Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
16 Mar 2009 : Column 964Wcontinued
The number of reported self-harm incidents in YOIs(2) and resulting hospital visits, involving juveniles and young adults, are detailed in the following table.
(2 )These figures refer to incidents of deliberate self-harm in single-function young offender or juvenile institutions only. They exclude any data from dual-function establishments with official young offender roles.
Young people incidents (15-18 yrs) | Juvenile hospital visits | Hospital visits as a percentage of incidents | Young adult incidents (18-20 yrs) | Young adult hospital visits | Hospital visits as a percentage of incidents | |
Mr. Grieve: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment he has made of the implications for rules relating to evidence and witnesses of the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Al-Khawaja and Tahery v the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement. [263147]
Mr. Straw: We are considering the implications of this judgment and whether or not to request a referral to the Grand Chamber.
Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 4 February 2009, Official Report, column 1219W, what the average time from arrest to sentence for persistent young offenders in Merseyside was in the latest period for which information is available. [262945]
Mr. Hanson: Overall statistics on persistent young offenders (PYOs) for England and Wales and the Merseyside police force area are available from 1997 to 2007.
These figures are designed to measure the speed and efficiency of the youth justice system, through monitoring the pledge to halve the average time from arrest to sentence for dealing with PYOs in England and Wales from 142 days in 1996 to 71 days. They are not designed to measure overall trends in youth crime, and will give a misleading picture of the true trend if used for this purpose.
On 10 December 2008, the Secretary of State for Justice announced in a written ministerial statement that the PYO pledge would be dropped with effect from the end of 2008. This is therefore the last year for which PYO statistics will be published and compiled.
The following table shows the average time from arrest to sentence for persistent young offenders in England and Wales and Merseyside in each year from 1997.
Average time from arrest to sentence for persistent young offenders | ||||
England and Wales | Merseyside police force area | |||
Number of cases heard | Average interval (days) | Number of cases heard | Average interval (days) | |
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) publishes the data in the table as National Statistics. Further information on persistent young offenders can be found on the dedicated page of the MOJ website:
www.justice.gov.uk/publications/averagetime arresttosentencepyo.htm
Mrs. Curtis-Thomas:
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 4 February 2009, Official Report, column 1193W, on young offenders, how many young offenders have been placed on the
intensive supervision and surveillance programme (ISSP) in Merseyside since 2001; and what assessment his Department has made of the comparative (a) costs and (b) re-offending rates arising from (i) ISSP sentences and (ii) custodial sentences. [262946]
Mr. Hanson: A total of 1,294 young offenders have been placed on the Intensive Supervision and Surveillance programme (ISSP) since the programme commenced in Merseyside in July 2001. A detailed breakdown by year and youth offending team in the Merseyside area is provided in the tables.
The cost of ISSP varies from region to region but the Youth Justice Board use an average cost of £8,250 per head. The average annual cost per custodial place at 1 April 2008 is:
Average annual cost per custodial place (£) | |
The Ministry of Justice publishes reoffending data based on disposal and this is available at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reoffending juveniles.htm
ISSP can be attached to a number of community sentences, to the supervision part of a detention and training order, on release from custody imposed for a serious offence or attached as a bail requirement. It is not possible to identify ISSP separately from centrally available data.
Bail | CRO( 1) | SO( 2) | SO/CRO ff bail ISSP( 3) | DTO( 4) | Sec 90-92( 5) | Total | |
(1 )Community Rehabilitation Order (2 )Supervision Order (3 )SO/CRO ISSP given after young offender has completed bail ISSP (4 )Detention and Training Order (ISSP applied after release from custody) (5 )Custodial sentence for most serious offences (ISSP applied after release from custody) |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |