Students and Universities - Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 496 - 499)

MONDAY 11 MAY 2009

RT HON JOHN DENHAM MP AND SIR ALAN LANGLANDS

  Q496  Chairman: Good morning. Could I very much welcome the Secretary of State, Mr John Denham, to this final evidence session of our Students and Universities inquiry and also a particularly warm welcome to Sir Alan Langlands, the Chief Executive of the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Sir Alan, it is the first time we have had the pleasure of meeting you before this Committee, but you are very welcome indeed; we hope you enjoy the afternoon. Secretary of State, in February 2008 you made your speech to the Wellcome Foundation—I think a very welcome speech—about looking 15 years ahead with our higher education system. You have commissioned a number of individual organisations or individuals to actually feed back to you in terms of creating a framework for higher education. Could you tell us at what stage that is and how do you actually intend to bring that to the attention of the House and indeed the wider public? Is there a timescale?

  Mr Denham: The process you describe is right. The key events I would point you towards are a speech that I made to a university vice-chancellors' audience at the end of February which I described as a "minded to conclude" speech, so it was a clear indication of the way in which I thought we would be going. The current plan is to produce the forward looking HE framework in the summer, certainly after the European and County Council elections, and then after that we will be launching the independent review of fees and of funding. I think the Committee will recall from last time I was here the basic idea was that the framework should set out the forward looking broad vision for higher education so that this time, when people come to look at funding issues, there is hopefully some sense of what it is we are trying to fund rather than trying to deal with the question of funding in the abstract without debating what sorts of universities, what their role is going to be, how they are going to develop in the future.

  Q497  Chairman: So in June/July time that will be produced.

  Mr Denham: Yes.

  Q498  Chairman: You will then launch the fees debate straight away or will you leave some time for that to be debated before you actually go for this fees review? What is your timescale there?

  Mr Denham: I need to be a bit cautious because I do not want you to get the idea that final decisions are being taken, so I will share with you the indication of current thinking and that might be that at the same time or about the same time that we publish the higher education framework we might indicate the broad terms of reference that a fees review might have. As you will know, Charles Clarke set a number forward in the original debate but we do need to look at whether that covers everything we need to look at. There then, I think, needs sensibly to be a period of time where people can comment on those and have some discussion about it before we move ahead with the review itself. So it is not an enormously drawn out process but long enough certainly for people to see the higher education framework, the way we want to move things and they can come back and make their comments on it.

  Q499  Chairman: So you are not expecting any final decision before May 2010.

  Mr Denham: I have not set a timetable on that.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 2 August 2009