Previous Section Index Home Page

12 Jan 2009 : Column 463W—continued

Regional Development Agencies

Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) how much each regional development agency plans to spend on cohesion and integration work in (a) 2008-09 and (b) each of the two subsequent years; [245522]

(2) how many staff in each regional development agency work on cohesion and integration; and what the cost of employing these staff is expected to be in (a) 2008-09 and (b) each of the two subsequent years. [245521]

Mr. McFadden: While regional development agencies (RDAs) take account of cohesion and integration issues, RDAs do not record expenditure according to cohesion and integration as a category of corporate spending. Furthermore, to separate out those data would incur disproportionate cost.

Regional Development Agencies: Cost Effectiveness

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment his Department has made of the value for money provided by regional development agencies. [245971]

Mr. McFadden: The Government have commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers to conduct an independent evaluation of the economic impact of RDAs. Their report has just been completed and I will be presenting it to the House shortly.

Regional Economic Council

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform with reference to the answer of 18 November 2008, Official Report, column 425W, on the Regional Economic Council, where on his Department's website the notes following each regional economic council are located. [243805]

Mr. McFadden: The minutes can be found on the BERR website:

under the ‘What we do’ heading and ‘Regional Economic Development’ section. A link to the Regional Economic Council will be found on this page.

Retail Trade: Reading

Mr. Rob Wilson: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many independent retailers were operating in the Reading Borough Council area in each of the last 10 years. [244438]


12 Jan 2009 : Column 464W

Kevin Brennan: I have been asked to reply.

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated January 2009:

Enterprises classified to SIC 52 Retail Trade in Reading Unitary Authority

Number of retail enterprises

1999

415

2000

400

2001

400

2002

380

2003

355

2004

350

2005

350

2006

360

2007

360

2008(1)

(1)420

(1) Wider VAT and/or PAYE based definition.

Royal Mail

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimate he has made of the cost of necessary Royal Mail plant modernisation. [245820]

Mr. McFadden: This is an operational matter for Royal Mail. I have therefore asked the chief executive of Royal Mail, Adam Crozier, to reply direct to my hon. Friend.

Copies of the letter will be placed in the Libraries of the House.


12 Jan 2009 : Column 465W

Mr. Drew: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what plans he has to negotiate access for Royal Mail to the (a) Dutch, (b) German and (c) French postal systems. [246058]

Mr. McFadden: A new postal directive was adopted at the end of January 2008 confirming that most member states, including the Dutch, German and French postal sectors, will be opened up to full access and competition by 1 January 2011.

The Government will continue to promote an open, transparent, cost-based, and non-discriminatory market for both domestic and international mail within the framework of the WTO GATS, Universal Postal Union (UPU) and EU obligations.

Royal Mail: Christmas

Ms Angela C. Smith: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what the cost to Royal Mail was of (a) producing and (b) delivering the Christmas cards it recently sent to every household in the UK. [246157]

Mr. McFadden: This is an operational matter for Royal Mail. I have therefore asked the chief executive of Royal Mail, Adam Crozier, to reply direct to my hon. Friend.

Copies of the letter will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Royal Mail: Manpower

Mr. Roger Williams: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment he has made of the effect of part privatisation of Royal Mail on the number of jobs in the organisation; and if he will make a statement. [246804]

Mr. McFadden: The Government are taking forward the proposal for Royal Mail to enter into a strategic minority partnership with a postal operator with a proven record in transforming its business, working closely with the workforce. Royal Mail will remain publicly owned.

Any impact on jobs associated with the modernisation of Royal Mail is an operational matter for the management of the company.

Royal Mail: Pay

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what the remuneration package of the chief executive of Royal Mail is; and what proportion of his remuneration is paid from public funds. [245697]

Mr. McFadden: The level of the chief executive's remuneration package is a matter for Royal Mail's remuneration committee. I have therefore asked the company secretary of Royal Mail to reply direct to the hon. Member.


12 Jan 2009 : Column 466W

All of Adam Crozier's remuneration is paid from Royal Mail funds.

Copies of the letter will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Small Businesses: North West

Mark Hunter: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many small and medium-sized enterprises operating in (a) the North West, (b) Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council area and (c) Cheadle constituency have been declared bankrupt in each year since 1997. [244813]

Mr. McFadden [holding answer 18 December 2008]: There is insufficient detailed information held centrally and in a readily available format to provide an answer to this question. This is because:

Tata Steel

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what recent discussions he has had with Tata Industries on the long-term future of the steel industry in the UK. [245676]

Ian Pearson: The Department enjoys an excellent relationship with Corus, which has been a subsidiary of Tata Steel since April 2007, and there is regular contact between BERR and Corus on a number of issues of interest to the company and the UK steel industry more widely.

Trade Unions: Elections

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will seek to amend section 14 of the Employment Act 1988 to allow seafaring union members to participate in votes via the internet when absent at sea. [244741]

Mr. McFadden: Section 54 of the Employment Relations Act 2004 provides an order-making power for the Secretary of State to widen the methods of voting which can be used in statutory ballots and elections under trade union law. The Government have no plans at present to use that power.

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will consider seeking to amend section 14 of the Employment Act 1988 to take account of the position of seafarers who are frequently absent from home. [244742]

Mr. McFadden: We have no current plans to amend the law on the political fund ballots.


12 Jan 2009 : Column 467W

Duchy of Lancaster

Admiralty House

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster with reference to the answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 1255W, on Admiralty House, what catering services were provided by the Cabinet Office's provider on a re-charge basis. [245887]

Kevin Brennan: I refer the hon. Member to the reply that was given to him on 9 June 2008, Official Report, column 94W.

Average Earnings

Mr. Willetts: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the mean gross weekly full-time earnings were for (a) male employees, (b) female employees and (c) all employees according to the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings for people aged (i) under 18, (ii) 18 to 20, (iii) 21 to 24, (iv) 25 to 29, (v) 30 to 39, (vi) 40 to 49, (vii) 50 to 59, (viii) 60 to 64 and (ix) 65 and over in each year between 1997 and 2007. [243711]

Kevin Brennan: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated December 2008:


12 Jan 2009 : Column 468W
Mean weekly pay—gross (£) for employee jobs( a) : United Kingdom, 1997 to 2008

Age under 18 Age 18-20 Age 21-24 Age 25-29 Age 30-39 Age 40-49 Age 50-59 Age 60-64 Age 65 and over

Full-time

1997

172

193

253

322

402

421

392

352

*331

1998

163

203

269

337

422

441

418

357

339

1999

173

210

284

352

436

455

431

377

*374

2000

192

217

287

370

454

476

444

390

386

2001

196

225

303

398

484

499

467

400

*406

2002

213

238

311

419

508

524

488

417

*419

2003

198

240

314

428

522

545

501

428

*436

2004(b)

216

249

324

442

541

567

524

443

428

2004(c)

218

246

320

433

531

560

519

446

417

2005

209

253

327

444

556

583

544

473

*456

2006(d)

209

262

334

452

576

611

569

509

*507

2006(e)

210

262

333

450

574

608

567

508

*506

2007

216

273

348

464

591

625

582

521

*476

2008

221

282

359

482

611

653

613

541

*507

Full-time Male

1997

*185

214

278

344

432

475

446

377

*357

1998

179

224

295

361

455

498

478

382

*364

1999

179

227

312

376

470

512

490

401

*422

2000

*204

235

310

396

489

534

504

415

*422

2001

*201

240

325

425

521

560

529

423

*440

2002

222

256

332

447

545

588

552

442

*478

2003

199

254

334

456

563

612

563

454

*474

2004(b)

*229

262

342

467

581

632

587

465

*459

2004(c)

*225

260

336

458

569

624

581

469

*450

2005

217

264

340

468

596

651

607

497

*500

2006(d)

203

277

348

475

616

687

635

537

*559

2006(e)

204

276

347

473

613

683

634

536

*557

2007

217

288

366

483

630

699

653

550

*515

2008

219

295

376

500

652

734

685

571

*551

Full-time Female

1997

*160

172

228

293

342

325

297

255

*251

1998

144

181

241

306

357

337

311

260

*260

1999

165

193

254

322

371

355

326

286

*255

2000

*182

197

262

334

386

370

339

292

*284

2001

191

207

279

362

413

389

358

313

*289

2002

*202

218

288

383

436

410

377

330

259

2003

195

223

292

392

448

427

396

342

*315

2004(b)

197

233

305

410

468

453

420

369

*332

2004(c)

209

230

303

403

463

448

418

369

*313

2005

200

239

313

417

486

469

446

399

*347

2006(d)

218

242

319

426

509

488

465

425

369

2006(e)

220

243

318

424

506

484

461

421

368

2007

*215

253

327

439

521

498

473

436

377

2008

*226

266

338

460

540

519

504

453

398

(a) Employees on adult rates whose pay for the survey pay-period was not affected by absence.
(b) 2004 results excluding supplementary survey for comparison with 2003.
(c) 2004 results including supplementary surveys designed to improve coverage of the survey (for more information see National Statistics website www.statistics.gov.uk).
(d) 2006 results with methodology consistent with 2005.
(e) 2006 results with methodology consistent with 2007.
Guide to quality:
The Coefficient of Variation (CV) indicates the quality of a figure, the smaller the CV value the higher the quality. The true value is likely to lie within +/- twice the CV—for example, for an average of 200 with a CV of 5 per cent., we would expect the population average to be within the range 180 to 220.
Key:
CV<= 5%
* CV> 5% and <= 10%
Source:
Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, Office for National Statistics. 1997-2008

Next Section Index Home Page