Previous Section Index Home Page

5 Feb 2009 : Column 1488W—continued


5 Feb 2009 : Column 1489W

School Leaving

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families when he plans to raise the education and training leaving age to (a) 17 and (b) 18 years; and if he will make a statement. [253199]

Jim Knight: Our intention is that from 2013 all young people will participate in some form of education or training post-16. We plan to raise the participation age in two stages: to 17 in 2013 and to 18 in 2015. The first cohort to benefit from these changes began year 7 in September 2008.

Schools: ICT

Mr. Purchase: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what powers Partnership for Schools has to prevent individual schools opting out of proposals for authority-wide ICT programmes in favour of submitting an Alternative Business Procurement Case. [252688]

Jim Knight: Partnerships for Schools does not have powers to prevent a school opting out of proposals for authority-wide ICT programmes. Where a school wishes to opt out of the managed service it must submit an Alternative Business Procurement Case. This must demonstrate that the school’s alternative provision will be at least of an equivalent standard to the managed service proposed by the local authority, that it is able to link up to the area-wide solution, and that it passes a value for money test to ensure taxpayers’ money is being well spent.

Schools: Music

Mr. Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) with reference to his Department’s press release of 21 November 2008, on funding for music in schools, how many new musical instruments have been bought with the funds announced; [254392]

(2) how much of the planned £40 million expenditure over four years on new musical instruments announced by his Department on 21 November 2007 has been spent. [254455]

Sarah McCarthy-Fry: The Music Instrument Fund (MIF) was introduced in 2007-08 and provides £10 million a year (capital grant) for LAs to purchase instruments for instrumental learning at key stage 2 or transitional programmes beyond key stage 2. In November 2007 it was announced that the £10 million grant would continue to 2011, hence the £40 million.

In 2007-08 local authorities claimed £9.97 million and 99,892 instruments were purchased. In 2008-09, £8.25million of the total allocation has already been claimed by local authorities and over 94,000 instruments purchased.

Schools: Parents

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what assessment he has made of levels of accountability of schools to (a) parents and (b) students since 1997. [253306]


5 Feb 2009 : Column 1490W

Jim Knight: Schools are accountable to the taxpayer, to parents and to pupils— both for their overall performance and for the outcomes of individual pupils.

The introduction of the New Relationship with Schools (NRwS) in 2004 brought about major changes to the school accountability framework, in order to make it more coherent and evidence-based. All schools now have a school improvement partner to help evaluate the school’s performance and identify priorities for improvement, and there is a greater emphasis on school self-evaluation and building schools’ capacity to drive their own improvement. The School Profile was also introduced to communicate with parents about each school’s progress, priorities and performance. Building on the NRwS, we now plan to make the accountability system even more coherent and better able to recognise the full range of each school’s achievements.

For example, school performance data are currently available to the public through the Achievement and Attainment Tables. However, we think there is scope for a wider range of information on schools’ performance to be reported in a clearer and more powerful way, so it can be more easily used by governors, parents and the public. In December, we launched a consultation on 21st Century Schools and the school report card. The school report card will set out a range of outcomes for which schools will be held to account and provide an indication of the degree of challenge faced by each school. The consultation will be followed by a White Paper in the spring and further consultation on the detail of the school report card indicators.

Parents and pupils also need to be able to hold schools to account for the outcomes they deliver for individual children. Schools must report individual children’s performance to parents and pupils at the end of the year, and many schools are now reporting pupils’ progress to parents on a more regular basis. We are supporting the development of teachers’ skills in pupil tracking through the Assessment for Learning Strategy, launched in May 2008 and underpinned by £150 million. We also expect that by 2010, all secondary schools will report online to parents on pupils’ attendance, behaviour, special educational needs and achievement, and that all primary and special schools will do so by 2012.

All schools are also required to have home school agreements, containing commitments made by the school and parents to support children’s education and well-being. In the children’s plan one year on progress report, we outlined a new approach to improving parents’ engagement and committed to review school reporting regulations and home school agreements and will shortly be consulting publicly on possible changes.

The inspection system gathers pupils’ and parents’ views about individual schools and assesses the extent to which parents are involved in their children’s learning and development. In April 2007 new powers were introduced to enable Ofsted to investigate complaints from parents about their children’s schools. These allow parents to raise concerns about systemic matters relating to a school which Ofsted can investigate. If the matter is of serious concern, this can lead to the immediate inspection of a school.

Schools: Standards

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what assessment he has made of
5 Feb 2009 : Column 1491W
the potential effects on standards of attainment in maintained schools of the implementation by independent schools of Charity Commission guidance on bursary schemes; and if he will make a statement. [253323]

Jim Knight: My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, has made no assessment of the potential effects on standards of attainment in maintained schools of the implementation by independent schools of Charity Commission guidance on bursary schemes. It is for each independent school that has charitable status to decide for itself how to meet the public benefit requirement, having regard to the guidance published by the Charity Commission.

Secondary Education: Finance

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his policy is on the provision of funding for children in their final year of secondary school who have repeated a year. [253700]

Jim Knight: Local authorities receive revenue funding according to the number of pupils they have on roll at the spring school census—this would include those pupils that are repeating a year. Local authorities will apply their local funding formulae to fund schools in their area which takes account of all the children attending school.

Secondary Education: Vocational Guidance

Dr. Kumar: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many staff in secondary schools are employed to act as careers advisers in (a) England, (b) the North East, (c) the Tees Valley and (d) Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland constituency. [253129]

Jim Knight: Responsibility for curriculum organisation and staffing is delegated to local authorities and schools. We do not keep records centrally on the number of teaching staff involved in providing careers advice in secondary schools.

Social Services: Children

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what recent representations he has received on the reorganisation of children's services in local authorities. [250958]

Beverley Hughes: My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, has received a large number of representations following the case of ‘Baby P' in Haringey. Many of the correspondents have been supportive of the current requirement to have integrated services for children under a single Director of Children's Services and some have suggested these arrangements should be reconsidered.

We are currently consulting on revised statutory guidance on the role of the Director of Children's Services and Lead Member for Children's Services. The consultation ends on 10 February 2009 and to date we have received three responses suggesting the current requirements for an integrated service should be reconsidered.


5 Feb 2009 : Column 1492W

Social Services: Haringey

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what inspections of Haringey council Ofsted has undertaken since 2000. [245922]

Beverley Hughes: This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in both the Libraries.

Letter from Christine Gilbert, dated 22 January 2008

Table A: Local education authority inspections carried out in Haringey since 2000
Type Date Publication date

Local education authority inspection

2002

26 September 2002

Local education authority inspection

2003

20 January 2004



5 Feb 2009 : Column 1493W
Table B: Annual performance assessments (APA) and joint area reviews (JARs) carried out on Haringey since 2005
Type Date Report/Letter published Notes

APA

June 2005 to July 2005

1 December 2005

APA

June 2006 to July 2006

n/a

APAs were carried out in 2005 and 2007. In 2006 Haringey had a JAR, so no APA was carried out. The JAR grades were carried forward for the purposes of the APA.

APA

September 2007 to October 2007

26 November 2007

APA

September 2008 to October 2008

17 December 2008

JAR

12 June 2006 to 23 June 2006

10 October 2006

JAR was carried out concurrently with the Audit Commission's Comprehensive Performance Assessment. It was also enhanced to enable coverage of the youth service (report published 16/10/2006).

JAR

13 November 2008 to 26 November 2008

1 December 2008

This JAR was commissioned by the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, to look specifically at Safeguarding Children. It was jointly carried out with the Healthcare Commission and Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary.


Table C: List of Ofsted's last inspections on children's care in Haringey
Reference n umber Setting n ame Provision t ype Inspection d ate

SC042906

London Borough of Haringey Fostering Service

Local Authority Fostering Agency

25 January 2008

SC072906

London Borough of Haringey Private Fostering Arrangements Service

Private Fostering Arrangements

30 January 2008


Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families with reference to the answer of 24 November 2008, Official Report, column 936W, on Social Services: Haringey, if he will place in the Library a copy of the report of each Ofsted inspection of Haringey council’s children’s social services since 2000. [253515]

Beverley Hughes: Copies of Ofsted’s inspection reports and assessments of Haringey’s children’s social services are available on Ofsted’s website. The following links are provided at:

Joint Area Reviews

Annual Performance Assessments


5 Feb 2009 : Column 1494W

Fostering services

Copies have also been placed in the Library.


Next Section Index Home Page