Students and Universities - Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 140 - 159)

MONDAY 23 MARCH 2009

MS CARLY ROWLEY, MR TOM DUTTON, MR ADAM HODGSON, MR JOEL MARTIN, MR GEMMA JEROME AND MR EDWARD NUSSEY

  Q140  Graham Stringer: Edward?

  Mr Nussey: When I applied to university, I have got older brothers and they were on the old scheme, and the fact that the costs had gone up did not really come to me that it would be an issue. I just accepted it and went into education and I think it will only hit home when I have to pay it off. In my situation where I am going into another course with potentially another four years, whether it is because I am better informed about the financial burden that it is going to put me in, or just the fact that it is another four years, the decision that I have made about which course I will go to has for the majority been based on finances. I have chosen a four-year course because the NHS will pay for tuition fees later in that course whereas the same scheme is not run in a five-year course and there is also the obvious extra year of fees that you have to pay.

  Q141  Graham Stringer: Just going back to the beginning, if it had been £6,000 rather than £3,000 would that have affected your choice?

  Mr Nussey: If I was well informed about it I think it would have, but I think if you are going to pay more for your education students will expect more input into decisions that the university makes, whether it is this consumer view I do not know, but you are still putting in a lot of your money, and even though it is not affecting you right now, in the future when you have to pay it back, it is going to affect you considerably.

  Q142  Mr Marsden: I was about to say that one of the issues around seeing yourself as a consumer is that you might want, all of you, to get more bang for your buck from some of your lecturers and teachers, but we will come on to that. Can I ask a quick question, not to everybody but to anybody who feels that they want to comment on it. In the previous session we touched on the issue of part-time students and we also touched on the issue of mature students. Obviously all of you here, with the exception of Gemma, are first-time students and you are all full-time students. The question I have got is a question that was raised in the previous session about the invisibility of part-time students. I am just interested in terms of the people that you mix with, your fellow students on courses, or even students you know socially, how much mixing is there with part-time students or with mature students? If there is, is there anything particularly beneficial you get out of that? Does anyone want to come in on that?

  Mr Nussey: There are a number of mature students within the Department of Biology at the University of Liverpool, but the contact with them is reduced because of the number of under-graduate students. From my experience, the contact that I have had with them has been beneficial because they bring a new dimension to the course and how you approach learning. On the part-time students, I am heavily involved in sport within the university and in that context mature students and part-time students who have made commitments toward sport have benefited everyone in the club, no question, because it just brings a wealth of experience and knowledge about several areas that help the university.

  Q143  Mr Marsden: Interesting. Carly?

  Ms Rowley: I think there is a high number of mature students at our university as a general sort of thing and particularly in the arts it has been really nice because with some being older it brings a sense of maturity and responsibility and really getting everything out of it. Sometimes going from my tutor in the writing centre you see the youngest students coming in and sometimes they are still in that school kind of mind, and it takes a little bit to get into the momentum of university. I think those that are coming back into education after a number of years are really making it for themselves and I have had really great experiences with mature students. I am in a band with one of them and he is highly intellectual and well read, and I do not think he could have got all that breadth of experience if he had not taken a little bit of time out first.

  Q144  Mr Marsden: Interesting. Can I just stick with you for a moment, Carly, because one of the points that has been made to us, as you may have heard, is about the strong link between academics and lecturers engaged in research and the quality of the teaching. What I want to ask you all briefly is, first of all, you do not have to name names but just the span of them, are the majority of your lecturers involved in research? If they are, does that affect positively or negatively your teaching experience?

  Ms Rowley: In both of my areas, literature and music, research is a key area. I am looking into doing a PhD next in the works of Anthony Burgess and I get to be tutored by the head of the Foundation who is a forerunner in that sort of research. My dissertation tutor is on the board of trustees of that Foundation. All of my tutors seem to be in really key areas of research that need more doing and they will support the students who want to go into these new areas also. I think it has had an effect on how many bursaries they can give for masters as well as on how well they do in the research.

  Q145  Mr Marsden: Okay, Tom, what about philosophy and English, are your tutors involved in research?

  Mr Dutton: I know one tutor who definitely is, and I imagine they all are to an extent. I know that one of my philosophy tutors, Patrice Haynes, has so much work to do that she finds that she has very little time. She is a really, really good tutor but I think she struggles to do the research on top of her other commitments.

  Q146  Mr Marsden: So that is an issue where your tutor is, as it were, giving time to her students that otherwise would have to come off her research. Again, do you know of examples where it works the other way round where research people are just not around for a certain period of time?

  Mr Dutton: I think generally the main people doing research do not teach as much. I think they are either separate or maybe only do a bit of research.

  Q147  Mr Marsden: Obviously it varies from discipline to discipline but, Adam, what is your experience?

  Mr Hodgson: In my first two years we were taught by PhD students on a couple of modules. This year we have had one tutor who has been involved in research and this has had a really bad impact on our teaching. It means that he has cancelled lectures because he has had to travel to other universities. In our first semester we have probably had around half of our lectures cancelled because of it. We worked with him and the Department to try and get those lectures rearranged, so we have had a lot more lectures in the second semester, although that in itself is problematic for students who are working round their studies, for example, like myself.

  Q148  Mr Marsden: Was that something that just happened straight off? You went in and he said, "Terribly sorry, but I have got to do X, Y and Z," I would have thought—and I am not trying to put anyone on the spot—if that was something that was pre-planned that should have been the responsibility of the faculty and/or him to make those rearrangements beforehand.

  Mr Hodgson: He is the only lecturer who can teach this module at this university, so that makes problems.

  Mr Marsden: So that is the problem, he was not easy to replace.

  Q149  Graham Stringer: Was there any noticeable difference in the quality of teaching when PhD students were taking you than if it was lecturers?

  Mr Hodgson: In the first year we actually talked to our personal tutors and asked if we could get one of the doctorate tutors changed because we thought he was a really bad teacher, but the other two doctorate tutors we have had have been amazing and they have been at the same level of quality as the full-time staff.

  Mr Martin: Each of my module leaders is involved in research to a certain extent. In one instance I have managed to secure an under-graduate research studentship with one of my module leaders, which is quite good.

  Q150  Mr Marsden: You have benefited directly from that?

  Mr Martin: Yes, but most notably my primatology module leader has his own research site in Costa Rica and he is to and from there regularly, but not once has it impacted on the lectures. He has always delivered the full two hours every week and he is always giving us reading to complete for the next week, and even in some cases back-up plans in case he cannot make it, but he has never actually done that.

  Q151  Mr Marsden: Gemma?

  Ms Jerome: In terms of this tension between research and teaching, as has been indicated in the previous panel, the University of Liverpool definitely in the view of some people has a prejudicial research focus. In terms of civic design, there is not necessarily that tension there. Most of the lecturers are engaged in research and usually at some kind of excelling level.

  Q152  Mr Marsden: Sorry to interrupt you, is there a link between the research that they are doing and what you are being taught by them? Do they come along and say, "We are talking about X this week but I would like also to tell you here about my latest research on this which fits directly in"?

  Ms Jerome: Sometimes but not always. There is not necessarily a rule there. What I have noticed just anecdotally is a particular lecturer I can think of who is very much engaged in the research, and I have found that quite often they are unable to bring that level of knowledge down to an under-graduate level to enable us to engage with it. They are so focused and I think the majority of their working week is in that research.

  Q153  Mr Marsden: It is this middle ground we were talking about earlier between teaching, research and scholarship, which is supposed to be about disseminating research whether it is their own or somebody else's?

  Ms Jerome: Definitely.

  Q154  Mr Marsden: Edward?

  Mr Nussey: I think research within my course has had a very beneficial effect. Starting from a very broad base in the first year the most interesting parts of that course were the bits where the lecturer would say, "In my lab over the road we are doing this," and then they teach us about it. It is becoming more important now that we are coming into third year and honours and people are looking at potentially going into research jobs within the university and elsewhere, that lecturers who are lecturing on their specific subject and specialist subject are the ones that are the most passionate about their courses. I am amazed by the number of students that are considering further education, PhDs and masters. I think the reason for that is because we have got the world-class researchers in our department. Although I think teaching is a very important side of it, research has improved the teaching in the faculty, yes.

  Q155  Mr Marsden: Finally, just to keep with you on that, this debate about whether you are a learner or a consumer, in terms of a balance between teaching and research from what you are saying that does not seem to be particularly relevant, does it?

  Mr Nussey: I do not quite follow.

  Q156  Mr Marsden: In the sense that if you are getting the best of both worlds, which is what you are indicating in terms of the research feeding into teaching, then presumably you are getting value both from the consumer point of view but also from a learner point of view in terms of you are getting the top people involved but equally at the same time you are getting the learning out of it as well?

  Mr Nussey: Yes I think so.

  Q157  Chairman: Could I just finally put one or two very, very quick points to you. We have heard a lot during this inquiry about plagiarism, of using other people's work and passing it off as your own. Do you feel, Gemma, that is a big issue at Liverpool?

  Mr Martin: I think it is more inflated than it actually is a real problem. There were a few quite humorous examples where work has been handed in and it had actually been plagiarised from that particular tutor so they have recognised it straightaway. I think there is quite advanced software now fully rolled out at the University of Liverpool, so it is quite difficult, and it is at the forefront of students' minds. I do not think they go about it with relish.

  Q158  Chairman: Do you know of any student who has been disciplined or sent down as a result of plagiarism?

  Ms Jerome: I do not know anyone.

  Mr Nussey: I know students who have been marked down for plagiarism. As Gemma said, there is a system called Turn It In and everything that we have to submit and will be marked has to be submitted through this as a way of the lecturers knowing how much.

  Q159  Chairman: But your lab work is not, is it?

  Mr Nussey: That will go through it.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 2 August 2009