Market Failure?: Can the traditional market survive? - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 40 - 49)

MONDAY 2 MARCH 2009

DR SOPHIE WATSON

  Q40  Chair: But it is selling things?

  Dr Watson: No, giving out advice and giving out leaflets. Other markets do what you are suggesting. Quite often the local authority will give over some stalls to local groups. I think that is one of their important roles in terms of making a community, that different kinds of things can happen relatively cheaply in one place. Normally people tend to rush past such things in the main High Street, whereas when it is in the market people are more likely to stop and have a look and perhaps talk to somebody about what is going on.

  Q41  John Cummings: Dr Watson, your research concludes that the market provision in any one locality needs to fit with and be responsive to the surrounding community needs, socioeconomic and demographic profile and local conditions. What lessons can be drawn for public policy from this research and who would learn the lessons?

  Dr Watson: It is a question of joined-up thinking. If you have a market in an area which is low-income or perhaps there is a high preponderance of people on benefits or a high preponderance of older people, you can look at those demographics around England in most towns. There is quite a lot of difference, say, between somewhere like Lowestoft and somewhere like Brighton, two seaside towns but with very different sociodemographics. It would seem to me that if you were strategically thinking about the kind of market to place in each of those places, you would be going for quite a different kind of market. Craft stalls and that sort of thing are not going to go down very well; there is not much point in putting them in an area that is a very low-income, perhaps elderly population. When I say a demographic, it is a question about thinking about what kind of market works in what kind of place. That is the variation you have. Farmers' markets are very successful, that is true, and especially the more upmarket farmers' markets are much more successful in middle-class areas than they are in poorer areas, because those products, organic products, usually have to be more expensive and so you have to think about the kind of market and the kind of people and place. That is my point and that is where vision comes in.

  Q42  John Cummings: Could you reasonably expect that to come from central government or would this be notes of guidance from the Department to those responsible for the licensing arrangements?

  Dr Watson: I think it would be about talking about the kind of way in which you would encourage certain kinds of traders into certain kinds of locations. In other words, it would be worth thinking about, for example, in a very multi-racial area, encouraging people who could start to sell products that cannot be found elsewhere. There are a lot of markets that are successful because they bring in, say, food products; if there is a predominately Asian population, those kinds of food products.

  Q43  John Cummings: Who would do this? Whose responsibility would it be?

  Dr Watson: I think the responsibility lies at the local government level. I think it is very difficult for national government. You cannot prescribe. You can set out guidelines, as Ann Coffey has said.

  Q44  John Cummings: Do you think market traders would look kindly on being lectured to by local government?

  Dr Watson: I do not think it is the market traders that are going to be lectured to, because most market traders elect to be in a particular market themselves.

  Q45  John Cummings: Do they not enter into partnerships with the local authority as to who has stalls and who does not have stalls?

  Dr Watson: They vary on that. Many market traders have an association and a chair, and usually it is the chair of the market traders who negotiates some of the local issues with the local authority. That is a very varied picture. Some of those market associations are much stronger than others. I do not think it is a question about being lectured to. I think it is simply the argument that a good—I will give you an example. They brought in a very proactive market trader in a market in Camden for a while, Queen's Crescent market. He took a lot of advice about how to change the market. It was a market in decline. He went out very strategically. He realised he had a middle-class, gentrified neighbourhood juxtaposed, so he brought in an Italian delicatessen type stall. He realised also that he had a strong Asian community so he brought in some people who cooked Asian food on the site. He realised that people wanted fish because there was not a fishmonger. He thought about all those things and proactively went out and found people to run those stalls, and those stalls came. Interestingly, when he stopped being there doing that kind of work, the market returned to a market in a state of decline. Watching that over a five-year period, you could see precisely my point about how somebody with vision, thinking through those kinds of larger issues, could make the market work.

  Q46  Anne Main: Could I just ask one question, and it is not meant to be facetious, but do you think the Government ought to have a market stall in today's economic climate, where people who have worries about benefit entitlement, tax, housing, jobs? Do you think there would be some value in government getting more in touch with the people and perhaps participating in markets?

  Dr Watson: I think that is a terrific idea. No, I think it is a terrific idea because markets operate as a space where people actually have time, usually, and it could be that that would be a way in which certain kinds of communication could take place. This gets back to the question of national agenda, obesity, and all those kinds of issues.

  Q47  Mr Betts: Markets, I think, are recognised by the Communities and Local Government Department as being important in the social exclusion agenda, in terms of offering a variety of different shopping opportunities in town and district centres, and city centres indeed. Do you think however that CLG is still missing a bit of a trick in that it has not really given markets the prominence they could play in terms of regeneration? I understand markets have not been considered as a key site for intervention within CLG policy. Do you think there is more that can be done there? Do you think CLG has only gone halfway towards recognising the importance of markets?

  Dr Watson: Absolutely more can be done. I would say that very little has been done so far. It seems to me that a lot of community agendas hinge on a market. The question of public space, for example. It is a strange thing in a way because we design public spaces like parks and so on, or think about public spaces like community centres, but the market just exists already as a public space where communities interact. So, yes, in terms of those kinds of issues. In terms of people keeping an eye on each other—and I do not mean in the surveillance way—market traders typically really look after their customers. It is an interesting role that they take on quite seriously themselves. They keep an eye out, if you like, for their customers and often provide advice or support. Lots of market traders, for example, will take a box of oranges back to some old lady's house who cannot come and get her oranges. It is surprising how much they do that. I think this is something that is going to be difficult to put into policy but if you talk about the way in which market traders take responsibility for the community, I think in many areas they do. So yes, I think it is a missed opportunity in all sorts of ways.

  Q48  Mr Betts: One other possibility—and Anne Main has raised I think quite an interesting idea about government presence—is post office presence. There is an example in my own constituency where we had a post office closure because of lack of adequate building, as it was then. With the local councillors and the Post Office we worked with the city council, and identified the opportunity, because a local businessmen came along as a sub postmaster, and we now have a market stall converted into a post office in the market in Crystal Peaks in my constituency, which seems an interesting way forward, because in terms of the profile of people who use the market, it is often people on lower incomes and often the elderly, they benefit from having a post office on hand. It is also bringing people into the market to trade as well. I just wondered whether that has been looked at as a policy possibility.

  Dr Watson: That is a very innovative policy, I think, and a terrifically positive idea. Interestingly, I know the story the other way round, which is that a number of markets had post offices and the post office went and the market was badly affected. I think that would be very creative thinking to do that.

  Q49  Mr Betts: Richard Jackson, the sub-postmaster, has been important in achieving that but, of course, it is a post office which opens on Sundays as well, which is quite a novel idea.

  Dr Watson: It is a very creative idea, a terrific idea.

  Chair: Thank you very much indeed.






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 23 July 2009