Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
28 Apr 2009 : Column 1215Wcontinued
The Solicitor-General:
The CPS holds a record of the number of defendants prosecuted for racist hate crimes.
The following table shows the number of such proceedings completed during each year for which figures are available, together with the outcome of proceedings. Outcomes are divided into conviction, including guilty pleas as well as convictions after trial, and unsuccessful outcomes, representing all outcomes other than a conviction.
CPS records are not held by parliamentary constituency, but according to the organisation unit of the service responsible for conducting the prosecution.
Separate figures are shown for north-east Essex, for CPS Essex, and for England. In addition, the table also shows figures for England and Wales in total.
Convictions | Unsuccessful | ||||
Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | Total | |
Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development how many officials in his Department are suspended; how many are suspended on full pay; for how long each has been suspended; and what the reasons are for each such suspension. [270522]
Mr. Michael Foster: There are no officials suspended.
The Department for International Development's (DFID) detailed Disciplinary Procedure and Guidance notes are held on the internal website. All staff have access to the website.
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development whether officials in his Department who have lost laptops that were the property of his Department in the last 12 months have been charged the full value of replacement. [266230]
Mr. Michael Foster: The Department for International Development's policy is that staff are only charged for the cost of replacing laptops if it is established that the member of staff was negligent. No staff have been charged for the cost of a replacement laptop in the last 12 months.
Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development which non-governmental organisations have received funds from the public purse to conduct aid work in Afghanistan in the last five years; and how much each received. [270472]
Mr. Michael Foster: For security reasons it is not possible to name the individual non-governmental organisations (NGOs) receiving direct funding from the Department for International Development (DFID).
DFID has allocated the following amounts directly to NGOs over the last five years:
Funding provided | |
£ | |
(1) No direct support to NGOs |
Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development which non-governmental organisations have received funds from the public purse to conduct aid work in Sudan in the last five years; and how much each received. [270475]
Mr. Michael Foster: The Department for International Development (DFID) has indirectly funded non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to carry out development and humanitarian work in Sudan through a number of channels: UN agencies that use NGOs as implementing partners for UN programmes; NGOs with which DFID has agreed Partnership Programme Arrangements; and pooled multilateral funds managed by the UN or World Bank that have disbursed to NGOs. Our total contributions to pooled multilateral funds for 2004-05 and 2008-09 are as follows:
Pooled fundingmultilateral | |
£ million | |
DFID provides funds directly to NGOs under the Basic Services Fund for South Sudan; for programme delivery such as elections or disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) support; and through bilateral partnerships. DFID has funded the following organisations in this way between 2004-05 and 2008-09:
Next Section | Index | Home Page |