Post offices - securing their future - Business and Enterprise Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 189-199)

FEDERATION OF SMALL BUSINESSES

31 MARCH 2009

  Q189 Chairman: Lady and gentleman, thank you very much indeed for being patient and waiting. We are running slightly late but I think you would understand we had important evidence to take there and some useful discussion, and I hope you found it interesting, too. We are very grateful to you for your written evidence. You come to us as partners in the Post Bank Coalition. Of course, I have worked closely with the Federation recently on rate relief and I am grateful for the support that I had from the Federation there as well. Can I ask you to quickly introduce who you are and I have one opening question before I hand over to Lindsay Hoyle.

  Mr Davenport: My name is Clive Davenport and I am the Policy Chairman for Trade and Industry for the Federation of Small Businesses.

  Ms Diallo: I am Ulrika Diallo and I work as a policy advisor for the trade and industry brief.

  Q190  Chairman: We have to say we like the trade and industry phraseology on this Committee! Just before we move to more specific questions, can I ask you to explain why the Federation takes an interest in the future of sub-post offices?

  Mr Davenport: It is essential to small businesses and it is also essential that small businesses do not see any more post office closures. We are having a hard enough time as it stands. The last round of closures has created a substantial problem for small businesses. To give you an idea, on average 19% of small businesses use the post office every day. If you project that up, that is 817,000 businesses every day which use post offices. That is how crucial small business is to the Post Office and the Post Office is to small business. It is a two-way street and that is why we have been involved in the Coalition and every other means at our hands to protect post offices. One of the things we do find is that there is plenty of debate about electronic communication, but our recent survey has shown that that is not the case. 88% of the recipients of the survey use post offices to do their accounts, to send their invoices, and they do it manually, they do not do electronic transfer, and only 11% use the electronic metered mail, so it flies slightly in the face of what is perceived with regard to the general public and the Government.

  Chairman: I think that will do by way of introduction. I am very grateful for that. If I ask anything I am likely to tread on my colleagues' toes so I will go straight to my colleagues. Lindsay?

  Q191  Mr Hoyle: It is an interesting point you make and I am sure Lord Mandelson and Pat McFadden will take that on board because all they keep saying is that businesses are just using metered mail and you are just proving the point. I also know in the postal survey you did that 89% of respondents use the Post Office to purchase stamps and send letters and 77% of respondents use the Post Office to send parcels. That is your survey and that just tells us how important the Post Office is. I am really pleased with that.

  Mr Davenport: That survey was six weeks ago, something like that.

  Q192  Mr Hoyle: So it is bang up-to-date. In fact, it is probably more bang up-to-date than the evidence we have heard from ministers, so that is good and I hope they are listening and taking that on board. Can I move you on to some of the questions. Is there anything inherent in what the Post Office does that justifies its monopoly?

  Mr Davenport: Guarantees their monopoly. As a small businessman, guaranteeing monopolies makes me uncomfortable, but what we have got to do is not look at just the service they give, it is the community that they generate, of which we are a part. We see the breakdown of that community. When post offices were closed I think between 14% and 16%, around that area, of local businesses were damaged, so they are an essential cornerstone of community life, and it is essential that they remain there, not only for our selfish reasons of wanting to have the service that we require but because the communities that they create give strength and therefore security as far as our own businesses are concerned around them.

  Q193  Mr Hoyle: So it would be fair to say that what you are saying is that it is a vital service they are providing that holds the community together. It is the catalyst that keeps that community alive and of course it keeps small businesses alive as well. Would that be fair to say?

  Mr Davenport: Yes, I am just uncomfortable with the word monopoly.

  Q194  Mr Hoyle: That is right because of the way that we do it, but what we are saying is that it is a vital service and it is very hard to measure just how good a service it is?

  Mr Davenport: Yes, as a community service, if you look at it as a community, you have to say to yourself what other community services are there when we look at the £150 million that has been mentioned. We could say that policemen are a community service. Are they a liability? Are nurses a liability? The Government has got to decide and society has got to decide where it places the Post Office within that whole structure of the services that are provided to its communities and to its people.

  Q195  Mr Hoyle: Absolutely right and the monopoly they have been given is the USO which guarantees that they deliver everywhere. Nobody else in competition wants the USO. They could all take it up but not one of them wants to step forward. It just proves that we really do have only one that can provide the service. SMEs use the Post Office largely, as was said, for mail services provided by the Royal Mail Group. Are there any companies which could offer mail services which could compete with Royal Mail—and this is the key part of it—and be more convenient than Royal Mail?

  Mr Davenport: I doubt it. The problem we have with all small businesses is that most large conglomerates like TNT and the like are not comfortable with volumes that small, they are not interested, and so you cannot get a service from them even if you wanted it. That is a common comment that is made by most of the recipients of our surveys, not just this one, other ones as well.

  Q196  Mr Hoyle: So it would be fair to say that it is profit before service where this is service before profit, in a sense?

  Mr Davenport: Indeed, and what we are looking at is the Post Office creates an even, reliable consistent service and that is what small businesses are desperate for. You have got to remember that something like 89% in the last survey work from home. It is quite substantial amounts.

  Q197  Mr Hoyle: We are going into the area that I just want to touch on and push a little bit more towards it. How much does the location of a post office matter and does business need them close by and, if so, why does it need them?

  Mr Davenport: It depends which type of business you are in. If it is small shopkeeping for financial services and so on, then they need them fairly local because they need to not leave funds in their premises at night and they tend to use the post office as a secure system to control that. A lot of other businesses (and this is where we get this how many times you visit the post office, on average twice a week) that are away from the post office area come in and do their mailing en bloc, both invoicing and sending out their goods. They do not do it on a daily or half-daily basis. They do it once a week or twice a week or more.

  Ms Diallo: If I could just add to that. It is about saving time as well because for a small business who often are sole traders, the vast majority of members that we represent have fewer than five employees or they are sole traders. To take that amount of time out, if you are based at home for example, and you can walk to your post office, that is a fairly swift operation, whereas if you have to get in your car, go to the nearest town and find a post office there, find parking, go in, queue up, because one of the things that we have seen with the last round of closures is that queuing times have increased considerably, it is a matter of saving essential time really for a small business.

  Q198  Mr Hoyle: And it is helping ensure that rural communities survive and it also helps save the climate as well, because we do not have to do all the extra miles and we do not have to all go to a town, and it is about the protection of rural areas. Is that fair?

  Ms Diallo: That is right.

  Q199  Chairman: Is it also important for your members, and I do not want the answer that sounds convenient, I want the truth, is it also useful for your members who are living in the internet age, many of whom are offering mail order business, to be able to go to the post office daily rather than twice a week to post packages to make sure their customers have their orders fulfilled in good time? Is that also an issue for small businesses?

  Mr Davenport: It certainly is.

  Ms Diallo: As Clive mentioned initially, 19% of our members visit the post office every day, probably because they want to respond to customers' demands quickly, they want to send a parcel straight away. 47% say that they visit the post office a couple of times per week, so it is certainly a very frequent occurrence in the life of a small business to go to the post office.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 7 July 2009