Scrutiny of Arms Export Controls (2009): UK Strategic Export Controls Annual Report 2007, Quarterly Reports for 2008, licensing policy and review of export control legislation - Defence Committee Contents


Memorandum from Mr Vernon Coaker MP, then Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Home Office

REPORTS FROM THE BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE, DEFENCE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES: SESSION 2007-08

Annual Report on Strategic Export Controls

  In their report of 17 July 2008, the Committees on Arms Export Control recommended that within six weeks of the publication of the Report the Home Office supply a memorandum responding to the matters raised on the import of arms in their Report last year. (Paragraph 78)

  A letter on this matter was sent to John Barrett MP on 2 April 2007 when he was a member of the Committee and I should explain that officials were under the impression that a copy of this letter had been subsequently relayed to the Committee in a response to a request for further information. I regret to say that we failed to pick up on the fact that this appears not to have happened and would wish to apologise for this misunderstanding.

  As the Committee will be aware, firearms import, monitoring and export is within the competence of a number of Government Departments. Anyone wishing to bring prohibited firearms into Great Britain must have an import licence in accordance with the policy laid down by the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform but they must also hold the Secretary of State's authority under section 5 of the Firearms Act 1968 in order to possess those firearms once they are in this country.

  Prohibited weapons are subject to a more stringent control than any other firearm and authority to possess or deal in such weapons is granted only if very good reason is shown. Extensive checks are made before a section 5 authority is issued by the Home Office to ensure there will be no risk to public safety. The police make enquiries into the background and bona fides of applicants and ensure that tight security is in place, and the Home Office insists on seeing evidence of a legitimate commercial need to possess the firearms. Where granted, section 5 authorities are tightly drawn, specifying where and how the firearms must be stored and transported. The police and Customs conduct checks on holders to verify that imported weapons are entered onto the register of transactions which all firearms dealers are required by law to maintain and to ensure they comply with the terms and conditions of their authority.

  A firearm is deactivated when it has been rendered incapable of firing "any shot, bullet or other missile". It is then considered no longer to be a firearm and therefore no longer subject to control. A firearm is presumed to be deactivated if it has been stamped and certified by one of the two Proof Houses as conforming to deactivation standards set by the Home Office. This is an evidential provision only (under section 8 of the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988) and does not preclude other forms of deactivation provided the outcome is no longer a firearm. However, a Proof House certificate has become the widely accepted system for showing that a firearm has been properly deactivated and that it can be possessed and traded lawfully. In practice, a dealer is required to continue to record anything which is not deactivated to these standards as a real firearm.

  Home Office standards for deactivation were originally compiled in 1989 in consultation with the Forensic Science Service and the gun trade. Following some instances of automatic and self-loading guns being reactivated the standards were revised in 1995 to the current, more stringent requirements. It is generally accepted that these new standards have proved to be very effective in preventing re-activation.

  I know the Government has already responded to the second part of your recommendation, concerning the import of 200,000 assault rifles, but I wanted to add that the Home Office keeps a close eye on the importation of large volumes of prohibited weapons and will consider very carefully any evidence coming to light which might justify revocation of a particular section 5 authority. We are not aware of any transactions in recent years where the dealers concerned have not held the necessary import licences and section 5 authorities. The police have indicated that they are satisfied that the firearms are being stored securely.

27 August 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 19 August 2009