Energy and Climate Change Contents


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1-19)

MR PHIL BENTLEY, MR MARTIN LAWRENCE, MR JIM MACDONALD, MR GUY JOHNSON, MR IAN MARCHANT AND MR NICK HORLER

11 FEBRUARY 2009

  Q1 Chairman: Good morning. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Select Committee for Energy and Climate Change. I am sorry it is a bit of a squeeze in this room, but, as a new committee, it is not possible for us to have had one of the larger interview rooms—that will be later on in our session. Welcome to the Chief Executives and senior managers from the six big energy companies. We are very glad you have joined us this morning. Can we start off by giving you a chance to introduce yourselves and your companies?

  Mr Horler: I am Nick Horler; I am Chief Executive of Scottish Power.

  Mr Marchant: I am Ian Marchant, Chief Executive of Scottish and Southern Energy.

  Mr Johnson: I am Guy Johnson, Director of Regulation at RWE npower.

  Mr Macdonald: Jim Macdonald; I am Commercial Director, E.ON.

  Mr Lawrence: Martin Lawrence, EDF Energy, currently looking after generation and supply.

  Mr Bentley: Phil Bentley, Managing Director of British Gas.

  Q2  Chairman: Thank you very much. Gentlemen, welcome, and thank you for the submissions you have put forward, which have been circulated to the Committee. If we can start off on energy prices, which is very pertinent to consumers and indeed to our economy in our country, I notice that one of you said in your submissions that there had been "difficult public relations circumstances" which, given the rise in prices, is not very surprising! Perhaps as a starter, two of your companies have announced price cuts, that is Centrica and Scottish and Southern; and four of you have not. I just wondered whether the four that have not could explain why that is the case.

  Mr Macdonald: Chair, I am happy to take that, if you are comfortable. I think E.ON was one of the first, towards the end of last year, to make it clear that as long as we saw a decrease in the wholesale price going forward, that we were indeed very optimistic about reducing prices in quarter one. I think it is fair to say we will still be in that very same situation, and the optimism from that point of view has increased as opposed to decreased. However, for very obvious reasons, looking around this table, I prefer not to go into any more detail than that but we certainly stand behind our original comment made towards the end of last year, and we hope to see something soon.

  Q3  Chairman: They do say in Yorkshire that "fine words butter no parsnips" and I wonder if you could give us some more precise details on when you can expect prices to come down.

  Mr Macdonald: Chairman, I am very sorry, but, obviously, my competitors here would be delighted to hear the same news, so if I can ask for your judgment on that one!

  Q4  Chairman: I understand that point and I wonder if some of your competitors might like to make their comments!

  Mr Johnson: I would make a couple of points in terms of the work we have done for our vulnerable customers in 2008, and although obviously there has been a great focus on absolute pricing, I would remind you that we have, for example, massively increased, as an industry, our energy efficiency programme. Our expenditure on that over the next three years is going to be £3.7 billion. Of that, at least 40 per cent is for priority group customers, those who are on the main income benefits or customers who are over seventy. The reality of that increased investment in energy efficiency is that it has the effect of reducing energy bills for a typical household by around £300 a year. The second point that I would make linked to that is that I think all the companies here—and certainly ourselves—have launched a new social tariff in 2008. That social tariff for us is specifically directed towards certain households with incomes of less than £13,500 a year. Again, that has been a major increase in expenditure and major commitment—not directly, in terms of prices—but for more than 60,000 of our customers to move to a reduction of £125 per fuel or £250 if they are dual fuel customers from the tariffs they would otherwise pay. Thirdly, we reduced in December our PPM prices by £30, having reduced—sorry those are our gas PPM prices; and we reduced our electricity PPM prices to bring them in line with cash and credit in August. Fourth, we have made a reduction for our off-gas grid customers. You will be aware from my evidence of the position in wholesale costs in comparison to pricing levels over the last two years; but I would comment that there has been a massive investment in our vulnerable customers as an industry, and that you will see coming through in 2009—maybe not in headline pricing cuts, but in the way that I have described.

  Q5  Chairman: I think that is a fair point, Mr Johnson. In terms of your parent company, which is German-based, how comparable have the prices been in Germany in terms of the rise and fall?

  Mr Johnson: What I have with me—and I am sure you had as well—is the data from the DECC September 2008 analysis of pricing across Europe. Our average domestic gas prices in the UK—we rank the lowest; and in terms of average electricity prices we rank fourth, but we rank, for example, substantially below Germany.

  Q6  Chairman: UK prices you are talking about!

  Mr Johnson: I am talking about UK in comparison to other countries in the EU.

  Q7  Chairman: That is current, is it?

  Mr Johnson: This is December 2008 DECC numbers.

  Mr Bentley: Chairman, you referred to Centrica there, and that is sometimes confusing because British Gas is the brand that everyone knows here in the UK, and Centrica is the name of our parent company, but it is a UK-listed parent company and we were the first to lower prices in 2009; and actually we were as well, twice in 2007, the first to announce price reductions. We are the largest buyer of gas here in the UK, and obviously we all want to see more gas sources brought to the UK to lower prices further. I just wanted to clarify that Centrica and British Gas are one and the same.

  Mr Horler: Chairman, for completeness, you asked of the four companies that have yet to move: while I will not be specific, and therefore maybe not butter your parsnips, I would say that you are obviously very well aware that two of our largest competitors have set dates at the point from which those decreases will take place—and we do not want to lose any customers and therefore we are likely to move soon.

  Mr Lawrence: To complete the circle, as it were, we are also in the position, and have said publicly, that we are actively looking at prices and expect to move our prices soon. Similarly to my colleagues, I do not expect to make an announcement here because a commercial decision has not been taken at this point in time, but what I can do is say that we will move soon.

  Q8  Dr Turner: I am particularly prompted by Jim Macdonald's previous responses. Wholesale prices have been reduced now for some considerable time, and the lag between wholesale price reduction and retail price for the customer reduction is quite considerable, much shorter than the lag between prices going up. The public is not terribly happy with this; the public has the perception, rightly or wrongly—and you have the opportunity to defend yourselves against the perception—that companies such as yourselves are squirreling away unjustifiable levels of profit, especially the bonus that you had from Phase 1 of the European Emissions Trading Scheme, and there was a great deal of public support for a windfall tax on your companies. Given that you were so coy about protecting your bottom line and unwilling to tell us why it is that you cannot reduce your prices now rather than at some optimistic point in the future, can you give an honest rebuttal of the call for a windfall tax on your companies?

  Mr Macdonald: You have covered several issues there, and I will try to cover them one at a time, but if I do miss one, obviously please come back to me. In terms of the wholesale prices, it is important that we do realise the increase in wholesale prices that we have seen. If I choose electricity, gas it would be roughly the same, so if I just choose that! If we go back to February 2007, which was the last time that prices came down, it gives us a reasonable pointer to move forward from. Since February 2007 the wholesale electricity price rose by about 212 per cent to July 2008. During that period of time our prices rose by 10 per cent, in electricity in that case, and by a further 20 per cent later on—or 16 per cent, should I say—giving a total of roughly 26 per cent. We protected our residential customers, and indeed all our customers from that viewpoint, from such a massive increase to that 212 per cent earlier from that, with price increases at the time of less than 30 per cent. You are absolutely correct that we have seen a massive decrease in that wholesale price; but even to today, if I use the same point of February 2007, the price of electricity is still 75 per cent ahead of that point in February 2007, and prices are only 30 per cent ahead from that point. I do not think anyone is in any way trying to protect the fact that we have seen a massive decrease in wholesale price from 212 down to 75; but we have only seen prices rise, from an E.ON perspective, 30 per cent over that same period. We have been able to smooth the effect of that wholesale curve in residential prices. You referred to the fact that Ofgem also looked at whether prices came down to the same extent after that drop in wholesale to the same extent that prices go up after a similar increase. They found that the price movement was very similar in both cases, from that side; so hopefully that gives some comfort. I am not trying to be in the least bit coy about prices. The other point you made that I should refer to—and again we have given the evidence to Ofgem—is that last year E.ON retail business within the UK environment made no profit whatsoever from that; so it is certainly not that we are trying to protect our bottom line in that context. We do not have a bottom line from that perspective. However, we did continue, as Mr Johnson said from an Npower perspective, to increase our social spend. We doubled that last year. The latest Ofgem review shows that we spent more per customer than any competitors from that viewpoint; so I do not think we were in any way coy about trying to protect either vulnerable customers or indeed the whole of our customer base when you look at a 212 per cent increase in wholesale price against the 30 per cent increase in prices. We have seen a dramatic decline. I was referring back to statements because I was quite rightly asked by the Chair—two of my competitors have made announcements regarding pricing; my reference goes back to the fact that we were actually one of the first to make the announcement that we were very optimistic that should wholesale prices continue to come down, we would very much want to reduce our prices for customers. We do our very best to reduce our prices as soon as we can, but, gentlemen and ladies, I would ask you—I do not want to give that information to my competitors today, for very obvious reasons.

  Mr Horler: Chairman, you will have seen that the submission that Scottish Power has put in, perfectly illustrates this point: it is common practice in the industry to buy forward, and we buy forward to protect our customers. Mr Macdonald has perfectly laid out the detail of this; that we use our buying strength to buy forward. The weighted average cost of gas is still working through portfolios at the moment—purchase of gas is still working through a period where in the summer of last year crude oil was $140 and we were being told by certain commentators that it might go to $200. We have set purchasing programmes; we think it is much more important than speculating the gas market, because our job is to buy gas and protect our customers to buy gas in that way. The graph we submitted perfectly illustrates it.

  Mr Lawrence: We have seen unprecedented volatility in the commodity markets over the past periods, and it is essential that we have been able to protect our customers from the extreme spikes up and down through the process for this programme of advanced buying, which is common across the industry.

  Q9  Chairman: How long would an advance contract run for? When you buy in advance, how long do you lock yourselves in for? How long do you lock yourselves in a price?

  Mr Bentley: I think every company looks at it slightly differently, but if you take it over a one or two-year period we are all buying forward, especially for this time of winter where the demand for gas goes up more than four times. A lot of that gas that we are burning today was bought in summer when prices were much higher, so you cannot take just one point in time and then interpolate a pricing decision. If you take a two-year period, gas prices for example over the two-years' wholesale markets have gone up by 70 per cent, but prices to the end customer in British Gas have gone up 11 per cent. When I explain that to people they do not always get it, but it is all because of when you buy the gas over a longer period of time. You raised a different point, Dr Turner, about the windfall taxes. This is something that is worthy of some discussion around the carbon allowances and the carbon regime, whereby those companies that emit the most carbon pollution have indeed been given those permits free, and they have real value. That has created a very imbalanced and unusual outcome whereby the more you emit, the more you pollute, the bigger the windfall; and certainly in British Gas we have the lowest carbon emissions of any of the companies here; and, frankly, we are disadvantaged as a consequence of that.

  Q10  Chairman: Do you get a share of that windfall?

  Mr Bentley: Well, let me just give you a number. The emissions of RWE npower across Europe are 150 million tonnes; British Gas is 6 million tonnes; so it is a fraction of the size. That is the point I am trying to make.

  Mr Johnson: Perhaps I can comment firstly on the specific question—Mr Macdonald talked more about wholesale electricity prices—if I could talk about wholesale gas costs. If one starts in January 2007 and looks at the profile since then, it went up to something like 2.5 times that level; but it is currently at something like twice that level. This is in terms of the gas wholesale cost on a pence-per-therm, one month ahead basis. Over that period we have increased our prices by 27 per cent; so there is no doubt that over that period, had we followed wholesale costs we would have more than doubled our prices and brought them back down again. The reality is that over that period wholesale gas costs have more than doubled and are still more than double their January 2007 levels; and over that period our prices have increased by 27 per cent. One second point in relation to the question was that Ofgem in its market report specifically—I looked it up and it was in paragraph 7.17—did not find that prices follow wholesale prices up quickly but down slowly. I suppose in relation to comments about investment returns and taxing those returns, I think very much like Mr Macdonald: our retail business has something like a quarter of the profitability of two years ago; but in terms of the wider business, including generation business, we have plans to spend £1 billion a year each year over the next ten years on investments in the UK, obviously on investments in renewables, in major offshore wind farms like Gwnt-y-Mor, which will be 750 megawatts, one of the largest wind farms in the world, and investments in things like Staythorpe and Pembroke, very, very efficient new combined cycle gas turbine plants. The effect of those investments will obviously help amongst other things to result in a reduction in our emissions intensity as well as having long-term benefits in terms of security of supply. Of course, the point about those investments is that the amount we are investing is vastly more than we are earning in the UK, and therefore the comments about windfall tax are perhaps one of the things that is most likely to cause concern in relation to that kind of level of investment programme.

  Chairman: We will be coming to the question of investments, Mr Johnson.

  Q11  Paddy Tipping: Could I ask Mr Marchant: I have heard you claim before, last year, that your tariffs in broad terms were the lowest in the market, and last week you were able to cut electricity prices by 9 per cent and gas prices by 4 per cent. Why can you do it and the others cannot?

  Mr Marchant: I have frankly got no idea.

  Q12  Paddy Tipping: Neither have consumers—that is the problem.

  Mr Marchant: One of the questions that occurs to me is why it is the two British quoted companies have announced first and the four Continental Europeans that have not. I do not know whether that is significant but it is an interesting question. To be fair to both Centrica as well as ourselves, we have a reputation for being first movers in price reductions. I think our pricing record as a company—I will take any scrutiny from anybody—I think it stands—I would refute a number of things in an earlier question, there is no evidence of lags. Indeed, I can demonstrate objectively that the avoidance of petrol pump pricing has been in consumers' interests. I can throw data at you—you know, how long do you want to spend on it? I have got the data here. The reality is that our pricing policy as a company will bear any external scrutiny you want to put on it, and I am sitting here tall. I hope they do not reduce prices because it means I can win customers, but that is probably not the right answer for UK plc; so I hope they get off their backsides and do something in the next few weeks.

  Q13  Paddy Tipping: So you have got off your backside and brought prices down by 9 per cent and 4 per cent.

  Mr Marchant: Yes.

  Q14  Paddy Tipping: What is the prospect of further cuts?

  Mr Marchant: When I look ahead, I am concerned that forward wholesale prices are higher, so I am now talking summer 2010 prices are about 10 per cent higher than summer 2009 prices; so I am concerned because that does not feel right, that if the wholesale price continue that we may see increases. The reality is that I would expect us to see another round of decreases later this year or early next year—but at the moment an objective analysis would suggest that is not possible. That is my best call at the moment. We are seeing the same in oil: oil prices currently are $46 but if you go out to 2011 you are well over $60; so you are seeing that the short-term prices are maybe artificially low or being dragged down by the very negative economic sentiment.

  Q15  Anne Main: I would like quite a brief answer to this question, please, if possible! Basically, you are all prepared to sit there and justify your pricing structure, so therefore do you feel the media has got it wrong, because that is where your consumers are getting their information from; and whilst you can sit here and give us all the information that you feel makes what you are doing sound ultimately very reasonable, it seems that you have not made that argument in the media—so has the media got it wrong?

  Mr Horler: My reflection on this is that I do not think the industry has done a very good job in explaining what is a consumer-focused, but potentially quite complicated subject.

  Q16  Anne Main: Have you been asked to explain?

  Mr Horler: I guess you are asking us to explain. We know ourselves that we need to do more

  Q17  Anne Main: It has been raging in the press. Did you make any attempt to explain?

  Mr Horler: Yes. I have worked in the industry now for twelve years and I worked in retail for six years before this: I have on a number of times explained things—attempted to explain that to the media. Many times I have been met with the response that that is not the story that they want to hear.

  Q18  Anne Main: So the media is against you—

  Mr Horler: We know—I know that we can do better at explaining this because actually it is a positive story: we are using our size and our strength to buy forward to protect our customers from a very volatile market. There are other markets in Europe that do not do that. If you take the previous two or three months' wholesale price plus a margin, I would not want to expose my customers to that because it is a very volatile market.

  Q19  Anne Main: Okay, I do not want all that detail; I just want to know why you have not made your case. Mr Macdonald, do you feel you could make your case to the media better, or have you tried to make your case better and the media is just not wanting to listen?

  Mr Macdonald: I think your original comment that the media has not been carrying the story we are putting out today says without any shadow of doubt we could have made our story better. That is something that we need to learn going forward in that context, and we have to put more effort behind doing it.

  Mr Bentley: There is not a journalist in the country that has not had this so-called Radiator Chart from British Gas, which explains exactly what makes up the £100 bill. I am happy to circulate that. The fact is that the commodity is £44 out of every £100 of bill; the metering and transportation costs are going up and up and the margins—



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 6 November 2009