Memorandum
submitted by Dr Stuart Hillmansen (LCT 40)
1. Executive
summary: Railways have a key role in the
UK
transport system. Unlike other transport
modes, the railway is able to use primary energy from a range of sources. In the UK the railway is powered using
diesel (gas oil) fuel, and using electricity taken from the national grid. Calculating emissions for a typical railway
journey is therefore complex and the results are very dependent on the
assumptions made. The current
state-of-the-art electric powered trains have very efficient traction systems,
and are able to regenerate energy while the vehicle brakes. However, older rolling stock is often less
efficient, and often cannot regenerate into the supply. Because of the long design life span of rolling
stock, the full penetration of technology into the railway can take a long time
(40 years approximately). There are
numerous coordinated industry led initiatives that are tackling energy
efficiency. These include, both
operational improvements, and the investigation of the impact of new
technologies. In the UK the recently
announced electrification plans will future proof the railway system, and will
enable the railway to benefit from the increasing decarbonisation of grid
electricity. Lightly used railway lines
on the extremities of the railway network may be a proving ground for novel
forms of low cost traction systems.
2. I have been
asked to produce a memorandum on the role of new technologies in reducing
emissions from rail transport. The scope
of the emissions considered in this submission include gaseous and particulate
emissions from the primary power source (power station or on board engine), and
does not include noise and vibration, electromagnetic emissions, or other
material emissions. The focus of the
memorandum is on passenger transport, and will primarily focus on operational
emissions. Emissions from any system
need to be assessed in terms of the construction, operation, and
decommissioning phases, in a life cycle analysis manner in order to make
meaningful intermodal comparisons.
3. This
memorandum will first review the fundamental characteristics of rail vehicle
transport, and then it will review the current mix of available traction in the
UK,
and then will identify the likely future trends in railway vehicle propulsion
and the current and future activities that are being implemented to improve the
environmental credentials of rail.
4. The rail
network in the UK
is approximately 40% electrified (in terms of track miles). The majority of electric routes use
25 kV 50 Hz AC (Alternating Current) overhead electrification, and
the rest is made up of third rail 750 V DC and some 1500 V DC
(Direct Current). Most of the passenger
kms are on the electrified network (approximately 60%).
5. Railway transport
is an exceptional form of mass transit - since it is the only form of mass
transit which is currently able to deploy zero carbon emissions technology on a
wide scale. This is due to the ability
of the electrified network to deliver power directly to a moving train at high
efficiency. The total emissions are
therefore directly linked to the up-stream power generating emissions, which
can be zero for hydro, nuclear, and renewable powered grids.
6. Railway
vehicles have a low specific resistance to motion in comparison to other modes
[1]. This is because the rolling
resistance of a steel wheel on a steel rail is very low. At higher speeds, aerodynamic forces become
more important, and railway vehicles benefit from the convoy formation in which
trailing vehicles travel in the slipstream of the proceeding vehicles. The overall resistance of a railway vehicle
follows a quadratic curve with increasing speed. Therefore when a train doubles its speed, the
energy dissipated by the resistive forces approximately goes up by a factor of
four. However, these forces are still
relatively low, and once a railway vehicle is at speed, it is able to coast for
a considerable distance before coming to a stop. The kinetic energy stored in a railway
vehicle at cruise is therefore significant.
7. The UK rolling
stock consists of a roughly equal mix of DC, AC and self powered stock (some of
the electric powered stock is dual voltage).
There are a number of different traction systems within these
trains. So the power flow from prime
mover (be it the power station or on board engine) to the wheels undergoes a
number of energy conversion processes.
It is important to recognise that in these systems the traction motors,
or indeed the hydraulic drives, are able to provide a retarding force to assist
in braking the train.
8. DC powered
systems in the UK
are fed from the power grid via rectifying substations. These
substations are positioned along the track at intervals of about 2-3 kms. The substations convert 3 phase AC high voltage
to low voltage DC which is then fed to the train using the line side conductor
rail. DC railways are low voltage high
current systems, and many thousands of amps may flow through the third rail
just to power one train. DC fed railway
vehicles are usually able to use dynamic braking, where the motor is used as a
generator which then provides a braking force on the vehicle. The braking effort provided by the generators
is blended with that produced by the friction brakes to achieve the overall
braking deceleration rate. The UK DC
railway network is beginning to implement DC regeneration, whereby the braking
energy from the motors is fed back into the network. This energy cannot be fed back into the grid
due to the nature of the rectifying substations, but must be used by a vehicle
in the vicinity (in electrical connection) of the braking train. This method is suitable for dense DC urban
networks where the spacing between the trains and stations is small. Regeneration in these systems can save a considerable
amount of energy and typically incur lower track access charges for the
regenerative capable vehicles (15%).
Future energy savings can be made through the more widespread
implementation of regenerative capable DC powered rail vehicles. Further benefits are currently being realised
through the implementation of driver training programmes which optimise the station-to-station
journey profile, train regulation and effective timetabling. Line-side energy storage systems are being
deployed in some international research studies. These systems essentially perform two
functions; they improve the line receptivity to regenerated energy (and are often
positioned at the entrances to station platforms where all trains brake), and
they reduce the total demand on the grid connection (thus lowering the
infrastructure requirements for grid connection). On less intensive DC systems, such as light
rail or tram systems, regeneration back into the network may suffer from receptivity
problems due to the large distance to the nearest powering train. In these systems, regenerated energy can be
stored on board the vehicle and later reused during the accelerating phase.
9. AC fed
railways are preferred for high speed and high power applications. In the UK the overhead line equipment
energised at 25 kV 50 Hz AC.
The currents are generally much lower, but the voltage is considerably
higher, thus necessitating excellent insulation and large clearances from
nearby structures. A fundamental
advantage of the AC fed systems is that the grid connections can easily be
configured to transmit power in both directions (as opposed to rectifying
substations in DC systems which only send power in one direction). This means that braking trains do not need a
powering train to absorb the regenerated energy. AC fed railway vehicles also make use of
dynamic braking where the motors are used as generators. Again the braking effort is blended with the
effort produced by the friction brakes.
Therefore in order to improve the proportion of energy that is returned
to the grid in a braking cycle, the vehicle should be slowed using a minimal
amount of friction braking, and the majority of the braking effort must be
produced by the motors. The most effective
solution is to use distributed traction (applies to both AC and DC fed
railways) where there are many motors along the length of the train as opposed
to a single locomotive at one end. The
UK Government has recently announced a major electrification plan for the UK (which will
use 25 kV 50 Hz AC). It
includes electrification of some key routes, with a number of other routes
still being considered under future plans.
This strategy will go someway towards insulating the railway from future
uncertainty over diesel availability on these routes, and will enable the
railway to benefit from the continuing decarbonisation of grid electricity.
10. The
routes around the UK
which are lightly used are currently served with aging Diesel Multiple Units and
are potential candidates for novel forms of traction when the vehicle fleet is
replaced (2020-2030). Some routes may
not be economic to electrify with current technology, and therefore a new
technology could provide a solution for these routes. The likely candidate technology for lightly
used routes could include; lower specification of electrification (such as that
used for trolley buses and tram systems), variants of hybrid electric diesel
vehicles with potential for recharging at stations, or depots, and the use of
low carbon synthetic fuels. Some recent
work at the University
of Birmingham has
investigated diesel hybrids. Hybrids
allow a more efficient operating point for the prime mover, and allow
regenerated braking energy to be stored for later use. Depending on the route, we found that savings
of up to 25% could be realised in comparison to the non-hybrid case [2].
11.
Fuel cells are another technology which could provide motive power for railway
vehicles. Much effort has been devoted
to demonstrators outside the UK
and the technical feasibility of a fuel cell to provide traction for a railway
vehicle has been proved beyond doubt.
However, the reliability, cost, effect on vehicle range, and
well-to-wheel efficiencies (compared to electric fed railways) present some
serious challenges. Fuel cell and
hydrogen research and development has target applications which rarely include
rail. However, rail vehicle
manufacturers are adept in translating technology from other sectors to the
railway, and should the technical development of fuel cell powered systems for
transport reach a suitably advanced stage, then it would be relatively
straightforward for a railway vehicle manufacturer to offer a fuel cell powered
vehicle.
12. Energy
metering for the railway takes place at the connection points to the national
grid. There are now efforts to decompose
this data further, by metering railway vehicles individually. The data from individual vehicles and drivers
will enable operational improvements to be quantified and implemented on a wide
scale. Improvements in driver style,
auxiliary power management (turning off equipment over night for example), are
therefore properly measured and therefore able to be managed more effectively.
13. The
mass of UK
railway vehicles has tended to increase in recent years. The reasons for this are quite complex,
however, increasingly the procurement process for new rolling stock is placing
stringent requirements on the mass of the vehicle, and it is expected that
newer vehicles will have lower masses.
Lower mass brings benefits to rail maintenance, as well as saving
traction energy.
14. System
wide solution. The UK railway is very much an integral part of the UK transport
system. Most journeys involve multiple
modes and the railway can be effective in providing the essential backbone of many
journeys. Increasing integration between
station access modes and the railway will lead to reduced overall environmental
impacts, for example, having electric
bus services, or tram systems sensibly connected to terminal stations, and
providing electric vehicle charging points at parkway stations could be a
realistic solution given the current efforts to electrify road transport.
October 2009
References
1. What Price
Speed-Revisited. The evolution of transport propulsion efficiency over the last
50 years. Ingenia. The informative quarterly of The Royal Academy of
Engineering. The Railway Research Group, Imperial College.
(ISSN 1472-9768), 2006, available from http:/
/www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/ingenia/issue22/Imperial.pdf.
2. DMU Hybrid
Concept Evaluation, Birmingham Research and Development Limited, March 10 2009 http://www.railway.bham.ac.uk/documents/Hybrid_Rail_Report_DMU_V1.pdf
|