| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
17 Dec 2008 : Column 804W—continued
“(The Council) notes that GMO-free zones can be created on the basis of voluntary agreement which, in line with relevant national law, could be tacit between the economic operators concerned in the area in question and that in order to ensure freedom of choice all concerned operators must be properly informed about an intention to create the GMO-free zone.”
The UK supported the adoption of the conclusions.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will make it his policy that all future field trials of genetically-modified crops in the UK shall be carried out at Porton Down or another high security establishment suitable for testing potentially harmful organisms. [243549]
Huw Irranca-Davies [holding answer 16 December 2008]: Genetically-modified crop trials will only be authorised if a robust assessment demonstrates that, with appropriate risk management controls in place, no adverse effects on human health and the environment would be expected. As such, it would not be necessary to require that approved trials are conducted in establishments suitable for testing potentially harmful organisms.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what reports he has received of cases (a) in the UK and (b) elsewhere of animal deaths in connection with the consumption of the foliage of genetically-modified Bt cotton plants. [243551]
Huw Irranca-Davies [holding answer 16 December 2008]: The only report we are aware of is that in India sheep in particular have died after grazing on the stubble of GM cotton crops. We understand that this matter has been considered by the Indian authorities, who have not identified any basis for concluding that the deaths were caused by a specific toxic effect of the GM plants.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many sites were used in England for the farm scale evaluations (FSE) of genetically modified organisms from January 2000; how many were vandalised; whether, in each case of vandalism, the trials produced data which was used in the final analysis of the FSE results; and if he will list in each case the (a) crop, (b) location, (c) six figure map reference and (d) Part B consent number, where appropriate. [241624]
Huw Irranca-Davies: The farm-scale evaluations involved 256 plantings in England after January 2000, in addition to the first three sites planted in the autumn of 1999. A list of all the FSE sites can be found on the web at:
41 plantings were vandalised and of these, eight were terminated and 33 continued to be used in the evaluations. A list of vandalised sites is as follows:
| Local Village / Town or Parish | Grid ref | Part B consent ref. | Crop type | Vandalism |
| (1) Trial terminated (2) Trail continued | ||||
The forage maize crop had a Part C (cultivation) consent, ref.C/F/95/12-07.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many Part B consents for the experimental releases of genetically modified organisms authorised under the Genetically Modified Organisms (Deliberate Release) Regulations 1992 and the GMO (Deliberate Release) (England) Regulations 2002 were (a) granted and (b) still valid in England since January 2000; and if he will list them. [241763]
Huw Irranca-Davies: 182 Part B consents were issued in England in the period when Directive 90/220/EEC was applicable. A list of these consents can be found on the DEFRA website at:
13 Part B consents have been issued in England since Directive 200/18/EC became applicable. A list of these consents is available on the DEFRA website at:
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |