Service Complaints Commissioner for the Armed Forces: the first year - Defence Committee Contents


3  The Service Complaints System

14. In this chapter we set out the Service Complaints System that is explained to Service personnel in Joint Service Publication 831. The latest edition of this publication, which we summarise below, came out in December 2008.[12]

The Complaints Procedure

15. Any person subject to Service law who thinks that they have been wronged in any matter relating to their Service has a statutory right to make a Service complaint. From 1 January 2008, as part of the implementation of the Armed Forces Act 2006, any serving or former member of the Armed Forces can also contact the Service Complaints Commissioner independently. All Complaints are resolved at one of three levels: Commanding Officer (Level 1), Superior Officer (Level 2), and the Defence Council (Level 3). January 2008 also saw the introduction of Service Complaints Panels, which will include an independent member to consider certain cases.

LEVEL 1: THE COMMANDING OFFICER

16. Normally, the Commanding Officer (CO) is the officer who has been appointed by the appropriate authority to be CO of a ship, unit or establishment and is able effectively to exercise their powers as such.[13] If the CO is the subject of complaint, the complaint is made to the CO's immediate superior in the chain of command. If that officer is also implicated, an officer of equal rank to the CO is nominated by the lead headquarters for that Service. If a complaint is made about a decision of the CO to reject a Service complaint, the CO passes it on to the Superior Officer.

17. Having considered a complaint, the CO may decide to

uphold the complaint and grant any redress which is appropriate within the CO's authority;

Reject the complaint (this does not prevent that decision being reversed at a higher level); or

Refer the complaint. If the CO believes that the complaint is well founded but lacks the authority to grant the redress sought, it is referred to his superior officer.

18. After reaching a decision, the CO informs the complainant, and anyone implicated in the complaint, in writing. If the complainant is not satisfied with the CO's decision he or she may apply in writing for the complaint to be referred to a higher level (the superior officer).

LEVEL 2: THE SUPERIOR OFFICER

19. The Superior Officer (SO) must be at least one rank above the CO considering the complaint. They must be an officer:

of or above the rank of rear admiral, major-general or air vice-marshal; or

of above the rank of RN captain, colonel or group captain who has been authorised by an officer (from (a) above) to carry out the function of SO.

20. The SO may receive a complaint in the following circumstances:

referred from the CO; or

referred from the CO because the complainant was not satisfied by the decision or the redress offered by the CO.

21. Having considered a complaint, the SO may decide to uphold, reject or refer the complaint to Defence Council level (Level 3). After reaching a decision, the SO informs the complainant, and anyone implicated in the complaint, in writing. If the complainant is not satisfied with the SO's decision they may apply in writing for the complaint to be referred to the Defence Council.

LEVEL 3: THE DEFENCE COUNCIL

22. Complaints that are referred to the Defence Council level are received by single Service secretariats. Complaints at this level may be dealt with in the following ways:

the Defence Council may consider and make a decision on the complaint. In practice, the single Service Boards will deal with the complaint.

the Defence Council may delegate the function of considering and deciding complaints to a Service Complaints Panel (SCP).

the Defence Council may refer a complaint to an SCP for consideration and a recommendation, but will take the decision on the complaint itself.

the Defence Council may require an SCP to assist it, and authorise investigation of the complaint by an SCP or another person.

23. In considering complaints, the single Service Board will comprise at least 2 members. The members may consider the complaint papers separately before meeting together to decide the case.

SERVICE COMPLAINTS PANELS

24. SCPs have the full delegated powers of the Defence Council. They will normally consist of two serving officers of at least one-star rank, usually of the same Service as the complainant. Single Service secretariats are responsible for nominating SCP members, except that independent members are nominated by the central secretariat.

25. When an independent member is required on an SCP, that SCP will consist of three members. An independent member can be any person appointed by the Secretary of State who is neither:

a member of the regular or reserve forces, or

a person employed in the civil service.

26. Under the Armed Forces Act, an independent member is required for complaints relating to allegations of:

  • discrimination,
  • harassment,
  • bullying, or
  • dishonest, improper or biased behaviour.

These subjects of allegations are referred to as 'prescribed behaviours'.

27. Decisions by SCPs have to be unanimous or by simple majority if there are more than two members on the SCP. Decisions of SCPs are final. Having considered a complaint, the Defence Council may decide to uphold and grant the appropriate redress, or reject the complaint. After reaching a decision, the Defence Council informs the complainant, and anyone implicated in the complaint, in writing. The letter should contain information on the next steps available to the complainant and that if the complainant remains dissatisfied, where to get further assistance.


12   Joint Service publication 831, Redress of Individual Grievances: Service Complaints Issue 2.0, Ministry of Defence, 1 December 2008 Back

13   Where the CO is a one-star officer, he may delegate to officers serving under command of colonel rank or equivalent the function in respect of Service complaints. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 1 July 2009