Previous Section Index Home Page

19 Jan 2009 : Column 1149W—continued


19 Jan 2009 : Column 1150W

19 Jan 2009 : Column 1151W
Special schools
School name Local authority Specialism

Abbey Court Community Special School

Medway

SEN Cognition and Learning

Abbey School

Rotherham

Sports

Amwell View School

Hertfordshire

Sports

Brackenfield Special School

Derbyshire

SEN Cognition and Learning

Bradstow School

Wandsworth

SEN Communication and Interaction

Brookfield School

Herefordshire

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

Foxwood School

Kent

SEN Cognition and Learning

Garratt Park School

Wandsworth

M and C

Hall School

Norfolk

SEN Communication and Interaction

Heathlands School

Hertfordshire

SEN Sensory Physical

Heritage Park Community School

Sheffield

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

Holly Bank School

Kirklees

SEN Sensory Physical

James Brindley School

Birmingham

Arts

Kilton Thorpe School

Redcar and Cleveland

Arts

Knightsfield School

Hertfordshire

SEN Sensory Physical

Longcause Community Special School

Plymouth

Sports

Mapledown School

Barnet

SEN Cognition and Learning

Mary Rose School

Portsmouth

Sports

Meadow High School

Hillingdon

SEN Cognition and Learning

Meadowgate School

Cambridgeshire

SEN Sensory Physical

Muntham House School

West Sussex

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

Newfield School

Sefton

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

Northcott School

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

SEN Communication and

Northgate School

Northamptonshire

Arts

Oak Grove College

West Sussex

Arts

Oakfield Park School, Ackworth

Wakefield

SEN Cognition and Learning

Oaklands School

Hounslow

SEN Sensory Physical

Parkwood Hall School

Kensington and Chelsea

Arts

Percy Hedley School

North Tyneside

SEN Sensory Physical

Rowdeford School

Wiltshire

SEN Communication and Interaction

Rumworth School

Bolton

SEN Communication and Interaction

Saxon Hill School

Staffordshire

SEN Sensory Physical

Shepherd School

Nottingham

Sports

Springhead School

North Yorkshire

SEN Cognition and Learning

St. Anthony's School

West Sussex

SEN Communication and Interaction

St. Rose's Special School

Gloucestershire

SEN Sensory Physical

Stony Dean School

Buckinghamshire

SEN Communication and Interaction

Sutherland House School

Nottingham

SEN Communication and Interaction

Talbot Specialist School (for cognition and learning)

Sheffield

SEN Cognition and Learning

The Bridge at HLC

Telford and Wrekin

B and E

The Castle School

West Berkshire

SEN Communication and Interaction

The Delves School

Derbyshire

Sports

The Eresby School, Spilsby

Lincolnshire

SEN Cognition and Learning

The Gatehouse School

Milton Keynes

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

The Grantham Ambergate School

Lincolnshire

Sports

The Meadows School

Durham

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

The Milestone School

Gloucestershire

SEN Communication and Interaction

The Old Park School

Dudley

SEN Communication and Interaction

The Parkside School, Norwich

Norfolk

SEN Communication and Interaction

The Phoenix School

Lincolnshire

SEN Behaviour Emotional and Social

The Shrubberies School

Gloucestershire

SEN Cognition and Learning

The St Francis Special School, Lincoln

Lincolnshire

SEN Sensory Physical

Thomas Bewick School

Newcastle upon Tyne

SEN Communication and Interaction

Valence School

Kent

Sports

Walton Leigh School

Surrey

SEN Cognition and Learning

Wightwick Hall School

Staffordshire

B and E

Wyvern School

Dorset

SEN Cognition and Learning


Star Chamber Board

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what assessment he has made of the performance of the Star Chamber Board to date; what achievements the Board has made since its establishment; and if he will make a statement. [247273]

Jim Knight: The Department's Star Chamber has been in existence for 10 years, and assesses requests for new or revised data collections, with the aim of ensuring that they are feasible, necessary, value for money and add as small a burden to the front line as possible. In 2006, the process was enhanced with the addition of an external panel comprising local authority and head teacher representatives.

The Star Chamber has performed a valuable role in ensuring burdens on schools and authorities are kept to a minimum, by scrutinising data collection plans. They have made an input into other, related, areas, including advising us about information that should be collected to inform the National Indicator Set. They have also input their views into how the Department's Simplification Plan can best fulfil the aim of cutting the data requests to the front line. In recognition of the balanced approach they have shown, the external panel have now been given the power to make the decisions about whether collection requests should go ahead.

Teachers: Training

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what assessment he has made of the progress made under Teach First initiative; and if he will make a statement. [247286]

Jim Knight: Since it began in 2003, the programme has attracted over 1,000 graduates into teaching. The programme was extended to Manchester and the Midlands in 2007; to Liverpool in 2008 and will extend to Yorkshire in 2009. In June, the Prime Minister announced an expansion in the programme from 370 places per year in 2008/09 to 850 per year in 2013/14.

In its inspection report published in 2008, Ofsted reported very favourably on the teacher training provided by the programme; noting that some of the trainees were the best that it had seen in any inspections.

The Government support Teach First because it brings into teaching high quality, well-motivated graduates who would not otherwise have considered teaching.
19 Jan 2009 : Column 1152W
Teach First operates in challenging urban secondary schools that would normally struggle to recruit such high quality trainees.

Mr. Slaughter: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which (a) private sector bodies and (b) university (i) education and (ii) mathematics faculties are taking part in the design of the courses that make up the continuing professional development contract put out by the National Centre of Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics and National Strategies. [247330]

Jim Knight: The National Centre for Excellence in the Teaching of Mathematics (NCETM) does not directly provide training and development for teachers, it seeks to improve access to and quality assure mathematics continuing professional development. Working with the wider mathematics community, the NCETM facilitates, enhances and provides strategic direction and leadership for all aspects of continuing professional development in mathematics.

Since their inception, the national strategies (NS) have worked with a number of different partner organisations on various CPD materials and approaches. These are for local authorities (LA) to use with schools and are in the form of LA consultant training and course materials.

Currently on mathematics, the NS work with a number of stakeholders including NCETM, Universities' Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET) and the Advisory Committee for Mathematics Education (ACME). They are also working with Hull and Reading Universities' Initial Teacher Training departments, Edge Hill University and KPMG's Charitable Foundation, the Every Child a Chance Trust.

Young Offenders

Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what percentage of inmates in young offender institutions previously had looked-after status in each of the last 10 years. [247856]

Beverley Hughes: Data on the number of young people in YOIs who have been looked after by local authorities earlier in their childhood are not collected centrally.

However, we can say that of the 59,500 young people looked after by local authorities at 31 March 2008, 130 were placed in a young offender institute (YOI) or prison. This is equivalent to 0.22 per cent. of the total number of looked after children.

The following table shows the data collected since 2004.

Year to 31 March: Total number of looked after children Number placed in YOI

2004

61,200

140

2005

61,000

110

2006

60,300

140

2007

60,000

150

2008

59,500

130


Next Section Index Home Page