Previous Section Index Home Page

15 May 2009 : Column 1105W—continued

Road Traffic

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what recent research his Department has (a) commissioned and (b) evaluated on the effects of traffic congestion on the environment. [275530]

Paul Clark: The Department for Transport has commissioned research into assessing the cost of transport's impact on the natural landscape. The results of phases 1 and 2 of the study are reported on the Department's website at:

In addition the Highways Agency is developing a methodology to account for the changes to the quantity of vehicle emissions that affect air quality that can result from major roads schemes.

Also, the Department is collaborating with DEFRA to manage research that DEFRA has commissioned to investigate the health impacts of environmental noise. Although the remit of the study is not confined to transport, it is recognised that transport is a major source of noise exposure to those who live or work near roads.

Although not recent, from 1998 to 2004 the Department ran a research programme—TRAffic Management and Air Quality research (TRAMAQ)—looking at the impact of traffic management schemes on air quality. Details of this can be found on the Department's website at:

There is also recently commissioned related research that is looking at the impacts, including environmental ones, of smarter choices, cycling initiatives, and sustainable travel measures generally.

Treasury

Annuities

Jo Swinson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what recent assessment he has made of the merits of removing the requirement for pensioners to buy annuities at the age of 75 years; [275672]

(2) with reference to the answer by the Leader of the House. 15 October 2008, Official Report, column 791, on pensions, what the outcome has been of discussions
15 May 2009 : Column 1106W
between his Department and the Department for Work and Pensions on the requirement on pensioners to annuitise pensions at the age of 75 years. [275627]

Ian Pearson: There is no requirement to annuitise at any age. Rather there is a requirement that an income be taken from pension savings by age 75.

The Government have considered this requirement to secure an income from a pension fund at age 75 in light of recent conditions in financial markets but has no plans to change it. 95 per cent. of people take an income from their pension savings by the age of 70.

The current rules already allow a considerable degree of flexibility. A pension income can currently commence at any time between the ages of 50 and 75, and can be taken from a pension fund without annuitising, through income drawdown. Even at 75, it is not compulsory to annuitise; alternatively secured pensions are available for those for whom they are suitable and who do not wish to buy an annuity.

Autism

Mr. Hands: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what guests were invited to the autism reception held at 11 Downing Street on 5 May 2009. [274673]

Angela Eagle: Invitations were issued by “Autism Speaks”—who hosted the reception—and not by HM Treasury.

Bank of England Act 1998

Mr. Amess: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the operation of the Bank of England Act 1998; what recent representations he has received about this Act; and what (a) statutory instruments, (b) departmental circulars and (c) other documents he (i) has issued since October 2008 and (ii) plans to issue in the next 12 months consequent on the provisions of the Act. [274018]

Ian Pearson: The Treasury reviews regularly the legislative framework for which it is responsible. It receives representations from a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government’s practice to provide details of all such representations.

The Banking Act 2009, which received Royal Assent on 12 February this year, includes provisions to amend the Bank of England Act 1998 and enables secondary legislation in relation to the role of the Bank. All such legislation is available from the Office of Public Sector Information:

Information published by the Treasury in relation to Part II of the Bank of England Act 1998 (Monetary Policy) can be found on its website, as can Treasury press releases relating to Bank of England appointments made under the Act:


15 May 2009 : Column 1107W

Mr. Amess: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many officials in his Department at each pay band have responsibility for the (a) formulation and (b) implementation of policy on the Bank of England Act 1998; what other posts in his Department each such official has held; and if he will make a statement. [274019]

Ian Pearson: The Treasury has a broad range of policy interests related to the Bank of England Act 1998, and flexes the related resources as required. Overall, at 1 April 2008, the Treasury Group had 1,451 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff. Further information regarding Treasury staffing can be found in its latest annual report available at

Child Tax Credit: Underpayments

Mr. Laurence Robertson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the amount of child tax allowance which was underpaid to married men in 2008-09; and if he will make a statement. [275899]

Ian Pearson: The information requested is not available as HM Revenue and Customs do not hold information on marital status.

Mr. Laurence Robertson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer up to what date reviews of an individual's child tax allowance could be requested; and if he will make a statement. [275900]

Ian Pearson: Information concerning tax credits customers' appeal rights can be found in the HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) leaflet WTC/AP “How to appeal against a tax credits decision or award” which is available on the internet at:

HMRC is statutorily allowed to examine the correctness of a tax credits claim after it has been finalised. Those powers include time limits for opening an enquiry although there are certain circumstances in which it will still be possible to reconsider a claim for any year after those time limits have expired. Further information can be found in the HMRC Claimant Compliance Manual published on the internet at:

Debts

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what recent assessment he has made of the effect on the economy of the level of personal debt; and if he will make a statement. [274620]

Ian Pearson: HM Treasury continually monitors the levels of both household liabilities and assets, and the implications of these for the wider economy are examined as part of the pre-Budget report and Budget forecasting process.


15 May 2009 : Column 1108W

Departmental Absenteeism

Mr. Hands: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many staff of his Department were recorded absent for non-medical reasons on (a) 2 February 2009 and (b) 3 February 2009; what estimate he has made of the (i) cost to his Department and (ii) number of working hours lost due to such absence; and what guidance his Department issued to staff in respect of absence on these days. [260470]

Angela Eagle: Treasury guidance ensures that staff attendance and absence are managed locally by line managers with their staff. Flexible working arrangements ensure that many staff have the capacity to work from home when transport or other disruptions occur.

Details of the number or cost of staff taking leave or applying flexible working arrangements on any particular day could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Contracts

Bob Spink: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer which services his Department has outsourced in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. [274442]

Angela Eagle: The Treasury has not outsourced any services within the past five years.

Departmental Disciplinary Proceedings

Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many officials in (a) his Department and (b) HM Revenue and Customs are suspended; how many are suspended on full pay; for how long each has been suspended; and what the reasons are for each such suspension. [270525]

Angela Eagle: Both the Treasury and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have well-established processes for dealing with staff disciplinary investigations, and both Departments work from the presumption that the conduct of an investigation, and any suspension from duty applied, does not imply that any wrongdoing or disciplinary conduct has taken place. Both have a policy to maintain staff on full pay while suspended unless there are compelling reasons to suspend without pay.

As a smaller Department, it is not the Treasury’s practice to comment on investigations, including whether or not a suspension has been applied, as to do so might compromise the outcome of current or future investigations.

Currently 22 HMRC staff are suspended, eight of those have been suspended for up to three months, three for three to six months, seven for seven to 12 months, two for 17 months, one for 25 months and one for 26 months. These suspensions have been applied because staff are under police investigation for matters in their private lives, because they are under criminal investigation by HMRC’s internal investigators, or because they are under investigation for potentially serious disciplinary offences.

Both Departments keep their disciplinary policies under review.


15 May 2009 : Column 1109W

Imports: Drugs

Harry Cohen: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what steps HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has taken in respect of the import of pharmaceutical products ordered over the internet which are deemed dangerous to public health; how many prosecutions have been bought in respect of illicit imports in the last five years; and what discussions HMRC has had with overseas administrations on the issue. [272626]

Dawn Primarolo: I have been asked to reply.

In the United Kingdom, strict legal controls apply to the retail sale and supply of medicines and these controls apply equally to medicines sold via the internet.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for enforcing medicines legislation and can take enforcement action against breaches of that legislation in the UK. During the last five years, 18 successful prosecutions have been brought involving medicines being traded illegally over the internet.

Medicines that are brought into the UK by an individual for his or her own personal use, including those purchased via the internet, are not subject to the controls of medicines legislation.

We are aware that considerable illegal activity takes place through websites hosted abroad and outside UK control. The MHRA works closely with European Union and other international regulatory authorities to ensure that, wherever possible, offending websites are amended to reflect the law. MHRA also participates in cross-Government and international groups set up to explore how best to combat internet issues, and exchange intelligence.

Members: Correspondence

Sir Michael Spicer: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he plans to reply to the letter of 17 March 2009 from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire on leading bankers, PO reference: 1/69395/2009. [275675]

Ian Pearson: A reply has been sent to the hon. Member.

Sir Michael Spicer: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the Economic Secretary to the Treasury plans to reply to the letter of 17 March 2009 from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire on the reduction of income derived from pensioners savings, PO reference: 5/04517/2009. [275676]

Ian Pearson: I have replied to the hon. Member.

Sir Michael Spicer: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when he will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire dated 19 February 2009, on national saving accounts, PO reference: 1/67675/2009. [275839]

Ian Pearson: I have replied to the hon. Member.


15 May 2009 : Column 1110W

Revenue and Customs: Closures

Mr. Timpson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for what reasons HM Customs and Excise’s offices in (a) Bangor, (b) Bedford and (c) Doncaster were withdrawn from the Workforce Change programme. [273641]

Mr. Timms [holding answer 8 May 2009]: The decisions to vacate HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) offices in Bangor, Bedford and Doncaster were among those announced in December 2008 at the conclusion of HMRC’s Workforce Change regional review programme to match HMRC’s estate to future business needs. Those decisions have not changed.

While HMRC has looked again at the timing of closures of a number of its offices in the light of budgetary constraints, the aim is still to close them in 2010-11. Full vacation of Ty Glyn, Bangor, and Weston House, Doncaster, originally expected by the end of 2009-10, has now been deferred until after 2009-10. The intention to vacate Portman House, Bedford, by spring 2011 remains unchanged.

Revenue and Customs: Crewe

Mr. Timpson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer for how long HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will remain contracted to Mapeley in respect of the HMRC office at Crewe House, Crewe. [275955]

Ian Pearson: HM Revenue and Customs’ (HMRC) office at Crewe House, Crewe was included in the Strategic Transfer of the Estate to the Private Sector (STEPS) outsourcing deal with Mapeley in April 2001. The STEPS contract is for a term of 20 years from 2001. However, there is flexibility within the contract for HMRC to fully or partially vacate properties prior to the contract expiry date in 2021. HMRC will remain contracted to Mapeley in respect of Crewe House until it vacates and the appropriate contractual vacation notice expires.

Mr. Timpson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 11 May 2009, Official Report, column 541W, on HM Revenue and Customs in Crewe, how much he estimates will accrue in each category of the proposed savings of £230 million to arise from the vacation of two floors of the HM Revenue and Customs offices at Crewe House, Crewe. [276014]

Ian Pearson: HM Revenue and Customs is unable to disclose the specific estate savings for Crewe House, Crewe on grounds of commercial sensitivity.

Stamp Duty Land Tax

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much the stamp duty land tax holiday is estimated to have cost the Exchequer at the latest date for which information is available. [275772]

Ian Pearson: The estimated cost of the stamp duty land tax holiday in 2008-09 and the cost for 2009-10 up to 3 September 2009, the original date for the end of the holiday, was published in the PBR 2008 report at:


15 May 2009 : Column 1111W

A revised estimate for the cost of the stamp duty land tax holiday in 2009-10, to 3 September 2009, was published in table A2 of the Budget 2009 report at:


Next Section Index Home Page