Mr. Gregory Campbell:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she expects work to be completed on the area beneath Lunar House to provide an additional covered queuing area for customers. [268727]
Mr. Woolas:
The UK Border Agency is committed to improving the public queuing area outside Lunar House. The work is intended to provide an enclosed, safe and secure queuing area for customers attending both the Public Enquiry Office and the Asylum Screening Unit. Project managers have already been appointed to consider and specify work options and provide costs for these improvements. The project managers' report is due back within the next few weeks. Once this has been received it is hoped that a decision may then be made to start works on site with a provisional completion date in early 2010. This will be subject to receiving timely landlord's consent for the works to be undertaken and planning approval from the local authority.
Malicious Communications Act 1988: Prosecutions
Mr. Amess:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prosecutions of (a) men and (b) women in each age group have taken place under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 in each 20 Apr 2009 : Column 187W
police force area in each year since the Act came into force; and how many of those prosecutions related to anti-Semitic material. [268583]
Mr. Woolas:
Data provided by the Ministry of Justice, showing the number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act in England and Wales, by police force area, sex and age, from 2002 to 2007 are in the following table. Court proceedings data for 2008 will be available in the autumn of 2009. The data provided cannot separately identify court proceedings relating to anti-Semitic material
20 Apr 2009 : Column 188W
The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.
Earlier data on prosecutions under the Act are not available because before 2002, data on this offence were reported to the Ministry of Justice as a part of a miscellaneous group which could not be separated.
Number of persons proceeded against under the 1988 Malicious Communications Act, broken down by police force area, sex and age, England and Wales, 2002 to 2007( 1,)()( 2)
Force
Sex
Age
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Avon and Somerset
Male
10 to 17
2
1
18 and over
1
3
5
6
8
Total
1
3
5
8
9
Female
10 to 17
1
2
1
18 and over
1
2
4
Total
1
1
4
5
Total
1
3
1
6
12
14
Bedfordshire
Male
18 and over
3
3
Total
3
3
Total
3
3
Cambridgeshire
Male
18 and over
2
1
Total
2
1
Female
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
Total
3
2
Cheshire
Male
18 and over
1
1
3
4
Total
1
1
3
4
Female
18 and over
2
Total
2
Total
1
1
5
4
City of London
Male
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
Total
1
1
Cleveland
Male
18 and over
2
1
2
Total
2
1
2
Total
2
1
2
Cumbria
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
1
2
1
4
2
Total
1
1
2
1
4
3
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
2
1
2
1
Total
3
1
2
1
Total
4
2
2
3
4
4
Derbyshire
Male
18 and over
1
1
2
6
Total
1
1
2
6
20 Apr 2009 : Column 189W
20 Apr 2009 : Column 190W
Female
10 to 17
1
1
18 and over
1
Total
1
1
1
Total
2
1
3
7
Devon and Cornwall
Male
10 to 17
1
2
2
18 and over
2
3
3
1
5
9
Total
2
3
3
2
7
11
Female
10 to 17
1
1
18 and over
1
1
3
3
1
Total
1
1
3
4
2
Total
3
4
6
6
7
13
Dorset
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
Total
2
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
1
2
Durham
Male
18 and over
1
3
Total
1
3
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
1
4
Essex
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
2
1
4
7
2
Total
1
2
1
4
8
2
Female
18 and over
1
2
Total
1
2
Total
2
2
1
4
8
4
Gloucestershire
Male
18 and over
3
1
1
1
1
Total
3
1
1
1
1
Total
3
1
1
1
1
Greater Manchester
Male
10 to 17
1
1
1
1
18 and over
1
3
3
3
7
7
Total
1
4
3
4
8
8
Female
18 and over
1
2
2
Total
1
2
2
Total
1
4
3
5
10
10
Hampshire
Male
10 to 17
1
1
18 and over
1
3
1
2
7
Total
1
3
1
3
8
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
Total
1
1
Total
1
4
2
3
8
Hertfordshire
Male
10 to 17
1
1
4
18 and over
1
5
1
3
10
9
20 Apr 2009 : Column 191W
20 Apr 2009 : Column 192W
Total
1
6
1
4
10
13
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
3
Total
1
1
3
Total
1
6
1
5
11
16
Humberside
Male
10 to 17
1
1
18 and over
1
1
5
3
4
Total
1
1
6
4
4
Total
1
1
6
4
4
Kent
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
2
1
1
2
Total
2
1
2
2
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
2
1
2
1
2
Lancashire
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
2
2
2
6
Total
1
2
2
1
2
6
Female
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
Total
2
2
2
1
2
7
Leicestershire
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
2
2
7
13
1
Total
2
3
7
13
1
Female
18 and over
1
1
1
Total
1
1
1
Total
3
4
8
13
1
Lincolnshire
Male
18 and over
1
1
1
5
4
Total
1
1
1
5
4
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
3
1
Total
4
1
Total
1
1
1
9
5
Merseyside
Male
18 and over
1
5
Total
1
5
Total
1
5
Metropolitan Police
Male
10 to 17
1
2
1
1
18 and over
14
14
20
16
15
26
Total
14
15
22
17
15
27
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
4
3
2
3
1
Total
4
3
2
4
1
Total
18
18
24
21
15
28
Norfolk
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
3
3
Total
1
3
3
1
20 Apr 2009 : Column 193W
20 Apr 2009 : Column 194W
Total
1
3
3
1
North Yorkshire
Male
18 and over
1
1
10
Total
1
1
10
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
Total
1
1
Total
2
1
11
Northamptonshire
Female
18 and over
2
Total
2
Total
2
Northumbria
Male
10 to 17
2
18 and over
1
1
2
3
5
10
Total
1
1
2
3
5
12
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
2
5
Total
1
2
5
Total
1
1
2
4
7
17
Nottinghamshire
Male
10 to 17
3
18 and over
1
1
3
4
1
4
Total
1
1
3
4
4
4
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
1
1
3
4
4
5
South Yorkshire
Male
18 and over
2
1
3
Total
2
1
3
Total
2
1
3
Staffordshire
Male
18 and over
1
3
4
3
3
Total
1
3
4
3
3
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
1
4
4
3
3
Suffolk
Male
10 to 17
1
2
18 and over
2
3
5
3
Total
2
3
1
5
5
Female
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
1
Total
2
4
2
5
6
Surrey
Male
18 and over
2
5
3
Total
2
5
3
Total
2
5
3
Sussex
Male
18 and over
1
Total
1
Female
18 and over
1
2
Total
1
2
20 Apr 2009 : Column 195W
20 Apr 2009 : Column 196W
Total
1
3
Thames Valley
Male
18 and over
6
9
5
5
6
Total
6
9
5
5
6
Female
18 and over
2
1
1
2
Total
2
1
1
2
Total
6
11
6
6
8
Warwickshire
Male
18 and over
1
2
2
Total
1
2
2
Female
10 to 17
1
Total
1
Total
1
3
2
West Mercia
Male
18 and over
1
2
3
4
9
Total
1
2
3
4
9
Female
18 and over
1
1
1
Total
1
1
1
Total
1
3
4
5
9
West Midlands
Male
10 to 17
1
1
1
18 and over
7
3
5
5
10
7
Total
7
4
5
6
10
8
Female
18 and over
2
2
1
Total
2
2
1
Total
7
4
5
8
12
9
West Yorkshire
Male
18 and over
3
1
6
11
Total
3
1
6
11
Female
18 and over
1
2
Total
1
2
Total
3
1
1
6
13
Wiltshire
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
5
Total
1
6
Female
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
Total
1
1
1
6
Dyfed-Powys
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
2
2
1
1
Total
2
2
1
2
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
2
2
2
2
Gwent
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
1
3
3
5
Total
1
3
3
6
Female
18 and over
1
Total
1
Total
1
4
3
6
20 Apr 2009 : Column 197W
20 Apr 2009 : Column 198W
North Wales
Male
18 and over
1
1
1
3
2
Total
1
1
1
3
2
Female
18 and over
2
2
Total
2
2
Total
3
1
1
5
2
South Wales
Male
10 to 17
1
18 and over
4
2
1
1
1
Total
4
2
2
1
1
Female
18 and over
1
1
Total
1
1
Total
4
2
3
2
1
England and Wales
Male
10 to 17
4
4
9
11
21
18 and over
53
66
78
87
144
194
Total
53
70
82
96
155
215
Female
10 to 17
2
1
1
5
5
3
18 and over
11
7
16
20
22
33
Total
13
8
17
25
27
36
Total
66
78
99
121
182
251
(1 )The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe. (2) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. Source:
Evidence and Analysis UnitOffice for Criminal Justice Reform