Post offices - securing their future - Business and Enterprise Committee Contents


Letter from Dr Bernie Doeser to Andrew George MP

  I hope that you have been able to have a break over Christmas and let me take this opportunity to wish you a successful 2009.

  I am writing in respect of the public campaign to keep Ashton Post Office open to which you tent your much valued support in the summer. As you recall Post Office Ltd would not provide us with the financial, usage, demographic or geographic information on which they based their decision to select Ashton for closure. As the limited information that they did give us, in the form of the Branch Access Report, was so flawed we had no faith in the fairness of the decision that they took.

  Early in the consultation period (on 18 July) I requested the above mentioned background information from Post Office Ltd under the Freedom of Information Act but which they subsequently refused to supply. I then requested an internal review by the Post Office of their decision to decline to provide this information, which was solely on the basis of commercial confidentiality, and in my view a reason not relevant to most of the information I had asked for.

  As the consultation period was ending, and the Post Office had not responded to my request for a review, on 26 August I submitted a formal complaint under the FOI to the Information Commissioners Office.

  A week later I was informed, by the Post Office, that the internal review had upheld the Post Offices original decision but it had failed to offer any relevant reason as to why the information I requested had been declined. Indeed the response had the flavour of a pro-forma reply which simply repeated much of the background to the Network Change Programme which was available on the Post Offices website.

  I then contacted the information Commissioners Office through their web form and advised them that the Post Offices internal review had completed unsatisfactorily and that I wished to proceed with the complaint.

  On 10 November, having not received any response from the Information Commissioners Office, either to the original complaint, or to my follow-up on the web form, I emailed the Information Commissioners Office requesting an update on the status of my complaint, but again received no response. In frustration on 22 November I wrote again to the Information Commissioners Office expressing my disappointment that they had not responded to my letter, web form or email over the past three months and that if they did not respond confirming that they were progressing with my complaint within two weeks I would be writing to you to ask you to raise this matter with the minister concerned, who is I understand, The Secretary of State for Justice The Rt Hon Jack Straw MP. I received a pro-forma letter confirming receipt of my letter and advising me that I would be given a reference number. Sadly to date no further communication has been received. I would like to know if the Secretary of State is satisfied that members of the public who lodge complaints via the ICO are made to wait for over three months for even an acknowledgement that their case is being dealt with.

  Should the ICO continue to ignore me I intend to make a FOI request to the ICO to ask for the papers relating to my complaint. If they do not provide them within the requisite timeframe I shall lodge a complaint with them about themselves. I think this would form the basis of a very amusing article in the national press.

  I have sent a copy of this letter to Richard Thomas the Information Commissioner.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 July 2009