The Defence contribution to UK national security and resilience - Defence Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Question Numbers 100-119)

RT HON BOB AINSWORTH MP, ADMIRAL LORD WEST OF SPITHEAD GCB DSC, MR JON DAY CBE, BRIGADIER CHIP CHAPMAN, MS GILLIAN MCGREGOR AND MS CHLOE SQUIRES

21 OCTOBER 2008

  Q100  Mr Crausby: Our visit to the Defence Academy last week, I think, provoked us into wanting to ensure that we get full value from the Defence Academy. Whilst I know that it must be very difficult for you to be specific about the training that the Armed Forces undertake for military assistance with the civil authorities, I think what we wanted to draw out really today was to ensure that that is going on and to ask broader questions, such as, is there any doctrinal training going on, for example?

  Brigadier Chapman: We have a defined doctrine which is out to all government departments, which is called "Operations in the UK: Defence Contribution to Resilience—JDP-02", which actually was only republished last year, as I think I am right in saying that it is the second edition. That goes through all the gamut of military support to the military and civil authorities, including MACP, MACD and military aid to the civil communities.

  Q101  Mr Crausby: Can you tell us in broad terms what role the Defence Academy plays in this regard with both the MoD and the Government, but broadly? I know it is very difficult for you to go into specifics, but we are interested, as I say, to ensure that we take full advantage of the facilities there.

  Brigadier Chapman: The actual doctrinal publication is produced by the Defence Academy through the Director General of Developments, Concepts and Doctrine, so they are plugged in with any developments in this area.

  Q102  John Smith: We were, Mr Chairman, as you know, very impressed by what we witnessed at the Defence Academy last week, and I know the Minister is very familiar with what is going on there. I wonder, do you see a greater role that could be played by that Academy in the training of not just military personnel to support civil authorities, but in the training of civil authorities and in fact possibly training the Cabinet? I do not think it would be a bad idea, from our experience last week, to have the Cabinet down once or twice a year and, instead of going to Chequers, perhaps they could go to the Defence Academy and co-ordinate some of this strategy.

  Mr Ainsworth: You were really impressed, but have you ever been to Chequers, I do not know!

  Q103  John Smith: I used to work there.

  Mr Ainsworth: The things that go on at Shrivenham are not exclusively defence; there are a lot of cross-government courses and training that is made available from the Defence Academy to other government departments. There is a course that I spoke of while you were there which was not exclusively defence, but people from other government departments were there at the time participating in the same courses as military personnel and civilians from the Ministry of Defence.

  Q104  Chairman: But I would echo what John Smith says, that a half day spent at Shrivenham by the entire Cabinet would pay absolute dividends for the future of the country, and I would suggest that is something you should be seriously considering.

  Lord West of Spithead: I am all for more military training for everybody, but I think it is just worth emphasising that an awful lot of these issues that we are talking about, the prime responders and the people who are primarily responsible for acting on them are other government departments and agencies. Taking the resilience area, for example, since the Civil Contingencies Act, there is no doubt a lot has been done there in terms of getting acts together and being able to react to these things, and there are large numbers of people. We have something in the region of, if you count PCSOs and everything else, 140/150,000 police in this country, then one looks at the numbers in the military and then we have got 52,000 in the fire brigades. The numbers involved and the responsibilities do lie with these other groups and, as I say, since the Civil Contingencies Act and our National Capabilities Programme, I think we are getting better and better at responding. When one needs the military, apart from some very niche things, if something goes dramatically worse, then there are mechanisms for actually achieving that, but, as my colleague says, there are certain things like MCT and certain things like the air capability which of course could not be provided by anyone other than the military itself.

  Mr Havard: One component we saw there was—is it called the Advanced Research Group—ARAG. To me, it is the Advanced Research Group.

  Mr Holloway: And Assessment Group.

  Mr Havard: Somebody is doing research and this research, whether it is stabilisation in Afghanistan, it is about resilience, it is about all of the various components of national security, and it is something that is under pressure, I believe, in terms of funding every year. It is one of those sorts of things where research is always thought to be not very useful until you need it of course and then nobody has been doing it. It just seems to me that it is a very valuable resource and it is maybe something which ought to be supplemented and embellished rather than under threat through its funding because it is the one place that brings together all the component parts.

  Chairman: Well, Minister, you have heard our plug for your establishment.

  Q105  Mr Borrow: We have had mention earlier in the proceedings of the role of Commander-in-Chief, Land and the support for civilian authorities, and there are a few questions that I had earmarked to ask you and some of them we may have touched on, but I will just run through them and perhaps get a response, Minister, to those issues. Firstly, could you outline briefly how the provision of military aid is made to the civilian authorities and what provision the MoD makes for emergencies in the UK? In what sort of situations would the civilian authorities be likely to request support from the Armed Forces and how is that decision made as to whether or not that support is given? Finally, are there specific capabilities which you have earmarked for supporting the civilian authorities? I think, Minister, you mentioned one situation and I was not quite sure whether that meant that you could not tell us about the rest or whether there was a wider range of specific capabilities which you could bring into the public domain at this point in time.

  Mr Ainsworth: There are two broad categories of capabilities which we maintain and one, I would say, is niche capabilities which other people generally cannot provide, and that is a full range from the air component through to maritime counterterrorism, Special Forces' capabilities, things that we cannot go into in detail, but they are there and the MoD is the provider, and then there is augmentation capability as well. Generally speaking, that is pulled together through the Commander-in-Chief, Land and the regional structure. Now, that can be provided by whatever is available to suit the purpose at the time. Sometimes it is Reserves and sometimes it is Regular Forces to meet the needs of the particular request. All of those are approved at ministerial level. All of them are charged against the Department which is requesting the assistance because they are the people who actually hold the responsibility, not the MoD, in the first place. If there is a training gain to the MoD in conducting a particular operation, then we take that into account in the charges that we make, but that is the broad structure. I do not know whether Jon might want to put any more on that.

  Mr Day: I think, Chip, you can go through the details.

  Brigadier Chapman: This really comes into three areas. That we provide military aid to the civil authorities is the broad-brush one and of course within the UK you have civil powers, which we support, by the government departments, the agencies, etc. I think your question is specific to the civil communities and, at the high end of that, we have Military Aid to the Civil Authorities, Category A, which is when there is a threat to life. When there is a threat to life, we would not charge and the Commander-in-Chief, Land, as the standing joint commander, would force-generate from any available Forces outside of the guaranteed niche capability to bring the capability to bear. For example, in the Gloucestershire floods last year when we provided 1,026 people to help the civil community in that circumstance, that was force-generated from SJC Land from the Regular and Reserve Force structure without any need to caveat defence outputs elsewhere in the world or in the UK within the basket of niche capabilities which are guaranteed 24/7, 365 for the high-end counterterrorist aspects or certain other guaranteed capabilities that we bring to bear.

  Mr Day: If it would be helpful, we can provide you with examples of the kinds of areas of support we have provided in recent years, both on an unclassified basis and on a classified basis as well.

  Chairman: Yes, both of those would be helpful, thank you.

  Q106  Mr Borrow: Can I just follow up and ask you, Minister, in relation to the sort of support that would be available in terms of helicopters over the next couple of years, are there any changes likely in that sort of support that can be provided in the UK to civilian authorities from helicopters were circumstances to arise when that request could be made?

  Mr Ainsworth: Well, we have the search and rescue capability and we have also got a training capability constantly available in the UK which could be recharged.

  Brigadier Chapman: It is worth saying that of course one of the few places where we do have a lead government department responsibility is in the provision of search and air rescue, and the number of places I do not think is going to rise in the future, and of course they are of extremely high readiness every day of the year to help the civil community. Of course in the Gloucestershire floods last year, that was the biggest search and rescue used in the UK, I think, since the Second World War.

  Q107  Mr Borrow: Are there any plans to change that capability in terms of the UK as against the capability that is available in theatre?

  Brigadier Chapman: It is different with a different series of aircraft; they are mutually exclusive.

  Mr Ainsworth: Search and rescue aircraft do not leave the UK, they are permanently tasked in the UK, but in Gloucestershire we used more than just search and rescue helicopters. We had Chinooks active in the area and the other helicopters which were just available and within the UK that we put to task in order to assist.

  Q108  Mr Borrow: Are there any changes proposed in terms of the provision that would be available were those circumstances to arise again?

  Mr Ainsworth: Specifically on helicopters, we have to maintain a helicopter force in the UK overwhelmingly for training purposes, and that is not going to alter. It is not just a case of your helicopter capability out in theatre, it is not judged by how many frames you can get out in theatre, but it is trained crews that you can get out in theatre that is often the pinchpoint, so you have to have that capability back in the UK.

  Q109  Mr Borrow: So as to the level of helicopter support that would be available in 18 months' time, were an emergency similar to the floods that took place in Gloucestershire last year to happen, we would be able to mobilise the same number of helicopters as were available to be mobilised in 2007?

  Mr Ainsworth: I know of no reason why we should not be able to.

  Chairman: I am sure you will find that we have further questions to ask on that sort of thing in due course.

  Q110  Mr Holloway: Admiral, if there were a series of big, white flashes in a provincial town or city or in London and there were thousands of dead and injured, can you give us just a flavour of the sorts of things that would happen in the aftermath in terms of all that you have been putting together?

  Lord West of Spithead: Sorry, do you mean CBRN-type?

  Q111  Mr Holloway: Or whatever, but something with many thousands of dead and injured, 10,000, say. What sort of things would come in?

  Lord West of Spithead: Well, the initial reactions, as I say, will be taken by the prime authorities, so it will be the police, fire brigade and ambulance which will take the initial actions. Very quickly, if it is a huge thing, it will become clear that they might need extra resources for cordons or whatever it might be, or, if it is a CBRN-type thing, actually for assistance in terms of work with contaminated things, things like that. Then, just digressing down that route, we have done some really good work there with defence and we have a police unit down at Winterbourne Gunner who work very closely and they do lots of exercises for gold, silver and bronze commanders and at Ryton they do similar work, so again over the last few months there has been a huge amount of work there on preparedness for those sorts of things. We would then have to ask for help from the MoD in terms of a MACP request or whatever.

  Q112  Chairman: Sorry, can you translate that please?

  Lord West of Spithead: That is Military Aid to the Civil Power. COBR obviously would be established and at COBR would be MoD, plus all the various people, and it would become very apparent that this was a very major thing. There would be demands from the people who are set up to respond that they needed extra resources and those bits would come in. Now, initially they might well think, "Well, we can do this with extra resources and police from other constabularies", things like that, but then they might rapidly say, "We need actually MoD assistance, we need extra resources", as I say, for cordons, a helicopter, or whatever it might be.

  Q113  Mr Holloway: Do you, for example, have a system in place whereby you can suddenly generate beds for 5,000 seriously injured people across the country or 10,000?

  Lord West of Spithead: I do not know the exact numbers, but the Department of Health have in place plans to take major numbers of casualties, and this is part of what we do across the board, that we push the departments that they have to put in various contingency plans, and it applies similarly to pandemic flu, it applies to dealing with dead bodies from pandemics. All of these things have to be looked at by that appropriate department to set in place plans and have those sitting there to action, and we do then exercise those as paper exercises and also some of them we exercise as actually people—

  Q114  Mr Holloway: But do you have a rough idea of how many beds you could generate over a very short period of time for a very, very large number of civilians?

  Lord West of Spithead: I have to say, I honestly do not, and it would be the Department of Health who would be able to tell you that very rapidly because they have things. For example, if a major, wide-bodied jet lands and hits London, there are things in place for what we do if that happens, and one would expect that there would be things in place for that, but I cannot give you a precise answer to that, I am afraid.

  Q115  Mr Jenkin: Just on this helicopters point, I represent an east of England constituency which is liable to flooding, coastal flooding, and in 1953 there were very serious floods and a great many people drowned, but, in these days of helicopters, one hopes the helicopters would be available and, as a topical subject, one would hope they would have winches because, in lifting people to safety from a flooded area, you require a winch in your helicopters. Is that something which is being addressed?

  Mr Ainsworth: There are winches widely available in the helicopter fleet and all of our helicopters in Afghanistan are now fitted with—

  Q116  Mr Jenkin: And on the training helicopters that would be deployed in an emergency?

  Mr Ainsworth: I cannot say that every training helicopter in the United Kingdom is fitted with a winch, no, I cannot say that. There are not only military helicopters available, but there are a lot of helicopters available through all kinds of different organisations in the United Kingdom in the way that there was not a generation ago.

  Q117  Chairman: Again, we will come back to that in due course.

  Mr Ainsworth: All the search and rescue helicopters have got winches of course.

  Lord West of Spithead: If I could just say to Bernard and his very valid question about flooding, what is a step forward is that this is now actually identified in the National Security Strategy as an issue. That is why I say this is a step forward and this means that, as it is in there, these will have to be addressed because the National Security Strategy will sit there and it will affect all those departments because, as it gets more comprehensive, it will start putting a weighting on things and people will have to say, "Right, we've got to do something about that", and it will force people to do things, so I think it is a good thing.

  John Smith: I do not think we should give the impression that there is general concern about the ability to respond to civil disasters. We had a major civil disaster exercise in my constituency recently in Barry with an airliner crashing into the big number one dock, involving all the services, and, I have to say, it was a huge success and the professionalism displayed by both civilian, voluntary and professional military personnel was exceptional. Why they chose Barry, I am not sure, Mr Chairman. I think it was to protect the next episode of Gavin and Stacey! It was a very successful exercise.

  Chairman: Another tribute!

  Q118  Mr Holloway: Do you have groups of people who sit around working up potential scenarios of things that terrorists might do, areas that are vulnerable?

  Lord West of Spithead: What you are talking about here is "red-teaming".

  Q119  Mr Holloway: Yes.

  Lord West of Spithead: JTAC do a small amount of that, but of course do very good analysis of the threat. It is a very good point, we do not have red teams set up specifically. We do task within the OSCT and we say, "Right, what ifs, what ifs, what ifs", and I will not go into some of the `what ifs' because it might tell, but I can give you one `what if'. For example, as we have done a very good job of melting down our own financial systems in the world, if I were an enemy, I would think, "How could I actually help them along the route?" so I said, "I want a `what if' for the things they might do", and that work is going on, and they have come up with various options. Is that the sort of thing you mean, Adam?

  Mr Holloway: Well, at a more sort of tactical level. Do you have people who sit around dreaming how you might blow up an airliner by putting different chemicals together?

  Chairman: We do not want to go into examples, but do you?



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 18 May 2009