Previous Section Index Home Page

20 Apr 2009 : Column 230W—continued


Vetting: Standards

Tom Brake: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average time was for each police force to release (a) a standard disclosure and (b) an enhanced disclosure as part of Criminal Records Bureau checks in the latest period for which information is available. [268421]

Mr. Malik: Only enhanced disclosures are sent to police forces as part of the Disclosure Service. Data concerning the average time taken to complete a disclosure by police force area are not a performance target and are not collated by the CRB. Comparative police force performance data can be found on the CRB website at

Average figures do not give an accurate indication of performance, since any force's performance can be affected by a number of factors; the volume of cases sent to a force to process in any given month, the number of staff available to process the checks and the IT resources on hand to forces. With these variables, performance can fluctuate within individual forces from one month to the next.

Written Questions: Government Responses

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when she plans to answer Question 250112, on Operation Pentameter, tabled by my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve) on 19 January 2009. [264897]

Jacqui Smith: My hon. Friend the Under-Secretary (Mr. Campbell) replied on 26 March 2009, Official Report, column 650W.

Children, Schools and Families

Building Schools for the Future Programme

Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much funding has been allocated to each school under the Building Schools for the Future programme to date. [268367]


20 Apr 2009 : Column 231W

Jim Knight: In Building Schools for the Future, funding is allocated to local authorities and not directly to schools. Local authorities take decisions on how to allocate this funding to their schools in accordance with local need. The following table shows the funding which has been allocated to authorities which have reached financial close in their BSF projects.

Funding
£000
Local authority project Conventional PFI credits Total

Bristol ph 1 (Wave 1)

7,598

157,173

164,771

Manchester

201,644

0

201,644

Greenwich

57,226

183,510

240,736

Bradford ph 1 (Wave 1)

9,461

111,904

121,365

Lancashire ph 1

4,183

94,812

98,995

Lambeth

87,123

0

87,123

Leeds ph 1

37,877

143,500

181,377

Solihull

29,536

86,790

116,326

Newcastle ph 1

36,856

51,706

88,562

Sheffield ph 1 (Wave 1)

22,721

88,999

111,720

Waltham Forest ph 1

38,321

29,078

67,399

Knowsley

3,508

249,984

253,492

Lancashire ph2a

3,098

75,049

78,147

Leicester ph 1

33,977

63,233

97,210

Lewisham ph 1 (Wave 1)

17,793

118,968

136,761

STaG phl

14,042

31,504

45,546

Leeds ph2

48,688

42,243

90,931

Sunderland ph 1

60,193

0

60,193

Westminster ph 1

71,892

0

71,892

Nottingham

146,325

75,913

222,238

Lancashire ph2b

1,679

45,461

47,140

Islington ph 1

40,051

64,460

104,511

Kent ph 1

130,698

98,840

229,538

Liverpool

17,747

0

17,747

Hackney

63,062

0

63,062

Middlesbrough

44,340

0

63,062

Newham

35,002

66,484

101,486

Tower Hamlets

50,640

0

50,640

Tameside

40,371

49,706

90,077

Haringey

64,770

0

64,770

Total closed phases—as at 31 March 2009

1,420,422

1,929,317

3,349,739


Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his latest estimate is of expenditure on the Building Schools for the Future programme in (a) 2008-09, (b) 2009-10 and (c) 2010-11. [268369]

Jim Knight: The following table shows the latest estimate of expenditure on the Building Schools for the Future programme. These estimates may change as projects progress through the procurement phase and into construction.

£ billion
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11

Capital grant

0.7

2.0

2.3

Notes:
1. These figures include estimated expenditure on academies delivered through the Partnerships for Schools national framework.
2. Capital grant payments are made following the financial close of the project in accordance with construction payment milestones.

In addition, we expect to allocate £3.9 billion PFI credits to projects in this period. Credits are allocated following approval of the project’s outline business
20 Apr 2009 : Column 232W
case, but the revenue payments to local authorities to which they relate are not made until the new school building is completed.

Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which banks are involved in the Building Schools for the Future programme. [268477]

Jim Knight: The following list sets out (i) financial institutions that are involved in BSF schemes that have already reached financial close; and (ii) financial institutions who are in the market to finance BSF schemes that have not yet reached financial close.

Funding to BSF schemes that have reached financial close:

In the market to fund BSF schemes that have not yet reached financial close:

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families which local authorities he expects to join the Building Schools for the Future programme after 2010; and if he will make a statement. [268677]

Sarah McCarthy-Fry: On 2 March 2009, the indicative revised prioritisation of Building Schools for the Future (BSF) was published, based on the revised expressions of interest which authorities provided in November 2008. Partnerships for Schools (PfS) the body which assists local authorities procure their BSF investment, is already engaging with authorities to discuss their readiness to deliver. No project will formally enter BSF until PfS is satisfied that there is robust evidence that the authority is ready to deliver. It has therefore not yet been decided which will be the next authorities to enter the programme after 2010-11.


20 Apr 2009 : Column 233W

Children: Autism

Mr. Marsden: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the average age at which a child receives a diagnosis of autism was in the latest period for which figures are available. [268161]

Phil Hope: I have been asked to reply.

This information is not collected centrally.

In 2001, the Medical Research Council (MRC) undertook the first comprehensive review of the UK research into autism, called the MRC Review of Autism Research and is still considered to be a leading source of information about the causes and epidemiology of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).

The review report states at page 15:


Next Section Index Home Page