Previous Section Index Home Page

30 Jun 2009 : Column 230W—continued

Departmental Press

Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what (a) newspapers and (b) periodicals are delivered to the private office of each Minister in his Department; and at what cost in the latest period for which figures are available. [279423]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: Attached is a list of newspapers and periodicals delivered to the private office of each Minister in the Department.

The overall cost of newspapers and periodicals delivered to the Ministers' office, for financial year 2008-09, was £6,851.21.

List of newspapers and periodicals delivered to each Minister's private office at the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Ed Balls

Sarah McCarthy-Fry/Andrew Adonis


30 Jun 2009 : Column 231W

Beverley Hughes

Baroness Morgan of Drefelin/Kevin Brennan

Jim Knight shared newspapers with Sarah McCarthy-Fry/Andrew Adonis' private office

EC Law

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the proportion of statutory obligations provided for by legislation on matters for which his
30 Jun 2009 : Column 232W
Department is responsible which were introduced as a consequence of obligations arising from EU legislation in the latest period for which figures are available. [281870]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: The Department for Children, Schools and Families has not carried out an estimate of the proportion of statutory obligations deriving from EU law within its policy remit. The key policy areas within the Department's remit (education in schools, children's social care and substantive family law) fall outside community competence.

European Union: Primary Education

Philip Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what information about the EU his Department provides to primary schools for teaching purposes. [282424]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: The Department does not provide information about the European Union to schools. The proposed new primary curriculum, which is being consulted on, will provide opportunities for children to learn about Europe and the European Union. For example pupils should be taught about links between local, British, European and world history.

Further Education

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of year 11 pupils (a) entitled to and (b) not entitled to free school meals who achieved at least five GCSEs at grades A* to C, including English and mathematics in (i) 2004, (ii) 2005 and (iii) 2006, achieved a level 3 qualification within two years of completing their GCSEs; and if he will make a statement. [280172]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: The information requested is shown in the following table. The higher progression rate to Level 3 at 18 among those not eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) who had gained at least five GCSEs at grades A*-C, including English and Maths, is partly a reflection of their higher average attainment in year 11 compared with their counterparts who were FSM eligible in year 11.

Number and proportion year 11 pupils gaining at least five GCSEs at A*-C in year 11 includ ing English and Maths who gain l evel 3 within two years, by eligibility for free school meals
Level 3 at 18( 1)

Number Percentage Base( 2)

Entitled to free school meals( 3)

2004

9,800

65.8

14,800

2005

9,200

64.4

14,300

2006

8,500

64.6

13,100

Not entitled to free school meals( 3)

2004

183,300

76.7

238,900

2005

178,000

76.6

232,300

2006

171,800

77.4

221,900

(1) Level 3 within two years of year 11 (e.g. 2006 for 2004 year 11 cohort).
(2) The base is total number gaining five or more GCSEs grades A*-C in year 11 including English and Maths.
(3) Based on eligibility for free school meals in year 11 for those in maintained provision only ) as eligibility for free school meals in year 11 is not available for the independent sector).
Source:
Matched Administrative Dataset.

30 Jun 2009 : Column 233W

Outdoor Education

Mr. Roger Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what funding his Department has given to the Learning Outside the Classroom programme in each of the last three years; and what funding has been allocated to the programme for each of the next three years; [282418]

(2) how many schools have indicated their support for the Learning Outside the Classroom Manifesto in each year since its launch; [282419]

(3) how many children of each age in each region experienced learning outside the classroom in each of the three years (a) before and (b) after the launch of the Learning Outside the Classroom Manifesto. [282420]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: A breakdown of the Department’s investment in England into the Learning Outside the Classroom (LOtC) programme is set out as follows:

Financial year Funding (£)

2006-07

1,750,000

2007-08

1,560,000

2008-09

1,500,000


This year the Department is funding the newly established Council for Learning Outside the Classroom £740,000 to take forward the aims of the Manifesto. Funding beyond this financial year has not yet been agreed.

There are currently 1,698 signatories to the Manifesto, including 199 schools. We also know from the huge
30 Jun 2009 : Column 234W
interest and enthusiasm from schools for last year’s LOtC Awards that schools and teachers recognise the importance of different activities outside of the classroom in supporting learning and development for their young people.

The Department does not collect data on how many children experience learning outside the classroom. However, we know that most schools do provide learning outside the classroom and recognise its importance. The 2006 NFER survey confirmed that schools were doing the same, or more, learning outside the classroom than before and they expect to do the same or more in future. Changes to the secondary curriculum are designed to encourage ‘curriculum opportunities’ outside the classroom and the proposed new primary curriculum, to be introduced from 2011, which is currently subject to consultation, will also reflect the need for teachers to engage pupils with these experiences.

Pupil Exclusions: Disadvantaged

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what proportion of children in each region who were subject to (a) permanent and (b) fixed-term exclusion from school were entitled to free school meals in the latest year for which figures are available. [279462]

Ms Diana R. Johnson: The information available on the number of exclusions (not the number of children) for 2006/07 is shown in the table. Some pupils may be excluded more than once.

Primary, secondary and special schools( 1) : Number and proportion of permanent and fixed period exclusions for pupils who were eligible for free school meals( 2, 3) —2006/07
Type of exclusion
Permanent Fixed period
Government office region Number Proportion( 3) Number Proportion( 4)

North East

210

49.6

7,200

39.3

North West

540

43.2

22,160

37.8

Yorkshire and the Humber

290

43.0

17,810

34.6

East Midlands

280

31.1

9,820

29.0

West Midlands

450

41.7

16,980

36.9

East of England

240

29.3

11,320

25.2

London

620

43.9

22,170

41.2

Inner London

230

48.2

9,190

48.4

Outer London

390

41.6

12,980

37.3

South East

380

27.8

19,530

25.8

South West

210

27.0

11,340

26.5

Total

3,210

37.0

138,320

32.5

(1) Includes primary, state funded secondary, and maintained and non-maintained special schools. Excludes general hospital schools.
(2) Pupils who were eligible for free school meals at the time of the January 2007 census.
(3) Number of permanent exclusions of pupils who were eligible for free school meals as a proportion of all permanent exclusions by region. Total number of exclusions includes pupils whose free school meal eligibility could not be determined.
(4) Number of fixed period exclusions of pupils who were eligible for free school meals as a proportion of all fixed period exclusions by region. Total number of exclusions includes pupils whose free school meal eligibility could not be determined.
Note:
Figures have been rounded to the nearest 10
Source:
School Census

Next Section Index Home Page