Post offices - securing their future - Business and Enterprise Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 180-188)

NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SUBPOSTMASTERS

31 MARCH 2009

  Q180  Mr Hoyle: That is interesting. But is it really a way forward to expect every subpostmaster to suddenly become a bank manager, offering the wide range of financial services? I believe they can do it but I would like to hear what you think on behalf of your members.

  Mr Thomson: What would happen, I reckon the biggest offices would be the financial advisers, for example, like you have in the banks. The rest of the network should do every other transaction, so we believe that the 12,000 should do as many banking transactions as possible. But because the Post Office is a trusted brand, because we are used to looking after money, because people feel secure when they come in, we also have fortress positions, because of all these reasons, because we sign the Official Secrets Act, in the Republic of Ireland, rather than everyone having to go through training from the start, the staff were given what you call grandfather rights, so they had to get some training, but that training was far less rigorous because of their specialisation, postmasters specialise in handing out money. They have done it for years for government, we still have 20% of the benefit market, we are honest, we sign the Official Secrets Act, we do not talk about our customers, we have great integrity, and I do not think it would take much to build on that to become a Postbank.

  Q181  Mr Hoyle: I agree and presumably if you are in a rural area and you wanted to see somebody, somebody could actually come into that post office, you could arrange an appointment for somebody from the centre, a constituency manager, whatever you want to call them. So it would be a way forward that we can deliver services, we can open up banking back into rural and urban areas where they have been neglected and where the banks have retreated from giving true competition, is that fair to say?

  Mr Thomson: Absolutely.

  Q182  Chairman: Just a couple of quick questions before we conclude. I was going to ask you about Essex and Devon and Wales, but actually you have made your views very clear in your written submissions so I think we can accept that you are not enamoured of the Essex model, their long-term plan of ownership, but in Wales though, I think we were all quite impressed by the money being paid to help subpostmasters diversify and retrain into new services they might provide, particularly food handling. That kind of approach does commit itself to, I imagine, assistance in retraining?

  Mr Thomson: We think the Welsh government, the Welsh Assembly, have really stepped up to the plate both in terms of rates relief and grants for subpostmasters as well, and we feel that the devolved assemblies in Northern Ireland and Scotland should look at that model and certainly can do more. But one of the disappointing aspects of this closure programme is under network reinvention, there were grants to help subpostmasters do up their offices, recognising that they have not been paid the money to invest it themselves. I think what is disappointing this time round, Peter, is that the Post Office are going to put £40 million in upgrading 373 Crown offices, and as we speak, not a single brass farthing into the rest of the network. That is bitterly disappointing, and we have raised that on numerous occasions. It is unfair, and if we want to have the brighter, better post offices of the future, then there has to be cognisance taken of the fact that subpostmasters need help to create these better, brighter offices for the future.

  Q183  Chairman: I do not think there is a Crown office left in Worcestershire, so they are lucky ones who do have one. The Post Office Essentials model, is it really commercially sustainable? This is going back to the old question about subpostmasters not getting enough money for their services.

  Mr Thomson: There are 19 offices in the trial for Post Office Essentials, and the jury is still out. Does it make money for the Post Office? We do not know yet, that is what the trial is doing. Does it lose less money? Yes, it does. However, there is a very serious caveat. We think Post Office Essentials can help the Post Office restructure the network for the future, for a sustainable network. There is a danger that if you take that model into too many branches by opening new branches, that all you do is cannibalise the existing network, so Post Office Essentials has a place, but that place, I believe, has to be tightly controlled. I think what the government should be looking to make sure is that the Post Office Essentials model can never be any more than a certain percentage of the post office network, because if it proliferates too much, then all you do is undermine the offices that are there, so it has to be very carefully watched, but it may have a future.

  Q184  Chairman: Finally, looking to our next witnesses in particular, I think we as a society, and politicians, tend to underplay the importance of the post office network to small business. We have had complaints from the small business community about some of the services not being provided appropriately in post offices, or not available at all, particularly banking services, for example small business bank accounts not available at the counter in post offices. That is leading our witnesses rather, but is there anything that you as sub-post offices would like to do more for local small businesses than you can do at present?

  Mr Jones: As small businesses are growing up in rural areas they need access to services, and particularly a route to market, and the Post Office provides that at 12,000 outlets throughout the UK. I feel that business banking could be improved and the services on offer in terms of current account banking, cash withdrawals to pay wages, and that type of thing, could be improved. I feel that it is becoming more important that services are available locally to business. I am fairly familiar with the Highlands of Scotland where people are making lifestyle choices and running particularly IT business consultancies and things like that from home, and they need to be able to access services, so business banking definitely and probably improvements in priority mail services as well.

  Mr Thomson: Just to add to that Peter, if in the future the Government were to award a contract for something and the Post Office were going to do it for 12 pence but PayPoint said they could do it for 10 pence, if the consequence of that decision of going to the lower bid and not the most economically advantageous price was that hundreds of post offices closed, then small businesses would have enormous cost added to their daily routine where rather than take their parcels or their banking to a local post office they would have to travel miles and miles, so there has to be an holistic approach by government.

  Q185  Chairman: One specific question and then we will have to close, I am afraid, because we are running out of time. The small business community does say that sometimes there are huge problems in Crown offices and franchised offices for small businesses in queuing and taking time out of their day, but they often say that even in sub-post offices the queues can be long and they want dedicated counters for business services. That is not going to be practical in many sub-post offices, is it?

  Mr Jones: As a sub-postmaster I have got a choice. I can overstaff my office and have no queue and not make any money, or I can not staff my office and have a big long queue.

  Q186  Chairman: Individuals quite like the queues because they can chat in them and talk to their neighbours.

  Mr Jones: Certainly there are people who value being in a queue in rural areas, but it boils down to finding a balance, and that balance is very, very important because striking that balance is the difference between success and failure in running a post office. That is the way it is. At times if we get a customer, particularly now with eBay, coming in with five, 10 or 20 packets to send, it can be quite time-consuming, so happily the Post Office are trialling a programme called Fast Drop at the moment, and it is a service for business to be able to walk up to a specific counter position, leave the mail there, and the sub-postmaster stamps the receipt and then does the paperwork afterwards.

  Mr Thomson: In fairness to sub-postmasters as well, for every time a post office is busy, there are significant quiet times as well. People do not remember when they walked up to a counter but they remember when they waited 10 or 15 minutes in a queue.

  Q187  Chairman: And those quiet times are predictable broadly, are they not, over the pattern of a week or so?

  Mr Thomson: They are.

  Q188  Chairman: Tell local small businesses to come when they are quiet, that is the answer, is it not?

  Mr Thomson: Many sub-postmasters do have shops and pubs coming with their banking money at quieter times when they can deal with it, so that is a practice on the ground already.

  Chairman: We have lots more that we would like to ask you but we really are out of time. Thank you very much. If you think there is something you have not said that you would like to have said, and I do not think there is, I think it is all covered in here but if there is something. We have particularly asked for evidence on the combi-till issue which is an interesting way of extending opening hours. Thank you very much indeed, we are very grateful to you.




 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 July 2009