|
Division
No.
5] Question
accordingly negatived.
Amendment
proposed: 7, in
clause 23, page 17, line 6, at
end insert— ‘(8) In section
104 (decisions of Panel and Council) after subsection (2),
insert— “(2A) The
Panel or Council shall take any advice or representations received from
the Marine Management Organisation into
account— (a) in deciding
whether or not to make an order granting development consent,
and (b) if it does decide to do
so, in deciding what (if any) requirements are to be imposed in
connection with the development for which consent is
granted.”. (9) In
section 105 (decisions of Secretary of State) in subsection (2), after
paragraph (c)
insert— “(3)
The Secretary of State shall take any advice or representations
received from the Marine Management Organisation into
account— (a) in deciding
whether or not to make an order granting development consent,
and (b) if it does decide to do
so, in deciding what (if any) requirements are to be imposed in
connection with the development for which consent is
granted.”. (10) In
section 116 (reasons for decision to grant or refuse development
consent) after subsection (1)
insert— “(1A)
Where the Commission has received advice from the Marine Management
Organisation, the reasons for decision to grant or refuse development
consent must include a statement of how (if at all) the Commission has
taken account of the Marine Management Organisation’s
advice.”’.—(Mr.
Benyon.) Question
put, That the amendment be
made. The
Committee divided: Ayes 4, Noes
9.
Division
No.
6] Question
accordingly negatived.
Clause 23
ordered to stand part of the
Bill. Ordered,
That further consideration be now adjourned.—(David
Wright.) 4.3
pm Adjourned
till Tuesday 7 July at half-past Ten
o’clock.
|
