Memorandum from Society of County Treasurers (LAI 19)

 

Background

 

1. The Society of County Treasurers (SCT) comprises all Chief Financial Officers from the shire counties in English local government. Following the reorganisation of local government in 1997, the SCT expanded to include three shire unitary authorities that had similar vested interests in local government issues. Together, these authorities represent 48% of the population of England and provide services across 87% of its land area.

 

Why do Local Authorities have cash balances?

 

2. There are broadly speaking 4 areas that give rise to cash balances within local authorities although local levels of each will vary widely.

 

3. The first area is reserves, either earmarked or general. It is a pre-requisite of sound financial planning to hold some reserves against unexpected events. Indeed, the Audit Commission recommend that authorities hold reserves and comment on them as part of their judgement of our use of resources.

 

4. The second area is large projects, especially the capital programme, where either the grant income or debt finance is raised prior to spend taking place. To some extent this is inevitable since to time income and spend to coincide perfectly would prove to be impossible.

 

5. The third area is general running cash flow. Typically most authorities receive government grants on a few days in each month and council tax income may be in a single lump sum depending on whether the authority raises council tax directly or receives it by way of precept. Authorities then pay a significant portion of their costs in salaries on one or two days towards the end of the month.

 

6. The fourth area is less clear cut in that it involves pension fund cash or cash for other local authorities such as fire or police where it is passed to another authority for operational reasons (public body to public body outsourcing). These sums don't change the overall total of local authority money but may hide its true source and the effect its investment has on each authority dependent on which body caries the default risk and gains from any marginal return on investment.

 

What are the present arrangements for local authorities' Treasury Management - and in particular the requirement to produce Annual Investment Strategies - and how have these affected the performance of local authorities, both as service providers and employers, given recent potential losses experienced by many local authorities?

 

7. Prior to the Local Government Act 2003, Local Government Investments had to be made with Government approved banks, with tight limits, and strong incentives to comply. Even so, failures such as BCCI and Chancery Bank meant that some Local Authorities had funds placed with failing banks.

 

8. An Authority's treasury management activities are now regulated by a variety of professional codes and statutes and guidance: -

 

a) The Local Government Act 2003 (the Act), which provides the powers to borrow and invest as well as providing controls and limits on this activity;

 

b) Statutory Instrument (SI) 3146 2003, as amended, develops the controls and powers within the Act;

 

c) The SI requires the Authority to undertake any borrowing activity with regard to the CIPFA Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities;

 

d) The SI also requires the Council to operate the overall treasury function with regard to the CIPFA Code of Practice for Treasury Management in the Public Services.

 

e) Under the Act the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) has issued Investment Guidance to structure and regulate the Authority's investment activities. Section 15(1)(a) of the act sets out clearly the guidance for investment. The guidance recommends that, "priority should be given to security and liquidity. However, that does not mean that authorities should ignore yield. It will be appropriate to seek the highest rate of return consistent with the proper levels of security and liquidity".

 

f) The CIPFA Code of Practice for Treasury Management in the Public Services requires as a minimum, the regular reporting of treasury management activities to: -

 

i) Forecast the likely activity for the forthcoming year (The Annual Treasury Management and Annual Investment Strategy Statements to Council in March each year); and

 

ii) A review of actual activity for the preceding year (outturn report).

 

9. Underpinning this at local level are also detailed Treasury Management Practices, which deal with the day to day operation of treasury management within authorities. Compliance with the regulations and underlying industry best practice is usually subject to annual inspection by each authority's external auditors.

 

10. The eventual effect of the recent potential losses is difficult to gauge as this will be dependent on the individual authority, how they account for the losses both in terms of short term impairments in their accounts and any actual losses as the position of the banks in administration becomes clearer. We welcome the CLG's announcement on 26th November of proposals for accounting for impaired loans in such a way as to mitigate the immediate effect on Council budgets and look forward to seeing detailed proposals. If we assume some losses do occur ultimately the authorities' members will have to balance budgets and that could mean either higher council tax levels or less service delivery (assuming all available efficiency gains are utilised to maximise service delivery anyway). Inevitably if there is less service delivered it is likely that this will lead to reductions in head count for authorities but it will depend on the individual authorities position as to whether this can be dealt with in natural wastage or would lead to redundancies. Inevitably it will take some time for these issues surrounding on-going budgets to play through.

 

In the light of recent events, are any changes needed to the framework for the scale, spread and risk of local government reserves?

 

11. It is important to note that the cause of the possible losses is a once in a generation global financial crisis. Irrespective of this fact, it is entirely correct for all authorities to re-appraise their processes and undertake a general review of the framework. However it is likely that any significant change in the framework would impair the flexibility of local members to implement local solutions to best meet local needs. Inevitably any reduction in risk taken is likely to lead to lower returns and could materially impact on an authority's capacity to fund its services.

 

Should local authority money be invested in Government stock, with lower risk, but with a low return? What effect would this have on UK banks and on council taxes?

 

12. Some local authority money is invested in government stocks by way of balancing the risk in their portfolios. As previously stated, restricting investments purely to government stock could materially affect returns used to support local authority services.

 

13. A survey conducted by the Society of County Treasurers during November 2008 indicates that average County Council balances are in the region of £170m (24 county councils responded). The survey also found that a 1% variance in investment returns would lead to an average change in band D council tax of approximately 0.1% or £10 per year.

 

What is the role of central government in providing financial advice and guidance to local authorities? Should any other bodies have a role?

 

14. Currently outside of the provision of law and guidance central government plays no role. The current guidance from CLG provides for three areas:

 

1. It is a requirement to have an annual strategy approved by members.

 

2. With the distinction between specified (low risk) and non-specified (higher risk) investments the guidance encourages an assessment of risk and limits what officers can do without express consent from Councillors. It needs to be remembered that unless the deposit was for longer than a year authorities will have classified their deposits with Icelandic institutions as specified. The CLG guidance defines a specified investment as being in sterling, having a maturity of less than one year and where the counterparty is either the UK Government, another local authority or with a body with high credit ratings. All other investments would be non-specified.

 

3. The guidance specifically refers to credit ratings, indicating that to some extent a reliance on external commercial credit rating agencies is an appropriate tool within treasury management. There is a wider industry question as to whether credit rating agencies provide a useful guide to investors of the true credit worthiness of banks. There is also a question regarding the possible conflict of interest imbedded in the credit rating agency model of the rating agencies being paid by the body that is being rated.

 

15. Other bodies whose views might usefully be sought are:

CIPFA

Audit Commission

Association of Corporate Treasurers

 

. Should the Government protect local authorities' investments in the same way that it is protecting personal assets? What consequence does this have for the relationship between local and central government?

 

16. In the long term it is difficult to see how the Government could undertake this without increasing regulation or reducing returns or both. It is possible that further work would find that the trade offs are acceptable to all.

 

17. It is a moot point as to whether greater regulation in this area is desirable or necessary. However any extension should be limited to an increase in the number of specific areas that need to be covered in the Annual Investment Strategy Statement without being prescriptive as to how each area is to be resolved. This will increase both transparency and member control of cash investment processes but retain the ability of local councillors to put in place procedures and investments that best meet local needs.

 

18. Areas that might be considered for explicit coverage in the Annual Investment Strategy Statement are:

 

The use, or not, of an external advisor

Schemes of delegation and the role of the Section 151 officer

The use of and procedures regarding credit rating agencies

 

December 2008