Previous Section Index Home Page

16 July 2009 : Column 688W—continued


Public Bodies

Robert Neill: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) what the (a) terms of reference are and (b) timetable is for his Department's review of quangos; [286647]

(2) if he will place in the Library a copy of the recent letter sent by the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to Government departments on reviewing quangos. [286648]

Mr. Byrne: On 3 July 2009 I announced that a review of arm's length bodies would be taken forward as part of the public value programme. The pre-Budget report will provide a progress report on the public value programme.

Taxation: Imports

Dr. Starkey: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much has been received by the Exchequer in duties collected from companies importing goods into the UK from Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory in the last 12 months for which figures are available. [287170]

Mr. Timms: In the 12 months ending 31 March 2009, HM Revenue and Customs have issued demands for £21,494 customs duty on products imported into the UK from Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory under the provisions of the EC-Israel Association Agreement.

Work and Pensions

Attendance Allowance

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what percentage of adults over the age of 65 years she estimates were eligible for attendance allowance in (a) Vale of York and (b) England in (i) 1997, (ii) 2001 (iii) 2005 and (iv) 2008. [286004]

Jonathan Shaw: We are unable to estimate the percentage of adults over the age of 65 years who may be eligible for attendance allowance.


16 July 2009 : Column 689W

Carer's Allowance

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what steps her Department takes to monitor the adequacy of level of carer's allowance in meeting costs incurred by carers. [287926]

Jonathan Shaw: Carer's allowance provides a measure of financial support for carers who give up the chance of full-time employment in order to look after a severely disabled relative, friend or neighbour. It is an income-maintenance benefit and is not designed to cover any costs arising from a person's caring responsibilities.

Children: Maintenance

Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with reference to paragraph 13 of the National Audit Office report, Child Support Agency-Implementation of the Child Support Reforms, HC1174, Session 2005-06, how many cases are now estimated to be stuck in the system. [279055]

Helen Goodman: The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system. I have therefore asked the Child Maintenance Commissioner to write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:


16 July 2009 : Column 690W

Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much (a) debt and (b) cumulative debt resulting from arrears attributed to the non-resident parent accrued to the Child Support Agency in each year since 1993. [279844]

Helen Goodman [holding answer 15 June 2009]: The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system. I have therefore asked the Child Maintenance Commissioner to write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:

Child Maintenance Arrears
March

2007 2008 2009

Arrears total (£ billion)

3.67

3.79

3.84

Arrears increase (£ million)

n/a

484

405

Arrears reduction (£ million)

n/a

-363

-362

Notes:
1. Movement in arrears components is based on an estimate from internal figures and is only available from March 2007, so only two years of information can be provided.
2. Arrears on each case have been calculated in the year to March 2007, March 2008 and March 2009. From this, each case has been classified as seeing an increase or a decrease in arrears across each year. The value of this increase or reduction has also been calculated.
3. This will only take into account the net arrears movement across the year and may miss some payments that have subsequently been cancelled out by further increases in debt within the year.
4. The figures for March 2009 are at the time of answering this question un-audited internal figures and are subject to revision which will be published in the CSA Annual Report and Accounts for 2008-09.

16 July 2009 : Column 691W

Departmental Information

Mrs. Laing: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many requests for communications data were made by her Department and its agencies to communication service providers (CSPs) under section 1 of the Social Security Fraud Act 2001 in (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003, (d) 2004, (e) 2005, (f) 2006, (g) 2007 and (h) 2008; and how many of these requests resulted in the requested communications data being disclosed by the relevant CSP. [284874]

Helen Goodman [holding answer 7 July 2009]: The information requested is not collated centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Housing Benefit: Greater London

Ms Buck: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many housing benefit claims were made by residents in each London local authority in 2007-08; and how many of these were made in respect of (a) private sector tenancies, (b) social rented tenancies, (c) in-work claims by private tenants and (d) in-work claims by social tenants. [284714]

Helen Goodman: The information is not available in the format requested. The available information is in the following table.


16 July 2009 : Column 692W
Number of housing benefit claimants by tenure: Great Britain, London local authorities, August 2007

Housing benefit claimants Housing benefit claimants with private tenancies Housing benefit claimants with social rented tenancies

Great Britain

4,040,940

940,600

3,100,350

London

698,340

155,340

543,010

Barking

18,410

3,530

14,880

Barnet

21,780

8,830

12,950

Bexley

11,620

2,780

8,850

Brent

28,230

8,210

20,020

Bromley

15,860

3,880

11,980

Camden

27,990

4,090

23,900

City of London

1,170

70

1,100

Croydon

26,690

10,510

16,190

Ealing

24,610

7,000

17,610

Enfield

25,090

9,650

15,450

Greenwich

25,310

3,750

21,560

Hackney

35,010

5,460

29,540

Hammersmith and Fulham

20,380

3,190

17,190

Haringey

30,980

8,070

22,920

Harrow

12,490

3,650

8,840

Havering

11,160

2,530

8,630

Hillingdon

15,970

4,280

11,690

Hounslow

17,070

3,830

13,240

Islington

28,840

2,210

26,630

Kensington and Chelsea

16,060

2,700

13,360

Kingston upon Thames

7,250

2,010

5,230

Lambeth

35,070

5,230

29,840

Lewisham

29,100

6,050

23,050

Merton

10,570

2,470

8,100

Newham

33,520

9,440

24,080

Redbridge

14,630

5,690

8,940

Richmond upon Thames

8,080

1,900

6,170

Southwark

34,560

3,180

31,380

Sutton

9,740

2,600

7,140

Tower Hamlets

32,040

2,530

29,510

Waltham Forest

22,140

6,090

16,050

Wandsworth

23,200

5,430

17,770

Westminster

23,730

4,510

19,220

Notes:
1. The data refers to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple.
2. Housing benefit figures have been rounded to the nearest 10.
3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated.
4. Housing benefit figures exclude any extended payment cases.
5. From February 2007, DWP has been collecting more detailed HB/CTB data electronically from local authorities. Over time this will improve the accuracy, timeliness and level of detail available in the published statistics. However, until the new data have been fully quality assured to National Statistics standards, the most recent summary statistics available are for August 2007.
Source:
Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent. case load stock-count taken in August 2007.

Next Section Index Home Page