Tim Loughton:
To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many children who left care in 2008 in each local authority area had had more than ( a) three, (b) five, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 30, (f) 40 and (g) 50 foster placements whilst they were in care. [255711]
An error has been identified in the written answer given to the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham (Tim Loughton) on 12 February 2009. Unfortunately the error occurred as a result of duplicate placement index numbers being counted instead of being removed during the analysis. This error has affected all of the figures provided.
The correct answer should have been:
Beverley Hughes:
Information on the number of children who left care in 2008 in each local authority who had more than (a) three, (b) five, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 30, (f) 40 and (g) 50 foster placements while they were in care in England can be found in the following table.
Children who ceased to be looked after by the number of foster placements while they were in care, by local authority( 1,)()( 2,)()( 3,)()( 4,)()( 5,) year ending 31 March 2008Coverage: England
Number
Number of foster placements during time in care
More than 3
More than 5
More than 10
More than 20
More than 30
More than 40
More than 50
England
3,400
1,500
340
50
10
North East
210
90
20
0
0
Darlington
5
0
0
0
0
0
Durham
35
15
0
0
0
Gateshead
10
0
0
0
0
Hartlepool
10
5
0
0
0
0
Middlesbrough
20
10
0
0
0
0
Newcastle upon Tyne
35
20
0
0
0
0
North Tyneside
20
5
0
0
0
0
Northumberland
15
0
0
0
0
Redcar and Cleveland
15
10
0
0
South Tyneside
15
0
0
0
0
0
Stockton-on-Tees
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
Sunderland
5
0
0
0
0
North West
480
210
50
10
0
Blackburn with Darwen
15
5
0
0
0
0
Blackpool
10
0
0
0
0
0
Bolton
20
5
0
0
0
0
Bury
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
Cheshire
50
25
5
0
Cumbria
35
15
5
0
0
0
Halton
10
5
0
0
0
0
Knowsley
20
15
0
0
Lancashire
65
30
10
0
0
Liverpool
40
15
0
0
Manchester
60
25
0
0
0
0
Oldham
10
5
0
0
0
0
0
Rochdale
10
0
0
0
0
0
Salford
10
5
0
0
0
0
Sefton
5
0
0
0
0
St. Helens
10
0
0
0
0
Stockport
10
0
0
0
0
0
Tameside
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
Trafford
10
0
0
0
0
0
Warrington
0
0
0
0
0
11 Mar 2009 : Column 5MC
11 Mar 2009 : Column 6MC
Wigan
15
10
0
0
0
0
Wirral
30
15
0
0
0
0
Yorkshire and the Humber
310
140
30
0
0
0
Barnsley
5
0
0
0
0
Bradford
35
15
0
0
0
0
Calderdale
20
10
0
0
0
0
Doncaster
25
10
5
0
0
0
0
East Riding of Yorkshire
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Kingston upon Hull, City of
35
15
0
0
0
0
Kirklees
10
0
0
0
0
0
Leeds
60
30
0
0
0
North East Lincolnshire
5
0
0
0
0
0
North Lincolnshire
5
0
0
0
0
0
North Yorkshire
20
10
0
0
0
Rotherham
20
10
0
0
0
0
0
Sheffield
20
10
0
0
0
0
Wakefield
20
5
0
0
0
0
York
15
10
0
0
0
0
East Midlands
250
110
40
0
0
0
Derby
15
10
0
0
0
0
Derbyshire
35
20
10
0
0
0
Leicester
35
15
0
0
0
0
Leicestershire
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
Lincolnshire
40
15
0
0
0
Northamptonshire
40
20
10
0
0
0
Nottingham
35
15
0
0
0
0
Nottinghamshire
25
10
0
0
0
0
Rutland
0
0
0
0
0
0
West Midlands
370
160
50
10
Birmingham
95
45
10
0
0
0
Coventry
30
10
0
0
0
0
Dudley
10
0
0
0
0
Herefordshire
10
0
0
0
0
0
Sandwell
25
10
10
0
0
0
Shropshire
5
0
0
0
0
Solihull
15
0
0
0
0
0
Staffordshire
40
10
0
0
0
0
Stoke-on-Trent
20
10
0
0
0
0
Telford and Wrekin
5
5
0
0
0
Walsall
15
0
0
0
0
0
Warwickshire
45
25
15
5
0
Wolverhampton
25
10
Worcestershire
20
10
0
0
0
0
East of England
360
180
40
0
0
Bedfordshire
10
0
0
0
0
0
Cambridgeshire
15
5
0
0
0
0
Essex
120
60
20
0
0
Hertfordshire
40
15
0
0
0
0
Luton
25
10
0
0
0
0
Norfolk
55
25
0
0
0
0
Peterborough
25
10
0
0
0
0
11 Mar 2009 : Column 7MC
11 Mar 2009 : Column 8MC
Southend-on-Sea
20
15
0
0
0
0
Suffolk
35
20
10
0
0
0
0
Thurrock
20
15
0
0
0
0
London
510
170
30
0
0
0
Inner London
230
80
10
0
0
0
Camden
15
0
0
0
0
0
City of London
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hackney
20
10
0
0
0
0
0
Hammersmith and Fulham
15
0
0
0
0
Haringey
20
10
0
0
0
0
Islington
15
0
0
0
0
Kensington and Chelsea
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lambeth
25
10
0
0
0
0
0
Lewisham
10
0
0
0
0
0
Newham
30
10
0
0
0
0
Southwark
35
15
0
0
0
0
Tower Hamlets
10
0
0
0
0
0
Wandsworth
15
5
0
0
0
Westminster
10
0
0
0
0
0
Outer London
280
100
20
0
0
0
Barking and Dagenham
25
10
0
0
0
Barnet
15
0
0
0
0
Bexley
10
5
0
0
0
0
Brent
30
10
0
0
0
0
0
Bromley
10
0
0
0
0
0
Croydon
25
0
0
0
0
0
Ealing
20
5
0
0
0
0
Enfield
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
Greenwich
25
0
0
0
0
0
Harrow
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
Havering
10
0
0
0
0
0
Hillingdon
20
10
0
0
0
0
Hounslow
10
0
0
0
0
0
Kingston upon Thames
10
0
0
0
0
0
Merton
5
0
0
0
Redbridge
10
0
0
0
0
Richmond upon Thames
0
0
0
0
0
Sutton
15
5
5
0
0
0
0
Waltham Forest
10
5
0
0
0
0
South East
490
210
40
0
Bracknell Forest
5
0
0
0
0
0
Brighton and Hove
35
20
10
0
Buckinghamshire
5
0
0
0
0
0
East Sussex
25
10
0
0
0
0
Hampshire
95
35
5
0
0
0
0
Isle of Wight
20
10
0
0
0
0
Kent
80
30
0
0
0
0
Medway Towns
15
5
0
0
0
0
0
Milton Keynes
25
20
0
0
0
0
Oxfordshire
20
10
0
0
0
0
0
Portsmouth
10
0
0
0
0
11 Mar 2009 : Column 9MC
11 Mar 2009 : Column 10MC
Reading
10
5
0
0
Slough
10
0
0
0
0
Southampton
25
10
0
0
0
0
Surrey
45
20
0
0
0
0
West Berkshire
0
0
0
0
0
West Sussex
50
20
0
0
0
0
Windsor and Maidenhead
0
0
0
0
0
Wokingham
5
0
0
0
0
0
South West
420
200
40
0
0
Bath and North East Somerset
5
0
0
0
0
0
Bournemouth
15
5
0
0
0
0
Bristol, City of
50
25
5
0
0
0
0
Cornwall
40
20
0
0
0
0
Devon
45
20
0
0
0
0
Dorset
15
5
0
0
0
0
Gloucestershire
40
20
0
0
0
0
Isles of Scilly
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
North Somerset
25
10
0
0
0
Plymouth
35
20
0
0
Poole
15
10
0
0
0
0
Somerset
45
25
0
0
0
South Gloucestershire
15
5
0
0
0
0
Swindon
40
25
5
0
0
0
0
Torbay
15
0
0
0
0
0
Wiltshire
15
10
0
0
0
0
(1) Source: SSDA903 return on children looked after. (2) Figures shown are cumulative. (3) The number of foster placements excludes any episodes of care where children were looked after under an agreed series of short term placements. (4) Children who, at the time they ceased to be looked after, were not in a foster care placement but who had previously been placed in foster care, have been included. (5) To ensure that no individual can be identified from statistical tables, we use conventions for the rounding and suppression of very small numbers. National figures have been rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 or to the nearest 10 otherwise. Numbers at local authority level have been rounded to the nearest five and numbers at region level have been rounded to the nearest 10. Numbers of five or less have been suppressed and replaced with a hyphen () except where the number is zero.