Previous Section Index Home Page

21 July 2009 : Column 1393W—continued

Public Service: Misconduct

Mr. Grieve: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 15 December 2008, Official Report, column 478W, on misconduct in public office, when he plans to place in the Library a copy of his letter. [278335]

Mr. Straw: I have written to the hon. Member on 19 July 2009 and have placed a copy in the Library of the House. I apologise for the delay.

Reoffenders: Essex

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what the re-offending rate of people in each age group in the Essex probation area was in each of the last five years. [287034]

Maria Eagle: The local re-offending figures are produced by aggregating the data of four snapshots of the probation caseload at the end of each quarter. Therefore the number of offenders quoted in the following table is
21 July 2009 : Column 1394W
approximately four times the number of offenders on the caseload at any one time.

The most recent re-offending rates for Essex are shown in the following table.

Local re-offending rates for Essex, 1 January-31 December 2008

Number of offenders Actual re-offending rate (percentage)

Essex probation area

20,217

8.17


The local re-offending rate is not broken down by age band.

Local adult re-offending rates by probation area or local authority are not available for periods prior to 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008.

Further details on local adult re-offending are available at:

Sexual Offences

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of people convicted of (a) rape and (b) sexual assault were aged (i) under 16, (ii) 16 to 18, (iii) 19 to 65 and (iv) over 65 years in each year since 1997. [285790]

Claire Ward: The number of persons found guilty at all courts for rape and sexual assault, in England and Wales, by age group, from 1997 to 2007 (latest available) is shown in the following tables.

The figures given in the tables relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offence for which they were dealt with. For example, when a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences, the offence selected is the one for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

Court proceedings data for 2008 will be available in the autumn of 2009.

Number of persons found guilty at all courts for offences of rape( 1) and sexual assault in England and Wales, by age group, 1997 to 2007( 2,3,4,5)
1997 1998 1999 2000( 6) 2001 2002

Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty

Rape

Age 10-15

25

4

16

2

26

4

16

3

19

3

12

2

Age 16-18

52

8

28

4

51

8

41

7

39

7

35

5

Age 19-65

528

86

600

89

559

86

515

87

498

88

574

89

Age 66 and over

10

2

29

4

16

2

21

4

11

2

23

4

Total all ages

615

100

673

100

652

100

593

100

567

100

644

100

Sexual assault

Age 10-15

196

7

207

7

208

7

185

7

218

9

237

9

Age 16-18

235

8

243

8

232

8

229

9

197

8

232

9

Age 19-65

2,376

80

2,278

79

2,259

79

2,023

78

1,946

77

1,988

77

Age 66 and over

156

5

166

6

169

6

147

6

156

6

133

5

Total all ages

2,963

100

2,894

100

2,868

100

2,584

100

2,517

100

2,590

100


21 July 2009 : Column 1395W

21 July 2009 : Column 1396W

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty Found guilty % of total found guilty

Rape

Age 10-15

16

2

23

3

32

4

39

5

38

4

Age 16-18

33

5

32

4

74

9

70

8

61

7

Age 19-65

594

89

658

89

660

83

728

84

731

84

Age 66 and over

27

4

29

4

29

4

25

3

42

5

Total all ages

670

100

742

100

795

100

862

100

872

100

Sexual assault

Age 10-15

164

7

246

9

170

8

138

7

147

7

Age 16-18

205

8

216

8

180

8

150

7

151

7

Age 19-65

1,955

79

1,996

77

1,747

78

1,613

79

1,668

79

Age 66 and over

143

6

150

6

141

6

151

7

137

7

Total all ages

2,467

100

2,608

100

2,238

100

2,052

100

2,103

100

(1) Includes attempted rape.
(2) Data are on the principal offence basis.
(3) Data includes the following statutes and corresponding offence descriptions:
Sexual Offences Act 1956 s.14
Indecent assault on a male.
Indecent assault on a female.
(4) The Sexual Offences Act 2003 came into force on 1st May 2004 and repealed previous Sexual Offences Acts:
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.1
Rape of a female.
Rape of a male
Attempted rape of a female.
Attempted rape of a male.
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.2
Assault on a male by penetration
Assault on a female by penetration
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.3
Sexual assault on a male.
Sexual assault on a female
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S. 5
Rape of a female child under 13 by a male
Rape of a male child under 13 by a male
Attempted rape of a female child under 13 by a male
Attempted rape of a male child under 13 by a male
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.6
Assault of a male child under 13 by penetration
Assault of a female child under 13 by penetration
Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.7
Sexual assault of a female child under 13
Sexual assault of a male child under 13
5 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
(6) Staffordshire Police Force were only able to submit sample data for persons proceeded against and convicted at magistrates' courts for the year 2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher orders of data, these data are not robust enough at a detailed level and have been excluded from the table.
Source:
Office for Criminal Justice Reform - Evidence and Analysis Unit (OCJR-E&A)

Next Section Index Home Page