Post offices - securing their future - Business and Enterprise Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Norfolk Rural Community Council (RCC)

SECTION 1—INTRODUCTION

  1.  This report has been prepared by the Norfolk RCC a member of the ACRE RCAN network. Because of our role in supporting rural communities throughout Norfolk, our focus in this document is towards provision of Post Office services in Rural areas.

  2.  Over the last two years, we have been closely involved in the recent Post Office Network change programme, working with local councils and communities to help minimise the effect of Post Office closures and also to ensure that best practice was adopted by POL.

  3.  As a result of this, we have also linked ourselves with Post Office Management at a senior level in order to gain a greater understanding of how the current set up is organised and run.

  4.  This has led us to become involved in a number of community projects that are directly linked to the supply of post office services to rural districts and to also consider a practical view regarding provision that is more cost efficient, offers greater social inclusion and improved economic benefit.

  5.  Our practical suggestions are outlined in this submission and we are more than willing to provide Oral evidence to the committee should this be requested.

SECTION 2—EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  6.  Post Office provision is seen to be an important element of social inclusion especially in Rural and remote areas, but alternative provision can result in strengthening of inclusion.

  7.  The product offering of POL is increasingly becoming available from alternative sources viz: on line

    (a) Access to internet is limited amongst older people:

    (i)
This can be overcome with central access and training.

    (b) Broadband access is erratic in many rural areas:

    (i)
A need for Government intervention to improve services.

    (ii)
Improved local economic benefits.

  8.  There is an opportunity to provide facilities for payment to and information from—local authorities. Also other amenities that improve access to services.

  9.  Offering Post Office products has a beneficial effect on the footfall of local businesses—especially village shops:

    (a) Many village shops under threat as a result of PO closures.

  10.   Does the provision of essential Post Office services require the physical presence of a Post Master and all the hardware associated with this?

  11.  Essential services are:

    (a) Postal.

    (b) Pension & other Social.

    (c) Financial/Banking.

  12.   Postal and Financial structures are serviced by a national support network which serves the current post office network:

    (a) Supporting other outlets would add little to costs:

    (i)
The infrastructure is already in place.

    (ii)
Simply adds to drop off & pick up points.

    (b) No cost of Post Master salaries in new outlets.

    (c) Opportunity for wider income than possible from current set up.

    (d) More economic than the current "outreach services".

  13.   Consideration to be given to provision of Post Office products by independent outlets, with payment made on a sales basis (either commission or unit sales):

    (a) Technology support required.

    (b) AMT & Banking facility:

    (i)
Can be handled mechanically.

  14.  Outlets do not have to be restricted to existing retail shops. Other central points exist within communities that could offer services—Village Halls, Social Clubs, Pubs, Filling stations etc etc.

  15.  The current system subsidises provision of all services when only are few are used.

  16.  We recommend that a number of test pilots be set up across the country to be run for a minimum of 12 months:

    (a) Important that sufficient time is allowed in order to change attitudes and build awareness.

    (b) Current system is entrenched in history, so change and acceptance will take time.

SECTION 3—WHAT SERVICES SHOULD THE POST OFFICE OFFER?

From Government, Local Authorities & Other Sources

  17.  The current products on offer from Post Office Ltd are as follows:
Foreign currencyFriendly Eyes & Ears*
Credit cardPhonecards
Personal loansGift vouchers
Money transfersPostal Services
Bill paymentsBenefits
Banking servicesLicences and Permissions
InsurancePassports
SavingsDriving licence
Savings stampsVehicle tax
National Savings and InvestmentsInternational driving permits
HomePhoneMedical care abroad—EHIC
Social Focal Point*Rod fishing licences
Community Information*Broadband
* Social inclusion community benefits.


  The use of Post Office traditional products has been in considerable decline over recent years and this is primarily due to increased availability of products direct from the internet. In addition Government policy to encourage social welfare and pension payments directly into private bank accounts, has resulted in a lesser need for access to banking services from Post Offices.

    (a) This decline has resulted in POL expanding their product lines such as insurance and foreign currency, which have proved to be important income providers to the organisation, but these products have an Urban bias and little relevance as essential products in rural communities

  18.  The vast majority of products offered by POL can be purchased "on line", it is even possible to purchase postage costs direct from the internet—very simple to access and no queues to suffer; all that is required is internet access, a credit card ,a pair of scales and a printer

  19.  The only products which are difficult to access and have a consumer demand are;

    Banking.

    Pension/Welfare Provision.

    Postal Services.

  20.  Whilst alternative provision for these services is possible, it is not ideal and indeed is unlikely to have to customer appeal that will deliver an attractive proposition eg Banking is possible through the provision of local credit unions, Pension provision can be provided by persuasion to use direct banking services and Postal services can be delivered by alternative providers, but this may not be as flexible with other providers in Rural locations

  21.  The importance of these services regarding local business and residents is set out in section 6. We do however believe that there is a strong economic argument that if you can offer consumers a selection of products for which a market exists, by combining as many of these together in the same place will increase the likely traffic to the location of the products on offer. In other words, there exists an opportunity to build increased traffic which will have wider benefits to both consumers and outlets. We are convinced that there is a market for some or even all of the following:

    (a) Local authorities; bill payment and information provision.

    (b) Utility Services; bill payment and information provision.

    (c) Internet access.

    (d) PCT; prescription collection and delivery plus delivery of some health services (dependent on location and venue).

    (e) Police consultation and advice.

    (f) CAB.

    (g) Community Transport information provision.

    (h) MP local surgery.

  This provides a real opportunity to deliver even greater social inclusion, which is seen to be an important element of Post Office provision (Section 6)

SECTION 4—STATED DESIRE FOR PRESENCE OF POST OFFICE SERVICES AND ACTUAL USE

  22.  The recent Network Change Programme caused considerable outrage amongst a raft of groups. Primarily this was about the effect it would have on social exclusion, hitting those sections of society that would be less able to cope without this provision.

  23.  Human nature resists major change and it is natural for consumer groups, politicians and citizens with a social conscience to protest when a public service such as the Post Office is seen to be under threat:

    (a) POL has estimated that as a result of the closure programme, 85% of those whose branch is closed will use alternative branches. What is not clear is the level of business that will migrate elsewhere. In our judgement this will be far greater

    (b) Communities that have lost their Post Office are in most cases managing to adapt either by using alternative branches, adapting to the new situation or in some cases setting up alternative provision

    (i)
Brockweir & Hewelsfield is a community shop in Gloucestershire where they have set up a successful independent Post Office offering http://www.plunkett.co.uk/whatwedo/rcs/shopdirectory.cfm/shop/238.

    (c) Recently (November 2008) with the assistance of NorfolkRCC, the Norfolk village of Methwold reopened its Post Office following nearly 8 months of closure. This was a community project run by local residents and had huge support in the village and surrounding areas. Subsequently, uptake of the re opened service has been relatively slow, as many local residents had already made alternative provision:

    (i)
The community is now investigating combining the Post Office provision with a community shop and if the two ventures can prove to be financially viable.

    (ii)
The current feeling is that the sum of the two parts will be greater than their individual situation.

  24.  It is our strong belief that should the Post Office continue in its current format it has a very bleak future as demand will continue to decline as technology, personal preferences and changes in society overtake the need for a large number of the products on offer.

  There is an urgent need for a radical change in the way that Post Office Ltd markets its products to consumers. In simple terms, provide people with what they want and they will come running—provide them with what they do not want and they will run away

SECTION 5—PROVIDING SERVICES THROUGH THE POST OFFICE & CONSUMER PREFERENCE FOR ALTERNATIVE CHANNELS

  25.  We question why it is necessary to provide some of the essential services needed in communities together with the cost burden that the current Post Office structure demands:

    (a) We believe that an opportunity exists to offer the services connected with the Post Office to a wider selection of outlets, without incurring the salary and some hardware overheads:

    (i)
This will require close co-operation with Post Office ltd to provide internet connections to their Horizon system and also link in with their local area financial and postal support.

    (ii)
The extra cost involved to support most new locations with these support systems would be minimal as the current PO Network already has an area infrastructure in place.

  26.  Outlets offering Post Office facilities could receive their income on a transaction basis (Either % or per item).

  27.  By offering these additional services, benefit is generated to the local facility by increasing footfall and therefore improving the opportunity to provide other products or services

  28.  Whilst there will be some set up costs involved, it is unrealistic to expect alternative outlets to absorb these costs. It is worth noting that the current system that exists, where the Post Master is expected to carry the majority of set up costs (circa £12,000), is both prohibitive and a key reason why there is major resistance to re opening branches, as the return is not consistent with the investment:

    (a) We would recommend that any set up costs should be heavily subsidised from within the current investment.

    (b) This is seen to be justified, as it is indeed an investment into the expansion of service provision and sales opportunities, rather than the current system which is a subsidy of a declining product.

SECTION 6—IMPACT OF PROVISION TO BUSINESSES & LOCAL RESIDENTS + IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL INCLUSION

  29.  Our investigation amongst rural businesses during the Network Change programme revealed two main areas of concern:

    (a) Loss of banking provision.

    (b) Loss of Postal provision.

  Whilst the latter point can be overcome with franking and local pick up, banking was seen to be an area of risk and also cost inefficiency, as extra time (man hours) would be required to visit either a bank branch in the local town or the nearest available Post Office branch

    (c) An unexpected concern was that in many instances the alternative local Post Office remained because it served an area of greater social exclusion. A number of businesses voiced concern about the higher security risks of banking at such branches.

    (i)
This has led some companies to cease their banking with POL and therefore a further loss of business.

  30.   Better delivery of broadband services will mean that more businesses can operate effectively from rural locations and enjoy relatively lower overhead costs:

    (a) This will mean that a greater proportion of the working population will also be able to enjoy home working, with all the energy savings and local economic benefits that this brings.

  31.  Strengthening of economies amongst rural neighbourhoods is an important element in the fight to reduce the sharp increase in deprivation amongst these communities.

  32.  Post Office and banking provision is a vital component of economic infrastructure in rural areas:

    (a) As local economies develop, so does social inclusion become stronger and deprivation declines.

  33.  Equally the effect of local provision of these services amongst residents is key to building greater inclusion, even more so when included together with all or part of the other items set out in paragraph 20:

    (a) Our experience with Norfolk's communities demonstrates that strengthening the focal point of villages results in greater involvement from a complete cross section of residents both from an age and social perspective:

    (i)
Effectively this is seen as building "Hubs" at the centre of community life

SECTION 7—WHAT LEVEL OF SUBSIDY?

  34.  One of the major problems we experienced in the Network Change Programme was that Post Office Ltd at times appeared to "hide" behind commercial confidentiality as a reason for not providing details of financial information behind many branch closures. This was particularly frustrating bearing in mind that a number of closures did not seem to stand up to economic comparison with some branches that remained open. Lack of available data from POL to support their actions made it difficult to accept that many closure decisions were based on true market economics.

  35.  Equally it is not known what the current subsidies are by Post Office branch and indeed what are the set criteria for subsidy levels:

    (a) It is clear to us that most communities can make a strong case for retaining their current Post Office.

    (b) It is difficult to argue from an economic position without any supporting data as to which branches should receive X and which Y:

    (i)
Clearly it is also vital to include social factors that require even greater subsidy.

  36.  We are certain that within the network there exists some opportunity to reduce operating overheads by adopting the proposals that we are putting forward:

    (a) It is however assumed that there could be limited opportunity for change to the new structure if it is accepted that the "slimmed down" version is already a more efficient network:

    (i)
We obviously cannot back this latter point without access to better financial detail.

    (b) We believe that with careful examination of the profile of business transactions at current branches, the type of service required by communities becomes clearer:

    (i)
It seems illogical to have a system that subsidises provision for all services when only a few are being used.

  37.  There is a need for wider provision of services, but this does not need to be done on a continuing subsidy basis

    (a) Some investment will be needed for set up costs of new outlets, but this could be a one off investment

    (i)
There may be some extra cost involved in terms of infrastructure support, but this should be minimal, given that the system is already in place

    (b) By basing delivery of current services on need, subsidy can be redirected and ultimately radically reduced

  38.  Ultimately, we do not believe that we should be asking "how much subsidy do we need". The key is how can we strengthen the delivery of products based on a need basis—if there is a market desire, then the requirement for subsidy will reduce:

    (a) Without access to detailed costs, it is our current judgement that some subsidy will continue to be required to sustain the support system for rural areas:

    (i)
We do believe that Rural areas have long been under supported financially compared on a per head basis with Urban.

    (ii)
It is clear to us that the economic growth opportunities cannot be ignored.

January 2009






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 July 2009