655 - Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Contents


Submission from the Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research (OSCHR)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  This memorandum provides background on the establishment, operation and progress of the OSCHR. This memorandum was prepared by the OSCHR Office with input from the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS) and the Department of Health (DH).

2.  The memorandum is designed to augment the OSCHR Chairman's First Progress Report, which was published in November 2008 and is attached at Annex 1.[1]

BACKGROUND TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF OSCHR

  3.  On 31 March 2006, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, appointed Sir David Cooksey to lead a review to build agreement on the best institutional arrangements for a new single fund for health research announced in the budget. The Report of the review, "A Review of UK Health Research Funding", was published in December 2006.

4.  The review concluded that, although good progress had been made in some areas, further work was needed to ensure that publicly funded health research was carried out in the most effective and efficient way, and to facilitate rapid translation of research findings into health and economic benefits. The Report recommended specific actions for the Government to take to achieve this. In his Pre-Budget Report on 6 December 2006, the Chancellor announced that he and the Secretaries of State for Health and for Trade and Industry (now Innovation, Universities and Skills) welcomed the report and would take forward its recommendations.

  5.  The Review recommended the establish a new Office for Strategic Coordination of Health Research (OSCHR) that would take an overview of budgetary division and research strategies of both the MRC and NIHR.

  6.  OSCHR was set up in January 2007 following the blueprint laid out in Sir David Cooksey's review, in order to develop a more coherent strategic approach to health research in England. During 2008, this role was extended to all three of the Devolved Administrations. This change reflects the collaborative, multi-disciplinary, multi-centre nature of much health research, and the need to maximise UK competitiveness in a global health research environment.

ROLES AND RELATIONSHIPS

The OSCHR Office

  7.  As recommended by the Cooksey Review, OSCHR was created as a jointly-staffed and funded office of the Department of Health and the Office of Science and Innovation (OSI) (now DIUS). OSCHR is headed by a non-executive Chair who is appointed by, and reports to, the Secretaries of State for Health and for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Professor Sir John Bell, Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford University and President of the Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS), was appointed as the first Chair of OSCHR.

8.  The work of OSCHR is overseen by the OSCHR Board, which first met in January 2007. Terms of Reference and membership are given at Annex 2. The Board has three non-executive members recruited through the Appointments Commission in accordance with the procedures set by the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments and appointed by Ministers. Initially there was representation on the Board from DIUS, DH England, MRC and NIHR, with a single representative for the Devolved Administrations. Following discussions with the Scottish Government, the Welsh Assembly Government, and the Northern Ireland Executive, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland agreed to become full Partners in OSCHR in 2008 and now have full representation on the OSCHR Board. The research funders, MRC, NIHR (for England), CSO (for Scotland) and WORD (for Wales), and the R&D Office of the HSSCSA (for Northern Ireland) are now referred to as "The OSCHR Partners".

The OSCHR Office

9.  The Office is administered by DH England under an agreement between DH and DIUS, and is funded jointly by DH and DIUS.

10.  The key messages emerging from the Cooksey Review were that there was the need to:

    — ensure a more strategically coherent approach to publicly-funded health research;

    — create a step-change improvement in the translation of basic research into health and economic benefits; and

    — encourage a stronger partnership with the health industries and charities.

The Roles of the OSCHR Partners

  11.  The OSCHR Partners are responding to these challenges by developing a shared Vision for UK Health Research. The Partners are working together to realise this Vision through the development of an integrated plan to deliver the Vision supported by five key areas of work: translational research, public health research, E-health records research, research methodology and human capital.

12.  All the OSCHR Partners remain the direct funders of research with their own budgets and lines of accountability. Each has, and continues to develop, its own strategy. The major difference since the Cooksey Review is that, under the oversight of the OSCHR Board(s), the OSCHR Partners are now coordinating their strategies to deliver the shared Vision for UK Health Research.

The Role of the OSCHR Board and OSCHR Office

  13.  The role of the OSCHR Board and OSCHR Office is a) to forge agreement between the OSCHR Partners on the UK Health Research Vision and their integrated plan to deliver the Vision, and b) to monitor the coordination and implementation of the OSCHR Partners' delivery of the Vision.

14.  Since the establishment of OSCHR in 2007, the OSCHR Partners have worked to coordinate their strategies in specific areas such as translational medicine, and have then brought these to the OSCHR Board for discussion and agreement.

  15.  OSCHR has the additional role of submitting a single funding bid to the Treasury covering the activities of the MRC (UK-wide) and the NIHR in England, and the allocation to the MRC and the NIHR rising to over £1.7 billion per annum by 2011 of Government funding needed to deliver the Vision.

  16.  The OSCHR Partners fund research that covers a very broad spectrum of activity. In order to help OSCHR fulfil its facilitation and monitoring roles three Boards—a Translational Medicine Board (TMB), an E-Health Records Research Board (EHRRB) and a Public Health Research Board (PHRB)—have been established to provide strategic oversight in these areas.

  17.  The roles of these Boards echo that of the main OSCHR Board in that they advise and monitor the coordination and implementation of the OSCHR Partners' delivery of the Vision according to their Terms of Reference. The Chairmen of the Boards attend OSCHR Board meetings and report on progress to OSCHR Board members. The three Boards were established at different times and are at different stages of development.

PROGRESS TO DATE

  18.  Full details of progress between January 2007—November 2008 are summarised in OSCHR's first progress report which was published on 18 November (Annex 1).

19.  The purpose of the OSCHR progress report was to highlight the main elements of the combined approach that has been put in place by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) since the Cooksey review. This period has seen an unprecedented commitment to health research in terms of funding, infrastructure, research programmes and the volume of health research commissioned.

  20.  There is a much closer working relationship between the OSCHR Partners, the major public funders of health research. Together, as part of a coordinated approach, they are now investing much more into research aimed at translating basic science ideas into new products and approaches to the treatment of disease and illness.

  21.  During 2007-08 the MRC and NIHR have, under the oversight of the OSCHR Translational Medicine Board, chaired by Prof Sir Alex Markham, jointly developed an ambitious new approach to translational medicine research.

  22.  Coordinated strategies have been created that are designed to increase translational research activity and capacity.

    — A system has been created which is designed to swiftly identify the latest advances in basic science, develop their potential into promising interventions, and evaluate effectiveness, value for money and broader impact for use in the NHS.

    — By working closely together, a coherent approach to public funding of translational medicine research has been developed by the MRC and NIHR that that provide opportunities for those choosing to move basic medical research discoveries towards commercialisation and clinical use.

    — For the first time, the "development gaps" where support was not consistently available have been addressed.

  23.  In the area of electronic records research, the OSCHR's E-Health Records Research Board, chaired by Prof Ian Diamond, has been working to facilitate coordination of funders' strategies in the area of E-health records research in order to maximise preparedness of the research community for exploitation of the CfH Research Capability Programme. A Strategic Framework for Health Informatics in Support of Research has been agreed to aid coordination of UK funders' strategies (including: maximising current investment, funding of infrastructure & novel research, training of human capital etc.) and a Strategic Coordination Group bringing together the major funders from the Government and charity sectors has been established.

  24.  It is envisaged that the Research Capability Programme and equivalents in Scotland and Wales will enable faster and easier access to health-related data sets. This will lead to increased numbers of research applications linking health data with population based research data including biological (genomic), trials, epidemiological and social science data.

  25.  Progress in methodology. The MRC and NIHR share a vision that the UK should lead the world in the development of pioneering research methodologies. A programme of research now supports this aim. It is hoped that research in universities and the NHS will benefit from new and improved ways of designing and conducting clinical research, and translation into patient benefit will be supported by better tools to inform regulatory and adoption decisions, and to support industry R&D needs.

  26.  Progress in public health research. A Public Health research Board chaired by Professor Ray Fitzpatrick was established in December 2008.

  27.  One of the key recommendations from the 2006 Review of UK health research funding by Sir David Cooksey was to establish "... an agreed and understood set of health research priorities for the UK that target the biggest and most important health challenges for the UK over the coming decade." During 2008, OSCHR coordinated a multi-stage project with the overall objective of identifying and prioritising "UK health research opportunities" over the next decade.

  28.  Extensive debate and discussion lead by the MRC identified that the key opportunities for maximum impact in health research over the coming years would be the application of a new and developing research approaches across a range of diseases and disorders. The Health Research Opportunities were published on the MRC website in Febuary 2009.

FUTURE CHALLENGES IDENTIFIED IN THE CHAIRMAN'S PROGRESS REPORT

  29.  In his foreword to the 2008 Progress Report the Chairman of OSCHR, Professor Sir John Bell highlighted the progress that had been made in addressing the Cooksey agenda and identified future challenges:

    — Communication.

    — Commercial interactions.

    — Public health research.

    — Governance of E-health Records Research.

    — Capacity building.

    — Innovation in the NHS.

  30.  These challenges are well recognised by the OSCHR Partners and further progress has been made since the Progress Report was published. This is summarised below.

  31.  There is agreement of the need for better communication of the combined funding landscape particularly for industry. A co-ordinated Communication Strategy is being developed by the OSCHR Partners.

  32.  Developing public health research is an OSCHR priority for 2009. The new Public Health Research Board has met and is currently engaged in mapping the public health research landscape. It will monitor the coordination and implementation of the OSCHR Partners' coordinated approach. Meanwhile, the MRC and NIHR have each taken a strategic coordination lead in two major areas of public health need with the MRC leading on Ageing and on Addiction & Mental Health, and the NIHR leading on Obesity and on Infection.

  33.  The OSCHR Partners have built further on their ongoing interactions with industry. Recent developments include the establishment of the MRC Industry Forum and the start of a collaboration between, industry, MRC, TSB and NIHR on stratified medicine announced in the recent Government response to Sir David Cooksey's Review and Refresh of Bioscience 2015 Report. The new (Government) Office for Life Sciences under the oversight of Lord Drayson is also concerned with this agenda. OSCHR and the OSCHR Partners are contributing fully to ongoing discussions.

  34.  Capacity building and training is an OSCHR priority for 2009. Work by the OSCHR Partners to develop a UK-wide Strategic Framework for Human Capital for Health Research is well advanced and will be discussed at the OSCHR Board in May.

  35.  Significant progress is being made in establishing the Health Research Support Service (HRSS) and equivalents in the Devolved Administrations and through the development of the Strategic Framework for Health Informatics in Support of Research. However, the OSCHR Progress Report highlighted the importance of agreeing appropriate governance arrangements that satisfy the public's and professionals' expectations and concerns with data security and patient confidentiality.

  36.  This issue is being tackled through a series of mechanisms that are designed to protect patient identifiable information, whilst enabling research to reach its potential in the UK. In England, a key development is the establishment of the Information Governance Services, to enable research using patient records within a risk based framework of controls. This work is being developed with the advice of the independent National Information Governance Board (NIGB).

  37.  The Progress Report highlighted the progress made through the NIHR but noted that the commitment to embrace research and innovation is still lacking in many NHS Trusts. Since then there have been a number of developments—the NHS Constitution was published in January 2009 after the publication of the Progress Report and makes clear that research is a core part of the NHS in that it enables the NHS to improve the current and future health of the people it serves. In addition the NHS Operating Framework 2009-10 states that providers of NHS care will need to increase their participation in research. The national ambition is to double the number of patients taking part in clinical trials and other well-designed research studies within five years.

May 2009

Annex 2

OSCHR BOARD MEMBERSHIP AND TERMS OF REFERENCE

OSCHR Board and key functions

  OSCHR's mission is to facilitate more efficient translation of health research into health and economic benefits in the UK through better coordination of health research and more coherent funding arrangements to support translation.

The key functions of OSCHR are to:

    — work with officials from DH, DIUS and the Devolved Administrations to set the Government's health research strategy, taking into account the advice, priorities and needs set out by NIHR and its equivalents in the Devolved Countries, MRC and the NHS;— set the budget required to deliver this strategy and submit a single Spending Review bid to the Treasury;

    — communicate the UK's health research opportunities to major stakeholder groups;

    — monitor delivery of the strategy against objectives and report to Parliament on progress; and

    — encourage a stronger partnership between Government, health industries and charities.

  OSCHR's role is a) to forge agreement between the OSCHR Partners on the UK Health Research Vision and their integrated plan to deliver the Vision, and b) to monitor the coordination and implementation of the OSCHR Partners' delivery of the Vision.

Membership of the OSCHR Board

    — Professor Sir John Bell—Chair, OSCHR— Professor Sir Leszek Borysiewicz—CEO, MRC

    — Professor Dame Sally Davies—Director General R&D, DH, England

    — Dr Russell Hamilton—In lieu of CEO, NIHR

    — Dr Tony Jewell—CMO, Welsh Assembly Government

    — Sir Alan Langlands—CEO, HEFCE

    — Professor Sir John Savill—Chief Scientist, Scottish Government

    — Professor Adrian Smith—Director General of Science and Research, DIUS

    — Sir Mark Walport—Director of The Wellcome Trust (Non-Executive member)

    — 2 non-executive members currently being recruited

  In attendance: Professor Sir Alex Markham (Chair TMB), Professor Ian Diamond (Chair EHRRB), Professor Ray Fitzpatrick (Chair PHRB), OSCHR Office lead officials.








1   Not printed, see www.nihr.ac.uk/files/pdfs/OSCHR_Progress_Report_18.11.08.pdf Back


 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 29 July 2009