Themes and Trends in Regulatory Reform - Regulatory Reform Committee Contents


Memorandum submitted by Ofcom

  1.  Ofcom is the regulator for the communications sector, with responsibility for regulating telecoms, broadcasting and the radio spectrum.

  2.  Ofcom is a public corporation that is held accountable to Parliament and subject to ongoing scrutiny by the National Audit Office. We are also subject to scrutiny by the Competition Appeals Tribunal, which can hear appeals on the merits of a significant range of decisions.

  3.  Ofcom welcomes this opportunity to contribute to the Regulatory Reform Committee's inquiry into Themes and Trends in Regulatory Reform. We believe that ongoing debate, review and reform of regulatory approaches are important.

  4.  We take this opportunity to set out an overview of our own approach to regulation and key examples of successful innovation in our regulatory approach. We believe these set a good standard for best practice in regulation and are relevant to the issues of effective regulation which the committee is considering

OFCOM'S APPROACH TO REGULATION

  5.  Ofcom's primary statutory duty is to further the interests of citizens and consumers, where appropriate through the promotion of competition.

  6.  Ofcom is committed to the principles of better regulation. We have a statutory duty, as set out below, to have regard to the principles of better regulation and to other principles of best practice as they evolve.

  7.  Under section 3(3) of the Communications Act we are specifically required to have regard to the principles under which regulation should be transparent, accountable, proportionate, consistent and targeted only at cases where action is needed.

  8.  Under section 6 of the Communications Act we have a duty to keep the fulfillment of our functions under review, to ensure that regulation by Ofcom does not involve:

    — The imposition of burdens which are unnecessary; or

    — The maintenance of burdens which have become unnecessary.

  9.  These principles are reflected in the more detailed regulatory principles that guide our day-to-day work. These regulatory principles include:

    — Ofcom will regulate with a clearly articulated and publicly reviewed annual plan, with stated policy objectives.

    — Ofcom will intervene where there is a specific statutory duty to work towards a public policy goal which markets alone cannot achieve.

    — Ofcom will operate with a bias against intervention, but with a willingness to intervene firmly, promptly and effectively where required.

    — Ofcom will strive to ensure its interventions will be evidence-based, proportionate, consistent, accountable and transparent in both deliberation and outcome.

    — Ofcom will always seek the least intrusive regulatory mechanisms to achieve its policy objectives.

    — Ofcom will research markets constantly and will aim to remain at the forefront of technological understanding.

    — Ofcom will consult widely with all relevant stakeholders and assess the impact of regulatory action before imposing regulation upon a market.

  10.  We take an evidence-based approach to regulation and are committed to consulting widely, where it is appropriate. We constantly seek to improve and update our consultation process to reflect changes in society and technology. In recent consultations, including our Public Service Broadcasting Review and Mobile Sector Assessment, we have included an option to contribute to our consultations via online "blogs".

  11.  We seek to ensure that we follow a transparent, systematic and objective approach when considering what regulatory solutions (self-, co—, or formal regulation) to rely on in specific cases. To this end, we recently published a statement on "Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions" in December 2008.[111] The statement sets out the high-level principles we will adopt to guide our thinking when analyzing alternative approaches. These principles are based on best practice in the communications sector and beyond, our own experience of co-regulation over the past five years, as well as stakeholders' input received during consultation.

  12.  We have a duty to undertake impact assessments to ensure that our regulation is well targeted and consistent with the principles set out above. Impact assessments encourage policy makers to consider a wide range of options, including not regulating, and provide a framework for analyzing the pros and cons of these objectives objectively. Impact Assessments are embedded in our policy development processes, including through training and corporate governance "check points" along the policy development path.

  13.  We think it is very important to take compliance and enforcement into account when introducing new regulation. A particular area of importance is considering the costs of compliance and providing clear information and guidance to companies about what they need to do to comply. We have a number of iniatives to ensure that the enforcement group of Ofcom is closely joined up with the policy development groups to make sure that compliance and enforcement is considered appropriately.

  14.  An example of this is our recent work on the misselling of mobile phones, which we will release a Statement on shortly. An important part of determining our regulatory approach has been considering the strengths and weaknesses of various enforcement mechanisms. We have also looked at what information and evidence we would need from a company if we were to undertake an investigation—to make sure that we are not imposing unnecessary record-keeping and evidentiary burdens on business. We have also written detailed guidelines to make it clear to companies how they can comply with new regulation.

  15.  We believe that we have strong analytical framework in place which is backed up by well integrated processes. This ensures that our regulation fulfills our primary goal of furthering the interest of citizens and consumers.

RISK BASED REGULATION

  16.  The concept of "risk-based regulation" has been an important part of the regulatory reform debate in recent years. Our starting point for this is that before deciding whether to apply risk-based regulation it is first necessary to distinguish between:

    — universal regulation—regulation that applies to all companies (for example, employment law or health and safety regulation); and

    — targeted regulation—this includes economic regulation, regulation that is ancillary to economic regulation in that it is designed to ensure orderly markets as competition develops and regulation that is designed to achieve specific public policy goals (for example Public Service Broadcasting obligations).

  17.  Risk-based regulation has a part to play in relation to universal regulation where it makes sense to direct resources towards companies that are most likely not to comply.

  18.  As a general point, we note that it is useful to consider the extent to which companies have the incentive to self-regulate—on their own companies may take too narrow a view of risk, focusing on the risk to their own businesses and not taking into account systemic risk. As set out in our statement on "Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions", industry-led regulation is likely to be effective where companies' commercial interests are aligned with public objectives. Where this is not the case, companies may not have sufficient incentives to self-police, and regulatory intervention is likely to be needed, either in the form of co-regulation or a full statutory solution.

  19.  Another general point we note is that Ofcom does consider "risk" as a normal part of our analysis of policy options—by taking into account the risks attached to different policy options.

  20.  We also note that as well as thinking about the extent to which companies (as opposed to Government and regulators) should be trusted to manage risks it is also useful to consider the responsibilities of consumers and citizens. For example, we consider that media literacy for consumers and citizens is an important way that the public can manage online risks for themselves

THE IMPACT OF CURRENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS

  21.  Recent economic developments will clearly have an impact on the sectors which Ofcom regulates. We are considering and analyzing these potential impacts closely on an ongoing basis.

  22.  We do not think that the current economic challenges will require a different fundamental approach and philosophy towards regulation in our case. The current principles and regulatory approaches which we already have (as set out above) mean that we have the structures and processes in place to be able to effectively take the changing economic environment into account in fulfilling our regulatory function.

  23.  We do note, however, that the current economic situation brings particular issues into sharper focus, including the following three:

(a)  New challenges in achieving investment in the consumer interest

  24.  The changing economic climate presents new challenges in considering the best way to achieve investment which is in the consumer interest. Investment is more likely in a growing than in a contracting economy. Less investment may not be in the consumer interest. The extent to which competition can impact on investment is an important part of this consider, which can in turn be affected by the changing economic environment. There is a need to balance certainty of regulation and flexibility, which allows for changing economic conditions.

  25.  Our work on super-fast broadband is a good example of how we can achieve this balance. Super-fast broadband can allow the delivery of new and improved technologies to consumers—a clear consumer benefit.

  26.  Our approach to super-fast broadband is to remove barriers to investment while preserving the potential for competition. BT, as the dominant provider, is an important player in investing in these new technologies. We have ensured BT lets competitors access the new technology it invests in. However, we will allow BT to set the prices it will charge to these competitors (with certain conditions ensuring there is not discrimination among competitors or BT's own retail business). Therefore, consumers can benefit from investment by BT and competitors who use the access technologies that BT invests in.

(b)  The importance of the consumer safety net

  27.  The current economic situation is likely to lead to greater potential for individual consumer detriment and harm. For example, in the telecommunications sector which we regulate there may be increased instances of telecommunications customers losing services because of company failure. An important part of our ongoing work is making sure that we are monitoring and responding to new instances and trends in potential consumer harm and detriment resulting from the changing economic conditions.

(c)  The impact of regulatory burdens

  28.  Changing economic conditions can clearly impact the impact that regulatory burdens can have on businesses. When following our standard processes of evaluating and weighing up the impact of regulatory burdens considering the impact of regulatory burdens on business is an important aspect. In doing this we will take into account changes in the economic environment.

KEY EXAMPLES OF REGULATORY BEST PRACTICE WHICH COULD INFORM THE DESIGN OF NEW REGULATIONS

  29.  We have identified four specific areas where we believe Ofcom demonstrates best practice in regulatory innovation, and which it may be helpful for the Committee to consider.

(a)  Regulation and Business

  30.  With respect to the relationship between regulation and "business success" we think it is important that business success and an effective regulatory framework are not seen as mutually exclusive. By establishing a secure and stable environment to operate in, regulation can be an important component for ensuring business success. An example from the telecommunications sector is the regulation of "rogue traders", who through misleading practices can take business away from legitimate businesses.

  31.  As a general position we take the view that regulation should promote sustainable competition and efficient investment, and should be focused on what is in the interests of consumers and citizens rather than the interests of particular companies.

  32.  The potential impact of regulatory burdens on regulated companies is an important part of considering the consumer interest—efficient and cost effective business is in the interests of consumers—which ultimately bear the cost of regulation. As said, an important part of our impact assessment process is looking at the potential regulatory burden on regulated companies. An example of this is our current work on telecommunications migration processes. At the moment there are different processes for different services (eg broadband compared to fixed). This can be confusing to consumers. However, it may also be inefficient for businesses to create single migration processes. We are currently working with industry to consider the potential options for change and the impacts on businesses.

  33.  As part of our ongoing focus on consumers, we also looking at the interests of "business consumers". Ofcom has recently launched a new project to better understand the interests of business consumers and to ensure that their interests are being met in a rapidly evolving telecoms market and economic environment.

(b)  A Strategic Approach to Regulation

  34.  An important aspect of the way we approach regulation which we have found to be successful is our strategic approach to regulation—where we look at sectors and the regulatory framework as a whole, rather than specific regulatory issues.

  35.  For example, key Ofcom projects have been strategic reviews of telecommunications, spectrum and public broadcasting. We are currently undertaking a strategic review of the mobile sector.

  36.  A strategic approach involves looking at the sector, identifying key issues that require regulatory intervention and stripping away regulation that is unnecessary. The benefit of taking a strategic approach is that it ensures that regulation is clearly targeted, balanced and joined up rather then becoming a "regulatory mesh" that evolves over time.

(c)  Focus on Consumer Issues

  37.  A good example of Ofcom's effective regulatory approach is our work on consumer issues. In its recent report "Rating the Regulators" Consumer Focus praised Ofcom's approach to consumer issues.

  38.  Ofcom believes that regulation should have a positive outcome for consumers. This can be direct or indirect, short or long term—but the regulation should have a clear pay off for consumers that can be clearly articulated. Considering and evaluating the "citizen and consumer benefit" is an important focus of our policy development process.

  39.  An interesting point to draw from the Consumer Focus review of Ofcom is that regulatory reform should not only focus on analytical principles and approaches but also on organizational structure and dynamics. For example, Consumer Focus drew attention to the beneficial impact that expanding Ofcom's Consumer Policy team and moving it into a different area (the Strategy and Market Development group) has had on Ofcom's approach to consumer issues.

(d)  Strength of Market Research and Intelligence

  40.  Our experience in regulation has also demonstrated the importance that strong market intelligence can play in achieving high standards of regulation.

  41.  Ofcom dedicates significant resource and energy to market intelligence and research. A key piece of work we do is the annual Consumer Experience Report, which surveys trends and changes across the communications sector. However, we also have an ongoing internal and external programme to ensure that we are across developments, trends and changes in the sectors we regulate.

  42.  This market intelligence allows us to do evidence based decision making, understand how the markets we regulate are evolving and the implications thereof, and in particular spot risks ahead of time. This ensures that we have a strong overall picture of the sectors we regulate. We can therefore approach specific regulatory issues in a well-informed way, backed up by a strong evidentiary base.

  43.  Ofcom would be happy to provide further information on these or other relevant issues if that would be helpful to the Committee.

March 2009








111   Please see http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/coregulation/statement/ Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 21 July 2009