Memorandum 21
Submission from the Engineering and Technology
Board
1. INTRODUCTION
AND EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
1.1 The Engineering and Technology Board
(ETB) welcomes the Committee's Inquiry into engineering. The ETB
supports the joint written evidence submitted by the "professional
engineering community". This written evidence concentrates
on issues which specifically relate to the work and remit of the
ETB.
1.2 The ETB is an independent organisation
that promotes the vital role of engineers, engineering and technology
in our society. The ETB partners business and industry, Government
and the wider science and technology community: producing evidence
on the state of engineering; sharing knowledge within engineering;
and inspiring young people to choose a career in engineering,
matching employers' demand for skills.
- Engineers and engineering make a vital
contribution to the UK's economic prosperity and to meeting some
of the key global challenges we face.
- Greater effective coordination is needed
on the multiplicity of promotional and awareness-raising activities
that are currently undertaken by a wide range of public, private
and professional organisations. While many of these interventions
and initiatives are excellent and have national coverage, better
coordination would maximise impact and improve the consistency
of messaging.
- Improved links between employers and education
providers are needed to ensure that education providers better
understand employers' skills requirements, specifically on the
content and design of the engineering diploma. A recent initiative
at Warwick University in automotive technology is a good example
of business and academia working together to create a course that
delivers the skills that employers need.
- We welcome the announcement in this year's
Budget of support for innovation, particularly through public
procurement and specifically for SMEs. We would welcome a review
of the impact of procurement on the performance of technology
businesses.
2. THE ROLE
OF ENGINEERING
AND ENGINEERS
IN UK SOCIETY
2.1 The lifestyle we enjoy today is, to
a large extent, the result of engineers applying science to create
the technology that most people take for granted. The UK led the
world in the application of engineering, to create its Industrial
Revolution. This has continued over the last two hundred years
and the harnessing of our world-class science base has allowed
us to remain one of the world's richest nations. Engineers and
engineering are thus central to sustaining and building on the
UK's economic competitiveness and to improving our quality of
life:
- Supporting the UK's economic competitiveness.
In the current technology-based global economy, the UK's continued
and improved economic performance will depend upon achieving a
balanced and sustainable economic model. This will be one that
is not just reliant on the service sector and one which produces
and capitalises on a population of world leading scientists and
engineers to produce and exploit technology.
- Sustaining and improving our quality of
life eg healthcare, particularly medical diagnostics and communications
(mobile phones, etc).
- Mitigating some of the key global challenges
we face, recognising that these serious threats also offer opportunities
for technological developments and new markets in which engineers
and engineering will play an increasingly important role, eg global
warming, the identification and delivery of sustainable energy
sources, the supply of clean water.
2.2 Indeed, the ways in which engineering
contributes to society are becoming ever more pervasive and diverse
as new technologies (the products of engineering), and new applications
for these technologies, proliferate. Engineering is dynamic, continually
evolving to meet changing circumstances and needs.
2.3 A recent report[39]
commissioned jointly by the ETB and the Royal Academy of Engineering
suggests that the extent and nature of engineers' and engineering's
contribution go largely unrecognised, with people failing to make
the connection between the technology they enjoy and the role
of engineering. Improving understanding of the relevance of engineering
is a necessary precursor to improving perceptions of engineering.
This misconception is particularly pronounced amongst young people.
2.4 The general perception of engineering
is clouded by a number of issues:
- the persistence of an outdated view of
engineering-a view which harks back to a nineteenth century image
of engineering
- a lack of clarity (even within the profession)
about exactly what constitutes engineering and who exactly should
be called an engineer.
2.5 This lack of understanding is particularly
concerning given the demographic decline in young people[40]
and the fact that engineers have tended to be drawn from a particular
demographic' ie white men.
2.6 One contribution to addressing this lack of understanding
is the ETB web portal-scenta[41]-that
seeks to inspire young people, using their preferred medium. It
provides examples of the wide range of contributions that scientists
and engineers make to their everyday lives, information on careers,
role models that they can identify with and examples of qualification
pathways to engineering careers.
2.7 The science and engineering community,
under the leadership of Sir Anthony Cleaver, Chairman of the ETB
and Sir Tom McKillop, President of the Science Council, is joining
with Government, charitable trusts and industry to create a UK
celebration of science and engineering to be held in London in
March 2009. This will incorporate the National Science Competition,
announced in this year's Budget.
2.8 The influence of engineers extends beyond
engineering occupations. Those educated and trained as engineers
work across a wide range of sectors and play an extensive role
in the UK economy, including at Senior Management level in FTSE
100 companies, where their skills are valued in non-engineering
applications.[42]
Recommendation
- Greater effective coordination is needed
on the multiplicity of promotional and awareness-raising activities
that are currently undertaken by a wide range of public, private
and professional organisations. While many of these interventions
and initiatives are excellent and have national coverage, better
coordination would maximise impact and improve the consistency
of messaging.
The recent example shown by the Chief Executives
of various engineering outreach organisations[43]
to better coordinate their activities and to work in partnership
should be continued and supported by Government funding within
an umbrella programme.
3. THE ROLE
OF ENGINEERING
AND ENGINEERS
IN UK'S
INNOVATION DRIVE
3.1 The Knowledge-Based Economy Needed for
the UK's Continued Economic Success demands higher-end skills
and relentless innovation. The UK is well placed to do this, with
a science base second only to the US[44]
and world-leading capital markets within the City of London. Despite
this potentially winning combination, we are not yet as successful
as many of our competitor nations at exploiting these assets,
through innovation, in order to create large, globally competitive
and sustainable enterprises. While the UK's record on numbers
of start-up companies may be improving,[45]
we have not been as successful as other economies at growing these
companies or at producing a critical mass of "serial innovators"
(something successfully achieved in the US).
3.2 The ETB's reports on innovation and
wealth creation from SET[46]
made a number of recommendations on action that could be taken
by Government, business and financial institutions to help realise
this potential. Some of these recommendations have been implemented,[47]
but more could be done to help unlock the opportunities our science-base
and capital markets present.
3.3 One of these reports, SET and the City,
examined UK venture capital and found that in comparison to the
US, UK venture capital is still relatively small in scale. For
UK venture capital, there are clearly difficulties posed by poor
returns in the technology sector since 2000, but there have been
encouraging recent signs of improvement. Early stage technology
businesses clearly need to deliver better performance, but institutions
should consider whether they could move prudently to a more US
model of funding for venture capital.
3.4 We applaud the establishment of the
Technology Strategy Board (TSB)-a model recommended in our report.
We encourage the TSB and the Government to ensure that the board
remains strategic, focused on facilitating and brokering and does
not simply evolve into another grant awarding body.
Recommendations
- All investors should be encouraged to
fund venture capital by the use of appropriate tax incentives.
- The TSB's funding should be doubled
over the next five years.
4. THE STATE
OF THE
ENGINEERING SKILLS
BASE IN
THE UK, INCLUDING
THE SUPPLY
OF ENGINEERS
AND ISSUES
OF DIVERSITY
(FOR EXAMPLE,
GENDER AND
AGE PROFILE)
4.1 Whilst qualifications are widely used
as a proxy for skills, the rapidly changing pace of technology
and the skills needs of UK economy mean that lifelong learning
is an essential component of up-skilling. An award of a qualification
is an important first step in demonstrating proficiency but it
is the application of skills that creates value.
4.2 The recent ETB/Royal Academy of Engineering
report[48]
on public attitudes to engineers and engineering showed that only
7% of 16-19 year olds felt they were quite knowledgeable about
engineering as a profession and just 5% felt very well informed
about the work of engineers. 16-19 year olds were also likely
to see engineering as more "manual", "structured"
and "serious". This obviously has implications for attracting
young people into careers in engineering, and could therefore
undermine our ability to meet our future skills requirements.
4.3 Employers' requirements
Employer skills surveys[49]
demonstrate that a substantial minority of engineering employers
are experiencing difficulty recruiting appropriately skilled staff.
4.4 A consultation of the ETB's Corporate
Members[50]
indicated that they had hard-to-fill vacancies in their organisations
and that this was primarily due to a mixture of applicants for
vacancies being of insufficient quality and volume. Lack of skills
and appropriate work experience were the most often cited reasons,
with suitable qualifications, attitudes and motivation also being
mentioned by some as lacking.
4.5 One respondent commented that "|high
level skills involving the use and understanding of maths and
physics-some candidates have apparently sound qualifications but
cannot apply their skills to new problems.", adding that
"Many of the skills|can be worked on once in employment.
The basic understanding of maths and physics is not so easy to
pick up later and must be the priority."
4.6 Another cited the problem of high technology
small companies that hire one or two graduates a year but cannot
carry the overhead of a two-year training programme before graduates
make a full contribution to the company.
4.7 The skills that engineers and technicians
will need more of in the future include: technical, team working
and problem solving skills. Communications, planning and organisational,
numeracy and literacy skills also rated highly.
4.8 Destination data from the Higher Education
Statistics Agency (HESA) has shown that six months after graduating
just over 3% of UK-domiciled civil engineering students are unemployed,
whereas the figure for other engineering disciplines is typically
in the range of 8-10%.
4.9 Exporting skills
The majority of full-time postgraduate engineering
students at UK HEIs are domiciled outside the EU. Even among full-time
engineering first degree students as many as a quarter of Chemical,
Process and Energy Engineering undergraduates, for example, are
from outside the EU. Although schemes exist to allow non-EEA graduates
to work in the UK, this does raise issues about the "export"
of skills to competitor nations and the balance of UK and foreign
domiciled students on engineering courses.
4.10 The ETB carried out a study[51]
in collaboration with the Engineering Professors Council (EPC)
which highlighted a potential imbalance in the make-up of student
cohorts resulting from the high numbers of overseas students studying
engineering at UK HEIs. The study indicated that the quality of
student experience may be affected by such imbalances.
4.11 Demographic issues
According to the population projections,[52]
the number of 16-year-olds has peaked in 2007 at 802,000 and is
forecast to fall each year to a low point of 671,000 by 2017-a
decline 16% for the annual cohort over the next ten years.
4.12 Women
Around one-in-seven engineering and technology
students in UK higher education are female-a figure which has
remained static in recent years, although twice the figure of
twenty-five years ago.[53]
4.13 The ETB particularly welcomes the Women
and Work Sector Pathways Initiative, which aims to test new recruitment
and career pathways for up to 10,000 women across nine different
sectors throughout England[54]-and
which it was recently announced will receive an additional £5
million. The ETB believes that this initiative will help to overcome
perceived obstacles to increasing female participation in engineering.
4.14 The ETB is also a core supporter of
the WISE campaign[55]
(Women into Science, Engineering and Construction) which collaborates
with industry and education to encourage UK girls of school age
to value and pursue STEM or construction related courses in school
or college and related careers.
4.15 Technician and vocational level
Engineers and technicians who have followed
the vocational route into engineering are the bedrock on which
the whole sector depends for the application of its activities,
innovation and R&D. Probably the most significant route into
engineering is the Apprenticeship and the ETB is concerned at
the significant fall in engineering Apprenticeship volumes-about
25% over the last three years.[56]
The Leitch Review of Skills[57]
recognised the vital contribution of the FE sector to up-skilling
and raising productivity.
4.16 The ETB welcomes the establishment
of National Skills Academies in manufacturing, construction, nuclear,
and process industries and strongly supports the work of the Sector
Skills Councils in meeting the demand for vocationally qualified
employees reflecting the needs of employers.
Recommendations
- Improved links between employers and
education providers are needed to ensure that education providers
better understand employers' skills requirements, specifically
on the content and design of the engineering diploma. A recent
initiative at Warwick University in automotive technology is a
good example of business and academia working together to create
a course that delivers the skills that employers need.
- The recent focus on boosting number
of apprenticeships, including adult apprenticeships, should be
scaled up.
- Diversity should be encouraged, including
gender, BMEs, returners etc. The work of the various organisations
which encourage diversity need to be better coordinated and integrated
with other broader programmes.
- A comprehensive review is needed of
the real cost of producing engineering graduates, particularly
the provision of practical training and laboratory work.
- A centralised FE statistical unit (like
HESA) should be established and examine uptake and progression
within strategically important areas for FE.
5. THE IMPORTANCE
OF ENGINEERING
TO R&D AND
THE CONTRIBUTION
OF R&D TO
ENGINEERING
5.1 The Lisbon Agenda[58]
is intended as a strategic response to address the low productivity
and stagnation of economic growth across the EU. An EU target
spending on research and development was set at over 3% of EU
GDP. The provision of intermediate and high level STEM Skills
for the UK Science, Engineering and Technology sector is one of
the key challenges recognised within the Lisbon Agenda.
5.2 A recent report[59]
estimated that to achieve the level of R&D activity envisaged
in the 3% target, an extra 500,000 graduate researchers would
need to be produced across the EU. For the UK to increase its
R&D expenditure by 40% there will need to be a 40% increase
in employment in the SET sector.
5.3 The initial targets set out in the Lisbon
Agenda were too ambitious and it seems unlikely that the UK will
achieve its 2.5% target of R&D spend of GDP by 2010. Therefore,
there needs to be far greater incentives for industry to invest
in R&D. The TSB will help the UK close in on its 2.5% target.
However, the £190m annual budget of the TSB should be considered
in the context of the £9 billion shortfall in R&D spending
seen in 2004.
5.4 The huge potential of public procurement
as a means of stimulating research and development has been recognised
but is yet to be realised.
Recommendation
- We welcome the announcement in this
year's Budget of support for innovation, particularly through
public procurement and specifically for SMEs. We would welcome
a review of the impact of procurement on the performance of technology
businesses.
6. THE ROLES
OF INDUSTRY,
UNIVERSITIES, PROFESSIONAL
BODIES, GOVERNMENT,
UNIONS AND
OTHERS IN
PROMOTING ENGINEERING
SKILLS AND
THE FORMATION
AND DEVELOPMENT
OF CAREERS
IN ENGINEERING
6.1 All these bodies engage in activities
to promote engineering skills and careers and progress has been
made in improving and joining up these initiatives to prevent
duplication of effort and inconsistency. Organisations that run
successful initiatives should be supported to increase their reach.
6.2 In order to promote engineering skills
and careers to young people, more should be done address them
via their preferred medium of communication ie the internet, as
well as to promote an inspiring message alluding to a modern vision
of engineering. The ETB aims to do this with its update of the
scenta portal and the enginuity[60]
(engineering careers information) website, and with the Science
Council's Futuremorph careers from science website.
6.3 University
Should provide our future engineers who are
fit for purpose and come with the broad foundation of education
and skills which are needed for careers in engineering and be
adequately funded to do so.
6.4 Industry
Evidence from the ETB's Business and Industry
(B&I) Panel suggests that there is wide recognition that engineering
employers have a key role in initial and continuous professional
development, promoting engineering careers, up-skilling, training
and providing awards to recognise success[61].
6.5 The Panel sees Government's key role
as promoting qualifications, professional engineering institutions'
role as supporting professional development, promoting careers
in engineering and engaging with their membership to ascertain
their views. Further Education colleges and private training providers
are recognised as being key players in the provision of training
courses[62].
6.6 Professional institutions should continue
to:
- Provide like-minded professionals with
"knowledge networks".
- Set and maintain professional standards,
in association with ECuk.
- Define chartered status; provide a framework
for Initial Professional Development (IPD) including defining
the skills needed eg project management.
6.7 GOVERNMENT
In addition to the earlier recommendations,
we:
- Applaud the Government's increased commitment
to lifelong learning.
- Recommend a review of the way Government
sets targets for the LSC to deliver the upskilling the UK requires.
March 2008
39 Public Attitudes to and Perceptions of Engineering
and Engineers, the ETB and the Royal Academy of Engineering,
2007 http://www.etechb.co.uk/_db/_documents/Public_Attitudes_to_and_Perceptions_of_Engineering_and_Engineers_2007.pdf
) Back
40
See footnote 14. Back
41
www.scenta.co.uk Back
42
Engineering UK 2007, p66 Engineers in the Economy, 2007,
the ETB, http://www.etechb.co.uk/_db/_documents/EngUK07.pdf Back
43
The Engineering Development Trust, the Learning Grid, the Smallpeice
Trust, Young Engineers. Back
44
As measured by citations of science publications; the UK produces
10% of the world's papers with only 1% of the world's population. Back
45
The Race to the Top-A Review of the Government's Science and
Innovation Policies, 2007 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/5/E/sainsbury_review051007.pdf Back
46
SET and the City: Financing Wealth Creation from Science, Engineering
and Technology, 2006, the ETB http://www.etechb.co.uk/_db/_documents/setandthecity.pdf
and The Frontiers of Innovation: Wealth Creation from Science,
Engineering and Technology in the UK, 2004, the ETB. Back
47
In the Spending Review 2004, following the publication of the
first report. Back
48
Public Attitudes to and Perceptions of Engineering and Engineers,
the ETB and the Royal Academy of Engineering, 2007 http://www.etechb.co.uk/_db/_documents/Public_Attitudes_to_and_Perceptions_of_Engineering_and_Engineers_2007.pdf
) Back
49
Such as the National Employer Skills Survey (NESS-England) and
the Scottish Employers Skills Survey (http://www.futureskillsscotland.org.uk/) Back
50
The ETB invited members of its Business and Industry (B&I)
Panel-made up of 28 active major engineering employers across
the UK. Back
51
The Costs of Teaching Engineering Degrees -http://www.etechb.co.uk/_db/_documents/ETB_EPC_-_Costs_of_Teaching_Engineering_Degrees_Final_Full_Report.pdf Back
52
Government Actuaries Department / the Office for National Statistics,
base 2006, .http://www.gad.gov.uk. Back
53
Source HESA Back
54
This is being delivered by Sector Skills Councils covering engineering
including Construction Skills, Energy and Utility Skills and SEMTA. Back
55
www.wisecampaign.org.uk Back
56
Source: LSC/SSAScot Back
57
The Leitch Review of Skills, HM Treasury, December 2006 Back
58
The Lisbon Agenda is an economic action and development plan for
the European Union (EU) set out by the European Council in Lisbon
in March 2000. Back
59
Gago 2004 Back
60
www.enginuity.org.uk Back
61
A respondent commented that "employers need to be more accountable
in promoting engineering as a career and pro-actively promoting
technical development opportunities internally and also with external
providers." Another noted that "...we would have more
success if there was... strong leadership|and industry saw there
were tangible benefits for being involved." One other commented
that we "...desperately need a framework showing clarity
of responsibility for promoting engineering... [with] too many
organisations seeing their competition as another engineering
[institution]... [and] we need to pool resources to expedite progress
against shared objectives, [and] remove duplication and redundancy
in what we do|" There is a clear call for a "powerful,
unified message". Back
62
One respondent commented that "the education sector should
focus on educating engineers and scientists ensuring a good grasp
of the fundamentals. Given a strong base, employers and training
providers can help develop other skills as a later date as required." Back
|