[back to previous text]

Mrs. Gillan: Can the Secretary of State confirm that the Labour-Plaid Administration in the Assembly have returned £77 million of funding to the European Union?
Mr. Murphy: No, I cannot confirm that. I shall write to the hon. Lady when I get that figure. I am sure that she has researched it well, but I shall have to get back to her on the detail. She should accept, however, that the ProAct scheme, for example, which everyone in the room understands is probably one of the most successful initiatives that the Welsh Assembly Government have introduced, is very largely funded by European money, as are ReAct and the JEREMIE—joint European resources for micro to medium enterprises—fund.
Alun Michael (Cardiff, South and Penarth) (Lab/Co-op): Will my right hon. Friend acknowledge that, whereas fluctuations in exchange rates occasionally make it difficult to spend funds 100 per cent., under the Conservative Administration, the then Secretary of State, the right hon. Member for Wokingham (Mr. Redwood), was sending back millions of pounds, for no reason other than the unwillingness of the Conservatives to invest in Wales? Will he remind his opposite number, the hon. Member for Chesham and Amersham, that these matters are fresh in the minds of people in Wales?
Mr. Murphy: Indeed they are fresh. Of course, the reason why the right hon. Member for Wokingham sent that money back was that he did not like Europe very much and consequently did not want to use the money for the people of Wales. He decided, from the fastness of his constituency in southern England, to ensure that the money that we should have had went back to Brussels.
Mark Pritchard (The Wrekin) (Con): It is a great shame that so many Labour Members want to talk Wales down. What is fresh in the minds of many people throughout Wales and, indeed, the United Kingdom is the failed Administrations of the former Prime Ministers Callaghan and Ramsay MacDonald. That is fresh in their minds as well.
In the Budget statement, there was reference to the future of coal. I would be interested to know whether the Secretary of State believes that jobs will be created because there is a future for coal. What does he think the impact will be on the former coal-mining communities throughout Wales, given that many homes and schools have been built since the coal mines were shut? Does he think that those coal-mining areas should be used again, given those facts, and before carbon capture and storage facilities have been put in place?
Mr. Murphy: As the hon. Gentleman knows, carbon capture is being worked on strenuously by the Government and various companies. Aberthaw in Vale of Glamorgan is being used as one of the pilots for that type of energy. I am sure that if that is successful we will see coal used more.
Returning to jobs. I touched on Jobcentre Plus— £1.7 billion in our country and 550 new jobs by October. In addition, the future jobs fund will, we think, give Wales some 7,500 new jobs in the months ahead. We are helping young people under 25 who have been out of work for a year, and the Welsh Assembly Government have given Wales the highly successful ReAct and ProAct schemes. I remind Members that there have been 118 applications to the ProAct scheme, 31 of which have been successful so far: £5 million has been spent and 2,400 jobs have been protected, but that is just the start. It is one of the most successful schemes in the United Kingdom, of any Administration. It is half-funded by European money, which has been used wisely and successfully by the Welsh Assembly Government.
On businesses, the HMRC business payment support scheme has meant that 4,710 small and medium-sized businesses in Wales have been helped, and £66 million has been set aside. Under the enterprise finance guarantee scheme, which ensures that lending comes from the banks to our small and medium-sized companies, nearly £10 million has been guaranteed so far, helping more than 100 businesses in Wales. There has been help for businesses to invest in capital projects, trading loss carry-back has been extended to help nearly 5,600 Welsh businesses, a trade credit insurance scheme was brought in at the Budget, and, to help our car industry, a scrappage scheme has been introduced, which could assist up to 385,000 people in Wales who own cars that are more than 10 years old. Those are all very practical ways in which businesses in Wales have been helped because of the positive policy of intervention by both the Government here in London and the Welsh Assembly Government in Cardiff.
Mrs. Gillan: I am delighted that the Secretary of State is at last coming forward with some facts and figures about the businesses and jobs that have been saved under the proposals in the “Real Help Now” publication that he put out at the end of last year. Will he now undertake to list all those companies and jobs, and write to me with the full details of what amounts were given to which companies, and which jobs have been saved?
Mr. Murphy: Under ProAct, the companies have been helped by the Welsh Assembly Government and so it is a matter for them to decide how to issue the statements; we make such decisions about the enterprise guarantee fund. I am certainly prepared to let the hon. Lady know the details, in so far as that does not breach commercial confidentiality, which is obviously an issue. If I had a company that was receiving funds, I would perhaps not want the world to know exactly what they were, so long as that was within the rules. If the hon. Lady suggests that those figures are wrong, she is very mistaken. The figures are right, and I will ensure that, as far as possible within the rules of commercial confidentiality, she and other members of the Committee are given the figures.
Mr. Roger Williams (Brecon and Radnorshire) (LD): My first instinct is always to be constructive, so I will try that in the first instance. The guarantee scheme, which ensures that banks lend to small businesses, extends, as far as I understand it, to 75 per cent. of the loan, with the other 25 per cent. carried by the bank. However, many banks now ask sole traders and managing directors to provide a guarantee and security for that 25 per cent., sometimes including their own home. As one or two of them have said to me, “We have confidence in our business but we are coming to the end of our careers and the last thing that we want is to see our home lost, just as we are coming up to retirement”. Will the Secretary of State look at that and see if anything can be done, intervening with the banks when they insist on doing that?
Mr. Murphy: Yes, the issue is still very real. It has got a little better in parts of Wales, certainly in terms of those banks that have had a great deal of public money put into them, but there is work to be done. A few weeks ago in Swansea the all-Wales economic summit concentrated heavily on the issue of banks in Wales. The regional directors of banks in Wales were there to answer points rightly made by businesses and others, including the points the hon. Gentleman raises with me. The issue is that in particular sectors—construction is a good example—lending is still very slow, if it happens at all, and in others it is backed up. Until the lending happens—and that is the purpose of these guarantee schemes—there will be difficulty in cash flow and therefore difficulty in reviving the economy. It is crucial to the whole Welsh economy that the banks play their part in being banks and do what they are supposed to do. That is why we as a Government are encouraging them and the Welsh Assembly Government are doing the same.
Lembit Öpik (Montgomeryshire) (LD): On that very point, the Secretary of State will be aware that on a number of occasions I have highlighted the concerns of my local businesses that, although they are viable and willing to invest, the banks are reducing overdraft facilities pretty much unilaterally and making it hard for those businesses to invest. Has he been able to make any progress with regard to Welsh banking facilities, to make sure that banks do not rein in overdrafts for businesses that are healthy and clearly desperate to invest but are not able to do so because the banks are making it virtually impossible?
Mr. Murphy: Overdrafts are in the same category as straightforward lending. If overdrafts are withdrawn from perfectly viable businesses, we are in difficulty. I and others are constantly making that point to banks in Wales, that they have to ensure that these small and medium-sized—sometimes bigger—businesses survive. As both the hon. Gentleman and the hon. Member for Brecon and Radnorshire have mentioned, the burdens that are placed on people sometimes in later life are to be avoided.
Perhaps it is important to say today, the 10th anniversary of the election of the Welsh Assembly, that the partnership that exists between the Government and Parliament here and our colleagues in Cardiff is a real one. It has shown in a stark and successful way how important it is to Wales to have a Welsh Assembly Government able to enhance and improve on the sort of help that we can give to businesses and families in our country. We must bear it in mind that about £1 billion has been committed over the past number of months by the Welsh Assembly Government to help in this recession—on procurement, business rates and schemes for home owners, families and businesses. Those things would not have happened had there not been a Welsh Assembly Government specifically able to do that for the people whom all of us here represent.
Mr. Hain: I agree with my right hon. Friend that the Assembly Government deserve great credit. However, will he raise with the Deputy First Minister, the Plaid Cymru leader, Ieuan Wyn Jones, the question of continued funding for Wales Rally GB? Around £2 million a year has been provided for the Welsh Assembly Government to the promoters of the rally and there is a five-year contract which is now in danger of being breached as a result of the Deputy First Minister’s decision. Many businesses in the valleys, in Carmarthenshire and in Powys depend on that investment. For £2 million of public investment, £10 million of spending is injected into the economy. Apparently, the decision was taken because there is a question whether the rally will be in the world rally championship next year. My understanding, as a result of the decision taken in Paris last week, is that it will be. Will my right hon. Friend please talk to the Deputy First Minister and write to me about this matter? It really needs reversing.
Mr. Murphy: Yes, I give my right hon. Friend that guarantee. I will certainly do that in the next few days.
Returning to the issue of the Assembly Government and the UK Government working together, there are special problems in Wales which affect us in a different way from other parts of the country. The very strong working relationship between the Assembly, the Government and local government in Wales is evident in the economic summits that we have been holding throughout Wales. Some people have said that they are of no use, but I entirely reject that. Indeed, the schemes that I have just outlined to the Committee, including those on procurement, rates and many others, flow directly from those economic summits because of suggestions made by businesses, trade unions and others who attend them. We could not have that sort of arrangement on a United Kingdom basis—it is too big—but on a Welsh basis we can bring people together to deal with such issues. The next summit will be held in the valleys. We have had one in Swansea, two in north Wales and one in Cardiff. They allow us to talk to our partners in Wales at every level about how we can best deal with the problems that affect Wales economically.
Julie Morgan (Cardiff, North) (Lab): I am sure that my right hon. Friend is aware that the Federation of Small Businesses, based in the Heath area of my constituency, is positive about the summits and praises them highly.
Mr. Murphy: I am indeed. Suggestions from the federation, the CBI and other representatives of business in Wales are not only taken seriously but acted on by the Welsh Assembly Government and the UK Government. We also act to help home owners. People do not have to lose their home as well as their job. The combination of those things is devastating for any family, so the various mortgage rescue and support schemes initiated by the British Government and the Welsh Assembly Government will benefit Welsh people especially.
Mr. Llwyd: I agree with what the right hon. Gentleman says, but he should mark the fact that there was a mortgage rescue scheme active in Wales from 1 September. I understand that it has come in over the border only in the last few weeks.
Mr. Murphy: Which explains why it is useful to have a Welsh Assembly in Cardiff.
As well as the question of jobs in Wales, and the schemes that help businesses and people struggling with mortgages, there is also the question of families and people who are more vulnerable than others. All the schemes that have been introduced in the past few weeks—whether they are helping pensioners get more money directly into their pockets, helping families with children through extra tax credits and child benefits or benefiting 1 million people in Wales through tax reductions—are helping people alongside the other measures that the Chancellor of the Exchequer introduced the other week.
Dr. Hywel Francis (Aberavon) (Lab): I warmly endorse the right hon. Gentleman’s support for the economic summit. Does he agree that the recent involvement of education bodies such as universities in the summits is important for building the knowledge economy across the whole of Wales?
Mr. Murphy: Indeed. My hon. Friend was with me in Swansea some weeks ago for the economic summit, and the university of Swansea was playing its part—a very real part—in regeneration and ensuring that we invest in new technology in south-west Wales, in particular. The use of our universities and colleges throughout Wales to help us through the recession is something that can be done uniquely through the constitutional structure that we now have in Wales.
Mark Pritchard: As a humble Back Bencher I do not have access to Short money, so I hope that the Secretary of State can find time to write to me to tell me how many homes have been saved in the past 12 months as a result of the Government’s so-called mortgage rescue scheme. I would be grateful for that information.
Mr. Murphy: Yes, we will certainly provide that information for the hon. Gentleman, who I am sure will not linger long on the Back Benches, as soon as we can.
Mrs. Gillan: Will the Secretary of State clarify something for me, because I am sure that he would not wish to mislead the Welsh Grand Committee? He has given the impression that there are special individual schemes for helping home owners in Wales. Will he confirm that all the schemes available to help home owners are UK-wide schemes? Although the mortgage rescue and affordable housing funding schemes are delivered through the mechanism of the Assembly, those schemes also exist in the rest of the United Kingdom, and all the other schemes are UK-wide, so there is no special treatment for Wales.
 
Previous Contents Continue
House of Commons 
home page Parliament home page House of 
Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 May 2009