Engineering: turning ideas into reality - Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Contents


Memorandum 108

Submission from High Power laser Energy Research project (HiPER)

OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR FUSION ENERGY

  The process of "nuclear fusion" involves the combination of two atomic nuclei to form a single, larger nucleus. If the initial atoms are small (ie near the start of the periodic table), then energy may be released during this process, because the larger atom will be more stable. That is, it has an effectively lower rest mass. As shown by Einstein (E= m c2), a change in mass will lead to the creation of a large amount of energy.


THE FUSION PROCESS

  Fusion is the process which powers the Sun. It is not encountered in everyday life on Earth because extreme temperatures are required (many millions of degrees) in order for the positively charged atoms to have sufficient speed to overcome their mutual repulsion. The temperatures are so high that the matter turns into a plasma, in which the electrons are stripped from their nucleus. The fact that high temperatures are needed gives rise to the common name for this approach being thermonuclear fusion. The Sun delivers the initial energy to create a plasma using the power of gravity. On Earth we need to find other solutions.

  The most advantageous fusion reaction for terrestrial studies is the combination of two Hydrogen isotopes (Deuterium and Tritium) to form a Helium nucleus plus a neutron. For energy production, we need to create a propagating fusion reaction-that is, one which sustains itself once we have initiated the reaction. This can be achieved by using the Helium nucleus to deposit its energy into its neighbouring atoms, thus providing sufficient heat to start the next reaction. The neutron is used to drive the power plant-it is captured in an absorbing blanket surrounding the system which heats up because of the energy deposited by the neutron. This is then simply used to heat water to power a conventional steam turbine for energy production.

  Fusion is the opposite process to nuclear "fission" (the process used in nuclear power plants), where heavy elements such as Uranium are split into two daughter nuclei.

  The benefits of fusion can be summarised as:

    (1) Abundant fuel and energy security: the raw products can be found naturally (Deuterium comes from seawater and Tritium can be created in situ within the fusion device itself).

    (2) The energy released is very high, meaning it is a naturally efficient system (multi-GW power plants are the predicted scale for fusion reactors).

    (3) The process is significantly cleaner than other bulk power production techniques: There is no greenhouse gas production, and there are no long-lived radioactive products, although there is activation of the reaction chamber that can persist for ~100 years.

    (4) The process is inherently safe (little or no stored energy, so no potential for runaway reactions).

  Thermonuclear fusion has been studied for approximately 50 years. The proof of principle (demonstrating the validity of the underlying science) has been achieved in defence programmes (in the 1980s). What remains is to find a route to produce a stable, efficient and cost effective power plant. There are two principal routes being explored, both of which are at a high stage of maturity, albeit still requiring multi-decade investment to develop to the stage of a viable reactor. The two routes are:

    (1) Magnetically confined Fusion Energy (MFE). Here, large low density plasmas made up of Deuterium and Tritium fuel are created in toroidal (doughnut-shaped) chambers called "tokamaks". The operation is essentially "steady state" rather than pulsed. The Joint European Torus (JET) based at the Culham Laboratory in Oxfordshire is the world's largest example and has demonstrated the scientific basis of magnetic confinement fusion. The international community has agreed to fund the next generation machine (ITER), to be sited in Cadarache, France towards the end of next decade. Its cost is of order $5B construction, and a similar sum for operation. See http://www.iter.org/index.htm

    (2) Inertially confined Fusion Energy (IFE). Here, high power pulsed lasers are used to compress a small pellet of Deuterium and Tritium to achieve very high densities (>30 times the density of lead) over a very short timescale (< 1 nanosecond). The National Ignition Facility in the USA is currently under construction with a mission to demonstrate the scientific basis of IFE (ie sustained, scalable thermonuclear burn). See .http://www.llnl.gov/nif/project/. Costs are similar to MFE. A significant amount of IFE research is also carried out within the UK, based on experiments at the Central Laser Facility at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxfordshire. This approach has the benefit of applicability to other scientific goals (astrophysics, material science, particle acceleration). With the advent of new laser technology leading to significantly reduced costs, an entirely civilian approach to IFE is now feasible, and forms the basis of the HiPER project (see below).

HIPER SUMMARY

  HiPER is a UK initiative for Europe to take a world leading position in the demonstration of Inertial Fusion Energy and the science of extreme conditions. This approach to energy and science is made feasible by the advent of a revolutionary approach to laser-driven fusion known as "Fast Ignition". HiPER will make use of advanced laser technology in a unique configuration, allowing fusion fuel to be compressed and then ignited to induce a propagating burn wave yielding significant energy gain (Q~100).

  At present, the HiPER project is a consortium of seven European countries at the national level (Czech Republic, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, with the UK taking the coordinating role), two regional governments (Madrid and Aquitaine), industry, plus scientists from four other countries (Poland, Germany, Russia, USA) and international links to Japan, China, Republic of Korea and Canada. The project has completed a two-year conceptual design phase, and has just entered a three year "preparatory phase" in April 2008 as part of the EC's stewardship of the ESFRI roadmap facilities. This phase is co-funded by the UK. Assuming success in this phase, construction is envisaged for the latter half of next decade.

  The facility will mark the culmination of a UK-led strategic alliance of laser capabilities across Europe, which includes all the major existing facilities and a significant intermediate step (PETAL), currently under construction near Bordeaux at a cost of ~€80M.

  The timing of the HiPER preparatory phase has been designed to take full advantage of international work in this area. Three strands of work are being planned to converge early next decade:

    -  IGNITION DEMONSTRATION: It is expected that net energy production from laser fusion will be demonstrated in the USA in the early part of the next decade on the National Ignition Facility (and subsequently on Laser Megajoule in France). This will mark the culmination of over 40 years' research, and a commitment of many billion dollars.

    -  FUTURE PATH: Alongside this, there has been significant investment in laser facilities around the world targeted at developing an advanced route to fusion ignition. This route is designed to increase the efficiency of the fusion yield using a substantially smaller facility. If successful, this will provide the confidence to proceed with engineering analyses for commercially viable energy production and will provide the technological basis for a broadly-based science programme. These facilities (in USA, Europe and Asia) are designed to provide the scientific evidence for how this field should develop. They are too small to achieve fusion gain themselves, but should within the next five years provide sufficient information to allow the future path to be adequately defined.

    -  INTEGRATED PLAN: The HiPER project is designed to capitalise on this work. The design phase has established the overall strategic requirements. The preparatory phase will provide the structural and technological groundwork to allow the next big step to proceed without delay, whilst ensuring that construction decisions are only taken after validation of the proposed approach. This preparatory phase will place Europe in a clear leadership position.

  The conceptual work done on HiPER has already had a significant influence on the international community. We note that the US are now actively working on fast ignition relevant modifications to NIF to follow on from the initial demonstrations of energy gain. Meanwhile, we have started discussions with the Japanese on the potential for an international approach to the next step. These changes can be capitalised upon as part of the HiPER project, and could enable HiPER to take a generational leap in capability (to high repetition rate operation) based on close coordination with our international partners.

EXPECTED SCIENTIFIC AND ECONOMIC IMPACT

  HiPER has been designed to marry together the establishment of European leadership in the science of extreme conditions with the key societal challenge facing mankind: a long-term supply of abundant clean energy.

  This is a field in which the UK can honestly claim to be a true world leader. We have the world's most powerful, most intense laser (Vulcan-PetaWatt), and are set to retain this leadership for the next few years with the emergence of the high intensity Astra-Gemini (2007) and Vulcan-10PW (2010-11) facility developments. This leadership has provided us with the scientific and technological knowledge and international reputation to propose and lead the HiPER project.

  The science case has been developed by over 50 senior scientists from 11 nations during the past two years. It offers a compelling argument for a step-change in laser capability for European academics. Its proposed science programme covers a broad spectrum in this rapidly developing field, with a facility capability that will offer unprecedented, internationally unique tools. The topical fields range from laboratory astrophysics, the study of extreme states of matter, planetary science, creation of relativistic particle beams, and fundamental quantum physics.

  It is clear that HiPER will open up entirely new areas of research, providing access to physics regimes which cannot be explored on any other science facility. Its user base will be greatly expanded compared to existing laser laboratories, consistent with this increase in scientific breadth.

  The energy mission is aimed at establishing the case for the exploitation of laser driven fusion. The project is timed so that decisions can be made following the upcoming demonstration of energy production from lasers (in ~2012 in the USA and subsequently in France). HiPER will develop the route to viable power generation by addressing the key R&D challenges-both scientifically and technologically. Its "Fast Ignition" approach promises a factor 5-10 reduction in scale (and thus cost) of the capital plant, whilst severing the principal link to classified applications. This allows academia and industry to take a lead role for the first time.

  Work in the current "preparatory phase project" will concentrate on establishing the most appropriate route to moving forwards in this area. It will assess the likely technical solutions and associated risks to allow informed decisions on the required R&D and facility specification for subsequent phases.

  Multiple energy solutions are demanded by a risk-balanced strategy for energy supply, with fusion able to offer the "holy grail" of energy sources-limitless fuel with no carbon or unmanageable radioactive by-products, energy security, and a scale able to meet the long term demand. Laser fusion is highly complementary to ITER, and is based on a scientifically proven approach (inertial confinement).

  There are significant industrial opportunities for the UK and Europe as part of the HiPER project-in the design and build phase, the operational phase, and from the ensuing technical spin-out opportunities. With regard to the future energy applications of HiPER, the scale of the potential economic impact is clear.

  HiPER would secure UK/European leadership in a field which is rapidly developing in Asia and the USA. No comparable laser system is underway anywhere in the world-HiPER will be a highly effective international attractor to the UK.

ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS

  The scale of the scientific and engineering challenge to achieve fusion energy is very significant. It covers a broad array of disciplines, each requiring a clear, long-term development plan. This demand a coherent approach linking: academic training to ensure adequate community skills; early industrial engagement to ensure opportunities for the UK are not missed; identification and funding for the required Research, Development and prototyping; and close collaboration between academia and industry to identify optimum solutions.

  The technical areas requiring development include:

    -  Remote handling and robotics in harsh environments.

    -  Advanced material science for reactor vessel components.

    -  Microscale and nanoscale facbrication and characterisation (of the fuel pellets).

    -  Advanced laser technology.

    -  Manufacture of at high volume, low cost of large scale (metre-diameter) optics.

    -  Adaptive and active optics.

    -  Radiation hardened electronics.

    -  Remote injection and tracking technology (of the pellet targets).

    -  Cryogenic (~20K) vacuum technology.

    -  Thermal system management.

    -  Structural engineering.

    -  Fluid dynamics (for liquid wall chambers).

    -  Waste management and tritium extraction.

    -  Automated alignment and component replacement.

FUNDING

  Technical work associated with the three-year preparatory phase has direct funding or in-kind commitments amounting to ~€70M from: European Commission, UK, France, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, Italy, Poland, Portugal and the Republic of Korea, plus formal agreements with institutions in Germany, Canada, USA, Japan and China.

  €13M of this is direct funding provided from the EC and the national partners (over three years) to fulfil specific project requirements of the preparatory phase.

  The cost of construction and operation will be assessed during the course of the preparatory phase and depends on key technology down-selection choices in the next few years. However, it is clear that it is in the billion-Euro class of facilities.

TIMELINE

    -  Conceptual design study [UK funding, scientists from 12 nations involved] (2005-06).

    -  Included on ESFRI European roadmap (October 2006); UK endorsement as Coordinators (January 2007).

    -  Preparatory Phase Project [National and EC funding] (April 2008 to March 2011).

    -  Detailed Engineering Phase (estimate 2011-14).

    -  Construction Phase (estimate 2014-20).

June 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 27 March 2009