 House of Commons |
Session 2008 - 09 Publications on the internet Private Business |
| Private Business in the House of Commons
|
|
|
|
PRIVATE BUSINESS
1. Canterbury City Council Bill (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Third Reading of the Canterbury City Council Bill, to move, That the Bill be read the third time upon this day six months. 2. Nottingham City Council Bill (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Third Reading of the Nottingham City Council Bill, to move, That the Bill be read the third time upon this day six months.
CONSIDERATION OF BILLS AS AMENDED 1. Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords] (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Consideration of the Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords], to move, That the Bill be considered upon this day six months. 2. Manchester City Council Bill [Lords] (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Consideration of the Manchester City Council Bill [Lords], to move, That the Bill be considered upon this day six months. 3. Leeds City Council Bill (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Consideration of the Leeds City Council Bill, to move, That the Bill be considered upon this day six months. 4. Reading Borough Council Bill (By Order). Mr Christopher Chope On Consideration of the Reading Borough Council Bill, to move, That the Bill be considered upon this day six months.
NOTICES OF MOTIONS AT THE TIME OF PRIVATE BUSINESS 1. CITY OF WESTMINSTER BILL [Lords] (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That so much of the Lords Message [12 October] as relates to the City of Westminster Bill [Lords] be now considered. That this House concurs with the Lords in their Resolution. –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 2. BOURNEMOUTH BOROUGH COUNCIL BILL [Lords] (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of the Bournemouth Borough Council Bill [Lords], which was originally introduced in the House of Lords in Session 2006-07 on 22 January 2007, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 3. MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL BILL [Lords] (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of the Manchester City Council Bill [Lords], which was originally introduced in the House of Lords in Session 2006-07 on 22 January 2007, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 4. CANTERBURY CITY COUNCIL BILL (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of the Canterbury City Council Bill, which was originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 5. LEEDS CITY COUNCIL BILL (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of Leeds City Council Bill, which was originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 6. NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL BILL (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of Nottingham City Council Bill, which was originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). 7. READING BOROUGH COUNCIL BILL (By Order): Adjourned Debate on Question [Thursday 29 October]. Motion made, and Question proposed, That the promoters of the Reading Borough Council Bill, which was originally introduced in this House in the previous Session on 22 January 2008, should have leave to suspend any further proceedings on the Bill in order to proceed with it, if they think fit, in the next Session of Parliament according to the provisions of Private Business Standing Order 188A (Suspension of bills). –(The Chairman of Ways and Means). |
|
| |
|
| |
| Prepared 5 November 2009 | |