[back to previous text]

Ms Keeble: I asked specifically about what constitutes a bedroom and who decides what is a pair, and I also asked about precedence. I particularly wanted an answer in Committee because that will be important for later interpretation of the Bill. Will my right hon. Friend deal with those specific points? There were also issues about children under the age of one.
What precedence does the standard—it may be revised, and I take the point that it appears likely that housing will be included in the new list—take over other types of measures? That precise point was raised earlier: in the absence of the new regulations that the Government committed themselves to bringing forward some time ago, there is a plethora of different standards, and the basic one is abysmally low. That is the one that I read out, which was objected to 75 years ago.
Mr. Timms: On the question of what constitutes a bedroom, I will need to clarify that and come back to my hon. Friend with a bit more detail.
Ms Keeble: The point of being able to ask in Committee is so that the answer will be in Hansard. An exchange of letters does not have the same status. It is important to set out what is meant by the standard, which will have a profound impact on the standard of housing provided for our constituents. It will have a real effect on some of the poorest families and children. We need to know the sequencing of the standards in the Bill, in relation to measures in other legislation that affects housing for families and children.
Mr. Timms: I have said that I will need to check on some of the points and come back on them. However, there will undoubtedly be opportunities later in the Committee’s sittings, or on Report, for me to put that detail on the record, and I shall be happy to do so.
However, I want to sound a cautionary note, because of course the statutory regulations under housing law will take precedence. The Bill may well effectively apply pressure for change, but it would be misleading if I were to give the Committee the impression that the inclusion of a particular formulation in the material deprivation index will override housing law. However, I shall be happy to come to the Committee or the House with the further detail that my hon. Friend has asked for, and ensure that it is on the record.
Ms Keeble: On that basis, and as there will be plenty of other opportunities to pursue the points of concern, I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 3 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
The Chairman: I remind the Committee of the convention that we should be careful not to bring beverages into the room.
1 pm
The Chairman adjourned the Committee without Question put (Standing Order No. 88).
Adjourned till this day at Four o’clock.
 
Previous Contents
House of Commons 
home page Parliament home page House of 
Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 28 October 2009