Post offices - securing their future - Business and Enterprise Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by the National Federation of Sub-Postmasters

  The National Federation of Sub-Postmasters (NFSP) is delighted that the Business and Enterprise Committee is conducting this inquiry, which provides us all with an excellent opportunity to maximise the use of an exceptional national asset—the post office network. We have reached a critical point at which we can either work to enhance this essential piece of the nation's critical infrastructure, providing the social and economic glue that holds communities together, or sit back and watch its slow and continued decline.

 (1)   What services should the Post Office network offer from government

  1.1  Post offices have traditionally provided a wide range of government services. Currently this includes access to state pensions and benefits and tax credits through the Post Office card account (POCA) and the Exceptions Service (green giros); driving licence applications and checking, fishing and game licence applications; issuing of vehicle licensing; statutory off road notification. Other government-related services include passport application and checking and European Health Insurance Cards.

  1.2  The post office network is the natural outlet for government services in local communities across the UK. Post offices have an unparalleled local reach, established infrastructure, experienced staff and receive high levels of trust from the public. Not only are government services extensively used at post offices, but also they are highly effective. For example, 77% of customers use post offices to access government forms.1 Passport applications processed using the Post Office "check and send" service see error rates of only 1%; error rates are 15 times greater for applications returned directly by post.2

  1.3  The NFSP strongly believes not only that the post office network should retain its current government services, but that these should be extended so that the network can provide a comprehensive range of government-related payment transactions, information provision, and form access and checking. It is essential that government departments and agencies offering their services via post offices should clearly inform the public that this is the case; some, such as DVLA, do not always do so. The BBC TV licence contract should be re-instated to the Post Office and new services should be added. For instance, if ID cards and biometric identity processing are introduced nationally, these should be available via post offices. Other types of service should also be considered, such as the Irish government's recent plans to oblige benefits claimants to sign on at post offices to help prevent benefit fraud; housing Jobcentre Plus IT terminals within post offices; Post Office Ltd (POL) taking over running the administration of the Social Fund from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP); using POL to extend the government's role in overcoming fuel poverty by providing access to utilities at affordable rates. The NFSP holds that the Government must use the network far more effectively and actively encourage departments to make their services available through post offices, both to maximise citizens' access to government information and services, and to increase post offices' footfall.

  1.4  In addition to formal transactions, post office customers often bring in government forms obtained at post offices or received through the post and ask subpostmasters to check them. Subpostmasters also frequently sign official documents, such as passport applications, for their customers. These are goodwill gestures and subpostmasters are not remunerated for offering them. There is strong evidence that this informal assistance is extensively drawn upon throughout the post office network—between 35% and 41% of customers do so.3

  1.5  The NFSP believes this informal role of subpostmasters should be enhanced and formalised into a face-to-face service for direct access to government information and services. This service should draw on the experience, and learn lessons from the government's previously proposed Government General Practitioner service of trained and IT-enabled staff acting as a guide to government,4 where subpostmasters and their staff would provide information and advice on central and local government issues and allow citizens to carry out routine transactions with all government bodies. Research on the very limited trial version of the proposal, suggests this type of service is effective and popular. Ninety percent of users reported satisfaction with the service and those in vulnerable groups particularly said it made them more likely to want to find out information on government services and would make it easier for them to do so.5 A one-stop shop for government information, offering a face-to-face service complementing the DirectGov website would provide convenient access to government services right in the heart of local communities, as well as a reinforcing a key facet of the Post Office's offer.

from local authorities

  1.6  Post offices are the ideal venue for providing payment collection facilities for local authorities. For local authorities this has the advantage of providing a direct means to support all local post offices; it also frees up administration, particularly regarding residents who need or wish to make very frequent low value payments. Currently many local authorities offer some payment facilities at post offices—this may include rent payments, council tax, payment for social services provision, meals on wheels, travel permits and passes, blue badges and leisure centre passports (see Appendix for a list of suggested examples of local authority services which could be channelled through post offices). Local authorities use a range of mechanisms for collecting these payments such as swipecards and stamps. The NFSP would like to see the current arrangements extended across the board to all local authorities and for all regular payments for services. This should be co-ordinated centrally by an agency such as the Local Government Association, rather than negotiated and implemented on a piecemeal basis, as is currently the case. Central co-ordination would enhance take-up among local authorities and reduce time expended by councils each navigating their own arrangements from scratch.

  1.7  POL is currently trialling Validate, a service designed the help prevent fraud and overpayments in housing benefit. It works by mailing customers and requesting them to produce evidence of any changes in their circumstances at a local post office, details of which are then transmitted to the local authority for reassessment of the benefit claim. POL has also piloted a consultation service enabling councils to use local post offices to conduct public consultations. The NFSP welcomes these pilots and would like to see such services extended throughout the UK. However, we note comments from POL regarding the difficulties in reaching the right decision makers within local authorities. Again, this seems to be evidence of the necessity to centrally co-ordinate local authority services available through post offices.

  1.8  In addition to the more transactional services, the NFSP would like to see all local authorities formalising arrangements and remunerating post offices for their informal role as a communications channel providing information and signposting to residents and visitors on local services.

from other sources, including services in competition with Royal Mail Group

  1.9  The NFSP believes that banking should be a major service provided by the post office network. Post offices are perfectly placed to meet the need for local access to cash and banking services, for individuals and small businesses. Even after the post office closures under the recent Network Change programme, the Post Office has unrivalled coverage across the UK, with more branches than all banks and building societies combined. The Post Office's coverage is particularly strong in deprived urban and rural areas where many bank branches have closed. Currently 4% of villages have banks whilst 60% have post offices.6

  1.10  The NFSP believes that Post Office banking, over and above the POCA, should have two elements. Firstly, a Post Office branded bank, or Postbank, should be created, building on the POCA to provide a full range of basic, current and business accounts. The Post Office is a trusted brand name, particularly among marginalised and vulnerable members of society who view the Post Office as both more trustworthy and more accessible than the banks. It is not the NFSP's intention to determine the detailed mechanics of how a Postbank should be operated at the Post Office, but we believe that the government and POL should urgently look at this proposal. The NFSP notes the growing calls for a state bank from commentators ranging from John McFall MP, chair of the Commons Treasury Committee, to Jim O'Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs.7 We urge the government to give serious consideration of the creation of a Postbank at the Post Office.

  1.11  The second element of Post Office banking needs to be post office access for all major high street bank accounts. Comprehensive access to all current, basic and business accounts over the post office counter would constitute an excellent free community banking service. At present, although a number of banks do offer banking services at post offices, significant numbers of bank accounts still remain unavailable at post offices; and many of the banks that do offer post office access severely limit the range of transactions available. The universal availability of these services would also make post office banking easier to promote. Currently the banks do not advertise their post office accessibility; and the restrictions on the number of accessible accounts and the range of transactions make it a difficult message for POL to promote. Germany provides a model for this, with Deutsche Post offering full access to all bank accounts alongside its own Postbank.

  1.12  Post offices now offer a range of other financial services including Post Office home and motor insurance, savings products and credit cards. These services have proved popular with many post office customers and the NFSP is delighted at these achievements and believes these services should continue to be offered. Similarly travel (insurance, money cards, bureau de change) and telephony (Post Office phone service, broadband, phone cards, mobile E top ups) have been well-received and should continue to form part of the Post Office's services.

  1.13  Bill payment facilities are, and should continue to be, an important part of the Post Office's services, enabling people to pay their bills in person by cash or cheque. Over half of all household bills paid using cash and cheques are handled at post offices.8 Bill payment services are particularly well-used by people on lower incomes who are considerably less likely to pay their bills by direct debit, and for budgeting reasons this is likely to remain the case.

  1.14  The NFSP believes the post office network should build on its traditional products and position as the retail arm of Royal Mail, and that the Post Office should be the place to go for all mail needs. We support the new mail services being introduced at the Post Office, such as e-fulfillment services. In future, post offices may be used increasingly by Royal Mail letters for the public to pick up packets and parcels; they tend to have more convenient opening times and are better located that Royal Mail Callers' Offices. A further possible new source of mails income for the post office network may derive from the liberalisation of the UK postal market. Postcomm has suggested that new mails operators may want to use the size and geographic coverage of the post office network to sell their products and services to domestic customers and small businesses. The NFSP agrees that if this is how postal competition develops, post offices must act as dropping off and collection hubs for all mails companies. However, to maintain the network's integrity, this should be agreed on a network-wide basis, rather than by arrangements with individual post offices.

  1.15  Post offices already provide an extensive and well used range of services for overseas travel; but are also well-positioned to take up a new role as local travel centres. Providing comprehensive information, timetables, tickets and passes for local bus and train services would be particularly valuable for the more vulnerable and digitally excluded members of society.

To what extent would these increase the network's commercial viability? Is there a case for any service to be subsidised, and if so, to what extent?

  1.16  In considering the impact of any service on the network's viability, a distinction needs to be drawn between income accrued centrally to POL, and to post office outlets or certain categories of post office outlet. For the network to be viable, individual sub post offices must also be viable. In order to be viable, individual sub post offices require a comprehensive range of government, mails, banking and other services which attract regular customer visits.

  1.17  In 2007-08, government-related services represented 26% of POL's revenue, a sharp decline from the 43% in 2003-04. Whilst much of this loss is due to the change in the way benefits are paid, the NFSP holds that the provision of government services should play a greater part of the post office network's offer. All government-related services provided by the Post Office need to be paid for; and an increase in the range of specific government services available at post offices should produce a corresponding increase in revenue. It is also absolutely essential that the rates at which POL and subpostmasters are paid for delivering these services are realistic. Contracts that pay at rates below the cost of providing the service will not deliver a long-term future for the post office network. The NFSP is extremely concerned about this issue, and notes for example, that the vital new POCA contract pays POL at a rate significantly lower than the previous contract.

  1.18  A government shop front service, extending the Post Office's current role, would need to provide revenue directly to the individual post offices offering the service. It is also likely to provide considerable indirect income through increased post office visits. An evaluation of a previous trial of this type of service concluded that the pilot may have increased footfall in participating post offices by 9%, while subpostmasters reported increases in Post Office business and private retail sales as a result.9

  1.19  Bill payment services constitute a significant part of a sub post office's income—on average 5% of total post office income, and 9% in urban deprived areas. 10 An increase in bill payment services offered at post offices—local authority, utility and others—will lead directly to increased income for subpostmasters. It is also likely to lead to increased footfall, as these transactions are regular transactions bringing customers onto the premises on a frequent basis, and these customers are likely to undertake other transactions or purchases in the post office and/or its attached business whilst paying their bills.

  1.20  Banking services have the potential to bring in a considerable income to post offices, both through direct payment for providing the service and also indirectly through increased footfall. In the past banking has not brought in particularly large sums for subpostmasters—around 1% of post office income in 2006. 11 We believe this is largely due to inadequate publicity, particularly from the banks themselves, and limited access to high street banks. The NFSP believes that introducing a Postbank and comprehensive well-publicised access to high street banks could provide a good income for post offices. A public survey in 2007 found that the main factor that would encourage people to make more use of post offices was access to high street banks (Postbank was not asked about). 12 The evidence from overseas is that Post Office banks can provide significant income for national Post Offices. For example 22.6% of La Poste Group's turnover in 2007 was generated by La Banque Postale; the launch of BancoPosta led to a net profit for the first time in 50 years for Post Italiane.

  1.21  The range of Post Office financial services has expanded considerably over recent years. Whilst these may be bringing in a considerable proportion of POL's revenue and are essential to the company's viability, the NFSP is concerned that their impact on individual sub post offices should not be overstated. Ipsos MORI research found that in 2006, subpostmasters earned a very small proportion of their monthly income from Post Office financial services. 13 Income on these products is increasing, but it is still a very small part of sub post office income. Sales of financial services largely directly benefits other parts of the network; 60% of financial services product sales are made by Crown post offices. 14

  1.22  Mails income is absolutely critical to the post office network; last year it brought in 35% of POL's revenue. The network must continue to offer these services. New services such as parcel and packet picking up and working with eBay and mail order houses, are very well received by the public and post offices are the natural and right home for such services.

  1.23  Whilst providing access to all the relevant postal operators' services—providing dropping off and collection hubs for all mails companies—may become an important function for the network, we caution about this bringing the sub post office any additional income. With mails volumes reducing significantly, new business from alternative operators will be at the expense of losses of Royal Mail business.

 (2)   How much account should be taken of

 (a)   costs to the taxpayer in providing services through the Post Office rather than through cheaper channels; and

  2.1  The issue of cost is complex. Although the move by the DWP to pay state pensions and benefits through bank accounts has had most impact in reducing government work through post offices; other government work has been re-channelled. For instance, in June 2006 the BBC decided to discontinue the provision of licensing services through post offices; the DVLA encourages internet renewal of vehicle excise duty. Such decisions have led to a reduction of income for the network and another government department stepping in to provide financial support to prevent the total collapse of the post office network. Serious consideration should be given as to whether the use of ostensibly cheaper channels has meant that the overall costs to the taxpayer have actually been reduced, or whether the result has simply been "taxpayers' money…going around in a circle". 15 The same issue arises when contracts do not pay at a high enough rates to cover POL's and subpostmasters' costs of providing the service.

  2.2  The provision of services through non-Post Office channels which ultimately leads to the closure of post offices is also likely to result in increased costs to taxpayers. Post offices form part of our critical national infrastructure, playing a unique social and economic role in providing services and supporting retail in local communities. Post office closures frequently results in inconvenience and increased transport costs for many. The closure of local post offices will create a long-term environmental cost through obliging individuals to undertake more journeys by car, rather than walking to access vital services. Research also shows that older people, people who are less mobile and those who do not have their own transport often become dependent on others following the closure of their local post office. 16 The erosion of the fabric of a community—to which the closure of a post office may contribute—is likely to lead to the need for more formal services for the most vulnerable residents. In turn this may also lead to increased costs for taxpayers.

 (b)   consumer preference for alternative channels

  2.3  In geographical terms the post office network is the UK's most accessible face-to-face channel for mails, banking and government services. Seventy-nine percent of small businesses say that a local banking facility is either important or very important for their business. 17 Research also shows 79% of small businesses use their local post office for sending parcels, and 78% for purchasing stamps. 18 Face-to-face, locally accessible channels are also extremely important for the most vulnerable members of society. Government figures19 show that 35% of households have no home internet connection, and it is predicted that the proportion digitally excluded adults will be 31% in 2015, with the highest proportions among older people and low income groups. 20 Society has a duty to these groups, and these duties should not be overridden by consumer choice.

  2.4  There is a balance to be found between short-term, narrow cost savings in limiting the choice of channels; and allowing genuine access to all sections of the community through a range of channels, including post offices. Whilst offering services only through digital channels may be welcomed by some sections of the public, the unintended consequences and their wider financial costs may not.

 (3)   To what extent would a desire for the presence of a Post Office or Post Office services translate into actual use of those services?

  3.1  The NFSP holds that it is essential the use of the post office network is maximised—it should offer comprehensive access to government, banking and mails services. More services available will mean more reasons to visit the post office. Customers in the post office for one transaction or product are also likely to make use of other services or buy other goods whilst they are there. Banking transactions are particularly important, as people frequently spend their cash where they access it.

  3.2  Research confirms that the two factors the public say are most likely to make an impact on their future use of post office services are the ability to access the high street banks (62% said this would increase their use of post office services) and the availability of more goods and services (58%).21

 (4)   What are the impacts of the availability of post office facilities for business and local residents; and in particular how significant is the network in aiding social nd financial inclusion;

  4.1  The evidence for the social and economic contributions made by post offices is overwhelming. Many studies have highlighted the extremely valuable role played by the network in supporting local communities over and above that of providing mails, government, banking and financial services. This includes assistance for vulnerable residents—informal advice, interpreting official letters, fielding lost property, taking messages, offering emotional support and providing a focal point for communities.

  4.2  Post offices provide an important function in supporting local retail. Around 75% of post offices also house a shop or other business. In deprived urban and rural communities post offices are frequently the only local place to take out cash. Post offices provide services for local businesses, especially through cash and deposit facilities, stamps and mailing. The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) found 20% of small businesses use the post office every day and 47% use it more than once a week. 22 Eighty-two percent of small businesses told the FSB that the closure of their local post office would have a significant impact on their business. The main impact would be increased travel time, which is damaging to small businesses because it takes time out of the business day. This costs the business money, a particular concern at a time when businesses are facing the greatest financial pressures for decades.

  4.3  Post offices play an essential part in supporting local economies. A study by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) emphasises the role of post offices as an anchor for local economies. 23 Based on detailed analysis of Manchester post offices, NEF concluded each post office contributes around £310,000 to the local economy each year, of which £120,000 is direct spending on local goods and services. In addition, NEF's analysis reveals that each post office saves small businesses in their direct vicinity in the region of £270,000 a year.

  4.4  The All Party Small Shops Group has reached similar conclusions and highlights the fact that at the local level, small shops clustered together rely on each other for survival. 24 Post offices are particularly key because of their unique social value and the sheer diversity and range of services provided which distinguishes them from other retailers.

  4.5  For financially excluded groups post offices provide trusted and local access to a wide range of banking and financial services (including the POCA) as well as government services and mail.

 (5)   What level of subsidy—if any—per Post Office would be reasonable in the long term; for example, should it be £20,000 or £200,000?

  5.1  Between 2003 and 2011, the Government has contributed £150 million a year in the form of the Social Network Payment (now Network Subsidy Scheme); this annual figure has not increased with inflation over the period. POL figures show that only 4,000 post offices are profitable for them, the government funding is paid to POL to support essential infrastructure, but individual post offices are not directly remunerated. The NFSP holds that this government funding needs to continue; and POL should carefully look at targeting elements of this payment at post offices that would otherwise close.

  5.2  Research for the NFSP found that in 2006, 40% of subpostmasters made a loss and were unable to cover their post office staff costs, overheads and personal drawings from the net post office pay. 25 Such findings are a matter of serious concern for the future of the network as a whole.

  5.3  The recent Network Change programme was designed to improve the financial position of the post office network by cutting central costs and making individual post offices more profitable. Individual post office profitability should increase because of customers moving their business from closed post offices to the remaining ones and also because a more planned approach ought to mean the location and services of the remaining post offices are more appropriate to the needs of local communities. But the NFSP was always clear that closures alone would not deliver viability to the network. The other part of the solution is to increase income for the remaining offices—this must be by bringing additional and improved services into the network and ensuring that the payment for existing and new services to both POL and subpostmasters themselves is sufficient. Contracts that give work to POL and subpostmasters, but at cut-throat prices, will leave the network needing additional government funding from other sources or risk further widespread post office closures.

  5.4  For the post office network to be viable there has to be a stable, critical mass of post offices. It is essential for subpostmasters to know their offices have futures, both individually and as part of a wider thriving network; and for POL's clients to know the number of post offices is stable. Fears of an ever diminishing network are not likely to bring in new business or renewed contracts if there are alternative networks or methods of service delivery. The strength of the network lies in its depth and reach; an ever reducing network would inevitably undermine its future viability.

REFERENCES

1.  Ipsos MORI, January 2007, Stakeholder Consultation. Conducted for Postwatch

2.  National Audit Office, October 2003, Difficult Forms—How government agencies interact with citizens

3.  Postcomm, 2001, Serving the Community I & II—evidence of the community value of post offices

4.  Performance and Innovation Unit, June 2000, Counter Revolution—modernizing the post office network

5.  MORI, 2002, Consumer Usage Survey (2)—the Your Guide Research Programme. Conducted for POL

6.  Treasury Committee, March 2005, Cash Machine Charges

7.  The Guardian 9/1/09, Evening Standard 15/12/08

8.  Postcomm, November 2008, A Year of Transition—annual report on the network of post offices 2007-08

9.  Department of Trade and Industry, 2002, Evaluation of the Pilot of the Your Guide Service of Post Offices as Government General Practitioners

10.  Ipsos MORI, March 2006, Subpostmaster Income Wave 3. Conducted for NFSP

11.  See 10

12.  See 1

13.  See 10

14.  See 8

15.  Trade and Industry Committee, October 2006, Royal Mail Group

16.  Postwatch, November 2002, The Impact of Post Office Closures in the Rural Community

17.  Federation of Small Businesses, 2006, Lifting the Barriers to Growth in UK Small Businesses

18.  Federation of Small Businesses, December 2006, Small Businesses and the UK Postal Market

19.  Department for Communities and Local Government, October 2008, Understanding Digital Exclusion

20.  Demos, November 2007, Web I'm 64

21.  See 1

22.  See 18

23.  New Economics Foundation, December 2006, The Last Post

24.  All Party Parliamentary Small Shops Group, February 2006, High Street Britain: 2015

25.  See 10

APPENDIX

  Suggested examples of local authority payments which councils could run through post offices:

    — Council Tax.

    — Council rents/mortgages.

    — Social Service bills, including Home Helps, Meals on Wheels, residential and day care homes.

    — Leisure centre passes.

    — School meals.

    — School lessons/extra school activities—eg music tuition, gymnastics.

    — Parking fines.

    — Bus passes.

    — Disabled badges.

    — Residents' parking permits.

    — Bus tickets and passes.

    — Vehicle removal fees.

    — Commercial waste fees.

    — House clearances.

  In addition, councils could make use of local post offices to allow citizens to access council information and services:

    — Display information, eg.

    — planning applications.

    — Electoral Roll.

    — Public consultations.

    — Courses, meetings and events.

    — Information on police and fire service.

January 2009






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 July 2009