Pre-appointment hearing with the Chairman-elect of Ofcom, Dr Colette Bowe - Culture, Media and Sport Committee Contents


Examination of Witness (Question Numbers 40-59)

DR COLETTE BOWE

13 JANUARY 2009

  Q40  Mr Bailey: On the other hand, it could be cheaper for the consumer as you balance the interests.

  Dr Bowe: Well, that is the point really, is it not, how you balance these things off? I am sort of drifting here into talking about football issues which are not my responsibility and I had probably better bring it back to the reality.

  Q41  Mr Bailey: We could have another meeting to do all that.

  Dr Bowe: I had better bring it back to the reality of the facts, that Ofcom's job here is purely to be concerned with competition issues. It is not our job to be concerned about the sort of public policy dimension of, for example, was it the England-Croatia game that so many people were upset about in the autumn?

  Q42  Mr Bailey: Yes, that is right.

  Dr Bowe: Sadly, that is not part of Ofcom's remit, that kind of public policy issue. Our job is competition issues, and I think I probably have to confine myself to that.

  Q43  Mr Bailey: The bottom line is: do you think it will be cheaper to watch live football on pay-TV in the future?

  Dr Bowe: I do not know the answer to that. I would hope that it was, and I say that both as a regulator and as a passionate fan.

  Q44  Mr Hoyle: Can I just take that last point up. Will you class it as a failure if it is not cheaper for people to watch because presumably the remit is actually to help consumers?

  Dr Bowe: Yes.

  Q45  Mr Hoyle: Competition is wonderful, but there has to be a benefit from competition.

  Dr Bowe: Yes.

  Q46  Mr Hoyle: Surely, the benefit must be that it is cheaper for consumers, so will it be a failure if you do not get the product cheaper?

  Dr Bowe: A good question. From the consumer's point of view, what would be the kind of outcome that you want? Do you want it cheaper? Do you want it available on more channels? Do you want a choice?

  Q47  Mr Hoyle: Well, I think it is a bit like going to football, is it not, that only certain people can afford to go and the rest of the people cannot, so it is about encouraging and helping those who cannot watch TV at the moment to watch their passionate game cheaper.

  Dr Bowe: I think I would regard a good result as people having more choice of where they could watch it actually.

  Q48  Mr Hoyle: What does that mean?

  Dr Bowe: A wider range of channels on which it was available.

  Q49  Mr Hoyle: Right, but, if you cannot afford to watch it, is that a failure?

  Dr Bowe: I think we are getting into a sort of hypothetical area.

  Q50  Mr Hoyle: Do you believe it should be cheaper or not? Let us make it straightforward and simple, yes or no?

  Dr Bowe: I do not think I can really give you an opinion on that because it depends on the commercial deals that have been struck.

  Q51  Mr Hoyle: Excuse the pun, but you must have a goal and an objective and the goal must be surely to actually get the prices down because the idea is that competition is meant to make it cheaper for everybody.

  Dr Bowe: You would predict that, if there were more competition in this marketplace, then the prices would fall, but I think the main objective of even raising this, and, by the way, this is just at the stage where we are consulting on this, I think the objective is to consider whether more competition could be introduced into this marketplace, and I would really like to emphasise that Ofcom has not concluded its consultation on this.

  Q52  Mr Hoyle: Most people in this country actually find it obscene, the amount of money that is going into football, that it does not go into development, but it actually goes into the obscene wages, and the thing that they would like to see is the price coming down to allow more people to watch it.

  Dr Bowe: Speaking personally, and sorry, Chairman, perhaps I am banging on too much about football, but I was just about to say something about the price of tickets to go to a live game, but I will shut up because I am in danger of getting away from Ofcom's remit here, but we will talk about that later.

  Mr Whittingdale: Now, let us move on to public service broadcasting.

  Q53  Mr Evans: I would just like to make one request though on the football thing that Lindsay has brought up, which is that you want more people to have access to it and more cheaply and one area which I would love you to look at is the pricing of football on TV in pubs. For a lot of people who have got small pubs, they just cannot afford the subscriptions because it is done on old rateable values, and one great thing that Ofcom could do would be to allow the smaller pubs, not the mega-pubs, the smaller pubs which do not have many people, the opportunity for those pubs to be able to subscribe at a realistic level, so please can you look into that?

  Dr Bowe: I will take it on board. I do not know how that market works, but can I take it away?

  Q54  Mr Evans: Please. On public service television, what do you think the state of public service television in the UK is at the moment?

  Dr Bowe: What do I think the state is? I think it is a very difficult moment for public service broadcasting. Before I get into the substance of this, Chairman, I wonder if I could say something general. You are all extremely aware that Ofcom is due to make a considered statement on its proposals on public service broadcasting quite shortly, and I mentioned a little while ago that there is an Ofcom Board meeting discussing the final version of that today. I am afraid this means that there is not a great deal by way of specifics that I can say to you, Mr Evans, and indeed other members of the Committee, and I would like earnestly to apologise for that. I know how deeply unsatisfactory it is for you for a witness to come along and speak in generalities about an issue of such importance, but, I am afraid, I cannot pre-empt that document and I particularly cannot talk about any issues that are market-sensitive, and I know you understand that. What I would like to say in order to make this slightly less of a disappointing moment is that, as soon as we can, I would very much like to come back and talk to you about our position, but, I am afraid, at this moment I cannot be at all precise about any of the issues, including some that were raised only yesterday by Michael Grade and Mark Thompson. I am really sorry, but, I am afraid, that is just sort of where we are.

  Q55  Mr Evans: So that rules out anything about a Channel 4/Channel Five merger!

  Dr Bowe: Shall we move swiftly on!

  Mr Whittingdale: I can hear a dying fox somewhere!

  Q56  Mr Evans: There is one other aspect of public service television which I think you can comment on. You say that sometimes Ofcom can have a hard touch, that it does not seem to have a quick touch, and I will go back to the—

  Dr Bowe: It does not seem to have a quick touch?

  Q57  Mr Evans: No, it does not. The investigation into the Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand affair, when can we expect that report to come out?

  Dr Bowe: I do not know when that process is going to be concluded. The reason any of these processes takes a long time, and now I am not speaking specifically about that particular case, but this is sort of what happens, there is quite a heavy process around those kinds of complaints partly because the sanctions, the things that flow, are actually quite heavy, and I think you would expect, and in fact the legislation requires, us to be very, very meticulous in how we do this. The decisions can be appealed and Ofcom can be judicially reviewed for its handling of such cases, all of which means that you do not do them in five minutes. I know that is a deeply tedious, bureaucratic and quango-ish sort of response, but that is how the legislation was constructed. Leaving aside the inevitable sort of tedium of what I have just said, I think actually at the level of human rights it is probably the right way to do it, so, I am afraid, I cannot tell you when there is going to be a conclusion on that case and also, despite the slightly sardonic things I have just said, I feel very comfortable that Ofcom has a very good process around all of that and handles it with a sort of due deliberation.

  Q58  Mr Evans: He is likely to be back on the air then before any announcement is made?

  Dr Bowe: That is a matter for the BBC.

  Q59  Mr Evans: Well, we know when he is coming back on the air, so it is actually a matter for Ofcom whether they get it out before then or not. On a technicality, with a fine, because you can impose a fine—

  Dr Bowe: Yes.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 19 January 2009