Previous Section Index Home Page

8 July 2009 : Column 812W—continued


Animals: Abuse

Mr. Oaten: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many individuals were prosecuted for neglect of animals resulting from leaving animals in confined and hot spaces for a prolonged period in each of the last two years; and what average fine was issued for those convicted in such cases. [285070]

Jim Fitzpatrick: It is not possible to separately identify the number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts and found guilty under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 at all courts in England and Wales for neglect of animals left in confined and hot spaces for a prolonged period(1).

Animals: Quarantine

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many animal quarantine centres are in operation in the UK. [284035]

Jim Fitzpatrick: In England, Scotland and Wales there are currently 29 authorised quarantine premises for domestic (i.e. pet) animals. Quarantine premises in Northern Ireland are licensed by DARDNI (the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Northern Ireland).

Zoos and research establishments have not been included as the number of these establishments (which do not offer rabies quarantine for pets belonging to members of the public) that are approved can change frequently and are authorised only when required.

Avian Influenza: Poultry

Ms Keeble: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent assessment he has made of links between stocking densities of broiler chickens and the incidence of avian influenza. [283923]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The management of animal disease risks forms part of sustainable livestock production. There is a variety of different livestock production systems and each present different animal disease challenges. More intensive systems in which the animals are housed provide greater opportunities for preventing disease
8 July 2009 : Column 813W
entering a herd or flock but higher stocking densities mean that disease, once it gains entry to a farm, may spread more rapidly. Good husbandry and management will help reduce the risk of entry but this risk cannot be eliminated. Sometimes disease will occur. This can happen in both intensive and extensive systems.

The risk of influenza has not been shown to be greater in either, although experience has shown that close contact between animals and man is an important factor in possible transmission to man.

Further, there is no evidence of a correlation between intensive farming and the frequency of influenza pandemics. Indeed, the frequency of influenza pandemics has not changed despite the intensification of livestock production in developed countries since the 1950s.

Avian Influenza: Vaccination

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether birds other than those in zoos may be vaccinated in the event of an outbreak of avian influenza; and if he will make a statement. [284097]

Jim Fitzpatrick: We would not vaccinate poultry in advance of an avian influenza outbreak, nor would we use the vaccine as an immediate disease control response, due to the limitations of the vaccines. Early reporting, rapid action, biosecurity, culling and surveillance remain the most effective ways of protecting against and controlling an avian influenza outbreak.

We keep our policy on vaccination under review in the light of scientific developments in vaccines. Vaccination also forms part of our contingency planning in view of potential uncertainties in the nature and spread of the virus. However, preventive vaccination of poultry is not the most effective defence against avian influenza, because currently available vaccines have a number of disadvantages.

With some limited exceptions, it is against the law to import, possess or administer avian influenza vaccine without authorisation from the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Bees

Mr. Leech: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent representations he has received on funding for research into the problems affecting the honey bee. [283650]

Jim Fitzpatrick: DEFRA has received approximately 13 parliamentary questions, 34 letters from MPs and 123 other pieces of correspondence in the last three months on the subject of honey bee health, including funding for research. There was an MP debate about bee health organised by Dr. Ian Gibson, former Labour MP for Norwich North, on 29 April, and a House of Lords Debate about the effect of disease on the British bee population, moved by Lord Moynihan on 21 May.

DEFRA has recently provided increased funding to bee health. £2.5 million is being made available over the next five years to the insect pollinator initiative on pollinator decline. In addition, £2.3 million will be provided to the Food and Environment Research Agency’s National Bee Unit over the next two years to implement the first stage of the healthy bees plan.


8 July 2009 : Column 814W

Carbon Emissions

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the percentage of the UK’s (a) greenhouse gas, (b) methane and (c) nitrous oxide emission which derive from (i) agriculture and (ii) forestry. [284872]

Jim Fitzpatrick [holding answer 7 July 2009]: According to the UK greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventory: 1990-2006 report, GHG emissions from agriculture in 2006 were 44.71 Mt CO2e which was 7 per cent. of total UK emissions. Emissions for which agriculture was responsible are as follows:

Forestry is recorded in the UK GHG inventory as part of the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) sector which contains both sources and sinks of GHGs. In 2006, the UK GHG inventory reported the following sources and sinks for the forestry sector:

Dairy Farmers of Britain: Insolvency

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will hold an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the failure of Dairy Farmers of Britain, with particular reference to (a) the role of the banks, (b) when the receivers were brought in and (c) the expected financial effect on dairy farming. [283619]

Jim Fitzpatrick: Dairy Farmers of Britain (DFoB) is registered by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) under the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965. The FSA, in its capacity as registering authority, is working closely with the Receivers, who will be examining the reasons for the failure of DFoB and publishing their findings in a report to all creditors.

The Industrial and Provident Societies Act provides the FSA with only limited powers of investigation, and these are linked to its obligation to be satisfied that a society qualifies for registration under the Act.

The Receivers—PricewaterhouseCoopers were called in on 3 June. They have estimated the total financial costs to DFoB members to be around £83 million.

Departmental Energy

Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much was spent on energy efficiency measures for his Department’s
8 July 2009 : Column 815W
estate in each year from 2004 to 2009; what assessment has been made of the effectiveness of that expenditure; and what plans he has for future energy efficiency measures. [280542]

Dan Norris: DEFRA became responsible for implementing energy efficiency measures throughout the DEFRA in 2006. Since that date expenditure on energy efficiency measures is as shown in the table (DEFRA Estates does not hold information for the period 2004-06).

Investment in energy efficiency

£

2006-07

244,272

2007-08

1,187,697

2008-09

2,369,134


These data do not include expenditure on energy efficiency measures in new builds and refurbishments as sustainable technologies and energy efficiency measures are inherent in the overall programme and costs.

The measures implemented by DEFRA Estates resulted in achievement of the Energy Efficiency Accreditation Scheme (EEAS) in 2007 and the Carbon Trust Standard in 2008, both of which are independently assessed and confirm increased energy efficiency and a reduction in carbon emissions.

DEFRA has already met the Sustainable Operations on the Government Estate (SOGE) Target for reducing carbon emissions from offices and the continued programme of spend on efficiency measures will ensure that the Department is in the best possible position when Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) begins in 2012. In addition, a Sustainable Built Environment Workplace Support (SBEWS) delivery partnership with Interserve plc which spans a 15-year period will deliver significant efficiencies, not just in energy but across the entire range of SOGE targets.

Departmental Information Officers

Paul Holmes: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the cost to his Department of press office staff other than press officers has been in each year since 1997. [283070]

Dan Norris: The requested information cannot be provided due to disproportionate costs.

Dogs: Tagging

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will undertake research into the effect of dog microchipping schemes on (a) levels of crime and (b) perceptions of crime. [284100]

Jim Fitzpatrick: There are no plans to assess the effect of dog microchipping schemes on levels of (a) crime and (b) perception of crime.

Domestic Waste Disposal

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Meriden of 19 May
8 July 2009 : Column 816W
2009, Official Report, columns 1279-82W, on domestic waste: waste disposal, what records the Waste and Resources Action Programme holds on the frequency of the collection of household residual waste in each of the new unitary councils. [284082]

Dan Norris: The Waste and Resources Action Programme's (WRAP) records on the frequency of collection arrangements have not been updated since the local government reorganisation in April 2009. However, WRAP'S understanding is that these arrangements are still continuing exactly as they did before the local government reorganisation took place.

Farmers: Manpower

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many (a) dairy, (b) arable, (c) beef and (d) sheep farmers there are in each English county. [283583]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The number of farmers on dairy, arable, beef and sheep holdings in June 2008 (the latest data available) are shown in the following table. The type of farm is determined by the predominant agricultural activity taking place on the holding, using data from the annual June Survey of Agriculture. Beef and sheep farms are not categorised separately.

The number of farmers on mixed holdings are also shown as these are holdings with both livestock and crops but where neither activity dominates.


8 July 2009 : Column 817W

8 July 2009 : Column 818W
Number of farmers by predominant farm type
(a) Dairy farmers (b) Arable farmers (c) and (d) Beef and sheep farmers (e) Mixed farmers

Dairy Cereals General cropping Grazing livestock (LFA) Grazing livestock (lowland) Mixed

Hartlepool and Stockton-on-Tees

17

147

(1)

0

58

22

South Teesside

29

75

(1)

29

28

44

Darlington

18

129

24

0

53

46

Durham CC

133

534

37

1,078

458

234

Northumberland

89

711

75

1,333

430

367

Tyneside

(1)

85

(1)

18

43

36

Sunderland

0

35

0

0

10

(1)

West Cumbria

771

118

32

760

768

215

East Cumbria

1,402

175

40

2,608

1,093

348

Halton and Warrington

24

89

55

0

35

25

Cheshire CC

1,337

392

252

263

1,405

288

Greater Manchester South

35

30

21

106

74

18

Greater Manchester North

127

115

24

335

149

54

Blackburn with Darwen

24

0

(1)

113

19

11

Blackpool

0

0

0

0

0

Lancashire CC

1,388

184

494

1,548

1,149

314

East Merseyside

0

103

45

0

27

11

Liverpool

0

(1)

0

0

(1)

0

Sefton

0

19

32

0

25

(1)

Wirral

22

15

10

0

33

11

Kingston upon Hull, City of

0

(1)

(1)

0

0

0

East Riding of Yorkshire

70

1,329

671

0

431

331

North and North East Lincolnshire

10

413

195

0

144

70

York

20

149

76

0

84

40

North Yorkshire CC

1,364

2,320

845

2,816

1,898

1,208

Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham

115

605

98

102

239

131

Sheffield

42

21

(1)

157

36

18

Bradford

83

(1)

0

435

78

38

Leeds

34

133

57

56

131

45

Calderdale, Kirklees and Wakefield

173

221

55

932

167

163

Derby

0

(1)

0

0

12

(1)

East Derbyshire

104

205

45

126

194

123

South and West Derbyshire

791

318

81

1,257

654

260

Nottingham

0

(1)

0

0

(1)

0

North Nottinghamshire

60

607

230

0

287

162

South Nottinghamshire

34

278

61

0

164

82

Leicester

0

(1)

(1)

0

(1)

0

Leicestershire CC and Rutland

340

1,080

96

0

1,110

333

Northamptonshire

59

1,107

65

0

862

247

Lincolnshire

100

2,688

1,513

0

776

422

Herefordshire, County of

218

544

492

511

1,431

642

Worcestershire

181

574

304

0

1,290

338

Warwickshire

139

925

127

0

1,005

337

Telford and Wrekin

42

73

69

0

101

32

Shropshire CC

997

837

347

915

1,763

785

Stoke-on-Trent

(1)

(1)

0

0

43

(1)

Staffordshire CC

1,343

545

258

1,064

1,269

356

Birmingham

(1)

23

(1)

0

6

0

Solihull

11

54

(1)

0

74

28

Coventry

(1)

12

(1)

0

27

11

Dudley and Sandwell

(1)

0

(1)

0

14

7

Walsall and Wolverhampton

(1)

(1)

18

0

16

(1)

Peterborough

(1)

131

72

0

20

(1)

Cambridgeshire CC

14

1,502

849

0

311

118

Norfolk

95

1,404

1,858

0

862

507

Suffolk

85

1,827

737

0

660

356

Luton

0

(1)

0

0

(1)

(1)

Bedfordshire CC

25

729

93

0

225

79

Hertfordshire

29

646

20

0

278

67

Southend-on-Sea

0

0

0

0

0

(1)

Thurrock

0

24

(1)

0

35

(1)

Essex CC

31

1,797

289

0

508

257

Inner London—west

0

(1)

0

0

(1)

0

Inner London—east

0

0

0

0

(1)

(1)

Outer London—east and north-east

0

30

17

0

19

(1)

Outer London—south

0

20

5

0

20

8

Outer London—west and north-west

(1)

(1)

(1)

0

20

14

Berkshire

26

242

28

0

263

73

Milton Keynes

13

112

0

63

12

Buckinghamshire CC

114

462

34

0

697

249

Oxfordshire

102

951

84

0

700

278

Brighton and Hove

(1)

(1)

(1)

0

8

(1)

East Sussex CC

114

342

81

0

1,263

274

Surrey

73

129

24

0

644

82

West Sussex

111

419

107

0

720

197

Portsmouth

0

0

0

0

(1)

0

Southampton

(1)

(1)

(1)

0

(1)

(1)

Hampshire CC

190

793

112

0

1,260

313

Isle of Wight

57

88

21

0

267

49

Medway

0

18

20

0

28

(1)

Kent CC

102

895

334

0

1,500

389

Bristol, City of

0

(1)

(1)

0

24

0

N and NE Somerset, S Glos.

403

279

35

0

972

231

Gloucestershire

432

748

88

0

1,699

413

Swindon

24

65

(1)

0

50

15

Wiltshire CC

506

871

73

0

1,244

293

Bournemouth and Poole

(1)

0

0

0

10

(1)

Dorset CC

789

447

53

0

1,539

290

Somerset

1,338

685

167

507

2,706

592

Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

1,251

609

396

954

2,377

925

Plymouth

0

(1)

(1)

0

20

0

Torbay

(1)

0

0

0

27

19

Devon CC

2,419

1,081

334

2,172

4,594

1,491

England

20,122

35,402

12,843

20,194

45,827

15,915

(1 )Suppressed to prevent disclosure of information about individual holdings.
Notes:
1.Farmers includes full- and part-time farmers, partners, directors and spouses if working on the holding.
2.The grazing livestock farm type categories also include a small number of holdings with farmed deer and goats.
Source:
June Agricultural Survey

Next Section Index Home Page