Greening Government - Environmental Audit Committee Contents


Memorandum Submitted by Tandberg

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  1.1  TANDBERG is a leading global provider of high definition video conferencing and telepresence products to public services in 90 countries across the world. TANDBERG designs, develops and markets systems and software for video, voice and data technologies. The company has a particular expertise working with governments and their agencies to promote the use of visual communications to provide major benefits in the delivery of public services.

  1.2  TANDBERG is committed to supporting the Government's Transformational Government: enabled by technology strategy, a Cabinet Office initiative led by the e-Government Unit which aims to deliver public service improvements through the innovative use of information technology. Visual communications can play a valuable role in supporting the Government's e-Government priorities: delivering better public services, reducing burdens on front line staff and improving the efficiency of service provision.

  1.3   In particular, video conferencing technology offers the potential for significant reductions in the need to travel, not only enabling the Government to reduce the carbon emissions associated with its operations, but also to reduce costs and increase productivity.

  1.4   Video conferencing has been transformed over recent years. Modern systems provide the highest real time video and sound quality in "face-to-face" communication over existing IP infrastructure. Additionally, video conferencing systems now possess the capability to share presentations and other computer applications alongside live video, record meetings for later streaming to desktop PCs and integrate with existing collaboration software packages from providers such as Microsoft and IBM Lotus.

  1.5   Our response sets out the potential of visual communications in greening government, why we think this potential is not currently being realised and some suggestions for improvements.

  1.6   Many people have had poor experiences of video conferencing in the past and are therefore sceptical of the benefits it can bring. TANDBERG would like to extend an invitation to the Committee to see one of our telepresence suites and how effective video conferencing can now be at first hand.

THE ROLE OF VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS IN GREENING GOVERMENT

  2.1   Research has shown that as much as 93% of communication between people is determined by cues such as body language[17]. Face-to-face meetings are seen as more personal and productive, whilst information in face-to-face meetings is easier to understand and retain than phone or email.

  2.2   Face-to-face meetings are therefore essential to effective government. However, "face-to-face" does not always need to mean "in person". Advances in video conferencing technology now mean that face-to-face meetings can be held a at distance over high quality video and sound links. Whilst there will always need to be some meetings that are held in person, today's video conferencing technology can eliminate the need to travel to many others.

  2.3  By eliminating unnecessary travel, organisations can significantly reduce their impact on the environment.

  In 2006 Vodafone employees made 13,500 fewer flights as a result of the use of video conferencing, saving thousands of tonnes of CO2.

  2.4   In addition to reducing carbon emissions, video conferencing brings a range of other benefits, including:

    — Savings on travel, fuel, fleet and insurance costs

    — Savings on overnight accommodation and subsistence costs

    — Reduction in employee time away from the office

    — Reduction in the time employees need to spend away from home, travelling early or late or staying overnight

    — Increased efficiency from faster and better decision-making.

  Volkswagen has reduced travel expenses by 30% through the use of video conferencing systems.

  2.5   The scale of travel undertaken by ministers and civil servants in government departments and agencies means there is significant scope for carbon reductions through replacing travel with the use of video conferencing. Between April 2006 and December 2007 (the most recent complete set of figures available), the Government offset 128,482 tonnes of CO2 from flights, equivalent to 306 million air miles[18]. In 2007-08, emissions from road travel by government departments equalled 148,762 tonnes and despite falling by 10% across all departments since 2005-06, some departments have seen only small reductions or even increases.



DepartmentCo2 emissions during
2007-08 (tonnes)
% change since
baseline (2005-06)
ECGD 7.2-72.50%
HMT* 150.7-41.70%
LOD 1,927.9-24.50%
BERR 826-22.30%
DFID 14-22.20%
CLG 3,812.1-21.20%
HMRC 21,827.2-18.10%
DCMS 47.4-17.30%
MOJ 9,789.7-15.10%
DfT 9,748.1-14.50%
FCO 259.7-13.90%
DH 553.3-13.10%
DEFRA 2,1978-12.80%
DWP 20,082.6-5.80%
MOD 43,700-5.50%
HO 6,360-0.70%
FSA 100.4-0.60%
CO 34.60.00%
FC 3,0342.50%
ONS 3,0304.10%
DCSF 1,47916.30%
TOTAL 148,762 -10.30%


Seventh Annual Sustainable Development in Government (SDiG) assessment, 12.12.08


  2.6   Video conferencing is already in use across all government departments, but its uptake is extremely variable, as these figures from a July 2007 Freedom of Information request demonstrate.


Department
Number of VC units Frequency of use
Department for Children, Schools and Families (and former DfES) 60Daily, with 1,060 conferences taking place in June 2007
Department for International Development 111Over 500 conferences per month
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 15Daily, with 339 conferences taking place between January and May 2007
Department for Work and Pensions 275 Over 1,000 hours per month
Foreign and Commonwealth Office 53 846 conferences in 2006
Department for Transport 8 Average of 46 conferences per month
Department for Communities and Local Government 4359 conferences last year
Home Office 14340 conferences in 256 days
Department of Health36 Daily
Wales Office 2Daily
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (and former DTI) 22Daily
Northern Ireland Office 7 Daily
HM Treasury 14No records
Ministry of Justice 16 No records
Cabinet Office 21No records
Department for Culture, Media and Sport 3At least once a month
Ministry of Defence No response received No response received
Scotland OfficeNo response received No response received




  2.7   In some departments, use of video conferencing seems to be minimal, with DCMS for example saying at the time of this FOI that it only used its three sets "at least once a month". In contrast, some departments and agencies have transformed the way that they work through the use of video conferencing and have delivered impressive carbon reduction, cost savings and productivity gains at the same time as improving the service that they deliver.

    The Northern Ireland Prison Service

    The Northern Ireland Prison Service has completely reformed the way prisoners attend court hearings by installing 132 video conferencing units as part of an integrated network across the criminal justice system. Inmates no longer travel to court for bail or remand hearings, instead appearing over video link from the detention centre where they are based. The savings from transport costs alone are estimated at £10 million per year.

    Officials throughout the NI criminal justice system rely on video conferencing to streamline administrative business. The network links-up two dozen courthouses, three detention centres, 17 police stations, the Youth Justice Agency, the Department of Public Prosecutions, the Crown Solicitor's Office, the Probation Board, the Legal Services Commission, the Police Ombudsman's Office and the Assets Recovery Agency.

    The resulting cost-saving benefits have been significant. Police officers have been transferred from escort duty to crime fighting and the throughput of cases in court has been increased. Around 50% of all pre-trial hearings are now conducted via video conferencing, including almost all bail and remand hearings.

  2.8   It's clear therefore that, whilst the use of video conferencing will never be the whole answer to the greening government challenge, its use has demonstrable benefits and few downsides.

BARRIERS TO ACTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGE

  3.1   The continuing variability of usage of video conferencing across government departments is therefore a concern. TANDBERG believes this is due in the main to a lack of leadership and the absence of key drivers of behavioural change.

  3.2   As with any major behavioural change, political will and leadership from the centre will be required to ensure that the benefits of video conferencing are spread across all departments. Despite its proven benefits, there is no cross-departmental policy advocating the use of the technology and we would suggest that the Cabinet Office's Transformational Government strategy should include a specific role for video conferencing across government departments and in the delivery of public services.

  3.3   The targets in the framework for Sustainable Operations on the Government Estate (SOGE), set by the Prime Minister in 2006, include a target to reduce carbon emissions from road vehicles for administrative operations. Important though it is to reduce emissions from road travel—a 10% reduction has been delivered against this target—this ignores the carbon emitted by journeys made by either air or rail, which are at least as big as those from road vehicles. The SOGE framework will only ever be a limited driver for reduced travel and its associated emissions in this case and the SOGE transport target should include all travel made by ministers and civil servants.

  3.4   Entrenched behaviours—such as travelling to meet colleagues for meetings—do not change overnight. All departments should actively promote video conferencing internally to encourage staff to switch from unnecessary travel to video conferencing.

  3.5   The Government's programme of offsetting flights made on government business—whilst a positive step—may in fact have the unintended consequence of leading civil servants and ministers to believe that they do not need to take action to reduce unnecessary flights. We believe that offsetting should exist in an emissions reduction hierarchy that compels and incentivises reduction of travel over offsetting.

  3.6   One way to do this would be to introduce a presumption against travel, and give every government employee a personal responsibility for justifying their travel. We believe that civil servants should have to justify the necessity of travel and demonstrate that the use of video conferencing wasn't a suitable alternative on travel requests and expenses forms.

  3.7   We are concerned that the Government's Greening ICT strategy is aimed almost exclusively at reducing the overall carbon emissions of the Government's ICT use and doesn't appear to contain a mechanism for assessing the impact that new ICT investment might have in reducing emissions elsewhere, for example by reducing the need for civil servants to travel. We believe that the Greening ICT strategy should take a more holistic approach to the impact of ICT on the environment, positively recommending the expansion of ICT that would reduce overall emissions, even where such expansion may cause the proportion of emissions from ICT to rise.

CONCLUSION

  4.1   In conclusion, TANDBERG believes that the benefits for the Government of video conferencing are too large to ignore or leave to chance. A relatively simple switch from travelling to hold most meetings in person to holding meetings face-to-face by video conference would result in significant reductions in carbon emissions and costs, increases in productivity and standards of services and improvements in work-life balance for ministers and civil servants alike.

  4.2   With a relatively simple set of changes to targets and practices, TANDBERG believes that the benefits of video conferencing can be spread across government.

  4.3   Many people are surprised when they see the quality of today's video conferencing technology and TANDBERG would welcome the opportunity to demonstrate its possibilities to the Committee at your convenience.

21 April 2009







17   Mehrabian A, "Silent Messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes", Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1981 Back

18   Public servants clocked up 306m air miles last year, The Guardian, 25 March 2008 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 5 August 2009