Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
24 Feb 2009 : Column 690Wcontinued
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many private security licences are currently suspended by the Security Industry Authority. [257054]
Jacqui Smith: As at 12 February 2009, 220 licences were suspended by the Security Industry Authority.
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average time to process a licence application from (a) British citizens, (b) other EEA nationals and (c) non-EEA nationals by the Security Industry Authority was in each of the last five years. [257055]
Jacqui Smith: This information is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many offences under the Private Security Industry Act 2001 of (a) working without a licence, (b) breaking licence conditions and (c) deploying unlicensed operatives have been identified by the Security Industry Authority's enforcement activity in each of the last five years; [257057]
(2) how many people have been (a) prosecuted and (b) convicted for offences of (i) working without a licence, (ii) breaking licence conditions and (iii) deploying unlicensed operatives under the Private Security Industry Act 2001 in each of the last five years. [257058]
Jacqui Smith: Data on offences identified by the Security Industry Authority are not available.
The following table provides annual data on the numbers of prosecutions and convictions for the offences of working without a licence and deploying unlicensed operatives under the Private Security Industry Act 2001.
Data on the numbers and prosecutions and convictions for breaking licence conditions are not available. This is because offences under section 9(4) of the Private Security Industry Act 2001 cannot be separately identified.
Data for 2008 will be available in late 2009.
Number of defendants proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty at all courts for offences under the 2001 Private Security Industry Act, England and Wales, 2004 - 07( 1, 2) | |||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | ||||||
Offence | Statute | Proceeded against | Found guilty | Proceeded against | Found guilty | Proceeded against | Found guilty | Proceeded against | Found guilty |
(1) The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. (2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. |
Annette Brooke: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if she will make it her policy to gather specific information from local police forces on the ages of victims of sexual crimes in order to (a) centrally record and (b) centrally analyse the data. [255719]
Mr. Alan Campbell: The Home Office is currently developing a new system for receiving recorded crime data from police forces. This is designed to enable forces to submit information in the form of individual crime records. Data, once validated, will give the Home Office access to more detailed information about victims of crimes, including the age of victims. We expect this system to become fully operational during 2009-10.
Mr. Ruffley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many offences under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 were recorded in 2007-08, broken down by offence; what percentage of such offences was proceeded against at court; and what percentage resulted in (a) a conviction and (b) a sanction detection. [256689]
Mr. Alan Campbell: The information is not available in the form requested.
Table 1 gives the number of offences recorded in 2007-08 for the offence classifications which came into force with the introduction of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. It also gives the number of offences detected by means of a sanction detection. Table 2 shows the numbers of defendants proceeded against and found guilty at all courts for 2007 and is taken from the court proceedings database held by the Office for Criminal Justice Reform.
The figures given in table 2 relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the offence selected is the one for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
Recorded crime and court proceedings statistics are from two different databases and recorded in quite different ways. Recorded crime data are provided on a financial year basis and count offences whereas court
proceedings data are on a calendar year basis and count offenders. Therefore, these two separate data-sets are not directly comparable.
Table 1: Offences recorded under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and detected by means of a sanction detection2007-08 | ||
Offence | Number of offences | Number of sanction detections |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |