Previous Section Index Home Page

25 Feb 2009 : Column 848W—continued


Prisons: Drugs

Mr. Ruffley: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many visitors to prisons were found to be in possession of illegal drugs in 2007-08; how many such visitors were referred to the police; and what steps were taken in respect of those not referred to the police. [256749]

Mr. Hanson: The data are not available in the format requested.

It is the National Offender Management Service's policy for all prison visitors found in possession of illicit drugs to be referred to the police. As a result of which in 2007-08 the police made 424 arrests of prison visitors the majority of which would have been for drug offences.

These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit.

Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Martin Horwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) what the length is of each custodial sentence, other than suspended sentences, handed down under the provisions of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 since the Act came into force; and when each such sentence was handed down; [258740]

(2) how much has been received in fines imposed under the provisions of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 in each year since its entry into force; and how the receipts have been allocated; [258744]

(3) how many persons prosecuted under the provisions of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 received custodial sentences, other than suspended sentences, in (a) each year since 2006 and (b) 2009 to date. [258745]


25 Feb 2009 : Column 849W

Mr. Hanson: The available information is shown in the following table.


25 Feb 2009 : Column 850W
Sentences imposed for offences under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992—1993 to 2007

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Fines imposed

Cruelty to badgers

Average fine amount (£)

355

272

465

266

.516

478

283

213

Number of offenders fined

14

12

13

6

3

4

3

4

Sum of fines imposed (£)

4,970

3,264

6,045

1,596

1,548

1,912

849

852

Not giving up dog for destruction(1)

Average fine amount (£)

51

167

240

200

183

51

41

51

49

Number of offenders fined

9

3

5

2

3

6

14

11

27

Sum of fines imposed (£)

459

501

1,200

400

549

306

574

561

1,323

Lengths of immediate custodial sentences

All offences under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Up to 3 months

1

5

1

2

Include 3 up to 6 months

1

1

3

5

9

2

Total custodial sentences

2

6

3

5

10

4


2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Fines imposed

Cruelty to badgers

Average fine amount (£)

300

1,466

250

2,000

Number of offenders fined

1

3

2

1

Sum of fines imposed (£)

300

4,398

500

2,000

Not giving up dog for destruction(1)

Average fine amount (£)

47

51

51

64

69

78

Number of offenders fined

21

10

7

8

4

4

Sum of fines imposed (£)

987

510

357

512

276

312

Lengths of immediate custodial sentences

All offences under the Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Up to 3 months

3

1

Include 3 up to 6 months

8

1

1

Total custodial sentences

3

1

8

1

1

Notes:
1. The offence of ‘Failing to give up a dog for destruction having custody of a dog whilst disqualified’ is an offence under the Badger Act (1992) and the Dangerous Dogs Act (1991). It has been included in these figures, although it is not possible to tell which Act was intended when sentencing.
2. The statistics are presented on the principal offence basis, where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed, where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe.
3. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system
Source:
OMS Analytical Services, Ministry of Justice

Data on the collection of fines for specific offences are not held, therefore the answer given shows the sum of all fines imposed for offences relating to the Protection of Badgers Act 1992, the actual amount collected is not known. As with all collected fines the receipts are paid into the Consolidated Fund at HM Treasury and are then allocated according to Government spending priorities as part of the spending review process.

Statistics for 2008 will not be available until Sentencing Statistics 2008 is published in late 2009.

Repossession Orders

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many court orders for home repossession have been issued in Eastbourne constituency in each month of the last two years. [257083]

Bridget Prentice: Figures for Eastbourne parliamentary constituency are not available. However, the following table shows the number of mortgage and landlord possession actions in Eastbourne county court.


25 Feb 2009 : Column 851W

The civil procedure rules state that all claims for the repossession of land must be commenced in the district in which the land is situated. However, Eastbourne county court may cover areas other than the Eastbourne constituency. Therefore not all possession actions at this court necessarily relate to Eastbourne constituency.

Court level statistics on mortgage and landlord repossession actions from 1987 to 2008 are available on the Ministry of Justice website at:


Next Section Index Home Page