Appointment of the Deputy Chairs of the Infrastructure Planning Commission - Communities and Local Government Committee Contents


1  Introduction

Pre-appointment hearings

1. The July 2007 Green Paper The Governance of Britain proposed the introduction of pre-appointment hearings for key public officials in which Parliament has a particularly strong interest. It stated that in each case, it should fall to the relevant Select Committee to conduct the hearing, which should cover "issues such as the candidate's suitability for the role, his or her key priorities, and the process used in selection".[1] Following consultation with the Government on the conduct of such hearings, the Liaison Committee has published guidance for committees to ensure that they are conducted appropriately.[2] The outcome of the hearing is non-binding, though the Report from the Committee should inform Ministers' decision-making on whether to proceed.

Posts of Deputy Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission

2. The posts of Deputy Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) are positions to which the pre-appointment scrutiny procedure applies. In proposing the procedure, the Government expressed the view that it should apply to

positions in which Parliament has a particularly strong interest because the officeholder exercises statutory or other powers in relation to protecting the public's rights and interests.[3]

As is apparent from the description of the role below—and from interventions by Members during passage of the Bill which became the Planning Act 2008[4]—that criterion applies with especial force to those responsible for the work of the IPC.

3. We considered the appointment of the Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission in March this year, endorsing the Government's appointment of Sir Michael Pitt.[5] Deputy Chairs of public bodies are not usually subject to the pre-appointment scrutiny procedure. The decision to subject the posts of Deputy Chair of the IPC to such scrutiny was announced by the Secretary of State during debate at Report stage of the Planning Bill and followed suggestions to that effect by Members during Committee stage of the Bill.[6] Those suggestions were prompted by concerns about a potential deficit in democratic accountability following transfer of responsibility for decisions on major infrastructure projects to the IPC from the Secretary of State. [7] We are pleased that we have had the opportunity to question Robert Upton and Dr Pauleen Lane, the Government's preferred candidates for the very first Deputy Chairs of the IPC, and to express our views on the suitability of their appointments.


1   Ministry of Justice, The Governance of Britain (Cm 7170), July 2007. Back

2   First Report of the Liaison Committee, Session 2007-08, Pre-appointment hearings by select committees, HC 384, pp. 8-9. Back

3   Ibid. Back

4   See, for example, Planning Bill Committee, 10 January 2008, cols 172, 180-81, 184, 202-4, 219-25; HC Deb, 25 June 2008, cols 349, 362, 363, 366-7. Back

5   Fourth Report of the Communities and Local Government Committee, Session 2008-09, Appointment of the Chair of the Infrastructure Planning Commission, HC 354Back

6   Planning Bill Committee, Tuesday 15 January 2008, cols 208, 210, 220-1. Back

7   HC Deb, 25 June 2008, col 349. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 27 July 2009