The Balance of Power: Central and Local Government - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents



Memorandum by Adrian Beresford-Wylie, Chief Executive of the Australian Local Government Association in response to questions posed by the Second Clerk of the CLG Select Committee (BOP 60)

(A)  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CENTRAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

1.   How would you describe the relationship between central (either federal or territorial) and local government in Australia?

  There are around 567 local councils in Australia.

  Each state and the Northern Territory has local government legislation which establishes a system of local government, determines the scope of local government activities and sets the accountability framework (ie, the requirement for annual reporting). Local government is often referred to as a creature of the states.

  The Federal (national) government does not have a direct legislative relationship with local government. The Australian Constitution is a written document which sets out the exclusive powers of the Federal Government and the areas over which the Federal and state governments share power. Where the Constitution is silent about an area, the states retain legislative power over the area. The Constitution is silent about local government and so the states retain legislative responsibility for local government.

  The relationship between the Federal Government and local government has mostly been a financial relationship, with the Federal government providing general revenue support through what is known as the Financial Assistance Grants (which currently amount to around $1.9 billion per annum) which are paid as grants to the states but then passed on to local government . The Federal Government has also provided specific funding through programs to achieve particular policy objectives (for example, improving the condition of local roads through funding the Roads to Recovery program).

2.   Does local government In Australia need greater autonomy from central government? If so, in what ways?

  The better question would be does local government need greater autonomy from state/territory government rather than the national government. The central government (the Australian Government) does not have an accountability relationship with local government.

  At the state level, local governments have been subject to forced restructuring and amalgamation. This has been opposed by local government which favours voluntary amalgamation and resource sharing.

  Local government across the state jurisdictions accepts the needs for an accountability framework through state government rather then central government.

3.   Is it important for local government to have its role protected within a written constitution and if so why?

  The issue is not protection of local government's role in the Australian Constitution, rather it is inclusion of local government in the Constitution to acknowledge local government's role in the Federation.

  Each state has a constitution and local government is included in those constitutions.

  In 1974 there was a referendum to change the Australian Constitution to strengthen the direct financial relationship between the Australian Government and local councils. The Constitution provides that the Commonwealth Parliament (ie the central government) can provide grants to state governments on whatever terms and conditions it sees fit. It can also take over the debts of states. The proposed change top the Constitution would have placed local government on the same footing as the states—able to receive grants and have its debts paid. The referendum was not passed by the Australian electorate.

  A second referendum in 1988 to recongise the system of local government in the Constitution in much the same language as used in state constitutions also failed at the ballot box.

  Local government recently considered the issue, given that the new Federal Labor Government has constitutional recognition of local government as policy.

  A special summit of local government convened by ALGA on 9-11 December 2008 supported the inclusion of local government in the Federal Constitution based on the following principles:

    — The Australian people should be represented in the community by democratically elected and accountable local government representatives;

    — The power of the Commonwealth to provide direct funding to local government should be explicitly recognised; and

    — If a new preamble [for the Constitution] is proposed, it should ensure that local government is recognised as one of the components making up the modern Australian Federation.

  These principles would reinforce the view that communities should have democratically elected local representatives and seek to ensure that the Commonwealth has the capacity to provide direct funding to local government to improve the infrastructure and services communities legitimately expect at the local level.

(B)  LOCAL GOVERNMENT POWERS

4.   How much variation of priorities, standards and delivery of public services is acceptable at the local level in Australia?

  There is a wide variation of services and standard at the local level depending on the capacity of the individual council. There is an expectation that councils will maintain local roads and provide waste disposal. In some states (Queensland, Tasmania and parts of western New South Wales) councils also provide water and sewerage.

  State Government local government legislation no longer specifies the services to be provide. Rather they provide powers of general competence to councils allowing them to provide the services and infrastructure they see fit providing they can fund them and they do not conflict with other levels of government.

  The provision of general purpose funding by the Commonwealth through the Financial Assistance Grants is aimed in principle at assisting councils to provide a minimum level of services to communities.

5.   To what extent does local government in Australia have to prioritise national (or territorial) performance targets over local priorities?

  There are conflicts between state government requirements and local priorities which are manifested in unfunded mandates ("cost shifting") from state government onto local government in areas such as health, the environment and planning.

(C)  INDEPENDENT COMMISSION QUESTIONS

6.   Is the Australian Commonwealth Grants Commission's allocation system fair and transparent?

  The Commonwealth Grants Commission (CGC) does NOT allocate the grants provided by the Australian Government to local councils. The CGC does play a role in allocating GST (ie an indirect tax not dissimilar to VAT) between the state and territories based on relativities which reflect relative need and relative revenue raising capacity.

  Each state (and the Northern Territory, but not the ACT which has a unitary system of government) receives general revenue support from the Australian Government for local government under the Commonwealth's Local government (Financial Assistance) Act 1995. The funding is distributed between states on the basis of population and within states on the basis of methodologies which reflect the seven national principles set out in the Act. This results in most of the funding being allocated between councils in each jurisdiction on the basis of relative need. Each states is required to maintain (at its own expense) a local government grants commission to develop a methodology for this funding distribution and to collect data from councils which can be used to make an annual recommendation on funding allocations. In practice this means each jurisdiction runs a grants commission as a small agency (often located within its department of local government) with two or three professional staff and several part-time commissioners.

  While the methodologies must be consistent with the seven national principles, they do not need to be identical. That said, considerable efforts have been made in recent years by the Commonwealth to encourage an exchange of information between the grants commissions on their methodologies to promote greater consistency.

  The methodologies are complex and include a large number of costs adjustors which are given specific weightings to determine relative need and relative revenue raising capacities. An annual conference of the grants commissions helps to promote greater consistency of methodologies.

7.   On balance, is it better to have an independent allocation system or a politically accountable government allocation system?

  The current allocation system is a politically accountable system. Although allocations between the states are based on population, allocations within the states are based on allocation recommended by the local government grants commissions and determined in a transparent fashion by applying a public methodology. However, the Federal Minister makes the final allocation (usually by accepting the recommended allocation from the state local government minister who in turn accepts the recommendation of the local government grants commission but he or she can vary the allocation if desired).

8.   To what extent is local government affected by decisions made by the Australian Commonwealth Grants Commission?

  The decisions of the Commonwealth Grants Commission have no meaningful impact on local government. Occasionally the Commonwealth Government may task the CGC with reviewing the operation of the Federal act (reviews ion 1991, 2001) or the fixed distribution of the local roads component of the Financial Assistance Grants (2006). It is then up to the Federal Minister to accept any recommendation from the CGC.

9.   What is the role of Local Government Grants Commissions in Australia?

  As above, to make recommendations to the state minister for local government (who then makes a recommendation to the Federal Minister) on the distribution of the Financial Assistance Grants.

10.   To what extent are they independent of government?

  They are usually part of the state local government department. Their administrative costs are met by state governments. Their staff are state government public servants.

11.   Are they fair and transparent?

  Yes. Each state local government grants commission publishes an annual report which details the distribution methodology and the actual distribution of grants.

12.   To what extent is local government financially dependent upon funding allocated by a Local Government Grants Commission?

  Financial Assistance Grants total about $1.9 billion out of total funding around $23 billion per annum.

7 January 2009







 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 20 May 2009