3 Sustaining the network
68. The network has long been valued for more than
just the provision of mail collection and delivery:
We all go straight to the post office when in
a strange place, if we are in the slightest difficulty. The post
office is there 'on his Majesty's service' to get us out of trouble.[70]
According to NFSP research:
the two factors the public say are most likely
to make an impact on their future use of post office services
are the ability to access the high street banks (62% said this
would increase their use of post office services) and the availability
of more goods and services (58%).[71]
Virtually all of the submissions to the Committee
reflected the huge demand for still more services to be provided
through post offices. However, we recognise that people may like
having access to post office services, but may not actually use
them. The challenge for Post Office Ltd will be not just to offer
the services discussed in this chapter, but to do so in an environment
that is attractive and efficient enough to attract customers.
69. Each of the new services identified over the
course of this inquiry is explored below in more detail under
each category of 'core service': postal services, central government
services, local government services, financial services, and community
services. Some are examples of services currently offered in a
few post offices that represent good practices that could be emulated
throughout the network; some are entirely new ideas; and some
are inventive but may be impractical. But they demonstrate clearly
that the network's potential is far greater than has so far been
realised.
Postal services
70. Post Office Ltd received £358 million
from Royal Mail Group in 2007-08 for providing mail services.
In an earlier report the Committee expressed concern about the
lack of clarity over the extent to which this sum was related
to the cost of providing those services.[72]
For example, it is not clear whether the payment includes any
consideration of the exclusive access to the network that Royal
Mail Group has enjoyed up until now. We are encouraged that the
Postal Services Bill, in recognition of the need for appropriate
oversight of Post Office Ltd's funding arrangements, proposes
to improve transparency with a statutory requirement for Post
Office Ltd to lay its accounts before Parliament each year.[73]
71. The most commonly requested new postal service
is for the post office network to act as a mail or parcel delivery
and collection service for all mail operators and couriers, not
just for Royal Mail.[74]
The growth of e-commerce, coupled with changing working patterns,
has meant that private individuals and businesses need a place
to send and receive parcels. Postcomm notes that in 2007, £46.6 billion
was spent online, an increase of 54% over the previous year.[75]
Increases in online commerce represent a huge opportunity for
Post Office Ltd to increase parcel receipt.
72. Postcomm submitted that "Post Office Ltd
should have complete commercial freedom to handle packets from
other postal operators than Royal Mail".[76]
Postcomm claimed that there was an exclusivity agreement between
Royal Mail Group and Post Office Ltd.[77]
However, CWU and Unite the Union told us that "the facility
already exists for competitors to request and agree access to
the network".[78]
Post Office Ltd confirmed that Royal Mail Group must make the
post office network available to any mails competitor.[79]
But although the mechanisms are in place for Royal Mail's competitors
to use the post office network, until recently, they have not
been acted on.
73. When questioned about the lack of deals with
Royal Mail's competitors, Post Office Ltd told the Committee that
it had just signed a contract with DX Group to provide a local
collection service for DX Group parcels.[80]
While the Committee welcomes this development, it raises the question:
why is this the first such deal?
74. The largest single source of Post Office Ltd
income is Royal Mail Group. As we have noted, there is little
clarity about how this is calculated, and we welcome the Government's
proposals to introduce more transparency into this. Given the
wider social role of post offices, we believe that it is appropriate
to allow any mail operator who wishes to negotiate with Post Office
Ltd to use the network. Post Office Ltd should do everything it
can to secure contracts with Royal Mail's competitors. However,
such contracts should be properly priced; any such arrangements
should "pay their way" for Post Office Ltd and its partners.
Central government services
75. The post office network has become increasingly
disassociated from government over time. According to Six Steps
to a Sustainable Post Office Network, government-related services
represented 26% of Post Office Ltd's revenue in 2007-08, a sharp
decrease from 43% in 2003-04. This is a worrying development,
because the network represents an invaluable opportunity for central
and local governments to reach citizens.
76. The NFSP stated that one of the reasons behind
the decline in the provision of government services through post
offices:
has been government departments or agencies seeking
to achieve narrow short-term cost savings. The loss of this work
has directly led to other arms of government paying to prop up
the network. This approach has been widely criticised, and was
described by the then House of Commons Trade & Industry Committee
as "taxpayers' money going round in circles".[81]
77. As we explored in the introduction to this report,
post offices have a vital role in sustaining the social fabric
in local communities, rural or urban, and the public considers
that the Government has a responsibility to ensure they continue
to do so. The more that useful services can be offered through
post offices, the greater their role will be in sustaining communities.
Pursuing individual departmental objectives through the network
will contribute to wider policy.
78. Unfortunately, government departments do not
appear to appreciate this at present. The post office network
is all too often seen as the problem of its sponsoring department,
rather than an opportunity for government services to reach every
community. At the beginning of this inquiry, the Committee asked
each government department several questions:
- What services do you currently
provide through post offices?
- Are you exploring the provision of any additional
services through post offices?
- What gets in the way of providing more services
though post offices?
Although the Government response to our inquiry on
the Postal Services Bill noted that "a range of prospective
opportunities for the Post Office to act as the 'Front Office
for Government' have been identified",[82]
this front office role does not seem to have penetrated deeply.
The Committee received responses from most government departments;
the responses were of varying quality. Some departments (notably
Transport and Home Office) provided thoughtful responses; several
others (Culture, Media and Sport; Health; Innovation, Universities
and Skills; Justice; and Northern Ireland Office) responded but
utterly failed to address our questions. The Department for Work
and Pensions reply was very poor, particularly considering their
key role in improving social inclusion. A number of departments
(Communities and Local Government; Children, Schools and Families;
Energy and Climate Change; International Development; Revenue
& Customs; Scotland and Wales) failed to respond at all.
79. Most of the departments which responded to our
letter adequately addressed the question about services currently
provided. The Committee's question about what additional services
could be offered was less well answered and in many cases, ignored.
The then Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
(BERR) stated that it was considering the use of post offices
to provide information on consumer credit and as a channel of
communication with small businesses about the Business Link services.[83]
The Ministry of Defence is currently working with the Department
for Work and Pensions to deliver more services to war pensioners.[84]
The Home Office is exploring using post offices to biometrically
enrol foreign nationals applying for identity cards.[85]
None of the other departments appeared to consider additional
service provision through the post office network.
80. Very few departments responded to our question
about what constrained them from using post offices to provide
additional services. Among those that did, cost was a common theme.
The Ministry of Defence pointed out that value for money could
be a constraint, and that the facility to deliver armed forces
benefits using post offices had been withdrawn because of costs.[86]
The Department for Transport stated that the cost of processing
the renewal of vehicle excise duty through a post office is 50%
higher than processing the same transaction online.[87]
81. The Department for Transport identified two more
constraints on the expansion of services through the network:
customers' preference for doing transactions from the comfort
of their homes; and the "growing need for specific expertise
in checking identity".[88]
The Home Office submitted that there are no constraints on the
expansion of the use of post offices as long as the services are
effective and competitive compared to other businesses.[89]
None of the other departments answered this question.
82. Value for money is important, and we have some
sympathy with departments' emphasis on the comparative costs of
using the post office network. We will explore this later in this
report. However, as we note above, government departments should
always consider what is the most effective way to reach those
who prefer to deal with matters face-to-face. It is legitimate
to encourage people to use cheaper communications channels, but
not to deny them choice.
83. We accept that not all government services
can be provided across the network, but as a minimum, wherever
a service can be provided by post then the associated material
should be available at post offices. For example, passport application
forms should be universally available. The Government must think
of post offices not just as a collection of private businesses,
but as a public service. Apart from the opportunity for better
communication and service that the network represents, where post
offices are no longer available, additional burdens may be placed
on social services.[90]
Failure to recognise this reveals a lack of a coordinated approach
within Government. As one submission put it, post offices are
a wasted asset:
Here is a wonderful nationwide network of Post
Offices, all in close touch with their local communities, capable
of doing much more than they currently do, even to carrying out
surveys or pilot schemes. It is clear that the Government does
not value them for their true worth by the emphasis it places
on directing their services to other agencies.[91]
84. The responses from government departments
to the Committee's inquiry were, as a whole, inadequate. Most
departments failed to suggest any way in which they might use
the post office network. It is easy to think of government facilities
which might usefully be available through the network, simply
because of its near universal reach: payment of fines, and proof
of such payment; provision of simplified consultation documents;
leaflets about departmental services and initiatives; application
forms for energy saving schemes; and provision of popular government
forms.
85. The Committee is profoundly disappointed by
the narrow focus on departmental concerns and the lack of attention
to citizens' needs displayed in many of the answers to our questions
about departments' use of the post office network. Government
is in the business of providing services, and the post office
network represents an unparalleled facility to deliver those services
to local communities. It is bizarre that government policy recognises
the value of the network, but that individual departments do not
see that they have a role in making sure that everybody, not just
the web enabled, has access to their services, and that taking
this seriously by using the post office network more could contribute
to wider policy aims.
A DIGITAL SWITCHOVER OF PUBLIC SERVICES?
86. The recently published Digital Britain
final report says:
Discussion with stakeholders inside and outside
Government has demonstrated a consistent view that Government
should develop a roadmap to a new programme of Digital Switchover
of Public Services (by which we mean online being the primary
means of access, rather than one among many - though clearly with
a safety net in delivery for those unable to access the service
online).[92]
87. We profoundly disagree. We support efficient
use of technology. We acknowledge that online schemes can save
taxpayers' money (Digital Britain notes the electronic
vehicle licensing scheme saves the DVLA around £8 million
per year). However, while it is reasonable for private companies
to decide to restrict their market segment to those who can use
web-based services, it is not appropriate for the Government to
do so.
88. According to Digital Britain itself, only
55% of those who already have the internet at home had used government
services online. That means many people have chosen not to. We
also note that Digital Britain's consultation process was
intrinsically likely to capture the views of the digitally confident,
rather than those who cannot or do not wish to engage in this
way. As we have noted, our web forum, which was intended as an
additional communication channel, provoked strong reactions. As
one respondent said:
There is a Poster in our Village Post Office
inviting the public to contribute to a debate instigated by Parliament
but giving only a web-site address. [...] I do not have the facility
to contribute in that manner and [...] I consider that to be somewhat
restrictive, if not discriminatory [
][93]
89. Public reaction to being expected to use the
internet as the main way to access government services would be
still stronger. Government's proper role is to encourage the take-up
of new technology, not to enforce it. Those who do not wish to
use the internet deserve more than a "safety net".
90. We recognise that providing services through
the post office network may be more expensive than providing those
services online. However, we consider the public's expectation
that there should be a choice of ways to access government services
and information is legitimate. The question should not be "is
it cheaper to provide this service entirely on-line or remotely?"
but "given that there needs to be a choice of delivery methods,
what is the most effective way to reach those who prefer to deal
with matters face to face?". As we have already noted
(see paragraph 16), the public does not believe it is acceptable
to offer services online only. Once it is accepted that there
will always be a proportion of the public that will not use cheaper
electronic communication methods, the value of the post office
network becomes clearer. One submission to the Committee noted:
"If post office outlets reduce further or disappear, Government
might in the future find itself in the position of having to re-establish
person-to-person services, at potentially greater expense".[94]
NEW CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES
THAT MIGHT BE OFFERED
91. Central government services currently provided
through some or all post offices include: car tax disc renewal;
Statutory Off-Road Notification; DVLA checking; fishing and game
licence applications; payments to benefit recipients and pensioners
through the POCA; passport check and send; European Health Insurance
Cards; National Savings and Investments (NS&I) products; and
the Child Trust Fund.[95]
In addition, 77% of customers use post offices to access government
forms.[96] There is a
range of other services which the network could offer, which can
be broadly divided into identity services, documentation checking,
and wider government services. Many build on services already
on offer or being piloted. The new central government services
suggested to the Committee are summarised in Table 2 below,
and then described in more detail below.
Table 2: Suggestions for possible new central
government services
Advice on government matters
Processing driving licenses
Processing passport applications
Vehicle licensing renewal
Application form checking service
Visas for foreign travel
Postal voting
Payment of benefits
| TV licensing
Proof of identity checks
Photocopy authentication service
Implementation of future ID cards
Renewal of DVLA's photo ID cards
War Pensioners' postal service
'Signing-on' for benefits
|
Identity services
92. Some of the suggestions for 'new' government services to provide
through the network are already available. For example, a number
of submissions recommended that post offices could be used for
processing driving licences.[97]
We note that on 23 March 2009, Lord Mandelson announced that Post
Office Ltd had signed a five-year contract to support the DVLA
in issuing photographic driving licences. The DVLA licence renewal
service will be available at 750 post offices.[98]
This contract should allow Post Office Ltd to undertake a multi-million
pound investment in verification technology, which could lead
to other related contracts. Indeed, the potential to use this
technology for other services was included in the contract.
93. The development of post offices' ability to provide
identity related services would clearly be welcomed by those who
submitted evidence to us. There is considerable demand for more
post offices to process passport applications.[99]
Some would simply like to be able to access passport application
forms in all post offices;[100]
others would like post offices to include passport photo booths,[101]
while another submitted that post offices could undertake passport
and identity interviews.[102]
There was widespread support for the use of the post office network
for implementing the identity card scheme.[103]
The Home Office is exploring the possibility of using post offices
for biometric enrolment of foreign nationals for the identity
card scheme, potentially using the DVLA's framework agreement.
The UK Border Agency aims to run a six to 12 month pilot at 20
post offices.[104]
This could lead to additional work related to the new generation
of passports.
94. However, before identity services could be provided
across the network, staff would have to have additional training.
The Department for Transport told the Committee that the "ability
to identify increasingly sophisticated counterfeits and forgeries
has become a specialist skill which Post Office staff, who handle
a very wide range of business and general transactions, cannot
be expected to have".[105]
95. Many or even most identity services may well
be too sophisticated to provide across the network. However, even
limited use of the post office network will allow these services
to be offered across a wider geographical area than would otherwise
be possible. There is potential to use the post office network
to offer such services at a range of locations across the UK,
which will both benefit those who need new driving licences or
identity documents and provide income for Post Office Ltd.
Documentation checking or authentication
96. Many of the submissions identified the post office
as a sensible place to have documents checked and processed. According
to Post Office Ltd, 2,500 post offices currently offer a 'passport
check and send' service and stock passport application forms.[106]
In addition, photo licence application checking is already available
in 743 post office branches.[107]
97. These services are currently funded by a payment
from the customer. There are other suggestions where the source
of payment is less obvious. It was suggested post offices could
be used to check benefits applications, as considered by the Irish
Government, in order to help prevent benefit fraud.[108]
This idea is similar to the 'Validate' pilot project, described
below in paragraph 115. The NFSP reports that subpostmasters already
provide an informal service for customers by checking application
forms for them. In addition,
Subpostmasters also frequently sign official
documents, such as passport applications, for their customers.
These are goodwill gestures and subpostmasters are not remunerated
for offering them. There is strong evidence that this informal
assistance is extensively drawn upon throughout the post office
network between 35% and 41% of customers do so.[109]
The CWU and Unite the Union similarly suggested that
post offices could both check and process tax self-assessment
forms.[110] Once again,
this might depend on staff training.
98. Postcomm notes that Portuguese post offices offer
a photocopy authentication service, and suggests that this is
a government service that the network might provide.[111]
Wider government services
99. Despite an increasing reliance on electronic
channels for the delivery of government services, some people
are unable or unwilling to use these channels. Consumer Focus
suggested that subpostmasters could check, authenticate and digitise
applications, and then forward them to the relevant government
department.[112]
100. Many submissions would like to see post offices
as a 'one-stop shop' for government services.[113]
The North Yorkshire County Council suggested that just as the
DirectGov website acts as a virtual one-stop shop for government
information, the post office network could be the complementary
face-to-face service.[114]
They envisage that: "Trained sub-postmasters could provide
information and basic advice on government issues (tax returns,
pension entitlements etc.), and help the public carry out routine
transactions".[115]
Cornwall County Council suggests that post offices could be used
to provide information on government policy.[116]
101. The CWU and Unite the Union support the notion
of a one-stop shop, because it:
can help the government reach vulnerable and
marginalised members of society in rural and urban-deprived areas.
Moreover, it can further the Government's regeneration agenda,
tackle the financial exclusion that is rife in communities across
the UK, and in so doing ensure a future for the Post Office network.[117]
They cite a scheme recommended in the 2000 report
of the PIU,[118] whereby
'Government General Practitioners' would act as a 'guide to government',
providing information and low-level advice on government issues
and handling transactions. CWU and Unite the Union would like
to see "trained counters staff working in this way in all
Post Offices across the country".[119]
102. However, the Government has already conducted
a trial of the PIU proposals under the label "Your Guide";
the then Minister, Mr Stephen Timms, said:
Very few of the sub-postmasters involved in the
pilot reported any increase in sales from the additional footfall
generated by "Your Guide". As that was what it was intended
to be about, we concluded from our evaluation that it would not
represent value for money to roll it out nationally.[120]
103. There may be scope for using the post office
network more as a source of government advice, but provision of
such services would require substantial investment in training
and, quite possibly, in technology. Moreover, this role would
have to be managed so that it took account of the fact that the
majority of branches are run by subpostmasters, not direct government
employees.
104. Several submissions saw potential for the post
office network to provide employment information. For example,
post offices could host Job Centre Plus 'Jobpoint' terminals,[121]
advertise job vacancies,[122]
or host local employment or skills fairs.[123]
105. There were two more unusual suggestions for
government services. Postcomm reports that postal voting services
are handled by post offices in Finland and suggests that this
service might be an opportunity for post offices.[124]
The CWU and Unite the Union suggested that the post office network
might be used to issue visas for foreign travel.[125]
It is not clear how practical these two suggestions are; however,
they indicate that there are potentially many innovative uses
of the network.
106. It is not enough simply to identify services
which could be provided through the network; they must provide
value for the Government. This is not simply a matter of the lowest
possible cost; the decisions need to be considered on a cross-government
basis. Expanding government services could help ensure the sustainability
of the network, and the additional costs of providing the services
might be offset by reduced costs in other publicly-funded areas.
107. Services must also provide income for the post
office network indeed, the Co-operative group is supportive
of post offices as a universal hub, but caution that:
for these services to contribute to a sustainable
Post Office network, the level of funding (e.g. the fee per passport
check) needs to be commensurate with the time or work involved
for both Post Office Limited and the operator of the Post Office.[126]
108. Even so, many of the preceding suggestions for
improved central government services are both feasible and advisable.
The biggest barrier to the expansion of government services
offered through the network is the attitude and lack of imagination
of most government departments. History has given government an
unparalleled and highly valued portal in the post office network.
Departments must try harder to provide their services through
post offices. At the very least, individuals must be able to get
important government forms in all post offices. It surely cannot
be beyond the Government's technological ability to provide a
means to supply such material electronically so that the most
up-to-date version of the form in question can simply be printed.
Some of the proposals which have been made to us are impractical
at first glance, but contain good ideas. Departments should not
simply dismiss the provision of services through the network;
they should assess whether offering services through post offices
would make life easier for their customers, and if so, whether
it is at all practicable.
109. In asking us to undertake the task force
role, BERR showed its commitment to a coordinated effort to provide
more services through post offices. The new Department for Business,
Innovation and Skills should continue this work. There should
be a government-wide leader to coordinate and implement as soon
as possible a programme of expanded government services in post
offices. There should be a new presumption that, in addition to
any other delivery methods, all government departments should
seek to deliver their services through the post office network
in the interest of social inclusion. They should also be obliged
to promote these delivery methods on an equal footing with other
methods. The example of the Pensions Agency, constantly seeking
to obscure the availability of its services through post offices,
stands as a warning as to what will happen if this policy is not
enforced properly.
Local government services
110. The post office network is also used for the
delivery of some local government services, although these vary
from place to place. Local services available through some post
offices include: applications for concessionary bus passes; acceptance
of council tax, rent and other payment types;[127]
meals on wheels; travel permits and passes; blue badges and leisure
centre passports.[128]
Post Office Ltd reports that of the 526 local authorities they
analysed, 312 use post offices for at least one service. However,
very few only 55 use them for council tax, rent
payments, and other local government services. Most just use them
for one type of local authority service.[129]
As with central government services, the Committee received many
suggestions for services that local authorities could offer through
the post office network. These are summarised below in Table 3.
Table 3: Suggestions for possible new local government
services
Paying rent for Council properties
Travel passes and parking permits
Leisure pass
Disabled badge issuing
Parking and other fines payment
Payment for Social Service provision
School uniform vouchers
School meal vouchers or payment
School lessons/extras
Council Tax payment
Congestion charge
| Building regulation fees
Garage/allotment/hall hire fees
National Non Domestic Rates
Local Authority payment collection point
Local Authority information provision
Consultation exercises on local matters
Vehicle removal/towing fees
Commercial waste fees
Recycling bag collection point
House clearance fees
Registration of change of circumstances
|
111. As with central government services, many suggested
that post offices could be a 'one-stop shop' for local government
services.[130] Post
offices could act as a payment collection point for local authorities,
including: [131]
rent for Council properties;[132]
council tax;[133] social
services such as 'Meals on Wheels';[134]
commercial waste fees;[135]
house clearance fees;[136]
vehicle removal fees;[137]
congestion charge fees;[138]
leisure passes;[139]
parking and other fines payments,[140]
and school meal vouchers and other payments to schools.[141]
The Scottish Grocers Federation points out that Proof of Age cards
are only available through local authority offices, and suggests
that they should be made available through the entire post office
network.[142]
112. Local transport transactions could also be dealt
with at post offices. Post offices could sell travel passes and
parking permits,[143]
which is already being done in some areas. For example, the Mayor
of London submitted that post offices will process applications
for London's new half price Bus and Tram discount scheme.[144]
113. Essex County Council suggested several other
local government transactions that could be done in post offices:
garage, allotment, and hall hire fees; building regulation fees;
business rates; and school uniform vouchers.[145]
North Yorkshire County Council gave an example of how this might
be done:
Leeds City Council is using post offices to administer
school uniform clothing allowance vouchers via Post Office Ltd's
new 'Post Office Payout' facility (a new way of paying out cash
or postal orders based on presentation of a letter & I.D.
verification).[146]
114. Other local government services that could be
offered through post offices include disabled badge issuing[147]
and recycling bag collection.[148]
Post offices could be a centre for general local authority information,[149]
or for consultation exercises on local matters.[150]
They could also be a place for citizens to register change of
circumstances details, such as change of address, births, marriages
and deaths.[151] One
person suggested that post offices could have 'over the counter
hotlines' to enable customers to learn about government services.[152]
115. Post offices currently offer a checking service
for some central government services. The North Yorkshire County
Council suggested that this service could be extended to include
benefits forms. They cite the example of the 'Validate' programme,
in which local authorities use post offices to help with change
of circumstance declarations to assist fraud detection and reduce
housing benefit overpayments, and state that this pilot programme
should be extended to all local authorities.[153]
This pilot programme appears to be successfully used in Wales.[154]
116. Some local authorities are already piloting
innovative uses of the network. For example, when the Committee
visited Essex, it learned about neighbourhood policing teams using
local post offices as a place to engage with the community. Essex
has also established community information points in some post
offices that have been 'rescued' by the County Council from the
closure programme. These are web-based service access points,
and the Council sees them:
providing services such as internet access; free
cash machines; bill payment facilities; postal services and banking
services. These services will be complemented by direct access,
through the community information points, to information about
the local community and signposts to services provided by Central
Government, County and District Councils, the Police and many
other public bodies.[155]
117. In Camden, Lambeth and Sedgemoor, pilot schemes
have been set up in which post offices deliver consultation exercises,
communicate with residents, and meet housing benefit intervention
targets.[156] Nottingham
City Council allow customers to pay rent or council tax at post
offices, and although they pay Post Office Ltd a commission for
each transaction, "this is a significantly cheaper option
than processing payments at housing offices".[157]
Some councils employ technology to support the use of post offices.
For example, Torbay Council use barcodes on council tax and business
rates bills, and these can be paid at any post office.[158]
118. While these ideas and pilot projects are welcome,
there is no uniformity about the extent to which local government
services are available through the post office network. It depends
entirely on the enthusiasm of the local authority in question.
Even though local authorities have been vociferous in opposing
post office closures, many local authorities provide no services
at all through post offices. Local authorities use post office
services even less, and less consistently, than central government.
Many are quick to say they support post offices, but then are
slow to offer their services through them the support
that really matters. They should try harder to provide their services
through post offices those who have piloted such services
have been enthusiastic about the results. The Local Government
Association should lead efforts to expand the availability of
local government services through the post office network.
119. As with central government services, it is clear
that there is substantial scope for more use of the network by
local government. The NFSP submitted that they:
would like to see the current arrangements extended
across the board to all local authorities and for all regular
payments for services. This should be co-ordinated centrally by
an agency such as the Local Government Association, rather than
negotiated and implemented on a piecemeal basis, as is currently
the case. Central co-ordination would enhance take-up among local
authorities and reduce time expended by councils each navigating
their own arrangements from scratch.[159]
Post Office Ltd also has a role to play here, in
publicising the services it can offer local authorities, and standardising
them as far as possible.
120. It is not appropriate for the Government
to dictate to local authorities the extent to which they provide
services through the post office network. However, we believe
more could be done to raise awareness of the potential of the
network. Post Office Ltd should take the lead in developing services
that can be easily accessed by local authorities. It should then
work with the Local Government Association to ensure that every
local authority is provided with information about the services
post offices can offer.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR POST
OFFICES
121. The Committee visited Essex, Devon and Wales
during the course of the inquiry because each has taken an innovative
approach to keeping its post offices open. The 'Essex model',
whereby the local authority provides the funding to maintain the
network, has successfully reopened post offices in Essex that
would have otherwise been lost to the community. These post offices
also provide a number of new local government services. The Committee
had an opportunity to visit one of the post offices reopened recently
thanks to council funding that in Epping and heard
from local businesses and customers how important the council's
role was in restoring a vital service.
122. There has been tremendous interest in the Essex
model, with many local authorities approaching Essex County Council
to learn more about it. Essex County Council suggested that local
authorities might even become responsible for post office provision
in their areas. The Committee does not see this model as appropriate
to extend throughout the network. Relying on local authorities'
funding to maintain the network would result in poorer local authorities
providing fewer or poorer services. This would undoubtedly undermine
the uniformity of service, which we have heard is a desirable
some might say necessary characteristic of a sustainable
post office network.
123. Devon County Council has taken a slightly different
approach to Essex. Based on the recommendations of the Devon and
Torbay Post Office Task Force, which was formed in response to
the closure programme, the council set up a three-year strategy.
This strategy includes giving business advice and grants
to replace salaries that are no longer paid by Post Office Ltd
to partner outreach branches that represent the sole remaining
shop in a village. The Committee visited one such branch in Kennerleigh
(see Figure 1 at the beginning of this report). This village
shop and post office is being sustained partly by community involvement,
but substantially by the county council's annual grant of £5,000
for three years. The council is also providing free business advice
to post offices such as the one in Kennerleigh, to help them devise
business strategies to become sustainable after the withdrawal
of support from Post Office Ltd.
124. The Welsh Assembly Government has taken yet
another approach to support post offices. In addition to the pilot
project for the 'Validate' programme, discussed above, and a pilot
project to use rural post offices as internet hubs, it has made
available a Post Office Development Fund. This fund allows subpostmasters
to apply for capital grants and revenue funding to improve the
non-post office elements of their businesses. The capital grants
can be as much as £20,000; revenue grants can be as much
as £15,000. Examples of supported projects include the introduction
of a new retail business, improvement of the sustainability of
the non-post office aspects of the business, and helping disadvantaged
groups. Training is offered, and grants can include funding to
cover staffing costs that make it possible for subpostmasters
to get such training. As with Devon, the intent of this programme
is not indefinite support of the post offices in question, but
rather, ensuring the long-term self-sustainability of vulnerable
branches through business improvement.
125. Post offices are community assets, and we
welcome the approaches to support them that we have seen. Essex,
Devon and Wales are showing commendable initiative. Undoubtedly
there will be many other examples throughout the United Kingdom.
In providing services through the post office network, Essex is
giving an example of a local authority using post offices as a
resource. We were particularly impressed by the effort that the
Welsh Assembly Government and Devon County Council have made to
improve the underlying businesses associated with sub-post offices.
Helping businesses in this way not only supports the network,
but safeguards other facilities for the local community.
Financial services
126. The post office network is already a major financial
network and provides financial services to people who would otherwise
be unbanked. Post offices are used to receive cash, pay bills
and operate some accounts. The fee-free ATM network expanded to
almost 1,700 this year, and in some communities the post office
provides the only free access to cash.[160]
The Treasury Select Committee has drawn attention in repeated
reports[161] to the
importance of the network in ensuring financial inclusion. Appendix B
lists the bank services available from Post Office Ltd.
127. The POCA gives people on low incomes and pensioners
access to cash in their communities: the Commission for Rural
Communities estimates that 300,000 people in rural England do
not have a bank account;[162]
HM Treasury reports that in 2006-07, almost 5% of adults in the
UK were unbanked.[163]
Without access to a nearby post office, people on low incomes
may have to spend money to get money. As the NFSP pointed out,
the post office network's "coverage is particularly strong
in deprived urban and rural areas where many bank branches have
closed. Currently 4% of village have banks whilst 60% have post
offices".[164]
128. The availability of banking services is also
exceedingly important to small businesses, which might use their
local post office for getting change for their tills, receiving
payments from customers and depositing their takings at the end
of the day. Many small businesses would like to see more banking
services available through post offices, including access to more
banks and building societies, which would enable them to access
their business accounts locally.[165]
NEW FINANCIAL SERVICES THAT MIGHT
BE OFFERED
129. As shown by the summary of suggestions received
by the Committee (Table 4, below), there is a tremendous
appetite for improved and broadened financial services provided
through the post office.
Table 4: Suggestions for possible new financial
services
Comprehensive current/basic/business
accounts
Ability to deposit cash and cheques
Ability to withdraw cash
Extend links with credit unions
Introduce free-to-use cash machines
Utility service bill payment facility
Savings Accounts Gateway
Loans for SMEs
Small personal loans / micro loans
| Financial advice
Extend ability for POCA users to accumulate weekly payments into a holding account for payment on a monthly basis to help those on fixed weekly or low incomes plan for direct debits
Establish a 'People's Bank' / Postbank
Community group bank accounts
Children's 'passbook' savings account
|
130. In some cases, there is simply demand for more
universal access to the accounts customers hold with other banks,
since those that offer services through the post office do not
necessarily make all their usual services available. Consumers
want the ability to withdraw and deposit cash, and deposit cheques
at post offices. Citizens Advice noted that:
We think that all bank accounts should be accessible
over post office counters. Not only would this help to foster
greater financial inclusion and allow a simpler message to be
disseminated about this facility, but it would also have a positive
impact on the number of people visiting post office branches by
increasing footfall.[166]
131. Additional savings products are also in demand.
Postcomm suggested that the new Savings Account Gateway programme,
which is intended to promote savings by people on benefits, might
well be delivered through post offices.[167]
Other submissions suggested post offices could offer a "children's
passbook savings account to get the new youngsters into the habit
of saving" to address the current 11-year age limit for card-operated
accounts.[168] One
person recalled their own childhood experiences with a Post Office
Savings Account, for which they could buy 'Sixpenny Savings Stamps'.[169]
A post office bank?
132. There have been calls for the establishment
of a full commercial bank as part of the post office network.
The NFSP proposed a "Postbank", because "the post
office network's geographical reach and high levels of trust present
an enormous opportunity to increase banking provision for communities
and small businesses throughout the UK".[170]
The NFSP did not provide specific recommendations other than "bringing
National Savings and Investments (NS&I) with an enhanced portfolio
of banking products out of the Treasury and back into the Post
Office" and "transferring the banking licenses of the
recently nationalised banks to the Post Office".[171]
133. There is also support for a slightly different
post office bank model: one that would fill a special role and
improve financial inclusion. For example, the Post Bank Coalition's[172]
model would "operate independently and while it will run
a commercial operation which will make a profit, the Government
could use the Post Bank as a vehicle to tackle financial exclusion
and help those on low incomes." The Post Bank is meant to
be publicly owned and community based, "with a diversity
of services and partnerships such as credit unions and community
development finance institutions".[173]
The Post Bank Coalition envisages a 'Universal Banking Obligation',
modelled on the Universal Service Obligation for mail services.
134. A number of submissions saw the current credit
crisis as an opportunity for the post office and an associated
post office bank to use its trusted brand to provide credit. Loans
for small and medium-sized enterprises,[174]
and small personal loans or micro loans[175]
were suggested as possible new financial services. Another submission
suggests small loans of £50 to £500, and proposes that
a post office bank could deliver the Social Fund, which Jobcentre
Plus currently administers, to support people on low incomes with
loans and grants to meet unforeseen costs.[176]
Similarly, CWU and Unite the Union suggested in their submission
to the Committee that post offices could give debt and financial
planning advice.[177]
135. Cornwall County Council saw a role for post
offices in providing banking services for community groups, seeing
a need for:
a bank account aimed specifically at community
groups/social enterprises which takes account of their specific
needs and aims and objectives. A proper banking service could,
after initial set up, generate income which would help reduce
or even eliminate the need for continued government investment
in the service.[178]
136. Extending links with credit unions was seen
as a possible avenue for improving post office services and financial
inclusion.[179] North
Yorkshire County Council stated that the post office network could
provide access to credit union customers:
Credit unions provide safe, ethical and accessible
savings and borrowing; and have seen their membership triple and
their loan portfolios increase five-fold in the past decade. Post
Office Ltd. should tap into the growing credit union movement
by developing partnership links with credit unions: both are concerned
with promoting social and financial inclusion.[180]
137. In its appearance before the Committee, Post
Office Ltd spoke of its ongoing efforts to increase the financial
and banking services available through post offices. All basic
bank accounts are accessible through the network, and many, although
not all, banks allow access to other services.
138. Mr Cook, Chief Executive of Post Office Ltd,
said of the Post Bank Coalition's proposal:
we are all aiming ultimately for the same thing,
which is a very material financial services offering for the Post
Office. The difference between what we are currently pursuing
and what the Coalition are looking for is whether or not we are
a bank in our own right or whether we partner to use another organisation
to do it.[181]
In principle, Post Office Ltd supports the Post Bank
Coalition's efforts, because "it is getting the nation talking
about the Post Office as a provider of financial services, and
that is what we want".[182]
However,
The precise model that sits underneath is a bit
more of a financial debate. Make no mistake, we have a Post Bank
already, what we want is a much bigger, more successful one that
drives income.[183]
139. Post Office Ltd described how it had expanded
financial services over the past four years:
In the space of the last four years we have signed
up two million customers. We now have two million customers who
have financial services products with the Post Office. That is
50% more than the Bank of Ireland has customers back in Ireland,
for goodness' sake. That is a very material book of business.
There are 700,000 car and home insurance policies. We have rolled
out 1,653 free to use ATMs and we are rolling out eight a week
as we currently stand here. We have a foreign currency business
which is turning over £3 billion a year of sales and we are
doing typically a million travel insurance polices every year.
We already have a really, really significant Post Bank, we just
do not call it a Post Bank.[184]
Post Office Ltd recognised the limitations of its
banking model in its present state of development:
It is still in some senses a bit of a niche player
because we do not have every product that everybody else has and
some of the bigger omissions are things like a current account,
but we are addressing them".
Mr Cook told the Committee that Post Office Ltd hopes
to launch a current account next year and that there is "no
reason why that would not be in every single branch".[185]
The current account would be provided in partnership with the
Bank of Ireland,[186]
a model that has also been chosen by other post offices across
Europe.[187]
140. Post Office Ltd has no plans to obtain a banking
licence a prerequisite to the establishment of a post
office bank and it does not necessarily accept that it
is desirable: "It is not automatically the case that being
an insurer or a bank in its own right is necessarily good but,
if we did aspire to it, it would require significant funds".[188]
Post Office Ltd's current financial situation would certainly
present challenges to obtaining the necessary capital to get a
banking licence. It would very probably have to come from public
funds.
141. Moreover, if Post Office Ltd moved toward becoming
something closer to a normal retail bank or to the community-supporting
model backed by the Post Bank Coalition, it would require staff
trained to offer financial advice, and premises which could provide
the privacy necessary for complex financial transactions to be
carried out. This is not impossible, but it would be a radical
change from the current way in which post offices provide their
services, and probably to the relationship between subpostmasters
or other network providers and Post Office Ltd.
142. Mr Cook told us that the risks of the current
model of partnership with Bank of Ireland are much lower:
there are two things going on, those who underwrite
the risk and take the financial risk of the event happening and
those who sell the policies, and the latter is a much more secure
model. When we sell car insurance and house insurance we are not
vulnerable as Post Office Limited to a loss of profitability in
those marketplaces because we just earn a commission off of selling
the policy.
143. It is clear that there is huge demand for
wider availability of banking services through post offices, and
this Committee strongly endorses the widely held view that banking
is essential to the network. What is less clear is the model
that should be used to expand banking services. The choices appear
to include: continuing down the path chosen by Post Office Ltd,
which is an expansion of the current relationship with the Bank
of Ireland; the establishment of an all-new post office bank;
and the pursuit of a network-wide relationship with a new partner.
144. The existing model for the expansion of banking
services that advanced by Post Office Ltd is an
incremental approach. Post Office Ltd must negotiate with each
bank if it wants it to provide banking services, such as cash
withdrawals, from post offices: "we have to persuade the
bank itself that they would value the additional service for their
customers of them being able to withdraw their money at the post
office counter".[189]
This model produces results slowly, and its results have been
a patchwork of services available for only a selection of banks
through post offices.
145. The current model also relies on the partnership
with the Bank of Ireland, which also has its critics. Post offices
receive a commission for introducing the customer to the Bank
of Ireland service. This introduction often leads to long-term
customers for the Bank of Ireland for a wide range of services,
but the post office concerned does not benefit financially beyond
the initial introduction. Surely, the reasoning goes, the establishment
of a post office bank would earn more profit for the network from
banking services than it does with the Bank of Ireland model.
There is some suggestion that something like the Girobank, which
became a financial success just prior to its sale, could be implemented
to capture more of the profit for the post office network.
146. There is also a public perception that, since
the public already partially owns some UK banks and has already
invested a lot of money, there has to be a way to turn one of
these banks into a post office bank that would allow the network
to earn more profit in the long term compared to simply being
an agent for the Bank of Ireland. There is no reason why banks
in which the public has a stake could not provide more of their
services through the post office network. However, suggestions
that Post Office Ltd could simply assume the banking licence of
one of the nationalised banks are misguided. Northern Rock, for
example, may be sold as early as the end of 2009.[190]
In addition, there may be state aid implications of using a nationalised
bank as a post office bank.
147. The Committee
has not sought access to the detailed business agreement for the
current Post Office Ltd arrangement with the Bank of Ireland,
it has not discussed alternative arrangements with other possible
partners, and it has not been provided by the Post Bank Coalition
with any detailed business case for their proposition. Similarly,
the Committee does not have the expertise to comment on the detailed
advantages and disadvantages in both banking and commercial terms
of any of the options available to Post Office Ltd to take forward
banking services. We are not bankers; we are politicians and we
do not feel confident in these circumstances in making a detailed
recommendation on the future banking arrangements that must be
provided through post offices. The Committee
strongly supports greater provision of banking services through
the network. However, it is not obvious how a new post office
bank would be funded and secured, whether it would entail ending
existing arrangements with the Bank of Ireland, and if so, what
would be the financial consequences of terminating these arrangements.
At this stage, the priority should be to extend financial services
as quickly as possible. The existing agreement with the Bank of
Ireland may be the best way to do that. Alternatively, it may
be appropriate to seek a new arrangement with a UK bank. If neither
of these courses works, a post office bank may be appropriate.
148. The Government should review urgently the
effectiveness of Post Office Ltd's strategy for expanding banking
services, but it is the outcome that matters (more access to banking
through post offices) and not the means. Post Office Ltd must
prove that its current model, involving the gradual expansion
of financial services, is, as it contends, the best way to improve
banking services. It must do so by providing more banking services
through the network and substantially broadening access arrangements
with high street banks. The Government should use its influence
to ensure that the banks in which the public is a shareholder
provide services through post offices. We appreciate that the
Government wishes to leave the banks to run themselves, but there
is currently a unique opportunity for the public to gain a specific
and valuable benefit from its shareholding.
Other financial services
149. Even if the time is not right for a fully fledged
post office bank, there is scope for post offices to be used to
increase financial inclusion. Post Office Ltd has said that it
is pursuing a 'financial inclusion' agenda through a dialogue
with the Association of British Credit Unions, but sees this as
supplementing, rather than replacing, its more commercial financial
services, such as those offered through its Bank of Ireland partnership.[191]
We support this approach - credit unions fill a valuable niche
and promote financial inclusion, but they cannot address many
of the banking needs identified as desirable from the post office
network. The nature of their work means that credit unions are
not cheap - they have a high loan default rate and so must have
high interest rates. Nonetheless, they provide valuable services
to their customers, and we would welcome any partnership between
the credit unions and the post office network. However, that partnership
should bear in mind the legitimate need for Post Office Ltd's
retail partners to be paid for the work they undertake.
150. There were several ideas for post office banking
services that could improve financial inclusion. Many of those
related to the POCA, which is a matter for the Department for
Work and Pensions (DWP), rather than Post Office Ltd itself. The
POCA offers only cash withdrawal and balance enquiries. Some felt
that direct debit and standing orders should be possible through
the POCA.[192] Ofgem
suggested that the POCA should be made more flexible to facilitate
cheaper direct debit bill payments:
we do recognise that for those consumers on limited
and fixed weekly incomes, monthly Direct Debit arrangements can
be difficult to manage and may not be suitable. Therefore the
ability to accumulate weekly payments into a holding account for
payment on a monthly basis to the supplier would seem the best
way of addressing this. Again, this additional functionality could
be built into POCA.[193]
Similarly, Water UK proposed a 'Saving from Poverty'
scheme using an enhanced POCA to collect income and benefits "and
make direct payments for essential services such as water, gas
and electricity, on an agreed customer creditor basis,
without the penalty payments associated with the current direct
debit systems".[194]
151. The DWP, which administers the POCA, emphasises
the importance of keeping the POCA simple. While it is making
some improvements to the POCA simplifying account opening,
giving access to post-office owned cash machines, and speeding
up payment clearance it resists any efforts to make the
POCA more like a bank account:
The Government does not have such plans primarily
because POCA was always designed for those customers who could
not open or operate any sort of bank account, including a basic
bank account. As such it fills a particular niche in a range of
products which aim to meet a wide spectrum of customer needs and
circumstances. There are already more than 25 bank accounts that
can be used at Post Office branches, so turning the POCA into
a bank account would duplicate existing provision. Allowing other
monies to be paid into the POCA (e.g. cash) would also mean that
the identification and verification requirements for opening a
POCA would almost certainly have to be tightened, thus denying
it to some of the customers who need it most. None of this, of
course, need inhibit the Post Office from developing and adding
to its own range of banking products something we would
welcome.[195]
152. The Government could do more to use the post
office network for services that improve financial inclusion.
The greater availability of fee-free cash machines and the renewal
of the POCA contract are welcome. However, more can be done; for
example, the new savings vehicles mentioned above the
Savings Account Gateway programme and a children's passbook savings
account. Similarly, the Committee sees no reason why the Government
could not work with Post Office Ltd to make the POCA more flexible
to facilitate direct debits; for example, by allowing POCA holders
to accumulate weekly payments into a holding account for payment
on a monthly basis. Meanwhile, we recognise that the POCA is unlikely
to be renewed again when it expires in five years. This gives
added urgency to the provision of better banking services through
post offices to enable migration to these services as the POCA
is wound down.
153. The Committee whole-heartedly supports the
rapid expansion of fee-free cash machines throughout the post
office network, and urges the Government to consider providing
more innovative tools to enable financially excluded individuals
to take advantage of direct debit bill payment discounts. The
Government should also use the post office network to promote
savings programmes for children and to deliver the Savings Account
Gateway programme.
Bill payment
154. There were many submissions calling for the
ability to pay all utility bills through post offices.[196]
One submission said:
I pay many of my bills at the Post Office but
there are others which require a visit to a branch of my Bank
(such as Credit Card payments); could the Post Office deal with
these? For those rural communities with an infrequent Bus Service,
such a facility at the Post Office would surely be a boon.[197]
155. The Committee received some innovative suggestions
for using the post office network to give consumers, particularly
those with low incomes, access to utilities at affordable rates.
The National Federation of SubPostmasters submitted that the network
could help overcome fuel poverty by improving access to affordable
rates.[198]
156. Attractive though these ideas are, neither the
Government nor the Committee have or should have the power to
require private sector bodies to provide payment services through
the post office network. Moreover, as we discuss later in this
report, the Post Office has to earn its place in society; it cannot
be left without competition. Some of the proposals put to us relate
to regulated industries. Regulators should consider these proposals,
and in particular should consider the extent to which payment
services are available across the whole country, but we have not
included this in our remit.
Community services
157. The intangible community services provided by
post offices are the most valued of all for some of those who
submitted evidence to the Committee. It is perhaps its broadest
and most ill-defined role, and the one least reflected in the
network's finances and sub-postmasters' incomes. Post offices
are critical, particularly to individuals in rural communities
and to the abundance of small businesses that would find it difficult
to function without the postal and banking services of the post
office. In some communities that suffer from a scarcity of shopping
facilities, the post office helps to prevent the shop where it
is based from going out of business.[199]
This is particularly important in rural areas, where "an
estimated 57% of rural postmasters provide the only retail outlet
in their village".[200]
158. Other community services informally provided
by some post offices include repeat prescription pick-up,[201]
acting as a local tourist information centre,[202]
"assistance for vulnerable residents informal advice,
interpreting official letters, fielding lost property, taking
messages, offering emotional support and providing a focal point
for communities".[203]
159. Torbay Council gave us a number of ways in which
post offices aided social and financial inclusion, including providing
a community focal point "where people can meet each other
and find out about issues that affect them" and representing
an "unofficial alert system that post masters operate for
customers who have not been seen when expected to be".[204]
A poll conducted for AgeConcern suggested that 90% of older people
viewed their local post office as a 'lifeline'.[205]
160. The social role of post offices is linked to
the government services role, in that by filling this role, post
offices displace some of the cost to Government.[206]
As one submission pointed out: "In many communities the PO
provides our social glue. It is often a key institution in the
local community encouraging social interaction and as such can
help reduce social care and health care costs, enabling people
to live independently for longer".[207]
The social role of the network has been acknowledged by the Government
and by communities, but no value has been put upon it, although
the Network Subsidy Payment to Post Office Ltd could be construed
as a valuation of sorts.
New community services that might be offered
161. The Committee received many innovative ideas
for additional community services that could be offered through
the post office network. Some are already offered in a few branches
on a pilot basis; most would be entirely new services. The suggestions
sent to the Committee are summarised below in Table 5. Most
ideas leverage the fact that the network is a natural communication
tool because of its reach and distribution. Citizens Advice research
done to support their submission to the Network Change consultation
showed that 32% of post office users already use post offices
for finding information.[208]
Table 5: Suggestions for possible new community
services
Police consultation and advice
Information on help for small businesses
Citizen Advice Bureau kiosk
Information on government policy
Community transport information
Community information such as opening times for other services
Tourist information accommodation booking
Small meeting rooms for hire
Job Centre Plus IT terminals and job vacancy adverts
Social Services information
Facilities to print government forms and documents
Telephone 'befriending' service for vulnerable people
Local 'outreach' service to vulnerable people
Passport photo booths
Internet terminals with access to a range of approved retailer sites
| IT and info point
Internet access or 'e-terminals'
Administration of the Social Fund
Travel agency services
Using PO Ltd to overcome fuel poverty by providing access to utilities at affordable rates
PCT prescription collection and delivery
'Hot Desking', Skype and video conferencing
MP or local councillor surgeries
Greater use of electronic terminals for routine processes (stamp sales etc) to free staff up for information provision, application checking etc.
Deliver consultation exercises on local matters, e.g. planning
Use free space for courses, meeting and events
Local coffee mornings
The 'Saving from Poverty' scheme
Local employment fairs
|
162. The communication of information via post offices
can go well beyond the provision of information about local and
central government. Some suggested that post offices could provide
general community information,[209]
such as opening times for health services, police, local support
agencies and charities, or community transport information.[210]
These services are offered in some post office branches on an
informal basis already, but there is support for their network-wide
provision.
163. Post offices could also be useful locations
for local MP or councillor surgeries,[211]
and while they are already used in some locations for police consultations
and advice, there were several suggestions that this role could
be extended further across the post office network.[212]
164. Citizens Advice and others suggested that post
offices could host Citizens Advice Bureau kiosks, which could
provide advice on issues ranging from energy efficiency to mobile
phone mis-selling.[213]
Citizens Advice's vision is that:
the post office network could offer information
not only from both central and local government, but could also
perform this service for regulators, boosting take-up among eligible
groups for specific entitlements, raising awareness of problem
areas and also of consumers' rights, while also helping to engage
consumers in markets where they may traditionally have been reluctant
to do so. This role could involve not only the provision of written
information but could also provide a location to provide access
to the internet or a forum in which information and advice could
be provided.[214]
165. Consumers could also be served through post
offices supplying internet terminals with access to a range of
approved retailer sites, with the branch earning a commission
when customers make purchases from a post office terminal:[215]
retailers could also make arrangements with post
offices so that orders could be purchased and collected at a post
office counter. This would provide a captive market for the Post
Office in relation to customers who do not have credit cards or
who do not feel comfortable providing their financial details
on-line.[216]
166. Internet terminals in various forms came up
in several submissions to the inquiry. One County Council thought
that, as in the 'Essex model', local authorities could rent space
from the post office to host an internet hub for local government
information and electronic payments.[217]
In general, internet access or 'e-Terminals' were seen as a good
fit with the post office network.[218]
167. The role of post offices as the 'lifeline' for
the vulnerable and isolated could be formalised by providing more
social service information.[219]
For example, some submissions proposed a telephone 'befriending'
service for vulnerable, isolated people in the community, providing
local social service outreach.[220]
Age Concern described what this programme might look like:
From the research undertaken by Help the Aged
as part of their contribution to the compensated closure programme,
the number of older people in the vicinity is known, and such
a scheme could be run in conjunction with social services who
would provide further data and professional support. Many sub-postmasters
claim to 'keep an eye' on the health and wellbeing of their regular
older customers, in future they could do so on a much more systematic
basis and be funded to do so.[221]
168. Another social service presently provided by
some post offices on an informal, unpaid basis is prescription
collection and delivery. The Committee received submissions supporting
the formal provision of this service through the post office network,
depending on the location.[222]
169. The Committee received several suggestions for
post offices taking even more of a tourism role than they already
informally fill. For example, post offices could provide tourist
information and accommodation booking.[223]
One submission suggested that post offices could partner with
high street travel agencies to offer services complementary to
Post Office Ltd's existing currency and insurance services.[224]
170. Some of the services proposed for the post office
network could particularly help small businesses. For example,
post offices could provide: free spaces for courses, meetings
and events;[225] small
meeting rooms for hire; 'hot desking', and skype and video conferencing
facilities.[226] However,
this suggestion depends on the post office premises in question
having the space for such facilities.
171. Our witnesses suggested a wide range of community
services which could be offered through post offices. The extent
to which each is practicable depends on local circumstances. There
may be scope for a rural post office to double as a tourist information
office. There may be circumstances where it would be possible
for a post office to be combined with business premises. There
may be circumstances in which a prescription collection service
could be offered on a commercial basis. We do not believe such
things can be mandated; they depend on the drive of the individual
who runs a particular post office, and indeed, on the community
surrounding the post office. However, they demonstrate the potential
strength and flexibility of a system where services are provided
through a partnership between the central company (Post Office
Ltd) and other partners. There is a role for Post Office Ltd in
making these arrangements easier; for example, by helping with
technology, arranging template agreements and articulating best
practice.
70 Edward Bennett, The Post Office and its Story
(London Seeley, 1912) Back
71
Ev 145 [NFSP] Back
72
Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Committee, Tenth Report
of Session 2007-08, Post Office finance: matters arising from
evidence taken on 10 June 2008, HC 662 Back
73
The Future of the Universal Postal Service in the UK, Cm
7650, Feb 2009, p 17 Back
74
Ev 160 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 175 [Postcomm]; Ev
87 [Association of Convenience Stores]; Ev 144 [National Federation
of SubPostmasters]; Ev 132 [Intellect]; Ev 191 [Scottish Grocers
Federation] Back
75
Ev 175 [Postcomm] Back
76
Ev 176 [Postcomm] Back
77
Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Committee, Fifth Report
of Session 2008-09, The Postal Services Bill, HC 172-II,
Ev 51 Back
78
Ev 109 [CWU/Unite the Union] Back
79
Q 334 [Mr Cook] Back
80
Q 333 [Mr Cook] Back
81
NFSP, Six Steps to a Sustainable Post Office Network, 23
March 2009, p 9 Back
82
Government Response to the House of Commons Business and Enterprise
Select Committee Report on the Postal Services Bill (Fifth Report
of the Session 2008-09: HC 172-I), Cm 7623, p 45 Back
83
Ev 60 [BERR] Back
84
Ev 61 [Defence] Back
85
Ev 62 [Home Office] Back
86
Ev 61 [Defence] Back
87
Ev 64 [Transport] Back
88
Ev 64-5 [Transport] Back
89
Ev 63 [Home Office] Back
90
Ev 205 [Unite] Back
91
Ev 129 [The Harwich Society] Back
92
Digital Britain, Final Report, June 2009 Cm7650, p 210 Back
93
Ev 190 [Brian Sawkins] Back
94
Ev 196 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community Councils] Back
95
Ev 64 [Transport]; Ev 60 [Defence]; Ev 66 [DWP]; Ev 62 [Home Office];
Ev 65 [Treasury]; Ev 180 [Post Office Ltd] Back
96
Ev 142 [NFSP] Back
97
Ev 158 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 74 [Age Concern]; Ev 193 [South Hams District
Council] Back
98
Ev 64 [Transport] Back
99
Ev 158 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [ACRE]; Ev 108
[CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 198 [Andrew Summers]; Ev 193 [South
Hams District Council] Back
100
Ev 117 [Essex FSB] Back
101
Ev 160 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
102
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union] Back
103
Ev 71 [Action with Communities in Rural England]; Ev 87 [Association
of Convenience Stores]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural
Community Councils]; Ev 142 [NFSP]; Ev 191 [Scottish Grocers Federation];
Ev 102[Co-operative Group]; Ev 74 [Age Concern] Back
104
Ev 63 [Home Office] Back
105
Ev 65 [Transport] Back
106
Ev 179 [Post Office Ltd] Back
107
Ev 177 [Post Office Ltd] Back
108
Ev 142 [NFSP] Back
109
Ev 142 [NFSP] Back
110
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union] Back
111
Ev 174 [Postcomm] Back
112
Ev 97 [Consumer Focus] Back
113
Ev 158 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 86 [Association of
Convenience Stores]; Ev 107 [CWU/Unite]; Ev 142 [NFSP]; Ev 102
[Co-operative Group]; Ev 97 [Consumer Focus]; Ev 97 [Citizens
Advice]; Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council]; Ev 87 [Hugh Bayley
MP]; Back
114
Ev 158 See also Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
115
Ev 158 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
116
Ev 104 [Cornwall County Council] Back
117
Ev 107 [CWU/Unite] Back
118
Cabinet Office, Performance and Innovation Unit Report, Counter
Revolution: Modernising the Post Office Network, (2000),
p 77 Back
119
Ev 107 [CWU/Unite] Back
120
HC Deb, 21 May 2003, col 306-13WH [Westminster Hall] Back
121
Ev 142 [NFSP] Back
122
Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
123
Ev 188 [Rural Action East] Back
124
Ev 174 [Postcomm] Back
125
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union] Back
126
Ev 102 [Co-operative Group] Back
127
Ev 183 [Post Office Ltd] Back
128
Ev 143 [NFSP] Back
129
Ev 183 [Post Office Ltd] Back
130
Ev 201 [Torbay Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities in Rural
England]; Ev 107 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 113 [Essex County Council];
Ev 102 [Co-operative Group]; Ev 97 [Consumer Focus]; Back
131
Ev 125 [Future Years]; Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council];
Ev 86 [Association of Convenience Stores]; Ev 194 [South Oxfordshire
District Council]; Ev 113 [Essex County Council]; Ev 191 [Scottish
Grocers Federation]; Ev 118 [Essex Rural Partnership]; Ev 97 [Consumer
Focus]; Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council]; Ev 96 [Commission for
Rural Communities]; Ev 171[Pinchbeck WI] Back
132
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community
Councils]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 143 [NFSP]; Ev 114
[Essex County Council]; Ev 90 [Cllr. Mike Carver]; Ev 134 [Marjorie
Lewis] Back
133
Ev 71 [Action with Communities in Rural England]; Ev 197 [South
West ACRE Network of Rural Community Councils]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite
the Union]; Ev 147 [NFSP]; Ev 193 [South Hams District Council];
Ev 90 [Cllr. Mike Carver]; Ev 134 [Marjorie Lewis] Back
134
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 147 [NFSP];
Ev 114 [Essex County Council] Back
135
Ev 147 [NFSP] Back
136
Ev 147 [NFSP] Back
137
Ev 147 [NFSP] Back
138
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union] Back
139
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the
Union]; Ev 147 [NFSP]; Ev 114 [Essex County Council]; Ev 75 [Age
Concern] Back
140
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community
Councils]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 147 [NFSP]; Ev 114
[Essex County Council]; Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council]; Ev 193
[South Hams District Council]; Ev 141 [Deborah Moggarch] Back
141
Ev 147 [NFSP] Back
142
Ev 191 [Scottish Grocers Federation] Back
143
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council]; Ev 71 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community
Councils]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 147 [NFSP]; Ev 114
[Essex County Council]; Ev 191 [Scottish Grocers Federation];
Ev 90 [Cllr. Mike Carver] Back
144
Ev 139 [Mayor of London] Back
145
Ev 114 [Essex County Council] Back
146
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
147
Ev 147 [NFSP] Back
148
Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
149
Ev 154 [Norfolk Rural Community Council] Back
150
Ev 201 [Torbay Council]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural
Community Councils]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 148 [NFSP];
Ev 163 [Nottingham County Council] Back
151
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the Union]; Ev 97 [Consumer Focus] Back
152
Ev 130 [Peter Horne] Back
153
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
154
Ev 143 [NFSP] Back
155
Ev 112 [Essex County Council] Back
156
Ev 201 [Torbay Council] Back
157
Ev 163 [Nottingham City Council] Back
158
Ev 202 [Torbay Council] Back
159
Ev 143 [NFSP] Back
160
Royal Mail Holdings plc, Report and Accounts, Year ended 29
March 2009, 14 May 2009, p 7 Back
161
Treasury Committee, Twelfth Report of Session 2005-06, Financial
inclusion: credit, savings, advice and insurance, HC848-I
and -II, and Treasury Committee - Thirteenth Report of Session
2005-06, "Banking the unbanked": banking services,
the Post Office Card Account and financial inclusion, HC1717 Back
162
Ev 94[Commission for Rural Communities] Back
163
HM Treasury, "Progress towards the shared goal on access
to bank accounts", 23 June 2008, available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/financial_inclusion_bankaccounts.htm Back
164
Ev 143 [NFSP] Back
165
Ev 120 [FSB] Back
166
Ev 92 [Citizens Advice] Back
167
Ev 174 [Postcomm] Back
168
Ev 198 [Andrew Summers] Back
169
Ev 191 [Brian Sawkins] Back
170
NFSP, Six Steps to a Sustainable Post Office Network, 23
March 2009, p 15 Back
171
Ibid. Back
172
The Post Bank Coalition is: Communication Workers' Union; Federation
of Small Businesses; new economics foundation; Unite the Union;
Public Interest Research Centre; and National Pensioners' Convention. Back
173
Post Bank Coalition, Post Bank at the People's Post Office,
17 March 2009, p 7 Back
174
Ev 71 [Action with Communities in Rural England] Back
175
Ev 129 [Richard Heller] Back
176
Ev 69 [A4e]; Ev 142 [NFSP] Back
177
Ev 108 [CWU/Unite] Back
178
Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
179
Ev 158 [North Yorkshire county Council]; Ev 72 [Action with Communities
in Rural England]; Ev 82 [Association of British Credit Unions
Ltd.]; Ev 190 [Phillida Sawbridge]; Ev 89 [Burrington Parish Council] Back
180
Ev 159 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
181
Q 359 [Mr Cook] Back
182
Q 365 [Mr Cook] Back
183
Q 365 [Mr Cook] Back
184
Q 365 [Mr Cook] Back
185
Q 361 [Mr Cook] Back
186
Q 363 [Mr Cook] Back
187
Q 364 [Mr Cook] Back
188
Q 364 [Mr Cook] Back
189
Q 370 [Mr Cook] Back
190
"Northern Rock to be sold by end of year", Sunday
Times, 26 April, 2009 Back
191
Q360 [Mr Cook] Back
192
Ev 124 [Fuel Poverty Advisory Group for England] Back
193
Ev 165 [Ofgem] Back
194
Ev 206 [Water UK] Back
195
Ev 66 [DWP] Back
196
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council]; Ev 85 [Association of
Convenience Stores]; Ev 118 [Essex Rural Partnership]; Ev 98 [Consumer
Focus]; Ev 193 [South Hams District Council]; Ev 134 [Marjorie
Lewis]; Ev 111 [Phil and Sally Deacon]; Ev 190 [Brian Sawkins] Back
197
Ev 190 [Brian Sawkins] Back
198
Ev 143 [NFSP] Back
199
Ev 162 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
200
Ev 116 [Essex County Council] Back
201
Ev 172 [David C Porter] Back
202
Ev 82 [Jon Amos] Back
203
Ev 146 [NFSP] Back
204
Ev 203 [Torbay Council] Back
205
Ev 205 [Unite] Back
206
Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
207
Ev 106 [Cornwall County Council] Back
208
Ev 91 [Citizens Advice] Back
209
Ev 118 [Essex Rural Partnership] Back
210
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council] Back
211
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council]; Ev 163 [Nottingham County
Council] Back
212
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council]; Ev 197 [South West ACRE
Network of Rural Community Councils]; Ev 75 [Age Concern] Back
213
Ev 92 [Citizens Advice]; Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council];
Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community Councils] Back
214
Ev 92 [Citizens Advice] Back
215
Ev 160 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
216
Ev 160 [North Yorkshire County Council] Back
217
Ev 163 [Nottingham County Council] Back
218
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council]; Ev 130 [Peter Horne];
Ev 132 [Intellect]; Ev 88 [Hugh Bayley MP] Back
219
Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community Councils] Back
220
Ev 75 [Age Concern] Back
221
Ev 75 [Age Concern] Back
222
Ev 155 [Norfolk Rural Community Council]; Ev 108 [CWU/Unite the
Union]; Ev 133 [Intellect]; Ev 105 [Cornwall County Council] Back
223
Ev 197 [South West ACRE Network of Rural Community Councils] Back
224
Ev 88 [Hugh Bayley MP] Back
225
Ev 148 [NFSP] Back
226
Ev 132 [Intellect] Back
|