and postpones the case

until the tribunal’s decision.

Clause 123: Time limits

20

Effect

408. A person, who wishes to bring a claim for breach of an equality clause or rule, or to

apply for a declaration about the effect of such a clause or rule, must normally do so within six

months of the end of the employment contract. In certain circumstances, this clause gives a

claimant more time to make a claim. This applies where the employer conceals certain

25

information from the claimant or where the claimant is under an incapacity (as defined in

clause 135). Members of the armed forces have an additional three months in which to bring a

claim because they must first make a complaint under the service complaint procedures.

E88


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 4 — Equality of terms

 
 

(6)   

This section does not apply to a complaint relating to an act done when the

complainant was serving as a member of the armed forces unless—

(a)   

the complainant has made a service complaint about the matter, and

(b)   

the complaint has not been withdrawn.

(7)   

Subsections (2) to (5) of section 115 apply for the purposes of subsection (6) of

5

this section as they apply for the purposes of subsection (1) of that section.

(8)   

In proceedings before an employment tribunal on a complaint relating to a

breach of an equality rule, the employer—

(a)   

is to be treated as a party, and

(b)   

is accordingly entitled to appear and be heard.

10

(9)   

Nothing in this section affects such jurisdiction as the High Court, a county

court, the Court of Session or the sheriff has in relation to an equality clause or

rule.

122     

References by court to tribunal, etc.

(1)   

If it appears to a court in which proceedings are pending that a claim or

15

counter-claim relating to an equality clause or rule could more conveniently be

determined by an employment tribunal, the court may strike out the claim or

counter-claim.

(2)   

If in proceedings before a court a question arises about an equality clause or

rule, the court may (whether or not on an application by a party to the

20

proceedings)—

(a)   

refer the question, or direct that it be referred by a party to the

proceedings, to an employment tribunal for determination, and

(b)   

stay or sist the proceedings in the meantime.

123     

Time limits

25

(1)   

This section applies to—

(a)   

a complaint relating to a breach of an equality clause or rule, or

(b)   

an application for a declaration referred to in section 121(3) or (4).

(2)   

Proceedings on the complaint or application may not be brought in an

employment tribunal after the end of the qualifying period.

30

88


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 4 — Equality of terms

 
 

Background

409. This provision replaces similar provisions in current legislation. Time limits provide

certainty by requiring claims to be brought within specified periods and also take into account

factors which may affect a claimant’s ability to assert his or her claim.

Example

5

• A former member of the armed forces wishes to bring a claim about her terms of

service. She first makes a service complaint and then brings a claim for breach of an

equality clause in an employment tribunal. The claim for breach of an equality clause

must be brought in an employment tribunal within nine months after her period of

service ended.

10

E89


 

Equality Bill
Part 9 — Enforcement
Chapter 4 — Equality of terms

 
 

(3)   

If the complaint or application relates to terms of work other than terms of

service in the armed forces, the qualifying period is, in a case mentioned in the

first column of the table, the period mentioned in the second column.

 

Case

Qualifying period

 
 

A standard case

The period of 6 months beginning with the last

 

5

  

day of the employment or appointment.

 
 

A stable work case (but not if

The period of 6 months beginning with the day

 
 

it is also a concealment or

on which the stable working relationship

 
 

incapacity case (or both))

ended.

 
 

A concealment case (but not if

The period of 6 months beginning with the day

 

10

 

it is also an incapacity case)

on which the worker discovered (or could with

 
  

reasonable diligence have discovered) the

 
  

qualifying fact.

 
 

An incapacity case (but not if

The period of 6 months beginning with the day

 
 

it is also a concealment case)

on which the worker ceased to have the

 

15

  

incapacity.

 
 

A case which is a concealment

The period of 6 months beginning with the

 
 

and incapacity case.

later of the days on which the period would

 
  

begin if the case were merely a concealment or

 
  

incapacity case.

 

20

(4)   

If the complaint or application relates to terms of service in the armed forces,

the qualifying period is, in a case mentioned in the first column of the table, the

period mentioned in the second column.

 

Case

Qualifying period

 
 

A standard case

The period of 9 months beginning with the last

 

25

  

day of the period of service during which the

 
  

complaint arose.

 
 

A concealment case (but not if

The period of 9 months beginning with the day

 
 

it is also an incapacity case)

on which the worker discovered (or could with

 
  

reasonable diligence have discovered) the

 

30

  

qualifying fact.

 
 

An incapacity case (but not if

The period of 9 months beginning with the day

 
 

it is also a concealment case)

on which the worker ceased to have the

 
  

incapacity.

 
 

A case which is a concealment

The period of 9 months beginning with the

 

35

 

and incapacity case.

later of the days on which the period would

 
  

begin if the case were merely a concealment or

 
  

incapacity case.

 

89


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Revised 24 April 2009