[back to previous text]

Mr. Crabb: I think that there is at least one other Member who wishes to speak, so I shall try to be as brief as possible. I welcome this important debate, which is timely, given the seriousness of the economic problems and challenges facing Wales.
During the course of the debate, reference has been made by numerous Members to the need to learn from history. I think that we have been treated to an element of historical revisionism from a number of Government Members in their belief that, somehow, pre-1997 was when all of Wales’s problems began and that since 1997 all that there has been is a steady stream of solutions to those problems. That is not the case at all.
Mrs. Siân C. James (Swansea, East) (Lab): That is not what people tell me on the doorstep.
Mr. Crabb: No, it is not what they tell the hon. Lady on the doorstep, because it bears no relation to the facts at all.
I should like to pick up on a couple of points made by the Secretary of State, who spoke about the economic diversification that has taken place in his constituency in recent years—the loss of jobs in heavy industry and the replacement of these jobs with a broader range of industry. We applaud that and recognise it as a positive point. However, the economic diversification that has been going on in parts of south Wales started well before 1997. In the late 1980s and early mid-1990s, enormous sums of inward investment came into Wales both from other parts of the UK and from places such as south-east Asia, America and throughout the world, generating new business ventures. That is what helped drive a large part of this economic diversification.
However, there are parts of Wales which have become less economically diversified in the past 10 years. There are areas of Wales like mine in Pembrokeshire in west Wales where the state—that hugely important component of the economy—has become even more dominant in the local economy. As a result, the economy has become less diversified. Certainly, the light manufacturing sector in Pembrokeshire has become a lot thinner in the past 15 years.
The economic situation facing the country in general, and Wales in particular, is extremely grave. We are undergoing an economic trauma, the likes of which we have not experienced—certainly not in my lifetime, and probably not in the lifetime of anybody else here either. There is no question but that the economic crisis is global in nature and that it affects all parts of the world. I have not heard anybody from the Opposition suggesting that somehow the problem started in Britain, but there has been an attempt honestly to recognise and appraise those elements of the crisis occurring in the UK. An example is the risky lending in the sub-prime mortgage market. Identical things were happening in the Mississippi housing market, and Northern Rock was doing the same kinds of thing as some lenders in the US. We share some of the origins of the problem: the same kind of high-risk, highly leveraged, enormous bets that were being placed by hedge funds and investment banks in the City of London were being placed in America as well. Let us avoid the impression that Labour Members are trying to present that somehow the problems started outside the UK and that we are just feeling the chill from that. We need to face up to and appraise the problems—the failures of managerial oversight in some of those banks and the failures of regulation in the UK itself. The hon. Member for Carmarthen, West and South Pembrokeshire and I serve on the Treasury Committee, and we have heard evidence about that in recent weeks.
So here we are—the party is over. The decade of debt-fuelled economic growth has come to an end. The public finances are smashed to pieces. The cupboard is empty. I should like to highlight a few areas where some of the failures over the last 10 years have left Wales in a more vulnerable position than it might otherwise have been. Those areas are critically important as we look to the future and to Wales’s re-emergence from the economic downturn. The first point, which has been made by several hon. Members, relates to the physical infrastructure in Wales, particularly transport. The Institution of Civil Engineers in Wales has produced a damning report on the state of our physical infrastructure. At the launch of that report in October, Keith Jones, the director, said:
“Current levels of funding for transport and services are inadequate to meet the needs of modern Wales”
Describing the physical infrastructure in Wales, the report referred to
“inadequate funding, limited public transport provision and poor transport links”.
There is much evidence to demonstrate the link between investment in infrastructure and the way in which it feeds into the drive for productivity and economic growth in future. We need to return to that and focus on the set of projects that Wales needs. The right hon. Member for Neath mentioned the delays in the heads of the valleys road project. I could also mention the A40 dualling project, which is badly needed to open up the west Wales economy and to secure economic growth.
We have discussed time and time again in this Committee and elsewhere in the House the failure to deliver broadband. It is shameful that after 10 years of economic growth, 10 years of subsidies to BT, and 10 years of rural broadband schemes, large numbers of people throughout rural west and north Wales do not have access to broadband, which will be a critically important part of the business toolkit for doing business in Wales in the 21st century.
Finally—I know that the hon. Member for Llanelli wants to speak and I want to give her as much time as I can—if there is going to be a rebalancing of economic growth, we need to export a lot more as a country. There is an important role for the UK Government and the Assembly Government to look at how they can better support Welsh exporters to take advantage of the sharp fall there in the value of sterling and the opportunities that that creates for exporting more and doing more to support Welsh businesses that are doing business overseas.
3.38 pm
Nia Griffith: I share with other hon. Members the very real concern about how best to deal with the current economic situation. Particularly at this time, we want close collaboration between the Wales Office and the Welsh Assembly Government. I welcome the way in which the Secretary of State has been working with the First Minister. One of the lessons we have learnt in the last few months is the sheer scale and unpredictability of events. We are seeing the very uneven impact of the economic downturn, with some sectors very badly affected indeed and others, as yet, hardly affected at all. Some sectors are much more fearful about jobs than others, and such factors are often not easy to predict, because they are dependent not just on our market conditions but on those abroad.
There is considerable concern in places such as my constituency, where we are very dependent on automotive industries. Clearly people will need to buy everyday necessities, but fewer people will be considering securing money to buy a car at the moment. Those are the areas where we need to ensure that we get flexible help as soon as we can. It is far better to help existing manufacturing industries that have already gone through all the trauma of making themselves as productive as possible, rather than letting them go to the wall and have to start all over again later on. We need to be ready to work with the Welsh Assembly Government to respond flexibly and sensitively to those particular needs.
In my constituency we have had two lucky reprieves. The Avon Inflatables plant is still open, in spite of the threat by the French company to close it down. One way we can help companies such as Avon Inflatables—a company that produces excellent inflatable boats for the Ministry of Defence—is through our public procurement policy. In the same way as we are introducing capital expenditure projects, we should be making absolutely sure that in all our public procurement policies we do our utmost to support our own manufacturing industry. As my hon. Friend the Member for Aberavon mentioned earlier, Corus is experiencing a bit of a boom with the sale of the tins, but we have to remember that the economic climate for the steel industry is still difficult and we certainly cannot be complacent.
We need to be careful that when we reskill people and help them to be flexible for the future labour market, we do not get into a time warp by giving them skills that are needed now but will not be needed in the future. We need to look carefully and imaginatively at how we do that.
In Euro-speak, west Wales is a “peripheral” area, in that we are a long way from the major markets. I ask our Ministers in the Wales Office to take account whenever possible of the additional difficulties that we in west Wales can encounter in attracting new industries, and to ensure that we keep our fair share of public sector jobs—in the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency and in Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs offices, for example. In that context, I ask my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Wales to talk to the Deputy Minister for Economy and Transport in the Welsh Assembly Government about extending the recently announced western valleys initiative to include not only part of the Amman valley but the whole of the Gwendraeth valley.
We have made enormous progress in helping our economy in west Wales to grow over the past 11 years, but it is still fragile in some areas. We need to be absolutely sure that our policies are directed at those areas that will find it most difficult to get through this economic downturn, and those that will need most help to take advantage of the upturn when it comes.
3.42 pm
Mr. Jones: I think that all members of the Committee agree that this is a timely, if rather sombre, debate, coming as it does in the midst of what the Minister for the Olympics recently described as
“a recession deeper than any that we have known”.
The Committee has expressed some realism about the problems that Wales and the whole of the UK face. It would be tempting to indulge in political knockabout today, but the people of Wales would not thank us for that.
The right hon. Member for Neath set the tone of the debate when he pointed out the difficulties that businesses are having in obtaining credit—a theme that has run through the debate. He described a guarantee scheme that would provide the indemnity that banks need if they are to start the process of lending to commercial borrowers again. That scheme bore an extraordinary similarity to the national loan guarantee scheme that the Conservative party has proposed.
I mention that, as I have done previously in this debate, because it seems that the Government recognise that their measures for guaranteeing business lending go nowhere near far enough. The principal vehicle that they appear to propose is the small business finance scheme, but that is a very small scheme compared to the size of the problem. It would provide funds of a mere £1 billion, which would only scratch the surface of the enormous problem that Members on both sides of the Committee have recognised today. The Conservatives’ scheme would provide funds of up to £50 billion and the Government need to provide that sort of commitment.
I am confident that in the fullness of time the Government will announce a scheme that will probably not bear the same name as ours, but will bear remarkable similarities to it. However, the crisis that now affects the economy, as the hon. Member for Ynys Môn pointed out, is unprecedented in the lifetime of anyone in the room. We need to address it urgently and we need to be bolder, so I urge the Minister—please—to consider a scheme along the lines of the one that the Conservative party has proposed.
The hon. Member for Carmarthen, East and Dinefwr delivered a very interesting historical analysis and speculated how, with the benefit of knowledge of history, one could ascertain how long and deep the recession would be. The truth of the matter is that, despite the benefit of knowledge of history, it is probably impossible to say, because, if we have learned one thing from history, it is that it rarely repeats itself. It will be interesting—albeit no doubt painful—to see just how long the recession will be.
Adam Price: Mark Twain said, history may not repeat itself, but it does sometimes rhyme.
Mr. Jones: Very true. Of course, Henry Ford once said, history is bunk. I do not necessarily think that either analysis is entirely correct.
The hon. Gentleman pointed out quite properly that he was sceptical about whether the cut in interest rates and the banks’ recapitalisation was working, and it is fair to say that one of the most significant problems of the recapitalisation, which the Conservative party fully supports, is that the liquidity criteria that the Government and their agencies have set mean that, to a large extent, the banks’ hands are tied. Again, I suggest the need—
Nick Ainger: Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Mr. Jones: No, I will not. You will forgive me, Mr. Caton, but I have only five minutes and I want to try to analyse as many speeches as possible. The principal difficulty is that, to a large extent, the liquidity criteria tie the hands of the banks. Again, the Government can assist by providing a guarantee scheme to free up the availability of credit.
The hon. Member for Aberavon, the Chairman of the Select Committee on Welsh Affairs, delivered his usual thoughtful contribution to the debate, in which he pointed out that the Select Committee is currently engaged in, and will shortly report on, two inquiries that are germane to the issues with which we are concerned today: globalisation and cross-border services. The hon. Gentleman also mentioned skills, and one point that emerged during evidence to the Select Committee was the mismatch between the skills qualifications on either side of the border. Many witnesses from whom we heard were concerned about that, and one lesson that we must learn is that, given that the Assembly has devolved powers on education, it should ensure that whatever qualifications it provides be portable across the border, because, in an economic downturn, the qualifications issued on one side of the border should be readily acceptable to employers on the other. The hon. Gentleman did not, however, mention digital exclusion, which is to be the subject of a forthcoming inquiry and is germane to the point that my hon. Friend the Member for Preseli Pembrokeshire made, when he talked of the difficulties that his part of Wales experiences with the electronic infrastructure.
The hon. Member for Brecon and Radnorshire expressed doubts about whether the VAT cut would deliver what the Government say it will. I am bound to say that I share his pessimism. When it is possible to walk into almost any high street store and find reductions of 30, 40 and 50 per cent., it seems to me that a reduction of 2.5 per cent. only trims the edges of the problem and will do nothing in real terms.
The hon. Gentleman also expressed concern about the impact of the increase in duty on the pub trade and I share that concern. Six public houses a day close in this country, and quite apart from the impact on social life, that is having an enormous impact on rural life. He was right to flag that problem up and, with all due respect to the hon. Member for Aberavon, I would rather see people drinking socially in pubs than drinking miserably at home out of tin cans.
We heard from the hon. Member for Ynys Môn who got nastily party political. I could easily respond in kind.
 
Previous Contents Continue
House of Commons 
home page Parliament home page House of 
Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2008
Prepared 18 December 2008