Previous Section Index Home Page

26 Feb 2009 : Column 1056W—continued


Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the estimated cost of the Terrier programme was on 31 March (a) 2003, (b) 2004, (c) 2005, (d) 2006, (e) 2007 and (f) 2008, broken down by (i) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (ii) indirect resource DEL and (iii) capital DEL. [257770]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information requested is shown in the following table. The figures include the cost of the assessment, demonstration and manufacture phases.

£ million
31 March 2003 31 March 2004 31 March 2005 31 March 2006 31 March 2007 31 March 2008

Direct Resource DEL

17

(1)

19

17

17

17

Indirect Resource DEL

10

(1)

11

8

11

18

Capital DEL

290

(1)

286

288

288

295

Total

317

312

316

313

316

330

(1) Breakdown not available

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the estimated cost of the Typhoon programme was from the (a) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (b) indirect resource DEL and (c) capital DEL at 31 March (i) 2001, (ii) 2002, (iii) 2003, (iv) 2004, (v) 2005, (vi) 2006, (vii) 2007 and (viii) 2008. [257771]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information you requested is shown in the following table, which includes the cost of the assessment, demonstration and manufacture phases.

£ million
As at 31 March: 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Direct Resource DEL

78

78

78

78

78

78

78

78

Indirect Resource DEL

2,469

2,338

2,987

2,328

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Capital DEL

16,400

16,295

16,683

16,686

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

Total

18,947

18,711

19,748

19,092

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1)

(1) The costs of Typhoon for these years are not included as the information is commercially sensitive.

26 Feb 2009 : Column 1057W

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the estimated cost of the Watchkeeper programme was on 31 March (a) 2006, (b) 2007 and (c) 2008, broken down by (i) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (ii) indirect resource DEL and (iii) capital DEL. [257774]


26 Feb 2009 : Column 1058W

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information requested is shown in the following table. The figures include the cost of the assessment, demonstration and manufacture phases.

£ million
31 March 2006 31 March 2007 31 March 2008

Direct Resource DEL

65

65

65

Indirect Resource DEL

60

54

50

Capital DEL

847

847

848

Total

972

966

963


Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the estimated cost of the Sting Ray life extension and capability upgrade programme was on 31 March (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003, (d) 2004, (e) 2005, (f) 2006, (g) 2007 and (h) 2008, broken down by (i) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (ii) indirect resource DEL and (iii) capital DEL. [257777]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information the hon. Member requested is shown in the following table and reflects demonstration and manufacture costs. There were no assessment phase costs, as the equivalent of the assessment phase occurred within a number of studies undertaken between 1993 and 1995, at a cost of £2.6 million, under the wider Sting Ray Post-Design Services contract.

£ million
As at 31 March each year
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Direct Resource DEL

(1)

(1)

0

0

0

0

0

0

Indirect Resource DEL

(1)

(1)

82

54

47

56

51

51

Capital DEL

(1)

(1)

743

740

552

538

526

525

Total

189

190

825

794

599

594

577

576

(1) Breakdown not available.

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the estimated cost of the Type 45 Destroyer programme was on 31 March (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003, (d) 2004, (e) 2005, (f) 2006, (g) 2007 and (h) 2008, broken down by (i) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (ii) indirect resource DEL and (iii) capital DEL. [257778]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information requested is shown in the following table. The figures include the cost of the assessment, demonstration and manufacture phases.

£ million
As at 31 March each year
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Direct Resource DEL

242

454

245

274

272

274

261

261

Indirect Resource DEL

875

646

820

833

797

797

Capital DEL

5837

5045

4649

5136

5033

5234

5638

5638

Total

6079

5499

5769

6056

(1)6126

(1)6342

6696

6696

(1) Due to rounding, the total figure does not equal the sum of the parts.
Note:
Due to rounding, the figure for 2005 and 2006 do not exactly equal the overall total programme cost published in the Major Project Report of the same year.

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the forecast cost of the Future Joint Combat Aircraft programme was from (a) direct resource departmental expenditure limit (DEL), (b) indirect resource DEL and (c) capital DEL at 31 March (i) 2001, (ii) 2002, (iii) 2003, (iv) 2004, (v) 2005, (vi) 2006, (vii) 2007 and (viii) 2008. [257780]

Mr. Quentin Davies: The information requested is shown in the following table. The figures include the cost of the assessment and demonstration phases. JCA has a tailored Main Gate for Demonstration only and approval was for CDEL only. Assessment phase included as RDEL.


26 Feb 2009 : Column 1059W

26 Feb 2009 : Column 1060W
31 March 2001 31 March 2002 31 March 2003 31 March 2004 31 March 2005 31 March 2006 31 March 2007 31 March 2008

Direct Resource RDEL

(1)

144

144

144

144

144

144

144

Indirect Resource DEL

(1)

311

306

194

239

239

287

283

Capital DEL

(1)

2,021

2,021

2,378

1,675

1,677

1,571

1,551

Total

2,380

2,476

2,471

(2)2,716

2,058

2,060

2,002

1,978

(1 )Breakdown not available.
(2 )Due to rounding, the figure does not exactly equal the overall total programme cost published in the Major Project report of the year in question.

Next Section Index Home Page