Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
29 Jun 2009 : Column 102Wcontinued
In 2008-09 28 staff also had Disclosure Scotland clearance.
Please note the figures for 2005-06 and 2006-07 are not fully verifiable so the figures provided are based on the best available data.
Mrs. Curtis-Thomas: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many parents in (a) Merseyside and (b) Crosby have appeared in court on charges related to the unauthorised absence from school of their child in the last (i) six, (ii) 12 and (iii) 24 months. [282526]
Mr. Coaker: I have been asked to reply.
The Department has policy responsibility for school attendance and the Ministry of Justice is responsible for the collection of prosecution data where parents have failed to ensure their children's regular school attendance. I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given on 16 June, Official Report, column 242W.
Paul Holmes: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many people under the age of 16 years have been issued with a penalty notice for disorder for each category of offence for which such notices are issued. [278450]
Mr. Straw: PNDs for young persons under the age of 16 were piloted for a year from July 2005 in six police force areas (Merseyside, Lancashire, Essex, Nottingham, west midlands (including West Midlands British Transport Police) and the Metropolitan Police (Kingston Division)). The most recent published data on the number of PNDs issued, by area and offence from the pilots are set out in the following tables.
The evaluation report on penalty notices for disorder (PNDs) for 10 to 15-year-olds was published on 5 November 2008. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House.
West midlands + BTP | Essex | All areas | |
Delivering alcohol to person under 18 or allowing such delivery | |||
Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many times a hearing at each asylum and immigration tribunal was adjourned for each reason for adjournment, in the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. [282245]
Bridget Prentice: For the financial year 2008-09, 12,063 substantive Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) hearings were adjourned from a total of 126,541 substantive hearings. The following table details the reasons for each adjournment.
The table includes a significant number of cases adjourned for a further reconsideration hearing. Once a reconsideration application has been granted, there is a first stage hearing to ascertain whether an error in law has occurred. If a material error of law is found, the case is officially adjourned, and there is a second stage hearing after which the AIT substitutes a fresh decision to allow or dismiss the appeal.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |