European Scrutiny Committee Contents


4 European Economic Recovery Plan: energy projects

(30405)

5972/09

COM(09) 35

Draft Regulation establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy

Legal baseArticles 156 and 175EC; co-decision; QMV
Document originated28 January 2009
Deposited in Parliament4 February 2009
DepartmentEnergy and Climate Change
Basis of considerationEM of 12 February 2009
Previous Committee ReportNone, but see footnotes 16 and 17
To be discussed in CouncilSee para 4.7 below
Committee's assessmentPolitically important
Committee's decisionNot cleared; further information awaited

Background

4.1 On 26 November 2008, we reported on a Commission Communication[16] (A European Economic Recovery Plan), which sought to develop an overall Community strategy in response to the financial crisis, notably by a major injection of an additional €200 billion purchasing power into the economy. That approach was subsequently endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008, which also supported increased Community spending in a number of areas, including €5 billion for energy, the broadband internet and rural development. The Commission has now brought forward this draft Regulation, which sets up a European Energy Programme for Recovery, and we are reporting separately on a further proposal dealing with the other two areas.[17]

The current proposal

4.2 The draft Regulation would establish three sub-programmes, which the Commission says will not only address the immediate economic situation, but also contribute to security of energy supply and a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, as envisaged in the Second Strategic Energy Review.[18] The sub-programmes cover gas and electricity interconnections, offshore wind energy, and carbon capture and storage, with an overall financial envelope for 2009 and 2010[19] of €3.5 billion (of which €1.75 billion would be for interconnection projects, €500 million for offshore wind energy, and €1.25 billion for carbon capture and storage).

4.3 The Regulation also lays down the criteria which the projects in each area would need to meet and the responsibilities of the Member States involved for technical monitoring and financial control, and it identifies a number of individual projects which meet the necessary conditions. Subject to the usual comitology procedures, the Commission will select for funding specific proposals put forward in order to realise each project, based on their technical and financial soundness.

Gas and electricity projects

These would need to contribute to the security and diversification of energy supplies; optimise the capacity of the energy network, particularly across borders; strengthen economic and social cohesion by reducing the isolation of less-favoured and island regions; facilitate the connection of renewable energy resources; and the safety, reliability and inter-operability of interconnected networks. Priority would be given to networks which support the internal energy market, which address bottlenecks, and which overcome environmental, technical and financial obstacles. The proposal identifies 13 gas projects, totalling some €1.025 billion (of which one — the Germany-Belgium-UK pipeline — would be of direct relevance to the UK), and 6 electricity projects, totalling €705 million (with the UK interest here relating to the proposed interconnection between the Republic of Ireland and Wales). In deciding which individual proposals should be selected, the Commission also has to take into account the extent to which the assistance given (of up to 50% of the eligible costs) will stimulate public and private finance.

Offshore wind projects

The Commission has identified 5 projects, two of which — the North Sea grid, and the Aberdeen offshore wind farm — involve a UK interest, and which have been selected on the basis that they are ready for implementation; are innovative whilst building on well established concepts; are capable of acceleration in response to financial stimulus; are large scale, with a cross-border significance; and where the results will be disseminated in accordance with the Strategic Energy Technology Plan [20] In order to be selected, individual proposals would have to include substantial capital expenditure in 2009 and 2010 and be led by a commercial undertaking.

Carbon capture and storage

The Commission has identified 11 projects, of which four — Kingsnorth, Longannet, Tilbury and Hatfield, Yorkshire — are in the UK, but says that assistance (of up to 80% of eligible costs) will be granted to no more than 5 of these, with a maximum of €250 million for any one project, and with no more than one project being selected in any one Member State. Proposals will need to demonstrate that they can capture at least 85% of carbon dioxide in power generating installations with at least 300 MW output, and can transport this and geologically store it safely underground. In addition, the project must involve substantial capital expenditure in 2009 and 2010, and promoters must undertake to make available to the wider industry any generic knowledge which is generated.

4.4 The Commission also addresses the question of funding, pointing out that it has already tabled in connection with the European Economic Recovery Plan a proposal[21] to revise the Multiannual Financial Framework for 2007-13 to make additional funds available under heading 1A (Competitiveness for growth and employment). It now suggests that resources not required for 2008 under the ceiling of heading 2 (Preservation and management of natural resources) should be transferred to heading 1A to fund these energy projects.

The Government's view

4.5 In his Explanatory Memorandum of 12 February 2009, the Minister of State at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Mr Mike O'Brien) says that the Government supports using the major part of any Community recovery plan to pursue energy and climate change objectives, and that it also supports the focus on energy infrastructure, offshore wind and carbon capture and storage as contributing to improving energy security and transforming the Community into a competitive low carbon economy. He adds that the UK will seek to ensure that the support in question is, so far as possible, used to deal with market failures, accelerating projects which secure the Community's objectives, enhancing energy security following the recent gas dispute between Russia and Ukraine, and achieving climate change objectives.

4.6 However, he points out that the Commission has not yet supplied an impact assessment on the grounds that "there has not been time", adding that one may be required at a future date when the details have been clarified, and that the UK will be pressing for a proper assessment of the economic case for projects as they are selected. He also says that the Government will be seeking greater clarification on the definitions, criteria and list of projects, and that it is concerned about the proposed approach to financing. He adds that the UK will work with like-minded Member States to ensure that the Commission explores all other possibilities for meeting the additional resources from the existing Financial Framework (including appropriate redeployment, re-profiling of expenditure, and the use of existing margins), and that it will argue that the financial aspects of the package as a whole should be agreed before the proposal can be adopted. The Minister also points out that the UK share of the €3.5 billion expenditure envisaged would be around €750 million.

4.7 The Minister says that the proposal was expected to be discussed informally at the Energy Council on 19 February, with formal agreement likely to be sought either at the General Affairs Council on 23 February or the European Council on 19 March.

Conclusion

4.8 This document gives rise to three separate issues — whether the measures proposed should be taken, how they should be achieved, and the level and manner of their funding. It is clear that the decision that a sum of some €3.5 billion should be devoted to energy-related projects was taken by the European Council in December 2008, and, as we have noted, the funding of these projects is linked closely to the changes in the Multiannual Framework Agreement for 2007-13, proposed in the Communication put forward by the Commission in December 2008. It seems to us that this last issue is one best pursued through that more general document, rather than in relation to individual proposals such as this one (and those on rural development and broadband).

4.9 However, as we have indicated, there are a number of other detailed points still outstanding on the current proposal, including not least the lack of an overall impact assessment and the need for individual projects to be subject to a proper economic assessment. We would like to have further information on these, and, whilst we are reporting the document to the House, we think it right to hold it under scrutiny.





16   (30213) 16097/08: see HC 19-i (2008-09), chapter 4 (10 December 2008). Back

17   See chapter 16 of this Report. Back

18   (30198) 15944/08: see HC 19-iii (2008-09), chapter 2 (14 January 2009). Back

19   The main body of payments would be made between 2009 and 2012, with the last payments, notably for carbon capture and storage, likely to take place in 2014-15. Back

20   (29194) 15458/07: see HC 16-vii (2007-08), chapter 12 (9 January 2008). Back

21   (30280) 17606//1/08: see HC 19-iii (2008-09), chapter 7 (14 January 2009) and chapter 7 of this Report. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2009
Prepared 6 March 2009