Previous Section Index Home Page

15 May 2009 : Column 1021W—continued

Motor Vehicles: Manufacturing Industries

Mr. Drew: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what his policy is on its payment of wage contributions to
15 May 2009 : Column 1022W
workers in the automotive industry on short-time working who are undertaking retraining in their own time. [275131]

Ian Pearson: The Government fully appreciate the difficulties that the automotive industry is experiencing during the current economic downturn.

While we are supporting a range of automotive support initiatives, we do not believe that introducing a general wage subsidy for all employers is a feasible, cost effective and sustainable option for the UK. Past experience in the UK when running a wage subsidy programme in the 1970s was that wage subsidies acted to create distortions and perverse incentives for other sectors and companies to bargain for subsidies.

We believe that the future success of British industry will be based on a highly skilled workforce, and where production is being reduced we are helping business train their workforces to ensure they emerge from the economic downturn in the best possible shape to compete in the future.

Automotive companies can access funding for training from Government and the Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies. Following demand from the automotive industry for this support, funding under the “Train To Gain” scheme for the sector has been increased substantially up to £100 million from the original budget of £65 million.

Tourism: Finance

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps his Department takes to monitor the effectiveness of spending by regional development agencies on the development of the tourism industry. [270403]

Mr. McFadden: BERR and other Government Departments are involved in development of each RDA’s Regional Economic Strategy (RES) and in approving each region’s Corporate Plan. The plans are reviewed to ensure that the RDAs deliver against ministerial priorities and priorities identified in the RES.

The RDAs took on strategic responsibility for tourism development in the regions in 2003, and have developed tourism strategies and delivery structures in line with their RES. DCMS works with the RDAs in advancing and assessing progress on key strategic objectives through:


15 May 2009 : Column 1023W

Children, Schools and Families

Class Sizes

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the average (a) infant, (b) primary and (c) secondary class sizes in the 20 local authority areas of (i) highest and (ii) lowest deprivation in the last period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. [262821]

Jim Knight: The requested information is shown in the table.


15 May 2009 : Column 1024W
Average class sizes( 1 ) as at January 2008 in England, by local authority

Key s tage( 1,2) Maintained p rimary( 3) State-funded s econdary( 3,4)

England

25.7

26.2

20.9

20 Local authority areas with the highest level of deprivation(5)

Liverpool

24.3

24.6

19.2

Hackney

26.5

25.8

20.9

Tower Hamlets

27.7

26.3

21.1

Manchester

26.1

26.6

21.3

Knowsley

24.8

25.7

20.5

Newham

27.1

26.8

23.1

Islington

25.1

25.5

22.1

Middlesbrough

22.5

23.5

19.3

Birmingham

27.1

26.8

20.5

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

25.2

25.7

22.0

Blackpool

27.1

27.8

22.0

Nottingham

24.7

25.7

19.4

Sandwell

26.5

26.7

20.6

Salford

25.0

26.0

20.9

Stoke-on-Trent

26.0

26.5

21.4

Blackburn with Darwen

26.4

27.1

21.4

Haringey

27.8

27.5

19.4

Lambeth

27.3

25.9

20.4

Leicester

24.8

24.9

22.5

Barking and Dagenham

27.0

26.9

19.9

20 Local Authority Areas with the lowest level of deprivation(5)

West Sussex

26.1

26.6

21.2

Kingston upon Thames

28.2

27.1

20.4

City of London

30.0

24.8

n/a

Bedfordshire

24.3

24.5

21.4

Hertfordshire

26.6

26.7

20.0

Cambridgeshire

26.3

27.0

22.0

Bath and North East Somerset

26.0

26.0

20.2

Oxfordshire

24.6

25.6

20.5

Leicestershire

25.1

25.9

22.1

Hampshire

26.3

27.0

22.1

Wiltshire

24.9

25.7

20.7

South Gloucestershire

25.4

26.5

20.1

Richmond upon Thames

28.0

26.5

23.5

Buckinghamshire

25.1

25.6

20.6

Bracknell Forest

26.8

26.8

21.2

Windsor and Maidenhead

24.0

25.5

20.0

West Berkshire

25.0

25.2

19.1

Surrey

26.8

27.0

21.7

Rutland

25.3

25.2

23.8

Wokingham

24.8

26.3

19.7

n/a=. Not Applicable
(1) Classes taught by 1 teacher.
(2) Includes reception classes.
(3) Includes middle schools as deemed.
(4) Includes Academies and City Technology Colleges.
(5) Ranked according to the indices of multiple deprivation.
Source:
School Census

Education

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much funding his Department plans to allocate to each local authority for discharging responsibilities which were formerly those of the Learning and Skills Council in each of the next five years. [275072]

Jim Knight: I refer the hon. Member to the reply given on 5 May 2009, Official Report, columns 150-54W. This set out the number of posts we expect to transfer to each local authority from the Learning and Skills Council, subject to the passage of the Apprenticeships, Learning and Skills Bill. We are currently working with the LSC to determine how much funding will transfer to local authorities with each post from April 2010.

Education: Assessments

Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the cost to his Department of examination fees for each type of examination in maintained schools was in each of the last 10 years. [274582]

Jim Knight: The Department began collecting information in sufficient detail to answer this question in 2002-03. No comparable data are available for previous years. The information in the table covers the combined costs of all relevant examination entry fees, including GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs, and any accreditation costs related to pupils. We do not collect separate data on each type of exam.

Financial year Examination fees (E21)( 1) (£)( 2)

2002-03

155,611,000

2003-04

173,843,000

2004-05

198,227,000

2005-06

220,056,000

2006-07

240,861,000

2007-08(3)

265,305,000

(1) Includes expenditure by local authority maintained schools in England on the costs of examination entry fees, and costs of accreditation related to pupils (the payments centres make to awarding bodies to register with them to take their qualification). This includes GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs and covers administrative costs e.g. external marking; it excludes the cost of exam resources, such as the test papers themselves.
(2) Figures are rounded to the nearest £000.
(3) 2007-08 data remain provisional and subject to change.
Source:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/localauthorities/section52/subPage.cfm?action=section52.default&;ID=58
(Budget Data Archive)

Next Section Index Home Page