Engineering: turning ideas into reality - Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Contents


Memorandum 76

Submission from EPC Global

Re: How easy is it to recruit the engineering staff you need?

  We're an engineering staffing company and we work with several of the world's largest engineering employers, helping them to recruit into thousands of roles here and abroad, mostly at the mid to senior end of the spectrum. We'd like to focus on these levels because it will be a while before any welcome initiatives to encourage recruits to the industry have an effect.

  Engineering employers face a number of challenges recruiting at this level, primarily a genuine shortage of talent in several fields thanks to an ageing workforce and/or high demand. The best evidence is the length of time that roles can go unfilled and the rates that some senior professionals can now command. In the UK some of the three most affected fields are power, oil and gas and rail.

  In summary we believe that (a) employers can't only blame talent shortages for their woes and (b) that the Government should recognise that employers can perhaps fill most vacancies from a domestic/EU talent pool (eventually) but it will cost them dearly to do so. In detail:

  We'd like to make four recommendations to employers:

    1. Be more strategic and stop being locally-minded regarding recruitment: Some forward thinking employers have left behind the days of "just in time" recruitment using local recruiters. They recognise that good people are essential to project delivery so plan much further ahead, with staffing as a board level issue. Still others in what remains a broadly conservative industry are opening their minds to using talent from overseas, once they are convinced of the validity of such recruits' qualifications.

    2. Commit to retraining or employing re-trained engineers. Talent from declining industries can be retrained for up and coming ones in certain areas but many employers aren't keen on the idea.

    3. Improve recruitment processes. Some engineering employers could speed up the whole selection process to match practices in other industries, or risk talent going to the competition.

    4. On the HR side, improve retention measures. Many employers could do a lot in this area and minimise the resource-heavy need to recruit in the first place.

  We'd like to make three recommendations to the authorities:

    1. Focus your efforts on getting women into engineering. The profession could be more "female friendly" and career paths in engineering need to be explained at an early age. We're only fishing from half the pool of potential engineers if we don't.

    2. The Migration Advisory Committee should broaden the shortage professions list to include engineers from other fields. Employers aren't only concerned about the availability of talent per se but also its cost. Salaries in some fields have surged thanks to skills shortages and make up a much higher proportion of outgoings. Of course, high salaries should help encourage British youngsters into engineering but employers can't either twiddle their thumbs and wait for this (and paradoxically a drop in salaries from adequate supply) to happen or cease trading because recruitment has become prohibitively expensive.

    3. Don't stop there: Make the UK more attractive as a destination to work for engineers-we surveyed 1,700 engineers from around the world earlier this year and the UK scored below many of our key competitor countries for quality of life.

November 2008





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 27 March 2009